Loading…
Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa
SUMMARY Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) otic suspension with that of neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10 000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (N/P/H) otic suspension in patients with acute otitis externa (AOE). Study Design: Randomized, observer-m...
Saved in:
Published in: | Current medical research and opinion 2004-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1175-1183 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3 |
container_end_page | 1183 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1175 |
container_title | Current medical research and opinion |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Roland, Peter S. Pien, Francis D. Schultz, Craig C. Henry, Dan C. Conroy, Peter J. Wall, G. Michael Garadi, Rekha Dupre, Sheryl J. Potts, Susan L. Hogg, L. Gail Stroman, David W. |
description | SUMMARY
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) otic suspension with that of neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10 000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (N/P/H) otic suspension in patients with acute otitis externa (AOE).
Study Design: Randomized, observer-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to 7 days treatment with either CIP/DEX 3-4 drops twice daily or N/P/H 3-4 drops three times daily.
Population: Patients of either sex and older than 1 year, with a clinical diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe AOE and intact tympanic membranes were recruited to participate.
Outcomes Measured: Signs and symptoms of AOE, including ear inflammation, tenderness, edema and discharge (assessed on Days 3, 8 [End-of-Therapy] and 18 [Test-of-Cure]); microbiologic eradication (presumed or documented); and frequency of adverse events.
Results: Patients enrolled numbered 468. In culture-positive patients who met the inclusion criteria (N = 396), clinical cure rates at Day 18 were significantly higher with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H (90.9% vs. 83.9%; p = 0.0375), as were microbiologic eradication rates (94.7% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.0057). In addition, the clinical response was significantly better with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H at Days 3 and 18 (p = 0. 0279 and p = 0. 0321, respectively), as was the reduction in ear inflammation at Day 18 (p = 0.0268). Both preparations were well tolerated in pediatric and adult patients.
Conclusions: 7 days treatment with CIP/DEX otic suspension administered twice daily is clinically and microbiologically superior to N/P/H otic suspension administered 3 times daily in the treatment of mild to severe AOE, and is equally well tolerated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1185/030079902125004312 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_1185_030079902125004312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>692349101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-PFCEQxYnRuOPqF_BgiAdv7RTQDN2JHnSz_kk28aLnTg0NGTZ0MwK9Dt9explkoyZ7IsDvVdWrR8hLBm8Z6-QaBIDqe-CMS4BWMP6IrFirRNN2Sj0mqyPQVEJekGcp3QIw3vX9U3LBpOCt5LAi5dpap1EXivNIE1qTCw2W5rCvz55qt4_B-nBA7eb1aA44mbzDFGZD70xMS6KzCVM5_u6DL1M5uJl-XNNdGWPQIWb3h7Uh0pBdvVFzyCbO-Jw8seiTeXE-L8mPT9ffr740N98-f736cNPoVojcKAVCVmvQ9kKwsWedgBGV0b1phbFcWoSWtcygVJ2CbsRectxuN5JrPjItLsmbU91q5OdiUh4ml7TxHuvgSxo2mw466FUFX_8D3oalDurTwOueN53gUCF-gnQMKUVjh310E8YyMBiOqQz_p1JFr86Vl-1kxnvJOYYKvD8Bbq6LmvBXiH4cMhYfoo04a5cG8WCDd3_pdwZ93mmM5t7DA_Lfxt6ueQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207968320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Roland, Peter S. ; Pien, Francis D. ; Schultz, Craig C. ; Henry, Dan C. ; Conroy, Peter J. ; Wall, G. Michael ; Garadi, Rekha ; Dupre, Sheryl J. ; Potts, Susan L. ; Hogg, L. Gail ; Stroman, David W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roland, Peter S. ; Pien, Francis D. ; Schultz, Craig C. ; Henry, Dan C. ; Conroy, Peter J. ; Wall, G. Michael ; Garadi, Rekha ; Dupre, Sheryl J. ; Potts, Susan L. ; Hogg, L. Gail ; Stroman, David W. ; Ciprodex Otic AOE Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) otic suspension with that of neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10 000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (N/P/H) otic suspension in patients with acute otitis externa (AOE).
Study Design: Randomized, observer-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to 7 days treatment with either CIP/DEX 3-4 drops twice daily or N/P/H 3-4 drops three times daily.
Population: Patients of either sex and older than 1 year, with a clinical diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe AOE and intact tympanic membranes were recruited to participate.
Outcomes Measured: Signs and symptoms of AOE, including ear inflammation, tenderness, edema and discharge (assessed on Days 3, 8 [End-of-Therapy] and 18 [Test-of-Cure]); microbiologic eradication (presumed or documented); and frequency of adverse events.
Results: Patients enrolled numbered 468. In culture-positive patients who met the inclusion criteria (N = 396), clinical cure rates at Day 18 were significantly higher with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H (90.9% vs. 83.9%; p = 0.0375), as were microbiologic eradication rates (94.7% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.0057). In addition, the clinical response was significantly better with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H at Days 3 and 18 (p = 0. 0279 and p = 0. 0321, respectively), as was the reduction in ear inflammation at Day 18 (p = 0.0268). Both preparations were well tolerated in pediatric and adult patients.
Conclusions: 7 days treatment with CIP/DEX otic suspension administered twice daily is clinically and microbiologically superior to N/P/H otic suspension administered 3 times daily in the treatment of mild to severe AOE, and is equally well tolerated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-7995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4877</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1185/030079902125004312</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15324520</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMROCX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Administration, Topical ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents - administration & dosage ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Ciprofloxacin - administration & dosage ; Drug Combinations ; Female ; Fluoroquinolone ; Framycetin - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Otitis externa ; Otitis Externa - drug therapy ; Ototopical anti-infective ; Ototoxicity ; Pharmaceutical Solutions - administration & dosage ; Polymyxin B - administration & dosage ; Single-Blind Method ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>Current medical research and opinion, 2004-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1175-1183</ispartof><rights>2004 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2004</rights><rights>Copyright Librapharm Aug 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15324520$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roland, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pien, Francis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Craig C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Dan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, G. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garadi, Rekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupre, Sheryl J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, L. Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stroman, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciprodex Otic AOE Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa</title><title>Current medical research and opinion</title><addtitle>Curr Med Res Opin</addtitle><description>SUMMARY
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) otic suspension with that of neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10 000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (N/P/H) otic suspension in patients with acute otitis externa (AOE).
Study Design: Randomized, observer-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to 7 days treatment with either CIP/DEX 3-4 drops twice daily or N/P/H 3-4 drops three times daily.
Population: Patients of either sex and older than 1 year, with a clinical diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe AOE and intact tympanic membranes were recruited to participate.
Outcomes Measured: Signs and symptoms of AOE, including ear inflammation, tenderness, edema and discharge (assessed on Days 3, 8 [End-of-Therapy] and 18 [Test-of-Cure]); microbiologic eradication (presumed or documented); and frequency of adverse events.
Results: Patients enrolled numbered 468. In culture-positive patients who met the inclusion criteria (N = 396), clinical cure rates at Day 18 were significantly higher with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H (90.9% vs. 83.9%; p = 0.0375), as were microbiologic eradication rates (94.7% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.0057). In addition, the clinical response was significantly better with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H at Days 3 and 18 (p = 0. 0279 and p = 0. 0321, respectively), as was the reduction in ear inflammation at Day 18 (p = 0.0268). Both preparations were well tolerated in pediatric and adult patients.
Conclusions: 7 days treatment with CIP/DEX otic suspension administered twice daily is clinically and microbiologically superior to N/P/H otic suspension administered 3 times daily in the treatment of mild to severe AOE, and is equally well tolerated.</description><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolone</subject><subject>Framycetin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Otitis externa</subject><subject>Otitis Externa - drug therapy</subject><subject>Ototopical anti-infective</subject><subject>Ototoxicity</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Solutions - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Polymyxin B - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0300-7995</issn><issn>1473-4877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU-PFCEQxYnRuOPqF_BgiAdv7RTQDN2JHnSz_kk28aLnTg0NGTZ0MwK9Dt9explkoyZ7IsDvVdWrR8hLBm8Z6-QaBIDqe-CMS4BWMP6IrFirRNN2Sj0mqyPQVEJekGcp3QIw3vX9U3LBpOCt5LAi5dpap1EXivNIE1qTCw2W5rCvz55qt4_B-nBA7eb1aA44mbzDFGZD70xMS6KzCVM5_u6DL1M5uJl-XNNdGWPQIWb3h7Uh0pBdvVFzyCbO-Jw8seiTeXE-L8mPT9ffr740N98-f736cNPoVojcKAVCVmvQ9kKwsWedgBGV0b1phbFcWoSWtcygVJ2CbsRectxuN5JrPjItLsmbU91q5OdiUh4ml7TxHuvgSxo2mw466FUFX_8D3oalDurTwOueN53gUCF-gnQMKUVjh310E8YyMBiOqQz_p1JFr86Vl-1kxnvJOYYKvD8Bbq6LmvBXiH4cMhYfoo04a5cG8WCDd3_pdwZ93mmM5t7DA_Lfxt6ueQ</recordid><startdate>20040801</startdate><enddate>20040801</enddate><creator>Roland, Peter S.</creator><creator>Pien, Francis D.</creator><creator>Schultz, Craig C.</creator><creator>Henry, Dan C.</creator><creator>Conroy, Peter J.</creator><creator>Wall, G. Michael</creator><creator>Garadi, Rekha</creator><creator>Dupre, Sheryl J.</creator><creator>Potts, Susan L.</creator><creator>Hogg, L. Gail</creator><creator>Stroman, David W.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Informa Healthcare</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040801</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa</title><author>Roland, Peter S. ; Pien, Francis D. ; Schultz, Craig C. ; Henry, Dan C. ; Conroy, Peter J. ; Wall, G. Michael ; Garadi, Rekha ; Dupre, Sheryl J. ; Potts, Susan L. ; Hogg, L. Gail ; Stroman, David W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolone</topic><topic>Framycetin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Otitis externa</topic><topic>Otitis Externa - drug therapy</topic><topic>Ototopical anti-infective</topic><topic>Ototoxicity</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Solutions - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Polymyxin B - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roland, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pien, Francis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Craig C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Dan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, G. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garadi, Rekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupre, Sheryl J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, L. Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stroman, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciprodex Otic AOE Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current medical research and opinion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roland, Peter S.</au><au>Pien, Francis D.</au><au>Schultz, Craig C.</au><au>Henry, Dan C.</au><au>Conroy, Peter J.</au><au>Wall, G. Michael</au><au>Garadi, Rekha</au><au>Dupre, Sheryl J.</au><au>Potts, Susan L.</au><au>Hogg, L. Gail</au><au>Stroman, David W.</au><aucorp>Ciprodex Otic AOE Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa</atitle><jtitle>Current medical research and opinion</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Med Res Opin</addtitle><date>2004-08-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1175</spage><epage>1183</epage><pages>1175-1183</pages><issn>0300-7995</issn><eissn>1473-4877</eissn><coden>CMROCX</coden><abstract>SUMMARY
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) otic suspension with that of neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10 000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (N/P/H) otic suspension in patients with acute otitis externa (AOE).
Study Design: Randomized, observer-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to 7 days treatment with either CIP/DEX 3-4 drops twice daily or N/P/H 3-4 drops three times daily.
Population: Patients of either sex and older than 1 year, with a clinical diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe AOE and intact tympanic membranes were recruited to participate.
Outcomes Measured: Signs and symptoms of AOE, including ear inflammation, tenderness, edema and discharge (assessed on Days 3, 8 [End-of-Therapy] and 18 [Test-of-Cure]); microbiologic eradication (presumed or documented); and frequency of adverse events.
Results: Patients enrolled numbered 468. In culture-positive patients who met the inclusion criteria (N = 396), clinical cure rates at Day 18 were significantly higher with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H (90.9% vs. 83.9%; p = 0.0375), as were microbiologic eradication rates (94.7% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.0057). In addition, the clinical response was significantly better with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H at Days 3 and 18 (p = 0. 0279 and p = 0. 0321, respectively), as was the reduction in ear inflammation at Day 18 (p = 0.0268). Both preparations were well tolerated in pediatric and adult patients.
Conclusions: 7 days treatment with CIP/DEX otic suspension administered twice daily is clinically and microbiologically superior to N/P/H otic suspension administered 3 times daily in the treatment of mild to severe AOE, and is equally well tolerated.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>15324520</pmid><doi>10.1185/030079902125004312</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-7995 |
ispartof | Current medical research and opinion, 2004-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1175-1183 |
issn | 0300-7995 1473-4877 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_1185_030079902125004312 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Administration, Topical Adolescent Adult Aged Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage Anti-Inflammatory Agents - administration & dosage Child Child, Preschool Ciprofloxacin - administration & dosage Drug Combinations Female Fluoroquinolone Framycetin - administration & dosage Humans Infant Male Middle Aged Otitis externa Otitis Externa - drug therapy Ototopical anti-infective Ototoxicity Pharmaceutical Solutions - administration & dosage Polymyxin B - administration & dosage Single-Blind Method Treatment Outcome |
title | Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A45%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20topical%20ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone%20versus%20neomycin/polymyxin%20B/%20hydrocortisone%20for%20otitis%20externa&rft.jtitle=Current%20medical%20research%20and%20opinion&rft.au=Roland,%20Peter%20S.&rft.aucorp=Ciprodex%20Otic%20AOE%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2004-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1175&rft.epage=1183&rft.pages=1175-1183&rft.issn=0300-7995&rft.eissn=1473-4877&rft.coden=CMROCX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1185/030079902125004312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E692349101%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-77035312049331d91830da7ec9e43ef25fa04141ea578708da952abb652c2d1c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207968320&rft_id=info:pmid/15324520&rfr_iscdi=true |