Loading…

Impact of Human-Centered Vestibular System Model for Motion Control in a Driving Simulator

This study presents a driving simulator experiment to evaluate three different motion cueing algorithms based on model predictive control. The difference among these motion strategies lies in the type of mathematical model used. The first one contains only the dynamic model of the platform, while th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on human-machine systems 2021-10, Vol.51 (5), p.411-420
Main Authors: Rengifo, Carolina, Chardonnet, Jean-Remy, Mohellebi, Hakim, Kemeny, Andras
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-be535922f0f688c9eada8ca6d4a14805799e68e3eb6c744514bb67a974e5cbf33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-be535922f0f688c9eada8ca6d4a14805799e68e3eb6c744514bb67a974e5cbf33
container_end_page 420
container_issue 5
container_start_page 411
container_title IEEE transactions on human-machine systems
container_volume 51
creator Rengifo, Carolina
Chardonnet, Jean-Remy
Mohellebi, Hakim
Kemeny, Andras
description This study presents a driving simulator experiment to evaluate three different motion cueing algorithms based on model predictive control. The difference among these motion strategies lies in the type of mathematical model used. The first one contains only the dynamic model of the platform, while the others integrate additionally two different vestibular system models. We compare these three strategies to discuss the tradeoffs when including a vestibular system model in the control loop from the user's viewpoint. The study is conducted in autonomous mode and in free driving mode, as both play an important role in motion cueing validation. A total of 38 individuals participated in the experiment; 19 drove the simulator in free driving mode and the remaining using the autonomous driving mode. For both driving modes, substantial differences is observed. The analysis shows that one of the vestibular system models is suitable for driving simulators, as it thoroughly restores high-frequency accelerations and is well noted by the participants, especially those in the free driving mode. Further tests are needed to analyze the advantages of integrating the chosen vestibular system model in the control design for motion cuieng algorithms. Regarding the autonomous mode, further research is needed to examine the influence of the vestibular system model on the motion performance, as the behavior of the autonomous model may implicitly interfere with subjective assessments.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/THMS.2021.3102506
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_9528891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9528891</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2573570519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-be535922f0f688c9eada8ca6d4a14805799e68e3eb6c744514bb67a974e5cbf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhoMoWLQ_QLwsePKQuh_Zze6x1I8UWjy0evCybJKJbkmydZMU-u9NSO1cZhie92XmDYI7gmeEYPW0TdabGcWUzBjBlGNxEUwoETKkDPPL_5kqch1Mm2aH-5KUcy4nwdey2pusRa5ASVeZOlxA3YKHHH1C09q0K41Hm2PTQoXWLocSFc73U2tdjRaubr0rka2RQc_eHmz9jTa26kWt87fBVWHKBqanfhN8vL5sF0m4en9bLuarMGMxbsMUOOOK0gIXQspMgcmNzIzII0MiiXmsFAgJDFKRxVHESZSmIjYqjoBnacHYTfA4-v6YUu-9rYw_amesTuYrPewwY0KwSB1Izz6M7N67367_UO9c5-v-PE15zHiMOVE9RUYq865pPBRnW4L1kLgeEtdD4vqUeK-5HzUWAM684lRKRdgf14d7Ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2573570519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Human-Centered Vestibular System Model for Motion Control in a Driving Simulator</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Rengifo, Carolina ; Chardonnet, Jean-Remy ; Mohellebi, Hakim ; Kemeny, Andras</creator><creatorcontrib>Rengifo, Carolina ; Chardonnet, Jean-Remy ; Mohellebi, Hakim ; Kemeny, Andras</creatorcontrib><description>This study presents a driving simulator experiment to evaluate three different motion cueing algorithms based on model predictive control. The difference among these motion strategies lies in the type of mathematical model used. The first one contains only the dynamic model of the platform, while the others integrate additionally two different vestibular system models. We compare these three strategies to discuss the tradeoffs when including a vestibular system model in the control loop from the user's viewpoint. The study is conducted in autonomous mode and in free driving mode, as both play an important role in motion cueing validation. A total of 38 individuals participated in the experiment; 19 drove the simulator in free driving mode and the remaining using the autonomous driving mode. For both driving modes, substantial differences is observed. The analysis shows that one of the vestibular system models is suitable for driving simulators, as it thoroughly restores high-frequency accelerations and is well noted by the participants, especially those in the free driving mode. Further tests are needed to analyze the advantages of integrating the chosen vestibular system model in the control design for motion cuieng algorithms. Regarding the autonomous mode, further research is needed to examine the influence of the vestibular system model on the motion performance, as the behavior of the autonomous model may implicitly interfere with subjective assessments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-2291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/THMS.2021.3102506</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITHSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Automatic ; Autonomous driving (AD) ; Computer Science ; Control design ; Control systems ; driving simulators (DSs) ; Dynamic models ; Engineering Sciences ; Force ; Human motion ; human motion perception ; Human-Computer Interaction ; Irrigation ; Mathematical model ; model predictive control (MPC) ; Modeling and Simulation ; Motion control ; motion cueing algorithms ; Predictive control ; Simulation ; Simulators ; Stability analysis ; Tuning ; Vehicle dynamics</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems, 2021-10, Vol.51 (5), p.411-420</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2021</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-be535922f0f688c9eada8ca6d4a14805799e68e3eb6c744514bb67a974e5cbf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-be535922f0f688c9eada8ca6d4a14805799e68e3eb6c744514bb67a974e5cbf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1670-0584 ; 0000-0002-8926-1359</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9528891$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03366349$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rengifo, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chardonnet, Jean-Remy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohellebi, Hakim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemeny, Andras</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Human-Centered Vestibular System Model for Motion Control in a Driving Simulator</title><title>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems</title><addtitle>THMS</addtitle><description>This study presents a driving simulator experiment to evaluate three different motion cueing algorithms based on model predictive control. The difference among these motion strategies lies in the type of mathematical model used. The first one contains only the dynamic model of the platform, while the others integrate additionally two different vestibular system models. We compare these three strategies to discuss the tradeoffs when including a vestibular system model in the control loop from the user's viewpoint. The study is conducted in autonomous mode and in free driving mode, as both play an important role in motion cueing validation. A total of 38 individuals participated in the experiment; 19 drove the simulator in free driving mode and the remaining using the autonomous driving mode. For both driving modes, substantial differences is observed. The analysis shows that one of the vestibular system models is suitable for driving simulators, as it thoroughly restores high-frequency accelerations and is well noted by the participants, especially those in the free driving mode. Further tests are needed to analyze the advantages of integrating the chosen vestibular system model in the control design for motion cuieng algorithms. Regarding the autonomous mode, further research is needed to examine the influence of the vestibular system model on the motion performance, as the behavior of the autonomous model may implicitly interfere with subjective assessments.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Automatic</subject><subject>Autonomous driving (AD)</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Control design</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>driving simulators (DSs)</subject><subject>Dynamic models</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Force</subject><subject>Human motion</subject><subject>human motion perception</subject><subject>Human-Computer Interaction</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>model predictive control (MPC)</subject><subject>Modeling and Simulation</subject><subject>Motion control</subject><subject>motion cueing algorithms</subject><subject>Predictive control</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulators</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Tuning</subject><subject>Vehicle dynamics</subject><issn>2168-2291</issn><issn>2168-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhoMoWLQ_QLwsePKQuh_Zze6x1I8UWjy0evCybJKJbkmydZMU-u9NSO1cZhie92XmDYI7gmeEYPW0TdabGcWUzBjBlGNxEUwoETKkDPPL_5kqch1Mm2aH-5KUcy4nwdey2pusRa5ASVeZOlxA3YKHHH1C09q0K41Hm2PTQoXWLocSFc73U2tdjRaubr0rka2RQc_eHmz9jTa26kWt87fBVWHKBqanfhN8vL5sF0m4en9bLuarMGMxbsMUOOOK0gIXQspMgcmNzIzII0MiiXmsFAgJDFKRxVHESZSmIjYqjoBnacHYTfA4-v6YUu-9rYw_amesTuYrPewwY0KwSB1Izz6M7N67367_UO9c5-v-PE15zHiMOVE9RUYq865pPBRnW4L1kLgeEtdD4vqUeK-5HzUWAM684lRKRdgf14d7Ig</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Rengifo, Carolina</creator><creator>Chardonnet, Jean-Remy</creator><creator>Mohellebi, Hakim</creator><creator>Kemeny, Andras</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1670-0584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8926-1359</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Impact of Human-Centered Vestibular System Model for Motion Control in a Driving Simulator</title><author>Rengifo, Carolina ; Chardonnet, Jean-Remy ; Mohellebi, Hakim ; Kemeny, Andras</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-be535922f0f688c9eada8ca6d4a14805799e68e3eb6c744514bb67a974e5cbf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Automatic</topic><topic>Autonomous driving (AD)</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Control design</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>driving simulators (DSs)</topic><topic>Dynamic models</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Force</topic><topic>Human motion</topic><topic>human motion perception</topic><topic>Human-Computer Interaction</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>model predictive control (MPC)</topic><topic>Modeling and Simulation</topic><topic>Motion control</topic><topic>motion cueing algorithms</topic><topic>Predictive control</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulators</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Tuning</topic><topic>Vehicle dynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rengifo, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chardonnet, Jean-Remy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohellebi, Hakim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemeny, Andras</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rengifo, Carolina</au><au>Chardonnet, Jean-Remy</au><au>Mohellebi, Hakim</au><au>Kemeny, Andras</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Human-Centered Vestibular System Model for Motion Control in a Driving Simulator</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on human-machine systems</jtitle><stitle>THMS</stitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>411</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>411-420</pages><issn>2168-2291</issn><eissn>2168-2305</eissn><coden>ITHSA6</coden><abstract>This study presents a driving simulator experiment to evaluate three different motion cueing algorithms based on model predictive control. The difference among these motion strategies lies in the type of mathematical model used. The first one contains only the dynamic model of the platform, while the others integrate additionally two different vestibular system models. We compare these three strategies to discuss the tradeoffs when including a vestibular system model in the control loop from the user's viewpoint. The study is conducted in autonomous mode and in free driving mode, as both play an important role in motion cueing validation. A total of 38 individuals participated in the experiment; 19 drove the simulator in free driving mode and the remaining using the autonomous driving mode. For both driving modes, substantial differences is observed. The analysis shows that one of the vestibular system models is suitable for driving simulators, as it thoroughly restores high-frequency accelerations and is well noted by the participants, especially those in the free driving mode. Further tests are needed to analyze the advantages of integrating the chosen vestibular system model in the control design for motion cuieng algorithms. Regarding the autonomous mode, further research is needed to examine the influence of the vestibular system model on the motion performance, as the behavior of the autonomous model may implicitly interfere with subjective assessments.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/THMS.2021.3102506</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1670-0584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8926-1359</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-2291
ispartof IEEE transactions on human-machine systems, 2021-10, Vol.51 (5), p.411-420
issn 2168-2291
2168-2305
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_9528891
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals
subjects Algorithms
Automatic
Autonomous driving (AD)
Computer Science
Control design
Control systems
driving simulators (DSs)
Dynamic models
Engineering Sciences
Force
Human motion
human motion perception
Human-Computer Interaction
Irrigation
Mathematical model
model predictive control (MPC)
Modeling and Simulation
Motion control
motion cueing algorithms
Predictive control
Simulation
Simulators
Stability analysis
Tuning
Vehicle dynamics
title Impact of Human-Centered Vestibular System Model for Motion Control in a Driving Simulator
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A48%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Human-Centered%20Vestibular%20System%20Model%20for%20Motion%20Control%20in%20a%20Driving%20Simulator&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20human-machine%20systems&rft.au=Rengifo,%20Carolina&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=411-420&rft.issn=2168-2291&rft.eissn=2168-2305&rft.coden=ITHSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/THMS.2021.3102506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2573570519%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-be535922f0f688c9eada8ca6d4a14805799e68e3eb6c744514bb67a974e5cbf33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2573570519&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9528891&rfr_iscdi=true