Loading…

Intention in motor learning through observation

The purpose of this experiment was to assess whether learning an action through observation is enhanced by the intention to reproduce the observed behaviour. Two groups of participants observed a model practise a timing task and performed a 24-hour delayed retention test. Participants in the first g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2006-02, Vol.59 (2), p.377-386
Main Authors: Badets, Arnaud, Blandin, Yannick, Shea, Charles H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3
container_end_page 386
container_issue 2
container_start_page 377
container_title Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
container_volume 59
creator Badets, Arnaud
Blandin, Yannick
Shea, Charles H.
description The purpose of this experiment was to assess whether learning an action through observation is enhanced by the intention to reproduce the observed behaviour. Two groups of participants observed a model practise a timing task and performed a 24-hour delayed retention test. Participants in the first group of observers were explicitly instructed that they would be required to execute the timing task that they had observed as accurately as possible during the delayed retention test. Observers in the second group were instructed that they would be required to describe as accurately as possible the behaviour that they had observed. A control group of participants, who did not observe the model, was also administered the delayed retention test. The results of the retention test indicated that absolute timing (parameterization) was learned by the observers to the same extent with or without intention to reproduce the task. Indeed, on the retention test absolute timing for the two groups of observers was as effective as that for the models. However, observing with an intention to reproduce the task was beneficial for learning the movement's relative timing structure. Results are discussed with respect to a potential mechanism by which intention enhances observation.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02724980443000773
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_02724980443000773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_02724980443000773</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67871027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtP3DAUhS3UCijtD-imyqZILAauH_FNJDYIlYI0Ujft2rqT2DNBiQ22w-PfN6NMYYHarmxZ33eOdRj7zOGUQwVnIFCougKlJAAgyj12yFHhAoTQ717uvDpgH1K6BVASNe6zA641r7SCQ3Z247P1uQu-6HwxhBxi0VuKvvPrIm9iGNebIqySjQ-0pT6y9476ZD_tziP26-rbz8vrxfLH95vLi-WiKXWdF7JSgC2WiNqtWilgRSRVS612pagFKbJCKmldLYErKXRrhSZLjarc9C8nj9jJnLuh3tzFbqD4bAJ15vpiabZvACVUSuEDn9jjmb2L4X60KZuhS43te_I2jMlorJBPW00gn8EmhpSidS_JHMx2UfNm0cn5sgsfV4NtX43dhBPwdQdQaqh3kXzTpVcOy7qscVt-OnOJ1tbchjH6acB_NuMsdN6FONBjiH1rMj33If5peWOZ_JQn8_y_pvx78W_98q4Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67871027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intention in motor learning through observation</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Badets, Arnaud ; Blandin, Yannick ; Shea, Charles H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Badets, Arnaud ; Blandin, Yannick ; Shea, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this experiment was to assess whether learning an action through observation is enhanced by the intention to reproduce the observed behaviour. Two groups of participants observed a model practise a timing task and performed a 24-hour delayed retention test. Participants in the first group of observers were explicitly instructed that they would be required to execute the timing task that they had observed as accurately as possible during the delayed retention test. Observers in the second group were instructed that they would be required to describe as accurately as possible the behaviour that they had observed. A control group of participants, who did not observe the model, was also administered the delayed retention test. The results of the retention test indicated that absolute timing (parameterization) was learned by the observers to the same extent with or without intention to reproduce the task. Indeed, on the retention test absolute timing for the two groups of observers was as effective as that for the models. However, observing with an intention to reproduce the task was beneficial for learning the movement's relative timing structure. Results are discussed with respect to a potential mechanism by which intention enhances observation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000773</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16618640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Psychology Press</publisher><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Imitative Behavior ; Intention ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Motivation ; Neurons and Cognition ; Practice (Psychology) ; Psychology and behavior ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor activities ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Retention (Psychology) ; Serial Learning ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2006-02, Vol.59 (2), p.377-386</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2006</rights><rights>2006 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1773-4409</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17595977$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16618640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00508447$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badets, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blandin, Yannick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><title>Intention in motor learning through observation</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>The purpose of this experiment was to assess whether learning an action through observation is enhanced by the intention to reproduce the observed behaviour. Two groups of participants observed a model practise a timing task and performed a 24-hour delayed retention test. Participants in the first group of observers were explicitly instructed that they would be required to execute the timing task that they had observed as accurately as possible during the delayed retention test. Observers in the second group were instructed that they would be required to describe as accurately as possible the behaviour that they had observed. A control group of participants, who did not observe the model, was also administered the delayed retention test. The results of the retention test indicated that absolute timing (parameterization) was learned by the observers to the same extent with or without intention to reproduce the task. Indeed, on the retention test absolute timing for the two groups of observers was as effective as that for the models. However, observing with an intention to reproduce the task was beneficial for learning the movement's relative timing structure. Results are discussed with respect to a potential mechanism by which intention enhances observation.</description><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imitative Behavior</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Neurons and Cognition</subject><subject>Practice (Psychology)</subject><subject>Psychology and behavior</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor activities</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Serial Learning</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtP3DAUhS3UCijtD-imyqZILAauH_FNJDYIlYI0Ujft2rqT2DNBiQ22w-PfN6NMYYHarmxZ33eOdRj7zOGUQwVnIFCougKlJAAgyj12yFHhAoTQ717uvDpgH1K6BVASNe6zA641r7SCQ3Z247P1uQu-6HwxhBxi0VuKvvPrIm9iGNebIqySjQ-0pT6y9476ZD_tziP26-rbz8vrxfLH95vLi-WiKXWdF7JSgC2WiNqtWilgRSRVS612pagFKbJCKmldLYErKXRrhSZLjarc9C8nj9jJnLuh3tzFbqD4bAJ15vpiabZvACVUSuEDn9jjmb2L4X60KZuhS43te_I2jMlorJBPW00gn8EmhpSidS_JHMx2UfNm0cn5sgsfV4NtX43dhBPwdQdQaqh3kXzTpVcOy7qscVt-OnOJ1tbchjH6acB_NuMsdN6FONBjiH1rMj33If5peWOZ_JQn8_y_pvx78W_98q4Z</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Badets, Arnaud</creator><creator>Blandin, Yannick</creator><creator>Shea, Charles H.</creator><general>Psychology Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Psychology press</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis (Routledge)</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1773-4409</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Intention in motor learning through observation</title><author>Badets, Arnaud ; Blandin, Yannick ; Shea, Charles H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imitative Behavior</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Neurons and Cognition</topic><topic>Practice (Psychology)</topic><topic>Psychology and behavior</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor activities</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Serial Learning</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badets, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blandin, Yannick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badets, Arnaud</au><au>Blandin, Yannick</au><au>Shea, Charles H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intention in motor learning through observation</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>377-386</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this experiment was to assess whether learning an action through observation is enhanced by the intention to reproduce the observed behaviour. Two groups of participants observed a model practise a timing task and performed a 24-hour delayed retention test. Participants in the first group of observers were explicitly instructed that they would be required to execute the timing task that they had observed as accurately as possible during the delayed retention test. Observers in the second group were instructed that they would be required to describe as accurately as possible the behaviour that they had observed. A control group of participants, who did not observe the model, was also administered the delayed retention test. The results of the retention test indicated that absolute timing (parameterization) was learned by the observers to the same extent with or without intention to reproduce the task. Indeed, on the retention test absolute timing for the two groups of observers was as effective as that for the models. However, observing with an intention to reproduce the task was beneficial for learning the movement's relative timing structure. Results are discussed with respect to a potential mechanism by which intention enhances observation.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Psychology Press</pub><pmid>16618640</pmid><doi>10.1080/02724980443000773</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1773-4409</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-0218
ispartof Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2006-02, Vol.59 (2), p.377-386
issn 1747-0218
1747-0226
language eng
recordid cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_02724980443000773
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Activity levels. Psychomotricity
Adolescent
Adult
Attention
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Imitative Behavior
Intention
Life Sciences
Male
Motivation
Neurons and Cognition
Practice (Psychology)
Psychology and behavior
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychomotor activities
Psychomotor Performance
Reaction Time
Retention (Psychology)
Serial Learning
Visual Perception
title Intention in motor learning through observation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A18%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intention%20in%20motor%20learning%20through%20observation&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Badets,%20Arnaud&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=377-386&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02724980443000773&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E67871027%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67871027&rft_id=info:pmid/16618640&rft_sage_id=10.1080_02724980443000773&rfr_iscdi=true