Policies and Imprisonment: The Impact of Structured Sentencing and Determinate Sentencing on State Incarceration Rates, 1978-2004

Research has begun to systematically assess the relationship between sentencing policies and state incarceration rates. Prior studies, however, have examined policy-based relationships in isolation, failing to consider the impact of combinations of policies. Using a pooled time series design, this a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Justice quarterly 2011-02, Vol.28 (1), p.174-201
Main Authors: Stemen, Don, Rengifo, Andres F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
corrections
Correlation analysis
Criminal justice
Criminal sentences
Deterrence
Discretion
Imprisonment
mass incarceration
Public policy
Sentencing
sentencing policies
States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Research has begun to systematically assess the relationship between sentencing policies and state incarceration rates. Prior studies, however, have examined policy-based relationships in isolation, failing to consider the impact of combinations of policies. Using a pooled time series design, this article examines interactions between structured sentencing, determinate sentencing, and state incarceration rates between 1978 and 2004. Results show that constraining release discretion through determinate sentencing matters more than constraining sentencing discretion through structured sentencing. Consistent with prior research, determinate sentencing was associated with lower incarceration rates independent of other policies. Contrary to prior research, however, the presence of presumptive sentencing guidelines was associated with lower incarceration rates only when combined with determinate sentencing. These findings suggest that while a state may effectively insulate sentencing decisions from outside social forces, if it fails to insulate release decisions from those same forces, they will continue to affect imprisonment levels.
ISSN:0741-8825
1745-9109
DOI:10.1080/07418821003694759