Conidial morphology and ecological characteristics as diagnostic tools for identifying Claviceps purpurea from salt-marsh habitats

Claviceps purpurea associated with grass hosts in salt-marsh habitats, also known as G3 ergot, can be differentiated from C. purpurea infecting grasses in other habitats, using genetic, chemical, and morphological criteria. However, only morphological analysis can be preformed on herbarium specimens...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of plant pathology 2005-09, Vol.27 (3), p.389-395
Main Authors: Fisher, A.J, DiTomaso, J.M, Gordon, T.R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
cereal grains
Claviceps purpurea
conidia
conidial morphology
ergot
fungal anatomy
geographical variation
grasses
habitats
host plants
pathogen identification
plant pathogenic fungi
salt marshes
salt-marsh habitats
Spartina
strain differences
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Claviceps purpurea associated with grass hosts in salt-marsh habitats, also known as G3 ergot, can be differentiated from C. purpurea infecting grasses in other habitats, using genetic, chemical, and morphological criteria. However, only morphological analysis can be preformed on herbarium specimens, which should not be destroyed, or older samples that cannot be grown in culture. To determine if conidial characteristics could be employed to identify the three infraspecific groups of C. purpurea (G1-G3), sclerotia from terrestrial grasses (G1), moist habitats (G2), and salt-marsh habitats (G3) were examined. All G1 sclerotia sank in water. All G3 sclerotia floated in water, except those from Washington State, which had variable buoyancy characteristics. Group 2 sclerotia did not float in water, except those collected from Calamagrostis nutkaensis and Ammophila breviligulata. Based on the length of conidia derived from a plant host, G1 samples are indistinguishable from G2 samples but are significantly different from G3. Conidia produced in culture were on average smaller than conidia produced on plant hosts. These results indicate that ecological and conidial characteristics can be used to distinguish G3 from G1, but cannot consistently separate either from G2.
ISSN:0706-0661
1715-2992
DOI:10.1080/07060660509507237