Loading…
Intention in motor learning through observation
The purpose of this experiment was to assess whether learning an action through observation is enhanced by the intention to reproduce the observed behaviour. Two groups of participants observed a model practise a timing task and performed a 24-hour delayed retention test. Participants in the first g...
Saved in:
Published in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2006-02, Vol.59 (2), p.377-386 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3 |
container_end_page | 386 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 377 |
container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Badets, Arnaud Blandin, Yannick Shea, Charles H. |
description | The purpose of this experiment was to assess whether learning an action through observation is enhanced by the intention to reproduce the observed behaviour. Two groups of participants observed a model practise a timing task and performed a 24-hour delayed retention test. Participants in the first group of observers were explicitly instructed that they would be required to execute the timing task that they had observed as accurately as possible during the delayed retention test. Observers in the second group were instructed that they would be required to describe as accurately as possible the behaviour that they had observed. A control group of participants, who did not observe the model, was also administered the delayed retention test. The results of the retention test indicated that absolute timing (parameterization) was learned by the observers to the same extent with or without intention to reproduce the task. Indeed, on the retention test absolute timing for the two groups of observers was as effective as that for the models. However, observing with an intention to reproduce the task was beneficial for learning the movement's relative timing structure. Results are discussed with respect to a potential mechanism by which intention enhances observation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02724980443000773 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_02724980443000773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_02724980443000773</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67871027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtP3DAUhS3UCijtD-imyqZILAauH_FNJDYIlYI0Ujft2rqT2DNBiQ22w-PfN6NMYYHarmxZ33eOdRj7zOGUQwVnIFCougKlJAAgyj12yFHhAoTQ717uvDpgH1K6BVASNe6zA641r7SCQ3Z247P1uQu-6HwxhBxi0VuKvvPrIm9iGNebIqySjQ-0pT6y9476ZD_tziP26-rbz8vrxfLH95vLi-WiKXWdF7JSgC2WiNqtWilgRSRVS612pagFKbJCKmldLYErKXRrhSZLjarc9C8nj9jJnLuh3tzFbqD4bAJ15vpiabZvACVUSuEDn9jjmb2L4X60KZuhS43te_I2jMlorJBPW00gn8EmhpSidS_JHMx2UfNm0cn5sgsfV4NtX43dhBPwdQdQaqh3kXzTpVcOy7qscVt-OnOJ1tbchjH6acB_NuMsdN6FONBjiH1rMj33If5peWOZ_JQn8_y_pvx78W_98q4Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67871027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intention in motor learning through observation</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Badets, Arnaud ; Blandin, Yannick ; Shea, Charles H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Badets, Arnaud ; Blandin, Yannick ; Shea, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this experiment was to assess whether learning an action through observation is enhanced by the intention to reproduce the observed behaviour. Two groups of participants observed a model practise a timing task and performed a 24-hour delayed retention test. Participants in the first group of observers were explicitly instructed that they would be required to execute the timing task that they had observed as accurately as possible during the delayed retention test. Observers in the second group were instructed that they would be required to describe as accurately as possible the behaviour that they had observed. A control group of participants, who did not observe the model, was also administered the delayed retention test. The results of the retention test indicated that absolute timing (parameterization) was learned by the observers to the same extent with or without intention to reproduce the task. Indeed, on the retention test absolute timing for the two groups of observers was as effective as that for the models. However, observing with an intention to reproduce the task was beneficial for learning the movement's relative timing structure. Results are discussed with respect to a potential mechanism by which intention enhances observation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000773</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16618640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Psychology Press</publisher><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Imitative Behavior ; Intention ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Motivation ; Neurons and Cognition ; Practice (Psychology) ; Psychology and behavior ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor activities ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Retention (Psychology) ; Serial Learning ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2006-02, Vol.59 (2), p.377-386</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2006</rights><rights>2006 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1773-4409</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17595977$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16618640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00508447$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badets, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blandin, Yannick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><title>Intention in motor learning through observation</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>The purpose of this experiment was to assess whether learning an action through observation is enhanced by the intention to reproduce the observed behaviour. Two groups of participants observed a model practise a timing task and performed a 24-hour delayed retention test. Participants in the first group of observers were explicitly instructed that they would be required to execute the timing task that they had observed as accurately as possible during the delayed retention test. Observers in the second group were instructed that they would be required to describe as accurately as possible the behaviour that they had observed. A control group of participants, who did not observe the model, was also administered the delayed retention test. The results of the retention test indicated that absolute timing (parameterization) was learned by the observers to the same extent with or without intention to reproduce the task. Indeed, on the retention test absolute timing for the two groups of observers was as effective as that for the models. However, observing with an intention to reproduce the task was beneficial for learning the movement's relative timing structure. Results are discussed with respect to a potential mechanism by which intention enhances observation.</description><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imitative Behavior</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Neurons and Cognition</subject><subject>Practice (Psychology)</subject><subject>Psychology and behavior</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor activities</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Serial Learning</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtP3DAUhS3UCijtD-imyqZILAauH_FNJDYIlYI0Ujft2rqT2DNBiQ22w-PfN6NMYYHarmxZ33eOdRj7zOGUQwVnIFCougKlJAAgyj12yFHhAoTQ717uvDpgH1K6BVASNe6zA641r7SCQ3Z247P1uQu-6HwxhBxi0VuKvvPrIm9iGNebIqySjQ-0pT6y9476ZD_tziP26-rbz8vrxfLH95vLi-WiKXWdF7JSgC2WiNqtWilgRSRVS612pagFKbJCKmldLYErKXRrhSZLjarc9C8nj9jJnLuh3tzFbqD4bAJ15vpiabZvACVUSuEDn9jjmb2L4X60KZuhS43te_I2jMlorJBPW00gn8EmhpSidS_JHMx2UfNm0cn5sgsfV4NtX43dhBPwdQdQaqh3kXzTpVcOy7qscVt-OnOJ1tbchjH6acB_NuMsdN6FONBjiH1rMj33If5peWOZ_JQn8_y_pvx78W_98q4Z</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Badets, Arnaud</creator><creator>Blandin, Yannick</creator><creator>Shea, Charles H.</creator><general>Psychology Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Psychology press</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis (Routledge)</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1773-4409</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Intention in motor learning through observation</title><author>Badets, Arnaud ; Blandin, Yannick ; Shea, Charles H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imitative Behavior</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Neurons and Cognition</topic><topic>Practice (Psychology)</topic><topic>Psychology and behavior</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor activities</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Serial Learning</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badets, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blandin, Yannick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badets, Arnaud</au><au>Blandin, Yannick</au><au>Shea, Charles H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intention in motor learning through observation</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>377-386</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this experiment was to assess whether learning an action through observation is enhanced by the intention to reproduce the observed behaviour. Two groups of participants observed a model practise a timing task and performed a 24-hour delayed retention test. Participants in the first group of observers were explicitly instructed that they would be required to execute the timing task that they had observed as accurately as possible during the delayed retention test. Observers in the second group were instructed that they would be required to describe as accurately as possible the behaviour that they had observed. A control group of participants, who did not observe the model, was also administered the delayed retention test. The results of the retention test indicated that absolute timing (parameterization) was learned by the observers to the same extent with or without intention to reproduce the task. Indeed, on the retention test absolute timing for the two groups of observers was as effective as that for the models. However, observing with an intention to reproduce the task was beneficial for learning the movement's relative timing structure. Results are discussed with respect to a potential mechanism by which intention enhances observation.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Psychology Press</pub><pmid>16618640</pmid><doi>10.1080/02724980443000773</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1773-4409</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2006-02, Vol.59 (2), p.377-386 |
issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_02724980443000773 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Activity levels. Psychomotricity Adolescent Adult Attention Biological and medical sciences Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Imitative Behavior Intention Life Sciences Male Motivation Neurons and Cognition Practice (Psychology) Psychology and behavior Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychomotor activities Psychomotor Performance Reaction Time Retention (Psychology) Serial Learning Visual Perception |
title | Intention in motor learning through observation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A18%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intention%20in%20motor%20learning%20through%20observation&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Badets,%20Arnaud&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=377-386&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02724980443000773&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E67871027%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-38407d75776fbd320baa34dad6f5292a4ae2343ef93014326de26aeac48f640f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67871027&rft_id=info:pmid/16618640&rft_sage_id=10.1080_02724980443000773&rfr_iscdi=true |