Loading…
The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items
Whereas early studies have found moderately high agreement between self- and observer-rated scores on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), these studies shared a common confound in that participants were aware of being directly observed. In the present study, confede...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis 2005-07, Vol.53 (3), p.306-320 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453 |
container_end_page | 320 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 306 |
container_title | International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | YOUNGER, JARRED KEMMERER, DAVID D. WINKEL, JUSTIN D. NASH, MICHAEL R. |
description | Whereas early studies have found moderately high agreement between self- and observer-rated scores on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), these studies shared a common confound in that participants were aware of being directly observed. In the present study, confederates made surreptitious observations of group participants' hypnotic responding. Following the hypnotic procedure, participants indicated whether or not they remembered each item and provided self-reports of their hypnotic response. The study assesses the accuracy of participant self-report for hypnosis items when individuals are unaware of being observed. Thirty-two percent of participants failed to recognize at least one item from the hypnosis session, suggesting that the inability to remember items is a common phenomenon. When participants reported not remembering an item, the accuracy of their self-reported response was no better than chance.
We wish to thank Krista Moe for her help in editing and preparing this manuscript. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00207140590961411 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_00207140590961411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>771705388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBPtFTYBw7mRhxqaq2W6moUrecLccfIiiJg-0A-ffNalfiUKmc5jDP-2g0LyHvGXxi0MBngBKQCagkyJoJxl6QDUMhioo1_CXZ7PfFCogT8ialnwCAjWxekxNWA9Z1jRtiH344utXxt46WXscwT3RndO9o8HS7TGPInaG7ORk35a7t-i4vX-i5MXPUZtlDO9f74t5NIWaqR0vz6vvmhhAX6kOkN9kN6S155XWf3LvjPCXfry4fLrbF7d31zcX5bWEEL3PhwDhpS6slNCWT2ILmnFWy5iiNL1vPdW3QiNYz4QBLwSV6Jp2tWsu1qPgpOTt4pxh-zS5lNXTr5X2vRxfmpBAZQsWbZiU_PkvWjRCIFa4gO4AmhpSi82qK3aDjohiofQnqSQlr5sNRPreDs_8Sx6-vwNcD0I3rjwb9J8TeqqyXPkQf9Wi6pPhzfvxv_ElK5b-ZPwKqlqYv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68447757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>YOUNGER, JARRED ; KEMMERER, DAVID D. ; WINKEL, JUSTIN D. ; NASH, MICHAEL R.</creator><creatorcontrib>YOUNGER, JARRED ; KEMMERER, DAVID D. ; WINKEL, JUSTIN D. ; NASH, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><description>Whereas early studies have found moderately high agreement between self- and observer-rated scores on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), these studies shared a common confound in that participants were aware of being directly observed. In the present study, confederates made surreptitious observations of group participants' hypnotic responding. Following the hypnotic procedure, participants indicated whether or not they remembered each item and provided self-reports of their hypnotic response. The study assesses the accuracy of participant self-report for hypnosis items when individuals are unaware of being observed. Thirty-two percent of participants failed to recognize at least one item from the hypnosis session, suggesting that the inability to remember items is a common phenomenon. When participants reported not remembering an item, the accuracy of their self-reported response was no better than chance.
We wish to thank Krista Moe for her help in editing and preparing this manuscript.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5183</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00207140590961411</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16076667</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention ; Awareness ; Deception ; Female ; Group Processes ; Humans ; Hypnosis ; Individuality ; Male ; Mental Recall ; Observer Variation ; Peer Group ; Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data ; Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data ; Self Concept ; Suggestion</subject><ispartof>International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis, 2005-07, Vol.53 (3), p.306-320</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16076667$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>YOUNGER, JARRED</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEMMERER, DAVID D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINKEL, JUSTIN D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NASH, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items</title><title>International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis</title><addtitle>Int J Clin Exp Hypn</addtitle><description>Whereas early studies have found moderately high agreement between self- and observer-rated scores on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), these studies shared a common confound in that participants were aware of being directly observed. In the present study, confederates made surreptitious observations of group participants' hypnotic responding. Following the hypnotic procedure, participants indicated whether or not they remembered each item and provided self-reports of their hypnotic response. The study assesses the accuracy of participant self-report for hypnosis items when individuals are unaware of being observed. Thirty-two percent of participants failed to recognize at least one item from the hypnosis session, suggesting that the inability to remember items is a common phenomenon. When participants reported not remembering an item, the accuracy of their self-reported response was no better than chance.
We wish to thank Krista Moe for her help in editing and preparing this manuscript.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Deception</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Group Processes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnosis</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Suggestion</subject><issn>0020-7144</issn><issn>1744-5183</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBPtFTYBw7mRhxqaq2W6moUrecLccfIiiJg-0A-ffNalfiUKmc5jDP-2g0LyHvGXxi0MBngBKQCagkyJoJxl6QDUMhioo1_CXZ7PfFCogT8ialnwCAjWxekxNWA9Z1jRtiH344utXxt46WXscwT3RndO9o8HS7TGPInaG7ORk35a7t-i4vX-i5MXPUZtlDO9f74t5NIWaqR0vz6vvmhhAX6kOkN9kN6S155XWf3LvjPCXfry4fLrbF7d31zcX5bWEEL3PhwDhpS6slNCWT2ILmnFWy5iiNL1vPdW3QiNYz4QBLwSV6Jp2tWsu1qPgpOTt4pxh-zS5lNXTr5X2vRxfmpBAZQsWbZiU_PkvWjRCIFa4gO4AmhpSi82qK3aDjohiofQnqSQlr5sNRPreDs_8Sx6-vwNcD0I3rjwb9J8TeqqyXPkQf9Wi6pPhzfvxv_ElK5b-ZPwKqlqYv</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>YOUNGER, JARRED</creator><creator>KEMMERER, DAVID D.</creator><creator>WINKEL, JUSTIN D.</creator><creator>NASH, MICHAEL R.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items</title><author>YOUNGER, JARRED ; KEMMERER, DAVID D. ; WINKEL, JUSTIN D. ; NASH, MICHAEL R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Deception</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Group Processes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnosis</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Suggestion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>YOUNGER, JARRED</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEMMERER, DAVID D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINKEL, JUSTIN D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NASH, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>YOUNGER, JARRED</au><au>KEMMERER, DAVID D.</au><au>WINKEL, JUSTIN D.</au><au>NASH, MICHAEL R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items</atitle><jtitle>International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Clin Exp Hypn</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>306-320</pages><issn>0020-7144</issn><eissn>1744-5183</eissn><abstract>Whereas early studies have found moderately high agreement between self- and observer-rated scores on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), these studies shared a common confound in that participants were aware of being directly observed. In the present study, confederates made surreptitious observations of group participants' hypnotic responding. Following the hypnotic procedure, participants indicated whether or not they remembered each item and provided self-reports of their hypnotic response. The study assesses the accuracy of participant self-report for hypnosis items when individuals are unaware of being observed. Thirty-two percent of participants failed to recognize at least one item from the hypnosis session, suggesting that the inability to remember items is a common phenomenon. When participants reported not remembering an item, the accuracy of their self-reported response was no better than chance.
We wish to thank Krista Moe for her help in editing and preparing this manuscript.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>16076667</pmid><doi>10.1080/00207140590961411</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7144 |
ispartof | International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis, 2005-07, Vol.53 (3), p.306-320 |
issn | 0020-7144 1744-5183 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_00207140590961411 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Attention Awareness Deception Female Group Processes Humans Hypnosis Individuality Male Mental Recall Observer Variation Peer Group Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data Self Concept Suggestion |
title | The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T21%3A08%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Harvard%20Group%20Scale%20of%20Hypnotic%20Susceptibility:%20Accuracy%20of%20Self-Report%20and%20the%20Memory%20for%20Items&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20hypnosis&rft.au=YOUNGER,%20JARRED&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=306-320&rft.issn=0020-7144&rft.eissn=1744-5183&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00207140590961411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E771705388%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68447757&rft_id=info:pmid/16076667&rfr_iscdi=true |