Loading…

The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items

Whereas early studies have found moderately high agreement between self- and observer-rated scores on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), these studies shared a common confound in that participants were aware of being directly observed. In the present study, confede...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis 2005-07, Vol.53 (3), p.306-320
Main Authors: YOUNGER, JARRED, KEMMERER, DAVID D., WINKEL, JUSTIN D., NASH, MICHAEL R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453
container_end_page 320
container_issue 3
container_start_page 306
container_title International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis
container_volume 53
creator YOUNGER, JARRED
KEMMERER, DAVID D.
WINKEL, JUSTIN D.
NASH, MICHAEL R.
description Whereas early studies have found moderately high agreement between self- and observer-rated scores on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), these studies shared a common confound in that participants were aware of being directly observed. In the present study, confederates made surreptitious observations of group participants' hypnotic responding. Following the hypnotic procedure, participants indicated whether or not they remembered each item and provided self-reports of their hypnotic response. The study assesses the accuracy of participant self-report for hypnosis items when individuals are unaware of being observed. Thirty-two percent of participants failed to recognize at least one item from the hypnosis session, suggesting that the inability to remember items is a common phenomenon. When participants reported not remembering an item, the accuracy of their self-reported response was no better than chance. We wish to thank Krista Moe for her help in editing and preparing this manuscript.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00207140590961411
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_00207140590961411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>771705388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBPtFTYBw7mRhxqaq2W6moUrecLccfIiiJg-0A-ffNalfiUKmc5jDP-2g0LyHvGXxi0MBngBKQCagkyJoJxl6QDUMhioo1_CXZ7PfFCogT8ialnwCAjWxekxNWA9Z1jRtiH344utXxt46WXscwT3RndO9o8HS7TGPInaG7ORk35a7t-i4vX-i5MXPUZtlDO9f74t5NIWaqR0vz6vvmhhAX6kOkN9kN6S155XWf3LvjPCXfry4fLrbF7d31zcX5bWEEL3PhwDhpS6slNCWT2ILmnFWy5iiNL1vPdW3QiNYz4QBLwSV6Jp2tWsu1qPgpOTt4pxh-zS5lNXTr5X2vRxfmpBAZQsWbZiU_PkvWjRCIFa4gO4AmhpSi82qK3aDjohiofQnqSQlr5sNRPreDs_8Sx6-vwNcD0I3rjwb9J8TeqqyXPkQf9Wi6pPhzfvxv_ElK5b-ZPwKqlqYv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68447757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>YOUNGER, JARRED ; KEMMERER, DAVID D. ; WINKEL, JUSTIN D. ; NASH, MICHAEL R.</creator><creatorcontrib>YOUNGER, JARRED ; KEMMERER, DAVID D. ; WINKEL, JUSTIN D. ; NASH, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><description>Whereas early studies have found moderately high agreement between self- and observer-rated scores on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), these studies shared a common confound in that participants were aware of being directly observed. In the present study, confederates made surreptitious observations of group participants' hypnotic responding. Following the hypnotic procedure, participants indicated whether or not they remembered each item and provided self-reports of their hypnotic response. The study assesses the accuracy of participant self-report for hypnosis items when individuals are unaware of being observed. Thirty-two percent of participants failed to recognize at least one item from the hypnosis session, suggesting that the inability to remember items is a common phenomenon. When participants reported not remembering an item, the accuracy of their self-reported response was no better than chance. We wish to thank Krista Moe for her help in editing and preparing this manuscript.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5183</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00207140590961411</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16076667</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention ; Awareness ; Deception ; Female ; Group Processes ; Humans ; Hypnosis ; Individuality ; Male ; Mental Recall ; Observer Variation ; Peer Group ; Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Self Concept ; Suggestion</subject><ispartof>International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis, 2005-07, Vol.53 (3), p.306-320</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16076667$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>YOUNGER, JARRED</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEMMERER, DAVID D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINKEL, JUSTIN D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NASH, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items</title><title>International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis</title><addtitle>Int J Clin Exp Hypn</addtitle><description>Whereas early studies have found moderately high agreement between self- and observer-rated scores on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), these studies shared a common confound in that participants were aware of being directly observed. In the present study, confederates made surreptitious observations of group participants' hypnotic responding. Following the hypnotic procedure, participants indicated whether or not they remembered each item and provided self-reports of their hypnotic response. The study assesses the accuracy of participant self-report for hypnosis items when individuals are unaware of being observed. Thirty-two percent of participants failed to recognize at least one item from the hypnosis session, suggesting that the inability to remember items is a common phenomenon. When participants reported not remembering an item, the accuracy of their self-reported response was no better than chance. We wish to thank Krista Moe for her help in editing and preparing this manuscript.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Deception</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Group Processes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnosis</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Suggestion</subject><issn>0020-7144</issn><issn>1744-5183</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBPtFTYBw7mRhxqaq2W6moUrecLccfIiiJg-0A-ffNalfiUKmc5jDP-2g0LyHvGXxi0MBngBKQCagkyJoJxl6QDUMhioo1_CXZ7PfFCogT8ialnwCAjWxekxNWA9Z1jRtiH344utXxt46WXscwT3RndO9o8HS7TGPInaG7ORk35a7t-i4vX-i5MXPUZtlDO9f74t5NIWaqR0vz6vvmhhAX6kOkN9kN6S155XWf3LvjPCXfry4fLrbF7d31zcX5bWEEL3PhwDhpS6slNCWT2ILmnFWy5iiNL1vPdW3QiNYz4QBLwSV6Jp2tWsu1qPgpOTt4pxh-zS5lNXTr5X2vRxfmpBAZQsWbZiU_PkvWjRCIFa4gO4AmhpSi82qK3aDjohiofQnqSQlr5sNRPreDs_8Sx6-vwNcD0I3rjwb9J8TeqqyXPkQf9Wi6pPhzfvxv_ElK5b-ZPwKqlqYv</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>YOUNGER, JARRED</creator><creator>KEMMERER, DAVID D.</creator><creator>WINKEL, JUSTIN D.</creator><creator>NASH, MICHAEL R.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items</title><author>YOUNGER, JARRED ; KEMMERER, DAVID D. ; WINKEL, JUSTIN D. ; NASH, MICHAEL R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Deception</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Group Processes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnosis</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Suggestion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>YOUNGER, JARRED</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEMMERER, DAVID D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINKEL, JUSTIN D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NASH, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>YOUNGER, JARRED</au><au>KEMMERER, DAVID D.</au><au>WINKEL, JUSTIN D.</au><au>NASH, MICHAEL R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items</atitle><jtitle>International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Clin Exp Hypn</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>306-320</pages><issn>0020-7144</issn><eissn>1744-5183</eissn><abstract>Whereas early studies have found moderately high agreement between self- and observer-rated scores on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), these studies shared a common confound in that participants were aware of being directly observed. In the present study, confederates made surreptitious observations of group participants' hypnotic responding. Following the hypnotic procedure, participants indicated whether or not they remembered each item and provided self-reports of their hypnotic response. The study assesses the accuracy of participant self-report for hypnosis items when individuals are unaware of being observed. Thirty-two percent of participants failed to recognize at least one item from the hypnosis session, suggesting that the inability to remember items is a common phenomenon. When participants reported not remembering an item, the accuracy of their self-reported response was no better than chance. We wish to thank Krista Moe for her help in editing and preparing this manuscript.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><pmid>16076667</pmid><doi>10.1080/00207140590961411</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7144
ispartof International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis, 2005-07, Vol.53 (3), p.306-320
issn 0020-7144
1744-5183
language eng
recordid cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_00207140590961411
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Attention
Awareness
Deception
Female
Group Processes
Humans
Hypnosis
Individuality
Male
Mental Recall
Observer Variation
Peer Group
Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data
Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data
Self Concept
Suggestion
title The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Accuracy of Self-Report and the Memory for Items
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T21%3A08%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Harvard%20Group%20Scale%20of%20Hypnotic%20Susceptibility:%20Accuracy%20of%20Self-Report%20and%20the%20Memory%20for%20Items&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20hypnosis&rft.au=YOUNGER,%20JARRED&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=306-320&rft.issn=0020-7144&rft.eissn=1744-5183&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00207140590961411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E771705388%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e0ce9d2da9082197b0a331596379cf2bf3a6c7c4bf14e0724397f19ed5bd3a453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68447757&rft_id=info:pmid/16076667&rfr_iscdi=true