Loading…

Phosphorus availability in soils amended with different phosphate fertilizers

Accurate measurement and characterization of phosphate rock dissolution are important for a better understanding of phosphorus (P) availability in soils. An incubation study was carried out on two New Zealand topsoils (0-15 cm; high P buffering capacity Craigieburn and low P buffering capacity Templ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Communications in soil science and plant analysis 2006-02, Vol.37 (1-2), p.25-39
Main Authors: Randhawa, P.S, Condron, L.M, Di, H.J, Sinaj, S, McLenaghen, R.D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9940fc567e56ecf92f4d7432537f1b693595384c1922050241cb965e7d5af9f53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9940fc567e56ecf92f4d7432537f1b693595384c1922050241cb965e7d5af9f53
container_end_page 39
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 25
container_title Communications in soil science and plant analysis
container_volume 37
creator Randhawa, P.S
Condron, L.M
Di, H.J
Sinaj, S
McLenaghen, R.D
description Accurate measurement and characterization of phosphate rock dissolution are important for a better understanding of phosphorus (P) availability in soils. An incubation study was carried out on two New Zealand topsoils (0-15 cm; high P buffering capacity Craigieburn and low P buffering capacity Templeton) amended with North Carolina phosphate rock (NCPR) and water-soluble phosphate (WSP) at 218 mg P kg(-1) (equivalent to 60 kg P ha(-1)). Isotopic exchange kinetics was carried out after 12 h and 28 days of incubation to characterize P availability. This study showed that sensitivity of capacity factors (r1/R, n) to explain changes in E1min values was affected by the P buffering capacity of the soils. The recovery of applied P in the E pool (Rec(inE)%) with extended incubation time was similar from the NCPR and WSP treatments (3.1-3.3%) in the Craigieburn soil compared with the Templeton soil in which Rec(inE)% values were greater in WSP (9%) than NCPR (1.3%) treatment. The higher values of P derived from the applied P fertilizers in the E pool (Pdff(inE)%>80%) suggested that the NCPR application in both soils would be efficient for increasing P availability to plants.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00103620500403572
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_00103620500403572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201301074732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9940fc567e56ecf92f4d7432537f1b693595384c1922050241cb965e7d5af9f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqD_DkXjyuTr42DXgR8QsqCtrzkmYTG9luShKt9debuoqHgp5CJu-TYQahQwwnGEZwCoCBVgQ4AAPKBdlCA8wpKQnD1TYarN_LHGC7aC_Gl3yVAsgA3T3MfFzMfHiNhXpTrlVT17q0KlxXRO_aXJ2brjFNsXRpVjTOWhNMl4rFl1PJFLmQsvkwIe6jHavaaA6-zyGaXF0-XdyU4_vr24vzcakZQCqlZGA1r4ThldFWEssawSjhVFg8rSTlktMR01iS9UR5BD2VFTei4cpKy-kQ4f5fHXyMwdh6EdxchVWNoV7vo97YRzbHvVmoqFVrg-q0i79Q8GrEOM25sz7nOuvDXC19aJs6qVXrww-if7UR__INVaf3lOVRL63ytXoOOTh5JIBpTgsmKKGfxAKNxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phosphorus availability in soils amended with different phosphate fertilizers</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Randhawa, P.S ; Condron, L.M ; Di, H.J ; Sinaj, S ; McLenaghen, R.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Randhawa, P.S ; Condron, L.M ; Di, H.J ; Sinaj, S ; McLenaghen, R.D</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate measurement and characterization of phosphate rock dissolution are important for a better understanding of phosphorus (P) availability in soils. An incubation study was carried out on two New Zealand topsoils (0-15 cm; high P buffering capacity Craigieburn and low P buffering capacity Templeton) amended with North Carolina phosphate rock (NCPR) and water-soluble phosphate (WSP) at 218 mg P kg(-1) (equivalent to 60 kg P ha(-1)). Isotopic exchange kinetics was carried out after 12 h and 28 days of incubation to characterize P availability. This study showed that sensitivity of capacity factors (r1/R, n) to explain changes in E1min values was affected by the P buffering capacity of the soils. The recovery of applied P in the E pool (Rec(inE)%) with extended incubation time was similar from the NCPR and WSP treatments (3.1-3.3%) in the Craigieburn soil compared with the Templeton soil in which Rec(inE)% values were greater in WSP (9%) than NCPR (1.3%) treatment. The higher values of P derived from the applied P fertilizers in the E pool (Pdff(inE)%&gt;80%) suggested that the NCPR application in both soils would be efficient for increasing P availability to plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-3624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00103620500403572</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CSOSA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; buffering capacity ; fertilizer application ; fertilizer requirements ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; isotopic exchange kinetics ; kinetics ; Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations ; nutrient availability ; phosphates ; phosphorus ; reactive phosphate rock ; rock phosphate ; soil fertility ; Soil science ; soil treatment ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; topsoil ; water solubility ; water-soluble phosphorus</subject><ispartof>Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2006-02, Vol.37 (1-2), p.25-39</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2006</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9940fc567e56ecf92f4d7432537f1b693595384c1922050241cb965e7d5af9f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9940fc567e56ecf92f4d7432537f1b693595384c1922050241cb965e7d5af9f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17568453$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Randhawa, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Condron, L.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, H.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinaj, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLenaghen, R.D</creatorcontrib><title>Phosphorus availability in soils amended with different phosphate fertilizers</title><title>Communications in soil science and plant analysis</title><description>Accurate measurement and characterization of phosphate rock dissolution are important for a better understanding of phosphorus (P) availability in soils. An incubation study was carried out on two New Zealand topsoils (0-15 cm; high P buffering capacity Craigieburn and low P buffering capacity Templeton) amended with North Carolina phosphate rock (NCPR) and water-soluble phosphate (WSP) at 218 mg P kg(-1) (equivalent to 60 kg P ha(-1)). Isotopic exchange kinetics was carried out after 12 h and 28 days of incubation to characterize P availability. This study showed that sensitivity of capacity factors (r1/R, n) to explain changes in E1min values was affected by the P buffering capacity of the soils. The recovery of applied P in the E pool (Rec(inE)%) with extended incubation time was similar from the NCPR and WSP treatments (3.1-3.3%) in the Craigieburn soil compared with the Templeton soil in which Rec(inE)% values were greater in WSP (9%) than NCPR (1.3%) treatment. The higher values of P derived from the applied P fertilizers in the E pool (Pdff(inE)%&gt;80%) suggested that the NCPR application in both soils would be efficient for increasing P availability to plants.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>buffering capacity</subject><subject>fertilizer application</subject><subject>fertilizer requirements</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>isotopic exchange kinetics</subject><subject>kinetics</subject><subject>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</subject><subject>nutrient availability</subject><subject>phosphates</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>reactive phosphate rock</subject><subject>rock phosphate</subject><subject>soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>soil treatment</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>topsoil</subject><subject>water solubility</subject><subject>water-soluble phosphorus</subject><issn>0010-3624</issn><issn>1532-2416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqD_DkXjyuTr42DXgR8QsqCtrzkmYTG9luShKt9debuoqHgp5CJu-TYQahQwwnGEZwCoCBVgQ4AAPKBdlCA8wpKQnD1TYarN_LHGC7aC_Gl3yVAsgA3T3MfFzMfHiNhXpTrlVT17q0KlxXRO_aXJ2brjFNsXRpVjTOWhNMl4rFl1PJFLmQsvkwIe6jHavaaA6-zyGaXF0-XdyU4_vr24vzcakZQCqlZGA1r4ThldFWEssawSjhVFg8rSTlktMR01iS9UR5BD2VFTei4cpKy-kQ4f5fHXyMwdh6EdxchVWNoV7vo97YRzbHvVmoqFVrg-q0i79Q8GrEOM25sz7nOuvDXC19aJs6qVXrww-if7UR__INVaf3lOVRL63ytXoOOTh5JIBpTgsmKKGfxAKNxw</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Randhawa, P.S</creator><creator>Condron, L.M</creator><creator>Di, H.J</creator><creator>Sinaj, S</creator><creator>McLenaghen, R.D</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Phosphorus availability in soils amended with different phosphate fertilizers</title><author>Randhawa, P.S ; Condron, L.M ; Di, H.J ; Sinaj, S ; McLenaghen, R.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9940fc567e56ecf92f4d7432537f1b693595384c1922050241cb965e7d5af9f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>buffering capacity</topic><topic>fertilizer application</topic><topic>fertilizer requirements</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>isotopic exchange kinetics</topic><topic>kinetics</topic><topic>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</topic><topic>nutrient availability</topic><topic>phosphates</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>reactive phosphate rock</topic><topic>rock phosphate</topic><topic>soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>soil treatment</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>topsoil</topic><topic>water solubility</topic><topic>water-soluble phosphorus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Randhawa, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Condron, L.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, H.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinaj, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLenaghen, R.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communications in soil science and plant analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Randhawa, P.S</au><au>Condron, L.M</au><au>Di, H.J</au><au>Sinaj, S</au><au>McLenaghen, R.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phosphorus availability in soils amended with different phosphate fertilizers</atitle><jtitle>Communications in soil science and plant analysis</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>25-39</pages><issn>0010-3624</issn><eissn>1532-2416</eissn><coden>CSOSA2</coden><abstract>Accurate measurement and characterization of phosphate rock dissolution are important for a better understanding of phosphorus (P) availability in soils. An incubation study was carried out on two New Zealand topsoils (0-15 cm; high P buffering capacity Craigieburn and low P buffering capacity Templeton) amended with North Carolina phosphate rock (NCPR) and water-soluble phosphate (WSP) at 218 mg P kg(-1) (equivalent to 60 kg P ha(-1)). Isotopic exchange kinetics was carried out after 12 h and 28 days of incubation to characterize P availability. This study showed that sensitivity of capacity factors (r1/R, n) to explain changes in E1min values was affected by the P buffering capacity of the soils. The recovery of applied P in the E pool (Rec(inE)%) with extended incubation time was similar from the NCPR and WSP treatments (3.1-3.3%) in the Craigieburn soil compared with the Templeton soil in which Rec(inE)% values were greater in WSP (9%) than NCPR (1.3%) treatment. The higher values of P derived from the applied P fertilizers in the E pool (Pdff(inE)%&gt;80%) suggested that the NCPR application in both soils would be efficient for increasing P availability to plants.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00103620500403572</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-3624
ispartof Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2006-02, Vol.37 (1-2), p.25-39
issn 0010-3624
1532-2416
language eng
recordid cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_00103620500403572
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
buffering capacity
fertilizer application
fertilizer requirements
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
isotopic exchange kinetics
kinetics
Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations
nutrient availability
phosphates
phosphorus
reactive phosphate rock
rock phosphate
soil fertility
Soil science
soil treatment
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments
topsoil
water solubility
water-soluble phosphorus
title Phosphorus availability in soils amended with different phosphate fertilizers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A31%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phosphorus%20availability%20in%20soils%20amended%20with%20different%20phosphate%20fertilizers&rft.jtitle=Communications%20in%20soil%20science%20and%20plant%20analysis&rft.au=Randhawa,%20P.S&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=25-39&rft.issn=0010-3624&rft.eissn=1532-2416&rft.coden=CSOSA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00103620500403572&rft_dat=%3Cfao_infor%3EUS201301074732%3C/fao_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9940fc567e56ecf92f4d7432537f1b693595384c1922050241cb965e7d5af9f53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true