A Revised Systematic Ichnotaxonomy and Review of the Vertebrate Footprint Ichnofamily Chirotheriidae from the British Triassic

• Published in: Ichnos (Chur, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2005-10, Vol.12 (4), p.241-299
• Main Authors: King, Michael J., Sarjeant, William A. S., Thompson, David B., Tresise, Geoffrey
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Chirotheriidae; Footprints; Hand Beast; Ichnotaxonomy; Triassic
• ISSN: 1042-0940; 1563-5236
• DOI: 10.1080/10420940591009312

Since 1838, many discoveries of the tetrapod footprint taxon Chirotherium and closely similar forms have been reported from the British Middle Triassic. These have been assigned to dozens of ichnotaxa, so that the identification and interpretation of members of the ichnofamily Chirotheriidae have become confused. Part 1 of this article deals with ichnotaxonomy. Revision of all the available material shows that there are at least three valid ichnospecies of Chirotherium, one of Synaptichnium, and one of Isochirotherium. The presence of a fourth related ichnogenus, Brachychirotherium, cannot yet be confirmed in Britain. Emended diagnoses are proposed for all four ichnogenera; they may be readily distinguished by the shape of the hand (manus) and foot (pes) impression and especially by the phalangeal counts. The natural cast of a probable tail impression, associated with Chirotheriidae footprints from the British Triassic is figured for the first time, as is a rare detailed impression of skin and the tarsal region of an Isochirotherium lomasi pes cast. Part 2 provides a critical history of the earliest discoveries of each of these ichnogenera in the British Triassic. It is subdivided into divisions, depending on the quality of data and existence of specimens, the localities in Britain which have yielded these ichnogenera; a detailed history and discussion is provided of the earliest discoveries made at each locality. The stratigraphic distribution and paleological significance of the ichnogenera/species are assessed.