The Purpose of Lexical/Sublexical Interaction during Spelling: Further Evidence from Dysgraphia and Articulatory Suppression

We investigated how the lexical and sublexical processes interact in spelling using an articulatory suppression task to disrupt the sublexical process in a dysgraphic patient (JDO). Using a similar task, Folk et al. (2002) found evidence that the sublexical process interacts with the lexical process...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurocase 2004-02, Vol.10 (1), p.65-69
Main Authors: Folk, Jocelyn R., Jones, Angela C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Agraphia - etiology
Agraphia - psychology
Chi-Square Distribution
Female
Head Injuries, Closed - complications
Head Injuries, Closed - psychology
Humans
Inhibition (Psychology)
Language
Reading
Verbal Behavior - physiology
Writing
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-6d7a06209b9a767580722066c9a4c1b6174eff10c85cea4702cb598b89b3aca03
cites
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Neurocase
container_volume 10
creator Folk, Jocelyn R.
Jones, Angela C.
description We investigated how the lexical and sublexical processes interact in spelling using an articulatory suppression task to disrupt the sublexical process in a dysgraphic patient (JDO). Using a similar task, Folk et al. (2002) found evidence that the sublexical process interacts with the lexical process by strengthening a target word's graphemes. We replicated the findings of Folk et al. in a patient with a more severe deficit to the lexical process. We compared the error patterns produced under normal spelling conditions versus spelling during articulatory suppression and found an increase in lexical substitution errors ("thaw"→T-H-O-U-G-H) under articulatory suppression. These findings indicate that by strengthening a target word's graphemes, the sublexical process helps to create an advantage for a target word over form-related word neighbours that compete with it for output.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13554790490960512
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_13554790490960512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85614571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-6d7a06209b9a767580722066c9a4c1b6174eff10c85cea4702cb598b89b3aca03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhoMotlZ_gBvJyt3YZCYfE3FTaquFCwq3roczmUxvZGYyniTaC_54I_eCi4Jd5YU8zwuHl5DXnL3jrGXnvJFSaMOEYUYxyesn5JQLJatGSfW05PJfFUCckBcxfmeMNa2Qz8kJl60wXNWn5PftztGvGdcQHQ0j3bh7b2E63-Z-OkR6sySHYJMPCx0y-uWOblc3TSW8p9cZ084hvfrpB7dYR0cMM_24j3cI684DhWWgF5i8zROkgHu6zeuKLsZS95I8G2GK7tXxPSPfrq9uLz9Xmy-fbi4vNpUVtUmVGjQwVTPTG9BKy5bpumZKWQPC8l5xLdw4cmZbaR0IzWrbS9P2rekbsMCaM_L20Lti-JFdTN3soy0nwOJCjl0rFRdS80dBpWutlGwKyA-gxRAjurFb0c-A-46z7u823YNtivPmWJ772Q3_jOMYBfhwAPwyBpzhV8Bp6BLsp4AjwmJ97Jr_9etH9QdWl-5T8wdQxrBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67276653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Purpose of Lexical/Sublexical Interaction during Spelling: Further Evidence from Dysgraphia and Articulatory Suppression</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Folk, Jocelyn R. ; Jones, Angela C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Folk, Jocelyn R. ; Jones, Angela C.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated how the lexical and sublexical processes interact in spelling using an articulatory suppression task to disrupt the sublexical process in a dysgraphic patient (JDO). Using a similar task, Folk et al. (2002) found evidence that the sublexical process interacts with the lexical process by strengthening a target word's graphemes. We replicated the findings of Folk et al. in a patient with a more severe deficit to the lexical process. We compared the error patterns produced under normal spelling conditions versus spelling during articulatory suppression and found an increase in lexical substitution errors ("thaw"→T-H-O-U-G-H) under articulatory suppression. These findings indicate that by strengthening a target word's graphemes, the sublexical process helps to create an advantage for a target word over form-related word neighbours that compete with it for output.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-4794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13554790490960512</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15849162</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NROCF5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Agraphia - etiology ; Agraphia - psychology ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Female ; Head Injuries, Closed - complications ; Head Injuries, Closed - psychology ; Humans ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Language ; Reading ; Verbal Behavior - physiology ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Neurocase, 2004-02, Vol.10 (1), p.65-69</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-6d7a06209b9a767580722066c9a4c1b6174eff10c85cea4702cb598b89b3aca03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,31257</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15849162$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Folk, Jocelyn R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Angela C.</creatorcontrib><title>The Purpose of Lexical/Sublexical Interaction during Spelling: Further Evidence from Dysgraphia and Articulatory Suppression</title><title>Neurocase</title><addtitle>Neurocase</addtitle><description>We investigated how the lexical and sublexical processes interact in spelling using an articulatory suppression task to disrupt the sublexical process in a dysgraphic patient (JDO). Using a similar task, Folk et al. (2002) found evidence that the sublexical process interacts with the lexical process by strengthening a target word's graphemes. We replicated the findings of Folk et al. in a patient with a more severe deficit to the lexical process. We compared the error patterns produced under normal spelling conditions versus spelling during articulatory suppression and found an increase in lexical substitution errors ("thaw"→T-H-O-U-G-H) under articulatory suppression. These findings indicate that by strengthening a target word's graphemes, the sublexical process helps to create an advantage for a target word over form-related word neighbours that compete with it for output.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Agraphia - etiology</subject><subject>Agraphia - psychology</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head Injuries, Closed - complications</subject><subject>Head Injuries, Closed - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>1355-4794</issn><issn>1465-3656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhoMotlZ_gBvJyt3YZCYfE3FTaquFCwq3roczmUxvZGYyniTaC_54I_eCi4Jd5YU8zwuHl5DXnL3jrGXnvJFSaMOEYUYxyesn5JQLJatGSfW05PJfFUCckBcxfmeMNa2Qz8kJl60wXNWn5PftztGvGdcQHQ0j3bh7b2E63-Z-OkR6sySHYJMPCx0y-uWOblc3TSW8p9cZ084hvfrpB7dYR0cMM_24j3cI684DhWWgF5i8zROkgHu6zeuKLsZS95I8G2GK7tXxPSPfrq9uLz9Xmy-fbi4vNpUVtUmVGjQwVTPTG9BKy5bpumZKWQPC8l5xLdw4cmZbaR0IzWrbS9P2rekbsMCaM_L20Lti-JFdTN3soy0nwOJCjl0rFRdS80dBpWutlGwKyA-gxRAjurFb0c-A-46z7u823YNtivPmWJ772Q3_jOMYBfhwAPwyBpzhV8Bp6BLsp4AjwmJ97Jr_9etH9QdWl-5T8wdQxrBg</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>Folk, Jocelyn R.</creator><creator>Jones, Angela C.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>The Purpose of Lexical/Sublexical Interaction during Spelling: Further Evidence from Dysgraphia and Articulatory Suppression</title><author>Folk, Jocelyn R. ; Jones, Angela C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-6d7a06209b9a767580722066c9a4c1b6174eff10c85cea4702cb598b89b3aca03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Agraphia - etiology</topic><topic>Agraphia - psychology</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head Injuries, Closed - complications</topic><topic>Head Injuries, Closed - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Folk, Jocelyn R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Angela C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Neurocase</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Folk, Jocelyn R.</au><au>Jones, Angela C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Purpose of Lexical/Sublexical Interaction during Spelling: Further Evidence from Dysgraphia and Articulatory Suppression</atitle><jtitle>Neurocase</jtitle><addtitle>Neurocase</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>65-69</pages><issn>1355-4794</issn><eissn>1465-3656</eissn><coden>NROCF5</coden><abstract>We investigated how the lexical and sublexical processes interact in spelling using an articulatory suppression task to disrupt the sublexical process in a dysgraphic patient (JDO). Using a similar task, Folk et al. (2002) found evidence that the sublexical process interacts with the lexical process by strengthening a target word's graphemes. We replicated the findings of Folk et al. in a patient with a more severe deficit to the lexical process. We compared the error patterns produced under normal spelling conditions versus spelling during articulatory suppression and found an increase in lexical substitution errors ("thaw"→T-H-O-U-G-H) under articulatory suppression. These findings indicate that by strengthening a target word's graphemes, the sublexical process helps to create an advantage for a target word over form-related word neighbours that compete with it for output.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><pmid>15849162</pmid><doi>10.1080/13554790490960512</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-4794
ispartof Neurocase, 2004-02, Vol.10 (1), p.65-69
issn 1355-4794
1465-3656
language eng
recordid cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_13554790490960512
source Taylor & Francis; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Adult
Agraphia - etiology
Agraphia - psychology
Chi-Square Distribution
Female
Head Injuries, Closed - complications
Head Injuries, Closed - psychology
Humans
Inhibition (Psychology)
Language
Reading
Verbal Behavior - physiology
Writing
title The Purpose of Lexical/Sublexical Interaction during Spelling: Further Evidence from Dysgraphia and Articulatory Suppression
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A00%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Purpose%20of%20Lexical/Sublexical%20Interaction%20during%20Spelling:%20Further%20Evidence%20from%20Dysgraphia%20and%20Articulatory%20Suppression&rft.jtitle=Neurocase&rft.au=Folk,%20Jocelyn%20R.&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=65-69&rft.issn=1355-4794&rft.eissn=1465-3656&rft.coden=NROCF5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13554790490960512&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E85614571%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-6d7a06209b9a767580722066c9a4c1b6174eff10c85cea4702cb598b89b3aca03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67276653&rft_id=info:pmid/15849162&rfr_iscdi=true