Loading…
Demonstrating Professional Vision: The Work of Critique in Architectural Education
This study provides an account of how architectural competencies are made visible in the work of critique in architectural education. It shows how critics enact a set of disciplined visual practices through which architectural qualities of proposed buildings become available for competent remark. Pa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mind, culture and activity culture and activity, 2009-04, Vol.16 (2), p.145-171 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5577ae8932e02331242f5df02b95421f675533df95a06bc5023a2bbf3aa3901b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5577ae8932e02331242f5df02b95421f675533df95a06bc5023a2bbf3aa3901b3 |
container_end_page | 171 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 145 |
container_title | Mind, culture and activity |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Lymer, Gustav |
description | This study provides an account of how architectural competencies are made visible in the work of critique in architectural education. It shows how critics enact a set of disciplined visual practices through which architectural qualities of proposed buildings become available for competent remark. Particularly prominent among these practices is the seamless fusion of gestural elaborations of architecture's designed objects with the envisaged spaces of a hypothetically perceived built environment. Furthermore, critics topicalize the communicative and rhetorical organization of the presentation as a designed object in itself. In shifts between topicalizations of proposed buildings and the designed representations of those buildings, critics construe qualities of the buildings as simultaneously visible and invisible: visible to the critic, but invisible to potential other viewers. This practice subjects students' work to a variety of pedagogically configured gazes. The student's socialization into a specialized field of practice, in which objects are designed according to professional rationalities that go beyond what is readily visible or accessible to the nonarchitect, is thereby made accountable for the communicative demands of professional practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10749030802590580 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_10749030802590580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ833833</ericid><sourcerecordid>1669600821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5577ae8932e02331242f5df02b95421f675533df95a06bc5023a2bbf3aa3901b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhQdR8PkDBBeDa0dvksk8xE1p64uCIlWXITNNNHU6qTcZqv_elBE3IoZADpzvHHJvFB0SOCVQwBmBPC2BBUl5CbyAjWiHcEaTvCjSzaCDnwSg3I52nZtDOCWFnehhpBa2dR6lN-1LfI9WK-eMbWUTP5m1OI-nryp-tvgWWx0P0Xjz3qnYtPEA61fjVe07DPR41tWhxLb70ZaWjVMH3-9e9Hg5ng6vk8nd1c1wMEnqlBGfcJ7nUhUlowooY4SmVPOZBlqVPKVEZznnjM10ySVkVc0DJGlVaSYlK4FUbC866XvdSi27SizRLCR-CiuNGJmngbD4IrpOUJpmDAJ-3ONLtGEA58XcdhjmdIICyyGHrAgQ6aEarXOo9E8rAbFetPi16JA56jMKTf3Dj28LxsINdt7bptUWF3JlsZkJLz8bixplWxv3u1T4Dx-SF_8m2d__-gLj0527</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203707068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Demonstrating Professional Vision: The Work of Critique in Architectural Education</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Lymer, Gustav</creator><creatorcontrib>Lymer, Gustav</creatorcontrib><description>This study provides an account of how architectural competencies are made visible in the work of critique in architectural education. It shows how critics enact a set of disciplined visual practices through which architectural qualities of proposed buildings become available for competent remark. Particularly prominent among these practices is the seamless fusion of gestural elaborations of architecture's designed objects with the envisaged spaces of a hypothetically perceived built environment. Furthermore, critics topicalize the communicative and rhetorical organization of the presentation as a designed object in itself. In shifts between topicalizations of proposed buildings and the designed representations of those buildings, critics construe qualities of the buildings as simultaneously visible and invisible: visible to the critic, but invisible to potential other viewers. This practice subjects students' work to a variety of pedagogically configured gazes. The student's socialization into a specialized field of practice, in which objects are designed according to professional rationalities that go beyond what is readily visible or accessible to the nonarchitect, is thereby made accountable for the communicative demands of professional practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-9039</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-7884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7884</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10749030802590580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Architectural Education ; Architectural Research ; Architecture ; Art Criticism ; Critical Viewing ; Design Requirements ; Education ; Educational Practices ; Foreign Countries ; Instructional Design ; Learning ; Professional development ; Rhetoric ; Sweden (Gothenburg) ; Visual Arts ; Visual Literacy ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>Mind, culture and activity, 2009-04, Vol.16 (2), p.145-171</ispartof><rights>Copyright Regents of the University of California on behalf of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge Apr 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5577ae8932e02331242f5df02b95421f675533df95a06bc5023a2bbf3aa3901b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5577ae8932e02331242f5df02b95421f675533df95a06bc5023a2bbf3aa3901b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ833833$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-224630$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lymer, Gustav</creatorcontrib><title>Demonstrating Professional Vision: The Work of Critique in Architectural Education</title><title>Mind, culture and activity</title><description>This study provides an account of how architectural competencies are made visible in the work of critique in architectural education. It shows how critics enact a set of disciplined visual practices through which architectural qualities of proposed buildings become available for competent remark. Particularly prominent among these practices is the seamless fusion of gestural elaborations of architecture's designed objects with the envisaged spaces of a hypothetically perceived built environment. Furthermore, critics topicalize the communicative and rhetorical organization of the presentation as a designed object in itself. In shifts between topicalizations of proposed buildings and the designed representations of those buildings, critics construe qualities of the buildings as simultaneously visible and invisible: visible to the critic, but invisible to potential other viewers. This practice subjects students' work to a variety of pedagogically configured gazes. The student's socialization into a specialized field of practice, in which objects are designed according to professional rationalities that go beyond what is readily visible or accessible to the nonarchitect, is thereby made accountable for the communicative demands of professional practice.</description><subject>Architectural Education</subject><subject>Architectural Research</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Art Criticism</subject><subject>Critical Viewing</subject><subject>Design Requirements</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Sweden (Gothenburg)</subject><subject>Visual Arts</subject><subject>Visual Literacy</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>1074-9039</issn><issn>1532-7884</issn><issn>1532-7884</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhQdR8PkDBBeDa0dvksk8xE1p64uCIlWXITNNNHU6qTcZqv_elBE3IoZADpzvHHJvFB0SOCVQwBmBPC2BBUl5CbyAjWiHcEaTvCjSzaCDnwSg3I52nZtDOCWFnehhpBa2dR6lN-1LfI9WK-eMbWUTP5m1OI-nryp-tvgWWx0P0Xjz3qnYtPEA61fjVe07DPR41tWhxLb70ZaWjVMH3-9e9Hg5ng6vk8nd1c1wMEnqlBGfcJ7nUhUlowooY4SmVPOZBlqVPKVEZznnjM10ySVkVc0DJGlVaSYlK4FUbC866XvdSi27SizRLCR-CiuNGJmngbD4IrpOUJpmDAJ-3ONLtGEA58XcdhjmdIICyyGHrAgQ6aEarXOo9E8rAbFetPi16JA56jMKTf3Dj28LxsINdt7bptUWF3JlsZkJLz8bixplWxv3u1T4Dx-SF_8m2d__-gLj0527</recordid><startdate>200904</startdate><enddate>200904</enddate><creator>Lymer, Gustav</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200904</creationdate><title>Demonstrating Professional Vision: The Work of Critique in Architectural Education</title><author>Lymer, Gustav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5577ae8932e02331242f5df02b95421f675533df95a06bc5023a2bbf3aa3901b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Architectural Education</topic><topic>Architectural Research</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Art Criticism</topic><topic>Critical Viewing</topic><topic>Design Requirements</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Sweden (Gothenburg)</topic><topic>Visual Arts</topic><topic>Visual Literacy</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lymer, Gustav</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>Mind, culture and activity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lymer, Gustav</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ833833</ericid><atitle>Demonstrating Professional Vision: The Work of Critique in Architectural Education</atitle><jtitle>Mind, culture and activity</jtitle><date>2009-04</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>145-171</pages><issn>1074-9039</issn><issn>1532-7884</issn><eissn>1532-7884</eissn><abstract>This study provides an account of how architectural competencies are made visible in the work of critique in architectural education. It shows how critics enact a set of disciplined visual practices through which architectural qualities of proposed buildings become available for competent remark. Particularly prominent among these practices is the seamless fusion of gestural elaborations of architecture's designed objects with the envisaged spaces of a hypothetically perceived built environment. Furthermore, critics topicalize the communicative and rhetorical organization of the presentation as a designed object in itself. In shifts between topicalizations of proposed buildings and the designed representations of those buildings, critics construe qualities of the buildings as simultaneously visible and invisible: visible to the critic, but invisible to potential other viewers. This practice subjects students' work to a variety of pedagogically configured gazes. The student's socialization into a specialized field of practice, in which objects are designed according to professional rationalities that go beyond what is readily visible or accessible to the nonarchitect, is thereby made accountable for the communicative demands of professional practice.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/10749030802590580</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1074-9039 |
ispartof | Mind, culture and activity, 2009-04, Vol.16 (2), p.145-171 |
issn | 1074-9039 1532-7884 1532-7884 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_10749030802590580 |
source | Taylor & Francis; ERIC |
subjects | Architectural Education Architectural Research Architecture Art Criticism Critical Viewing Design Requirements Education Educational Practices Foreign Countries Instructional Design Learning Professional development Rhetoric Sweden (Gothenburg) Visual Arts Visual Literacy Visualization |
title | Demonstrating Professional Vision: The Work of Critique in Architectural Education |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A28%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Demonstrating%20Professional%20Vision:%20The%20Work%20of%20Critique%20in%20Architectural%20Education&rft.jtitle=Mind,%20culture%20and%20activity&rft.au=Lymer,%20Gustav&rft.date=2009-04&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=145-171&rft.issn=1074-9039&rft.eissn=1532-7884&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10749030802590580&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1669600821%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5577ae8932e02331242f5df02b95421f675533df95a06bc5023a2bbf3aa3901b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203707068&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ833833&rfr_iscdi=true |