Loading…
Information Literacy Successes Compared: Online vs. Face to Face
This paper compares the results of a comprehensive exam taken by undergraduates enrolled in face-to-face and online sections of a three-credit course in information literacy. Authors discuss choosing, adapting, and implementing the comprehensive exam. Questions are mapped to the ACRL Competency Stan...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of library administration 2008-01, Vol.48 (3-4), p.379-389 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-849d75b46172847b80ef01a10db8078a97c17f6fd2601febb0c891ba3cb0a7663 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 389 |
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 379 |
container_title | Journal of library administration |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Burkhardt, Joanna M. Kinnie, Jim Cournoyer, Carina M. |
description | This paper compares the results of a comprehensive exam taken by undergraduates enrolled in face-to-face and online sections of a three-credit course in information literacy. Authors discuss choosing, adapting, and implementing the comprehensive exam. Questions are mapped to the ACRL Competency Standards for Information Literacy for Higher Education to assess the effectiveness of the course. Preliminary results indicate that online students performed slightly better than their face-to-face counterparts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01930820802289425 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_01930820802289425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57678469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-849d75b46172847b80ef01a10db8078a97c17f6fd2601febb0c891ba3cb0a7663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNte9LY1X5sP8aAUq4VCD-o5ZLMJrOxuapKq_fdu3epFsKcZmOeZGV4AzhGcICjgFUSSQIH7FmMhKS4OwAgVFOakYPQQjLbzvAfYMTiJ8RVCJChFI3A775wPrU6177JFnWzQZpM9rY2xMdqYTX270sFW19mya-rOZu9xks20sVny3_UUHDndRHu2q2PwMrt_nj7mi-XDfHq3yA0lIuWCyooXJWWIY0F5KaB1EGkEq77lQktuEHfMVZhB5GxZQiMkKjUxJdScMTIGl8PeVfBvaxuTautobNPozvp1VAVnXFAm94KkkAwViPcgGkATfIzBOrUKdavDRiGotqGqP6H2zsVuuY5GNy7oztTxV8RQUsrw9tubgauHeD98aCqV9Kbx4Uci_53he_U_lkqfiXwBcAKZzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>35961517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Information Literacy Successes Compared: Online vs. Face to Face</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Burkhardt, Joanna M. ; Kinnie, Jim ; Cournoyer, Carina M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burkhardt, Joanna M. ; Kinnie, Jim ; Cournoyer, Carina M.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper compares the results of a comprehensive exam taken by undergraduates enrolled in face-to-face and online sections of a three-credit course in information literacy. Authors discuss choosing, adapting, and implementing the comprehensive exam. Questions are mapped to the ACRL Competency Standards for Information Literacy for Higher Education to assess the effectiveness of the course. Preliminary results indicate that online students performed slightly better than their face-to-face counterparts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0193-0826</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-3564</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01930820802289425</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLADEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Binghamton, NY: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>ACRL ; assesment ; Competencies ; competency standards ; Distance learning ; Exact sciences and technology ; face-to-face teaching ; Information and communication sciences ; Information literacy ; Information science. Documentation ; Library and information science. General aspects ; online teaching ; Professional aspects ; Professional aspects : training, employment ; Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><ispartof>Journal of library administration, 2008-01, Vol.48 (3-4), p.379-389</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2008</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-849d75b46172847b80ef01a10db8078a97c17f6fd2601febb0c891ba3cb0a7663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,34136</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20944626$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burkhardt, Joanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinnie, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cournoyer, Carina M.</creatorcontrib><title>Information Literacy Successes Compared: Online vs. Face to Face</title><title>Journal of library administration</title><description>This paper compares the results of a comprehensive exam taken by undergraduates enrolled in face-to-face and online sections of a three-credit course in information literacy. Authors discuss choosing, adapting, and implementing the comprehensive exam. Questions are mapped to the ACRL Competency Standards for Information Literacy for Higher Education to assess the effectiveness of the course. Preliminary results indicate that online students performed slightly better than their face-to-face counterparts.</description><subject>ACRL</subject><subject>assesment</subject><subject>Competencies</subject><subject>competency standards</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>face-to-face teaching</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information literacy</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Library and information science. General aspects</subject><subject>online teaching</subject><subject>Professional aspects</subject><subject>Professional aspects : training, employment</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><issn>0193-0826</issn><issn>1540-3564</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNte9LY1X5sP8aAUq4VCD-o5ZLMJrOxuapKq_fdu3epFsKcZmOeZGV4AzhGcICjgFUSSQIH7FmMhKS4OwAgVFOakYPQQjLbzvAfYMTiJ8RVCJChFI3A775wPrU6177JFnWzQZpM9rY2xMdqYTX270sFW19mya-rOZu9xks20sVny3_UUHDndRHu2q2PwMrt_nj7mi-XDfHq3yA0lIuWCyooXJWWIY0F5KaB1EGkEq77lQktuEHfMVZhB5GxZQiMkKjUxJdScMTIGl8PeVfBvaxuTautobNPozvp1VAVnXFAm94KkkAwViPcgGkATfIzBOrUKdavDRiGotqGqP6H2zsVuuY5GNy7oztTxV8RQUsrw9tubgauHeD98aCqV9Kbx4Uci_53he_U_lkqfiXwBcAKZzg</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Burkhardt, Joanna M.</creator><creator>Kinnie, Jim</creator><creator>Cournoyer, Carina M.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Haworth Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Information Literacy Successes Compared: Online vs. Face to Face</title><author>Burkhardt, Joanna M. ; Kinnie, Jim ; Cournoyer, Carina M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-849d75b46172847b80ef01a10db8078a97c17f6fd2601febb0c891ba3cb0a7663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>ACRL</topic><topic>assesment</topic><topic>Competencies</topic><topic>competency standards</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>face-to-face teaching</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information literacy</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Library and information science. General aspects</topic><topic>online teaching</topic><topic>Professional aspects</topic><topic>Professional aspects : training, employment</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burkhardt, Joanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinnie, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cournoyer, Carina M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of library administration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burkhardt, Joanna M.</au><au>Kinnie, Jim</au><au>Cournoyer, Carina M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Information Literacy Successes Compared: Online vs. Face to Face</atitle><jtitle>Journal of library administration</jtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>379-389</pages><issn>0193-0826</issn><eissn>1540-3564</eissn><coden>JLADEL</coden><abstract>This paper compares the results of a comprehensive exam taken by undergraduates enrolled in face-to-face and online sections of a three-credit course in information literacy. Authors discuss choosing, adapting, and implementing the comprehensive exam. Questions are mapped to the ACRL Competency Standards for Information Literacy for Higher Education to assess the effectiveness of the course. Preliminary results indicate that online students performed slightly better than their face-to-face counterparts.</abstract><cop>Binghamton, NY</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/01930820802289425</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0193-0826 |
ispartof | Journal of library administration, 2008-01, Vol.48 (3-4), p.379-389 |
issn | 0193-0826 1540-3564 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_01930820802289425 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | ACRL assesment Competencies competency standards Distance learning Exact sciences and technology face-to-face teaching Information and communication sciences Information literacy Information science. Documentation Library and information science. General aspects online teaching Professional aspects Professional aspects : training, employment Sciences and techniques of general use |
title | Information Literacy Successes Compared: Online vs. Face to Face |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A24%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Information%20Literacy%20Successes%20Compared:%20Online%20vs.%20Face%20to%20Face&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20library%20administration&rft.au=Burkhardt,%20Joanna%20M.&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=379-389&rft.issn=0193-0826&rft.eissn=1540-3564&rft.coden=JLADEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01930820802289425&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E57678469%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-849d75b46172847b80ef01a10db8078a97c17f6fd2601febb0c891ba3cb0a7663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=35961517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |