Loading…
Validation of the Turkish version of "Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK)" questionnaire
Abstract Background: Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) questionnaire is the first to measure both the risk and impairment domains of the current guidelines in preschool children. We aimed to measure the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of the TRAC...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of asthma 2013-12, Vol.50 (10), p.1096-1101 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-75b575d088f6c65442c280fa3978aa66baf6b13801f50a7a4267835f3b91f2323 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-75b575d088f6c65442c280fa3978aa66baf6b13801f50a7a4267835f3b91f2323 |
container_end_page | 1101 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1096 |
container_title | The Journal of asthma |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Buyuktiryaki, Betul Sahiner, Umit M. Yavuz, S. Tolga Cavkaytar, Ozlem Yilmaz, Ebru Arik Soyer, Ozge U. Tuncer, Ayfer Sekerel, Bulent E. |
description | Abstract
Background: Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) questionnaire is the first to measure both the risk and impairment domains of the current guidelines in preschool children. We aimed to measure the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of the TRACK. Methods: A total of 268 children (69.8% boys) were included in the study. Caregivers responded to three individual TRACK questionnaires, at each clinical visit (baseline, 1st month, and 3rd month). At each visit, physicians determined the control level and the treatment strategy based on the GINA guideline recommendations. Results: The internal consistency reliability of the Turkish version of the TRACK questionnaire was found to be 0.74, 0.74, and 0.76 at each of the three visits, respectively (reliability statistics, Cronbach's alpha). There was a significant difference between the mean TRACK scores of the patients in different asthma control status categories (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.3109/02770903.2013.837481 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_3109_02770903_2013_837481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1459153055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-75b575d088f6c65442c280fa3978aa66baf6b13801f50a7a4267835f3b91f2323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0EpIqfk4K1kWZZ8aViW9IMECmHbqxjbElZqS1tJbtl_X7m7KfSS08DwvO8MD0JvKVkzSpr3pBSCNIStS0LZWjJRSfoMrShnZVExwp6j1YIUC3OGXsX4QEhekPolOitZI4QUZIXG7zDaHpL1DnuD06Dxbg4_bBzwLx3iaX2x0zFh4wO-13FvAyQfDhhcjzcxDRPgrXcp-BFbh29tH_Hl7n6zvb26wD_nnMwtDmzQr9ELA2PUb07zHH37eLPbfi7uvn76st3cFV1FZSoEb7ngPZHS1F3Nq6rsSkkM5KclQF23YOqWMkmo4QQEVGUtJOOGtQ01JSvZObo89u6D__uAmmzs9DiC036Oila8yZ4I5xmtjmgXfIxBG7UPdoJwUJSoxbN69KwWz-roOcfenS7M7aT7f6FHsRm4PgLWZW0T_PZh7FWCw-iDCeA6G5f6J098-K9h0DCmoYOg1YOfg8sCn_7xDxlPnjM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459153055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Turkish version of "Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK)" questionnaire</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Buyuktiryaki, Betul ; Sahiner, Umit M. ; Yavuz, S. Tolga ; Cavkaytar, Ozlem ; Yilmaz, Ebru Arik ; Soyer, Ozge U. ; Tuncer, Ayfer ; Sekerel, Bulent E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buyuktiryaki, Betul ; Sahiner, Umit M. ; Yavuz, S. Tolga ; Cavkaytar, Ozlem ; Yilmaz, Ebru Arik ; Soyer, Ozge U. ; Tuncer, Ayfer ; Sekerel, Bulent E.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background: Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) questionnaire is the first to measure both the risk and impairment domains of the current guidelines in preschool children. We aimed to measure the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of the TRACK. Methods: A total of 268 children (69.8% boys) were included in the study. Caregivers responded to three individual TRACK questionnaires, at each clinical visit (baseline, 1st month, and 3rd month). At each visit, physicians determined the control level and the treatment strategy based on the GINA guideline recommendations. Results: The internal consistency reliability of the Turkish version of the TRACK questionnaire was found to be 0.74, 0.74, and 0.76 at each of the three visits, respectively (reliability statistics, Cronbach's alpha). There was a significant difference between the mean TRACK scores of the patients in different asthma control status categories (p < 0.001). The test-retest reliability in stable patients was 0.90. The optimal cut-off scores according to the Youden index were 80 and 60 points for uncontrolled and very poorly controlled children, respectively. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the TRACK is an accurate and reliable tool for evaluating asthma control status among preschool Turkish children. Its widespread use may help physicians correctly assess control levels among children and may improve the quality of life for both patients and their caregivers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-0903</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4303</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2013.837481</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23977870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa Healthcare USA, Inc</publisher><subject>Asthma ; Asthma - therapy ; Child, Preschool ; children ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; questionnaire ; reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; responsiveness ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids ; Turkey ; validity</subject><ispartof>The Journal of asthma, 2013-12, Vol.50 (10), p.1096-1101</ispartof><rights>2013 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-75b575d088f6c65442c280fa3978aa66baf6b13801f50a7a4267835f3b91f2323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-75b575d088f6c65442c280fa3978aa66baf6b13801f50a7a4267835f3b91f2323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23977870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buyuktiryaki, Betul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahiner, Umit M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yavuz, S. Tolga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavkaytar, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Ebru Arik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soyer, Ozge U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncer, Ayfer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekerel, Bulent E.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Turkish version of "Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK)" questionnaire</title><title>The Journal of asthma</title><addtitle>J Asthma</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background: Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) questionnaire is the first to measure both the risk and impairment domains of the current guidelines in preschool children. We aimed to measure the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of the TRACK. Methods: A total of 268 children (69.8% boys) were included in the study. Caregivers responded to three individual TRACK questionnaires, at each clinical visit (baseline, 1st month, and 3rd month). At each visit, physicians determined the control level and the treatment strategy based on the GINA guideline recommendations. Results: The internal consistency reliability of the Turkish version of the TRACK questionnaire was found to be 0.74, 0.74, and 0.76 at each of the three visits, respectively (reliability statistics, Cronbach's alpha). There was a significant difference between the mean TRACK scores of the patients in different asthma control status categories (p < 0.001). The test-retest reliability in stable patients was 0.90. The optimal cut-off scores according to the Youden index were 80 and 60 points for uncontrolled and very poorly controlled children, respectively. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the TRACK is an accurate and reliable tool for evaluating asthma control status among preschool Turkish children. Its widespread use may help physicians correctly assess control levels among children and may improve the quality of life for both patients and their caregivers.</description><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Asthma - therapy</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>questionnaire</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>responsiveness</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>validity</subject><issn>0277-0903</issn><issn>1532-4303</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0EpIqfk4K1kWZZ8aViW9IMECmHbqxjbElZqS1tJbtl_X7m7KfSS08DwvO8MD0JvKVkzSpr3pBSCNIStS0LZWjJRSfoMrShnZVExwp6j1YIUC3OGXsX4QEhekPolOitZI4QUZIXG7zDaHpL1DnuD06Dxbg4_bBzwLx3iaX2x0zFh4wO-13FvAyQfDhhcjzcxDRPgrXcp-BFbh29tH_Hl7n6zvb26wD_nnMwtDmzQr9ELA2PUb07zHH37eLPbfi7uvn76st3cFV1FZSoEb7ngPZHS1F3Nq6rsSkkM5KclQF23YOqWMkmo4QQEVGUtJOOGtQ01JSvZObo89u6D__uAmmzs9DiC036Oila8yZ4I5xmtjmgXfIxBG7UPdoJwUJSoxbN69KwWz-roOcfenS7M7aT7f6FHsRm4PgLWZW0T_PZh7FWCw-iDCeA6G5f6J098-K9h0DCmoYOg1YOfg8sCn_7xDxlPnjM</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Buyuktiryaki, Betul</creator><creator>Sahiner, Umit M.</creator><creator>Yavuz, S. Tolga</creator><creator>Cavkaytar, Ozlem</creator><creator>Yilmaz, Ebru Arik</creator><creator>Soyer, Ozge U.</creator><creator>Tuncer, Ayfer</creator><creator>Sekerel, Bulent E.</creator><general>Informa Healthcare USA, Inc</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Validation of the Turkish version of "Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK)" questionnaire</title><author>Buyuktiryaki, Betul ; Sahiner, Umit M. ; Yavuz, S. Tolga ; Cavkaytar, Ozlem ; Yilmaz, Ebru Arik ; Soyer, Ozge U. ; Tuncer, Ayfer ; Sekerel, Bulent E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-75b575d088f6c65442c280fa3978aa66baf6b13801f50a7a4267835f3b91f2323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Asthma - therapy</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>responsiveness</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buyuktiryaki, Betul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahiner, Umit M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yavuz, S. Tolga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavkaytar, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Ebru Arik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soyer, Ozge U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncer, Ayfer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekerel, Bulent E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of asthma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buyuktiryaki, Betul</au><au>Sahiner, Umit M.</au><au>Yavuz, S. Tolga</au><au>Cavkaytar, Ozlem</au><au>Yilmaz, Ebru Arik</au><au>Soyer, Ozge U.</au><au>Tuncer, Ayfer</au><au>Sekerel, Bulent E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Turkish version of "Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK)" questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of asthma</jtitle><addtitle>J Asthma</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1096</spage><epage>1101</epage><pages>1096-1101</pages><issn>0277-0903</issn><eissn>1532-4303</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background: Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) questionnaire is the first to measure both the risk and impairment domains of the current guidelines in preschool children. We aimed to measure the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of the TRACK. Methods: A total of 268 children (69.8% boys) were included in the study. Caregivers responded to three individual TRACK questionnaires, at each clinical visit (baseline, 1st month, and 3rd month). At each visit, physicians determined the control level and the treatment strategy based on the GINA guideline recommendations. Results: The internal consistency reliability of the Turkish version of the TRACK questionnaire was found to be 0.74, 0.74, and 0.76 at each of the three visits, respectively (reliability statistics, Cronbach's alpha). There was a significant difference between the mean TRACK scores of the patients in different asthma control status categories (p < 0.001). The test-retest reliability in stable patients was 0.90. The optimal cut-off scores according to the Youden index were 80 and 60 points for uncontrolled and very poorly controlled children, respectively. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the TRACK is an accurate and reliable tool for evaluating asthma control status among preschool Turkish children. Its widespread use may help physicians correctly assess control levels among children and may improve the quality of life for both patients and their caregivers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa Healthcare USA, Inc</pub><pmid>23977870</pmid><doi>10.3109/02770903.2013.837481</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-0903 |
ispartof | The Journal of asthma, 2013-12, Vol.50 (10), p.1096-1101 |
issn | 0277-0903 1532-4303 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_3109_02770903_2013_837481 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Asthma Asthma - therapy Child, Preschool children Female Humans Infant Male questionnaire reliability Reproducibility of Results responsiveness Surveys and Questionnaires Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids Turkey validity |
title | Validation of the Turkish version of "Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK)" questionnaire |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A24%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Turkish%20version%20of%20%22Test%20for%20Respiratory%20and%20Asthma%20Control%20in%20Kids%20(TRACK)%22%20questionnaire&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20asthma&rft.au=Buyuktiryaki,%20Betul&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1096&rft.epage=1101&rft.pages=1096-1101&rft.issn=0277-0903&rft.eissn=1532-4303&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/02770903.2013.837481&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1459153055%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-75b575d088f6c65442c280fa3978aa66baf6b13801f50a7a4267835f3b91f2323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459153055&rft_id=info:pmid/23977870&rfr_iscdi=true |