Loading…

Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa

SUMMARY Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) otic suspension with that of neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10 000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (N/P/H) otic suspension in patients with acute otitis externa (AOE). Study Design: Randomized, observer-m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current medical research and opinion 2004-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1175-1183
Main Authors: Roland, Peter S., Pien, Francis D., Schultz, Craig C., Henry, Dan C., Conroy, Peter J., Wall, G. Michael, Garadi, Rekha, Dupre, Sheryl J., Potts, Susan L., Hogg, L. Gail, Stroman, David W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3
container_end_page 1183
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1175
container_title Current medical research and opinion
container_volume 20
creator Roland, Peter S.
Pien, Francis D.
Schultz, Craig C.
Henry, Dan C.
Conroy, Peter J.
Wall, G. Michael
Garadi, Rekha
Dupre, Sheryl J.
Potts, Susan L.
Hogg, L. Gail
Stroman, David W.
description SUMMARY Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) otic suspension with that of neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10 000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (N/P/H) otic suspension in patients with acute otitis externa (AOE). Study Design: Randomized, observer-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to 7 days treatment with either CIP/DEX 3-4 drops twice daily or N/P/H 3-4 drops three times daily. Population: Patients of either sex and older than 1 year, with a clinical diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe AOE and intact tympanic membranes were recruited to participate. Outcomes Measured: Signs and symptoms of AOE, including ear inflammation, tenderness, edema and discharge (assessed on Days 3, 8 [End-of-Therapy] and 18 [Test-of-Cure]); microbiologic eradication (presumed or documented); and frequency of adverse events. Results: Patients enrolled numbered 468. In culture-positive patients who met the inclusion criteria (N = 396), clinical cure rates at Day 18 were significantly higher with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H (90.9% vs. 83.9%; p = 0.0375), as were microbiologic eradication rates (94.7% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.0057). In addition, the clinical response was significantly better with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H at Days 3 and 18 (p = 0. 0279 and p = 0. 0321, respectively), as was the reduction in ear inflammation at Day 18 (p = 0.0268). Both preparations were well tolerated in pediatric and adult patients. Conclusions: 7 days treatment with CIP/DEX otic suspension administered twice daily is clinically and microbiologically superior to N/P/H otic suspension administered 3 times daily in the treatment of mild to severe AOE, and is equally well tolerated.
doi_str_mv 10.1185/030079902125004312
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_1185_030079902125004312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>692349101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-PFCEQxYnRuOPqF_BgiAdv7RTQDN2JHnSz_kk28aLnTg0NGTZ0MwK9Dt9explkoyZ7IsDvVdWrR8hLBm8Z6-QaBIDqe-CMS4BWMP6IrFirRNN2Sj0mqyPQVEJekGcp3QIw3vX9U3LBpOCt5LAi5dpap1EXivNIE1qTCw2W5rCvz55qt4_B-nBA7eb1aA44mbzDFGZD70xMS6KzCVM5_u6DL1M5uJl-XNNdGWPQIWb3h7Uh0pBdvVFzyCbO-Jw8seiTeXE-L8mPT9ffr740N98-f736cNPoVojcKAVCVmvQ9kKwsWedgBGV0b1phbFcWoSWtcygVJ2CbsRectxuN5JrPjItLsmbU91q5OdiUh4ml7TxHuvgSxo2mw466FUFX_8D3oalDurTwOueN53gUCF-gnQMKUVjh310E8YyMBiOqQz_p1JFr86Vl-1kxnvJOYYKvD8Bbq6LmvBXiH4cMhYfoo04a5cG8WCDd3_pdwZ93mmM5t7DA_Lfxt6ueQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207968320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Roland, Peter S. ; Pien, Francis D. ; Schultz, Craig C. ; Henry, Dan C. ; Conroy, Peter J. ; Wall, G. Michael ; Garadi, Rekha ; Dupre, Sheryl J. ; Potts, Susan L. ; Hogg, L. Gail ; Stroman, David W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roland, Peter S. ; Pien, Francis D. ; Schultz, Craig C. ; Henry, Dan C. ; Conroy, Peter J. ; Wall, G. Michael ; Garadi, Rekha ; Dupre, Sheryl J. ; Potts, Susan L. ; Hogg, L. Gail ; Stroman, David W. ; Ciprodex Otic AOE Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) otic suspension with that of neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10 000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (N/P/H) otic suspension in patients with acute otitis externa (AOE). Study Design: Randomized, observer-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to 7 days treatment with either CIP/DEX 3-4 drops twice daily or N/P/H 3-4 drops three times daily. Population: Patients of either sex and older than 1 year, with a clinical diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe AOE and intact tympanic membranes were recruited to participate. Outcomes Measured: Signs and symptoms of AOE, including ear inflammation, tenderness, edema and discharge (assessed on Days 3, 8 [End-of-Therapy] and 18 [Test-of-Cure]); microbiologic eradication (presumed or documented); and frequency of adverse events. Results: Patients enrolled numbered 468. In culture-positive patients who met the inclusion criteria (N = 396), clinical cure rates at Day 18 were significantly higher with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H (90.9% vs. 83.9%; p = 0.0375), as were microbiologic eradication rates (94.7% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.0057). In addition, the clinical response was significantly better with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H at Days 3 and 18 (p = 0. 0279 and p = 0. 0321, respectively), as was the reduction in ear inflammation at Day 18 (p = 0.0268). Both preparations were well tolerated in pediatric and adult patients. Conclusions: 7 days treatment with CIP/DEX otic suspension administered twice daily is clinically and microbiologically superior to N/P/H otic suspension administered 3 times daily in the treatment of mild to severe AOE, and is equally well tolerated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-7995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4877</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1185/030079902125004312</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15324520</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMROCX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Administration, Topical ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents - administration & dosage ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Ciprofloxacin - administration & dosage ; Drug Combinations ; Female ; Fluoroquinolone ; Framycetin - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Otitis externa ; Otitis Externa - drug therapy ; Ototopical anti-infective ; Ototoxicity ; Pharmaceutical Solutions - administration & dosage ; Polymyxin B - administration & dosage ; Single-Blind Method ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>Current medical research and opinion, 2004-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1175-1183</ispartof><rights>2004 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2004</rights><rights>Copyright Librapharm Aug 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15324520$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roland, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pien, Francis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Craig C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Dan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, G. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garadi, Rekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupre, Sheryl J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, L. Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stroman, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciprodex Otic AOE Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa</title><title>Current medical research and opinion</title><addtitle>Curr Med Res Opin</addtitle><description>SUMMARY Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) otic suspension with that of neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10 000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (N/P/H) otic suspension in patients with acute otitis externa (AOE). Study Design: Randomized, observer-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to 7 days treatment with either CIP/DEX 3-4 drops twice daily or N/P/H 3-4 drops three times daily. Population: Patients of either sex and older than 1 year, with a clinical diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe AOE and intact tympanic membranes were recruited to participate. Outcomes Measured: Signs and symptoms of AOE, including ear inflammation, tenderness, edema and discharge (assessed on Days 3, 8 [End-of-Therapy] and 18 [Test-of-Cure]); microbiologic eradication (presumed or documented); and frequency of adverse events. Results: Patients enrolled numbered 468. In culture-positive patients who met the inclusion criteria (N = 396), clinical cure rates at Day 18 were significantly higher with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H (90.9% vs. 83.9%; p = 0.0375), as were microbiologic eradication rates (94.7% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.0057). In addition, the clinical response was significantly better with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H at Days 3 and 18 (p = 0. 0279 and p = 0. 0321, respectively), as was the reduction in ear inflammation at Day 18 (p = 0.0268). Both preparations were well tolerated in pediatric and adult patients. Conclusions: 7 days treatment with CIP/DEX otic suspension administered twice daily is clinically and microbiologically superior to N/P/H otic suspension administered 3 times daily in the treatment of mild to severe AOE, and is equally well tolerated.</description><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolone</subject><subject>Framycetin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Otitis externa</subject><subject>Otitis Externa - drug therapy</subject><subject>Ototopical anti-infective</subject><subject>Ototoxicity</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Solutions - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Polymyxin B - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0300-7995</issn><issn>1473-4877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU-PFCEQxYnRuOPqF_BgiAdv7RTQDN2JHnSz_kk28aLnTg0NGTZ0MwK9Dt9explkoyZ7IsDvVdWrR8hLBm8Z6-QaBIDqe-CMS4BWMP6IrFirRNN2Sj0mqyPQVEJekGcp3QIw3vX9U3LBpOCt5LAi5dpap1EXivNIE1qTCw2W5rCvz55qt4_B-nBA7eb1aA44mbzDFGZD70xMS6KzCVM5_u6DL1M5uJl-XNNdGWPQIWb3h7Uh0pBdvVFzyCbO-Jw8seiTeXE-L8mPT9ffr740N98-f736cNPoVojcKAVCVmvQ9kKwsWedgBGV0b1phbFcWoSWtcygVJ2CbsRectxuN5JrPjItLsmbU91q5OdiUh4ml7TxHuvgSxo2mw466FUFX_8D3oalDurTwOueN53gUCF-gnQMKUVjh310E8YyMBiOqQz_p1JFr86Vl-1kxnvJOYYKvD8Bbq6LmvBXiH4cMhYfoo04a5cG8WCDd3_pdwZ93mmM5t7DA_Lfxt6ueQ</recordid><startdate>20040801</startdate><enddate>20040801</enddate><creator>Roland, Peter S.</creator><creator>Pien, Francis D.</creator><creator>Schultz, Craig C.</creator><creator>Henry, Dan C.</creator><creator>Conroy, Peter J.</creator><creator>Wall, G. Michael</creator><creator>Garadi, Rekha</creator><creator>Dupre, Sheryl J.</creator><creator>Potts, Susan L.</creator><creator>Hogg, L. Gail</creator><creator>Stroman, David W.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Informa Healthcare</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040801</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa</title><author>Roland, Peter S. ; Pien, Francis D. ; Schultz, Craig C. ; Henry, Dan C. ; Conroy, Peter J. ; Wall, G. Michael ; Garadi, Rekha ; Dupre, Sheryl J. ; Potts, Susan L. ; Hogg, L. Gail ; Stroman, David W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolone</topic><topic>Framycetin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Otitis externa</topic><topic>Otitis Externa - drug therapy</topic><topic>Ototopical anti-infective</topic><topic>Ototoxicity</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Solutions - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Polymyxin B - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roland, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pien, Francis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Craig C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Dan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, G. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garadi, Rekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupre, Sheryl J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, L. Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stroman, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciprodex Otic AOE Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current medical research and opinion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roland, Peter S.</au><au>Pien, Francis D.</au><au>Schultz, Craig C.</au><au>Henry, Dan C.</au><au>Conroy, Peter J.</au><au>Wall, G. Michael</au><au>Garadi, Rekha</au><au>Dupre, Sheryl J.</au><au>Potts, Susan L.</au><au>Hogg, L. Gail</au><au>Stroman, David W.</au><aucorp>Ciprodex Otic AOE Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa</atitle><jtitle>Current medical research and opinion</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Med Res Opin</addtitle><date>2004-08-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1175</spage><epage>1183</epage><pages>1175-1183</pages><issn>0300-7995</issn><eissn>1473-4877</eissn><coden>CMROCX</coden><abstract>SUMMARY Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) otic suspension with that of neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10 000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (N/P/H) otic suspension in patients with acute otitis externa (AOE). Study Design: Randomized, observer-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to 7 days treatment with either CIP/DEX 3-4 drops twice daily or N/P/H 3-4 drops three times daily. Population: Patients of either sex and older than 1 year, with a clinical diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe AOE and intact tympanic membranes were recruited to participate. Outcomes Measured: Signs and symptoms of AOE, including ear inflammation, tenderness, edema and discharge (assessed on Days 3, 8 [End-of-Therapy] and 18 [Test-of-Cure]); microbiologic eradication (presumed or documented); and frequency of adverse events. Results: Patients enrolled numbered 468. In culture-positive patients who met the inclusion criteria (N = 396), clinical cure rates at Day 18 were significantly higher with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H (90.9% vs. 83.9%; p = 0.0375), as were microbiologic eradication rates (94.7% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.0057). In addition, the clinical response was significantly better with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H at Days 3 and 18 (p = 0. 0279 and p = 0. 0321, respectively), as was the reduction in ear inflammation at Day 18 (p = 0.0268). Both preparations were well tolerated in pediatric and adult patients. Conclusions: 7 days treatment with CIP/DEX otic suspension administered twice daily is clinically and microbiologically superior to N/P/H otic suspension administered 3 times daily in the treatment of mild to severe AOE, and is equally well tolerated.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>15324520</pmid><doi>10.1185/030079902125004312</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-7995
ispartof Current medical research and opinion, 2004-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1175-1183
issn 0300-7995
1473-4877
language eng
recordid cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_1185_030079902125004312
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Administration, Topical
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Inflammatory Agents - administration & dosage
Child
Child, Preschool
Ciprofloxacin - administration & dosage
Drug Combinations
Female
Fluoroquinolone
Framycetin - administration & dosage
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Otitis externa
Otitis Externa - drug therapy
Ototopical anti-infective
Ototoxicity
Pharmaceutical Solutions - administration & dosage
Polymyxin B - administration & dosage
Single-Blind Method
Treatment Outcome
title Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A45%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20topical%20ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone%20versus%20neomycin/polymyxin%20B/%20hydrocortisone%20for%20otitis%20externa&rft.jtitle=Current%20medical%20research%20and%20opinion&rft.au=Roland,%20Peter%20S.&rft.aucorp=Ciprodex%20Otic%20AOE%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2004-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1175&rft.epage=1183&rft.pages=1175-1183&rft.issn=0300-7995&rft.eissn=1473-4877&rft.coden=CMROCX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1185/030079902125004312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E692349101%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207968320&rft_id=info:pmid/15324520&rfr_iscdi=true