Loading…
Family-friendly policies and gender bias in academia
Several recent reports on the status of women in US academic institutions have recommended more generous family policies to encourage and retain more women among academic staffs. Many of the policies suggested are modelled on those that have been in effect in Nordic countries for decades. The status...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of higher education policy and management 2008-11, Vol.30 (4), p.363-374 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-cb81ae8ac13b39c8a8536d56b18d5a74b2d3a82ed1a3bc1a61bb492ce1a383bc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-cb81ae8ac13b39c8a8536d56b18d5a74b2d3a82ed1a3bc1a61bb492ce1a383bc3 |
container_end_page | 374 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 363 |
container_title | Journal of higher education policy and management |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Mayer, Audrey L. Tikka, Päivi M. |
description | Several recent reports on the status of women in US academic institutions have recommended more generous family policies to encourage and retain more women among academic staffs. Many of the policies suggested are modelled on those that have been in effect in Nordic countries for decades. The status of women among Finnish and Swedish academic staff ranks is examined, with the assumption that women should be better represented if family policies are a significant factor in advancement and retention. It is found that similar conditions for female academics exist in the US as in Nordic countries, suggesting that advancement may be more dependent upon prevailing social conditions and gender stereotypes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13600800802383034 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_13600800802383034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ815167</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.200813244</informt_id><sourcerecordid>EJ815167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-cb81ae8ac13b39c8a8536d56b18d5a74b2d3a82ed1a3bc1a61bb492ce1a383bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUdtKxDAQLaLguvoBgg_9gWom6SUFX3TZ9cKCLwq-hWmSrpHeSALavzdrRYRFFAKTmXMZThJFp0DOgXByASwnoYZDGWeEpXvRDNK8TMqM8P1wD3gS0OfD6Mi5V0IoQM5nUbrC1jRjUlujO9WM8dA3RhrtYuxUvAkzbePKoItNF6NEpVuDx9FBjY3TJ191Hj2tlo-L22T9cHO3uFonMqPEJ7LigJqjBFaxUnLkGctVllfAVYZFWlHFkFOtAFklAXOoqrSkUoeehwmbRzD5Sts7Z3UtBmtatKMAIraxxU7soDmbNNoa-c1f3nPIIC8CvJpg2xovcMDaixfvBycUehSmq_tPpLcboXqzXcQY5MLoJpAFDauA0XS75_qnkTbD_4wmJhQ0fEAwKSaTiY5vvW2U8Dg2va0tdtK43YjCv_ugvPxTyX5_pQ_xAKkL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family-friendly policies and gender bias in academia</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Mayer, Audrey L. ; Tikka, Päivi M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Audrey L. ; Tikka, Päivi M.</creatorcontrib><description>Several recent reports on the status of women in US academic institutions have recommended more generous family policies to encourage and retain more women among academic staffs. Many of the policies suggested are modelled on those that have been in effect in Nordic countries for decades. The status of women among Finnish and Swedish academic staff ranks is examined, with the assumption that women should be better represented if family policies are a significant factor in advancement and retention. It is found that similar conditions for female academics exist in the US as in Nordic countries, suggesting that advancement may be more dependent upon prevailing social conditions and gender stereotypes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-080X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13600800802383034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>academic institutions ; Academic personnel ; Academic staff ; Academic staff university relationship ; Academic status ; College Faculty ; Equal Opportunities (Jobs) ; Europe: Social conditions ; faculty ; Family ; family policies ; Family Work Relationship ; Females ; Finland ; Foreign Countries ; Gender Bias ; Leave of absence ; Leaves of Absence ; Parental leave ; Postsecondary education ; Pregnancy ; Public Policy ; School Policy ; Sex Stereotypes ; Social Change ; Social Influences ; Sweden ; Teacher employment benefits ; Tertiary education ; United States ; United States: Social conditions ; Universities ; women ; Women and employment ; Women Faculty ; Working hours</subject><ispartof>Journal of higher education policy and management, 2008-11, Vol.30 (4), p.363-374</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association for Tertiary Education Management and the L H Martin Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Management 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-cb81ae8ac13b39c8a8536d56b18d5a74b2d3a82ed1a3bc1a61bb492ce1a383bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-cb81ae8ac13b39c8a8536d56b18d5a74b2d3a82ed1a3bc1a61bb492ce1a383bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ815167$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Audrey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikka, Päivi M.</creatorcontrib><title>Family-friendly policies and gender bias in academia</title><title>Journal of higher education policy and management</title><description>Several recent reports on the status of women in US academic institutions have recommended more generous family policies to encourage and retain more women among academic staffs. Many of the policies suggested are modelled on those that have been in effect in Nordic countries for decades. The status of women among Finnish and Swedish academic staff ranks is examined, with the assumption that women should be better represented if family policies are a significant factor in advancement and retention. It is found that similar conditions for female academics exist in the US as in Nordic countries, suggesting that advancement may be more dependent upon prevailing social conditions and gender stereotypes.</description><subject>academic institutions</subject><subject>Academic personnel</subject><subject>Academic staff</subject><subject>Academic staff university relationship</subject><subject>Academic status</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Equal Opportunities (Jobs)</subject><subject>Europe: Social conditions</subject><subject>faculty</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>family policies</subject><subject>Family Work Relationship</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Gender Bias</subject><subject>Leave of absence</subject><subject>Leaves of Absence</subject><subject>Parental leave</subject><subject>Postsecondary education</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>School Policy</subject><subject>Sex Stereotypes</subject><subject>Social Change</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Sweden</subject><subject>Teacher employment benefits</subject><subject>Tertiary education</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States: Social conditions</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>women</subject><subject>Women and employment</subject><subject>Women Faculty</subject><subject>Working hours</subject><issn>1360-080X</issn><issn>1469-9508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUdtKxDAQLaLguvoBgg_9gWom6SUFX3TZ9cKCLwq-hWmSrpHeSALavzdrRYRFFAKTmXMZThJFp0DOgXByASwnoYZDGWeEpXvRDNK8TMqM8P1wD3gS0OfD6Mi5V0IoQM5nUbrC1jRjUlujO9WM8dA3RhrtYuxUvAkzbePKoItNF6NEpVuDx9FBjY3TJ191Hj2tlo-L22T9cHO3uFonMqPEJ7LigJqjBFaxUnLkGctVllfAVYZFWlHFkFOtAFklAXOoqrSkUoeehwmbRzD5Sts7Z3UtBmtatKMAIraxxU7soDmbNNoa-c1f3nPIIC8CvJpg2xovcMDaixfvBycUehSmq_tPpLcboXqzXcQY5MLoJpAFDauA0XS75_qnkTbD_4wmJhQ0fEAwKSaTiY5vvW2U8Dg2va0tdtK43YjCv_ugvPxTyX5_pQ_xAKkL</recordid><startdate>200811</startdate><enddate>200811</enddate><creator>Mayer, Audrey L.</creator><creator>Tikka, Päivi M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200811</creationdate><title>Family-friendly policies and gender bias in academia</title><author>Mayer, Audrey L. ; Tikka, Päivi M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-cb81ae8ac13b39c8a8536d56b18d5a74b2d3a82ed1a3bc1a61bb492ce1a383bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>academic institutions</topic><topic>Academic personnel</topic><topic>Academic staff</topic><topic>Academic staff university relationship</topic><topic>Academic status</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Equal Opportunities (Jobs)</topic><topic>Europe: Social conditions</topic><topic>faculty</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>family policies</topic><topic>Family Work Relationship</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Gender Bias</topic><topic>Leave of absence</topic><topic>Leaves of Absence</topic><topic>Parental leave</topic><topic>Postsecondary education</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>School Policy</topic><topic>Sex Stereotypes</topic><topic>Social Change</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Sweden</topic><topic>Teacher employment benefits</topic><topic>Tertiary education</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States: Social conditions</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>women</topic><topic>Women and employment</topic><topic>Women Faculty</topic><topic>Working hours</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Audrey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikka, Päivi M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of higher education policy and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mayer, Audrey L.</au><au>Tikka, Päivi M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ815167</ericid><atitle>Family-friendly policies and gender bias in academia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of higher education policy and management</jtitle><date>2008-11</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>363-374</pages><issn>1360-080X</issn><eissn>1469-9508</eissn><abstract>Several recent reports on the status of women in US academic institutions have recommended more generous family policies to encourage and retain more women among academic staffs. Many of the policies suggested are modelled on those that have been in effect in Nordic countries for decades. The status of women among Finnish and Swedish academic staff ranks is examined, with the assumption that women should be better represented if family policies are a significant factor in advancement and retention. It is found that similar conditions for female academics exist in the US as in Nordic countries, suggesting that advancement may be more dependent upon prevailing social conditions and gender stereotypes.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13600800802383034</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1360-080X |
ispartof | Journal of higher education policy and management, 2008-11, Vol.30 (4), p.363-374 |
issn | 1360-080X 1469-9508 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_13600800802383034 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | academic institutions Academic personnel Academic staff Academic staff university relationship Academic status College Faculty Equal Opportunities (Jobs) Europe: Social conditions faculty Family family policies Family Work Relationship Females Finland Foreign Countries Gender Bias Leave of absence Leaves of Absence Parental leave Postsecondary education Pregnancy Public Policy School Policy Sex Stereotypes Social Change Social Influences Sweden Teacher employment benefits Tertiary education United States United States: Social conditions Universities women Women and employment Women Faculty Working hours |
title | Family-friendly policies and gender bias in academia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A57%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family-friendly%20policies%20and%20gender%20bias%20in%20academia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20higher%20education%20policy%20and%20management&rft.au=Mayer,%20Audrey%20L.&rft.date=2008-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=363-374&rft.issn=1360-080X&rft.eissn=1469-9508&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13600800802383034&rft_dat=%3Ceric_infor%3EEJ815167%3C/eric_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-cb81ae8ac13b39c8a8536d56b18d5a74b2d3a82ed1a3bc1a61bb492ce1a383bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ815167&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.200813244&rfr_iscdi=true |