Heidegger and Dasein's 'Bodily Nature': What is the Hidden Problematic?

• Published in: International journal of philosophical studies : IJPS 2000, Vol.8 (2), p.209-230
• Main Author: Cerbone, David R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biology; Heidegger Body Embodiment Interpretation Organism; Human body; Martin Heidegger; Mind and body. Personal identity; Phenomenology; Philosophical thought; Philosophy; Self; Temporal dimension
• ISSN: 0967-2559; 1466-4542
• DOI: 10.1080/09672550050084018

In Being and Time, Heidegger explicitly defers any consideration of ourselves (Dasein) as embodied. I try to account for Heidegger's reluctance to talk about 'the body' in connection with his explication of Dasein, by arguing that doing so would be at odds with the kind of investigation his 'phenomenology of everydayness' is meant to be. That Heidegger omits discussion of the body in Being and Time might lead one to think of the human body in terms of the other categories Heidegger deploys: readiness-to-hand and presence-at-hand (Being and Time) and biological organisms (Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics). I argue that any such identification ought to be resisted, as these categories serve only to deprive our bodies of their specifically human dimension. Indeed, by surveying the failure of these categories as proper to the human body, we gain further insight into Heidegger's initial deferral: only given the existential analytic can one begin to offer a proper account of ourselves in bodily terms.