Loading…

Comparative Study of Phase Resolved Partial Discharge Patterns obtained with Different Instruments on Individual Stator Bars and Coils

Partial Discharge (PD) measurements are used both for on-line condition monitoring of stator windings and quality control on newly manufactured stator bars and coils. The use of Phase Resolved Partial Discharge (PRPD) pattern recognition has proven to be an effective tool to identify active PD sourc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Levesque, Melanie, Seol, Yoon Duk, Hudon, Claude, Provencher, Helene
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 252
container_issue
container_start_page 249
container_title
container_volume
creator Levesque, Melanie
Seol, Yoon Duk
Hudon, Claude
Provencher, Helene
description Partial Discharge (PD) measurements are used both for on-line condition monitoring of stator windings and quality control on newly manufactured stator bars and coils. The use of Phase Resolved Partial Discharge (PRPD) pattern recognition has proven to be an effective tool to identify active PD sources within the insulation system. However, quantification of PD activity based on PD parameters extracted from the PRPD pattern is not trivial and requires a good understanding of the measuring techniques as well as of the physics of the PD phenomenon. This is particularly true for quality control tests on new bars and coils, where the reproducibility of PD results is essential. Since different PD instruments can be used, variability arising from different instruments must be evaluated. In this context, to validate the consistency of PD measurement results, a comparative study with four different commercially available PD instruments was performed in the laboratory on two individual stator bars and two coils. Quantification of PD results has been based on the combination of PRPD pattern analysis correlated with the maximum PD amplitude values. Qualitative analysis of PRPD pattern was principally used to correlate that the value of the maximum PD amplitude given by the PD instrument corresponds well to the PD activity measured on each bar and coil. The results presented in this paper reveal that the PRPD patterns obtained from all the instruments are generally consistent and that variability in the maximum PD amplitude from one instrument to another can be lowered by specifying experimental conditions limits. In this study, PRPD pattern analysis was used to correlate the maximum PD amplitude value with the contribution of various factors such as the sudden manifestation of new PD source the effect of the conditioning period and the capacitive coupler value.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/EIC51169.2022.9833154
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_9833154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9833154</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>9833154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i203t-dbf87aef3e8de57058a29536f5e0b2b21e07c01d7734c7b3ba98d42d2f5e63433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFtKAzEYhaMgWGtXIEI2MDWXSTLzqOOtULBYfS7_NH9sZDpTkrTSDbhuA_bpXPg4D4eQW86mnLP67mnWKM51PRVMiGldSclVeUauuNaqrJiQ1TkZCWV0oU3NL8kkxm_GGDdS65KPyG8zbHcQIPkD0mXa2yMdHF1sICJ9xzh0B7R0ASF56Oijj-sNhC_MTUoY-kiHNoHvM_Pj0yYDzmHAPtFZH1PYb7PNTJ-j9Qdv93lkmSANgT5AiBR6S5vBd_GaXDjoIk5OOiafz08fzWsxf3uZNffzwgsmU2FbVxlAJ7GyqAxTFYhaSe0Usla0giMza8atMbJcm1a2UFe2FFZkQMtSyjG5-d_1iLjaBb-FcFydbpN_VZdkWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparative Study of Phase Resolved Partial Discharge Patterns obtained with Different Instruments on Individual Stator Bars and Coils</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Levesque, Melanie ; Seol, Yoon Duk ; Hudon, Claude ; Provencher, Helene</creator><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Melanie ; Seol, Yoon Duk ; Hudon, Claude ; Provencher, Helene</creatorcontrib><description>Partial Discharge (PD) measurements are used both for on-line condition monitoring of stator windings and quality control on newly manufactured stator bars and coils. The use of Phase Resolved Partial Discharge (PRPD) pattern recognition has proven to be an effective tool to identify active PD sources within the insulation system. However, quantification of PD activity based on PD parameters extracted from the PRPD pattern is not trivial and requires a good understanding of the measuring techniques as well as of the physics of the PD phenomenon. This is particularly true for quality control tests on new bars and coils, where the reproducibility of PD results is essential. Since different PD instruments can be used, variability arising from different instruments must be evaluated. In this context, to validate the consistency of PD measurement results, a comparative study with four different commercially available PD instruments was performed in the laboratory on two individual stator bars and two coils. Quantification of PD results has been based on the combination of PRPD pattern analysis correlated with the maximum PD amplitude values. Qualitative analysis of PRPD pattern was principally used to correlate that the value of the maximum PD amplitude given by the PD instrument corresponds well to the PD activity measured on each bar and coil. The results presented in this paper reveal that the PRPD patterns obtained from all the instruments are generally consistent and that variability in the maximum PD amplitude from one instrument to another can be lowered by specifying experimental conditions limits. In this study, PRPD pattern analysis was used to correlate the maximum PD amplitude value with the contribution of various factors such as the sudden manifestation of new PD source the effect of the conditioning period and the capacitive coupler value.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2576-6791</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1665480238</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781665480239</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EIC51169.2022.9833154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Coils ; Instruments ; Insulation ; Partial discharge ; Partial discharge measurement ; Partial discharges ; Quality control ; quality control tests ; quantification ; stator winding ; Stator windings</subject><ispartof>2022 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC), 2022, p.249-252</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9833154$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,777,781,786,787,23911,23912,25121,27906,54536,54913</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9833154$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seol, Yoon Duk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudon, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Provencher, Helene</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study of Phase Resolved Partial Discharge Patterns obtained with Different Instruments on Individual Stator Bars and Coils</title><title>2022 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC)</title><addtitle>EIC</addtitle><description>Partial Discharge (PD) measurements are used both for on-line condition monitoring of stator windings and quality control on newly manufactured stator bars and coils. The use of Phase Resolved Partial Discharge (PRPD) pattern recognition has proven to be an effective tool to identify active PD sources within the insulation system. However, quantification of PD activity based on PD parameters extracted from the PRPD pattern is not trivial and requires a good understanding of the measuring techniques as well as of the physics of the PD phenomenon. This is particularly true for quality control tests on new bars and coils, where the reproducibility of PD results is essential. Since different PD instruments can be used, variability arising from different instruments must be evaluated. In this context, to validate the consistency of PD measurement results, a comparative study with four different commercially available PD instruments was performed in the laboratory on two individual stator bars and two coils. Quantification of PD results has been based on the combination of PRPD pattern analysis correlated with the maximum PD amplitude values. Qualitative analysis of PRPD pattern was principally used to correlate that the value of the maximum PD amplitude given by the PD instrument corresponds well to the PD activity measured on each bar and coil. The results presented in this paper reveal that the PRPD patterns obtained from all the instruments are generally consistent and that variability in the maximum PD amplitude from one instrument to another can be lowered by specifying experimental conditions limits. In this study, PRPD pattern analysis was used to correlate the maximum PD amplitude value with the contribution of various factors such as the sudden manifestation of new PD source the effect of the conditioning period and the capacitive coupler value.</description><subject>Coils</subject><subject>Instruments</subject><subject>Insulation</subject><subject>Partial discharge</subject><subject>Partial discharge measurement</subject><subject>Partial discharges</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>quality control tests</subject><subject>quantification</subject><subject>stator winding</subject><subject>Stator windings</subject><issn>2576-6791</issn><isbn>1665480238</isbn><isbn>9781665480239</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkFtKAzEYhaMgWGtXIEI2MDWXSTLzqOOtULBYfS7_NH9sZDpTkrTSDbhuA_bpXPg4D4eQW86mnLP67mnWKM51PRVMiGldSclVeUauuNaqrJiQ1TkZCWV0oU3NL8kkxm_GGDdS65KPyG8zbHcQIPkD0mXa2yMdHF1sICJ9xzh0B7R0ASF56Oijj-sNhC_MTUoY-kiHNoHvM_Pj0yYDzmHAPtFZH1PYb7PNTJ-j9Qdv93lkmSANgT5AiBR6S5vBd_GaXDjoIk5OOiafz08fzWsxf3uZNffzwgsmU2FbVxlAJ7GyqAxTFYhaSe0Usla0giMza8atMbJcm1a2UFe2FFZkQMtSyjG5-d_1iLjaBb-FcFydbpN_VZdkWg</recordid><startdate>20220619</startdate><enddate>20220619</enddate><creator>Levesque, Melanie</creator><creator>Seol, Yoon Duk</creator><creator>Hudon, Claude</creator><creator>Provencher, Helene</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220619</creationdate><title>Comparative Study of Phase Resolved Partial Discharge Patterns obtained with Different Instruments on Individual Stator Bars and Coils</title><author>Levesque, Melanie ; Seol, Yoon Duk ; Hudon, Claude ; Provencher, Helene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i203t-dbf87aef3e8de57058a29536f5e0b2b21e07c01d7734c7b3ba98d42d2f5e63433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Coils</topic><topic>Instruments</topic><topic>Insulation</topic><topic>Partial discharge</topic><topic>Partial discharge measurement</topic><topic>Partial discharges</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>quality control tests</topic><topic>quantification</topic><topic>stator winding</topic><topic>Stator windings</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seol, Yoon Duk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudon, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Provencher, Helene</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levesque, Melanie</au><au>Seol, Yoon Duk</au><au>Hudon, Claude</au><au>Provencher, Helene</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study of Phase Resolved Partial Discharge Patterns obtained with Different Instruments on Individual Stator Bars and Coils</atitle><btitle>2022 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC)</btitle><stitle>EIC</stitle><date>2022-06-19</date><risdate>2022</risdate><spage>249</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>249-252</pages><eissn>2576-6791</eissn><eisbn>1665480238</eisbn><eisbn>9781665480239</eisbn><abstract>Partial Discharge (PD) measurements are used both for on-line condition monitoring of stator windings and quality control on newly manufactured stator bars and coils. The use of Phase Resolved Partial Discharge (PRPD) pattern recognition has proven to be an effective tool to identify active PD sources within the insulation system. However, quantification of PD activity based on PD parameters extracted from the PRPD pattern is not trivial and requires a good understanding of the measuring techniques as well as of the physics of the PD phenomenon. This is particularly true for quality control tests on new bars and coils, where the reproducibility of PD results is essential. Since different PD instruments can be used, variability arising from different instruments must be evaluated. In this context, to validate the consistency of PD measurement results, a comparative study with four different commercially available PD instruments was performed in the laboratory on two individual stator bars and two coils. Quantification of PD results has been based on the combination of PRPD pattern analysis correlated with the maximum PD amplitude values. Qualitative analysis of PRPD pattern was principally used to correlate that the value of the maximum PD amplitude given by the PD instrument corresponds well to the PD activity measured on each bar and coil. The results presented in this paper reveal that the PRPD patterns obtained from all the instruments are generally consistent and that variability in the maximum PD amplitude from one instrument to another can be lowered by specifying experimental conditions limits. In this study, PRPD pattern analysis was used to correlate the maximum PD amplitude value with the contribution of various factors such as the sudden manifestation of new PD source the effect of the conditioning period and the capacitive coupler value.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/EIC51169.2022.9833154</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier EISSN: 2576-6791
ispartof 2022 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC), 2022, p.249-252
issn 2576-6791
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_9833154
source IEEE Xplore All Conference Series
subjects Coils
Instruments
Insulation
Partial discharge
Partial discharge measurement
Partial discharges
Quality control
quality control tests
quantification
stator winding
Stator windings
title Comparative Study of Phase Resolved Partial Discharge Patterns obtained with Different Instruments on Individual Stator Bars and Coils
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20of%20Phase%20Resolved%20Partial%20Discharge%20Patterns%20obtained%20with%20Different%20Instruments%20on%20Individual%20Stator%20Bars%20and%20Coils&rft.btitle=2022%20IEEE%20Electrical%20Insulation%20Conference%20(EIC)&rft.au=Levesque,%20Melanie&rft.date=2022-06-19&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=249-252&rft.eissn=2576-6791&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EIC51169.2022.9833154&rft.eisbn=1665480238&rft.eisbn_list=9781665480239&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E9833154%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i203t-dbf87aef3e8de57058a29536f5e0b2b21e07c01d7734c7b3ba98d42d2f5e63433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9833154&rfr_iscdi=true