Loading…

Split-face comparison of radiofrequency versus long-pulse Nd-YAG treatment of facial laxity

Background and objective. To improve photoaging skin with laser treatment, multiple sessions have been considered necessary to achieve results comparable with one radiofrequency (RF) treatment. We compared single-treatment improvements obtained by the long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser and RF device. S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy 2006-04, Vol.8 (1), p.17-22
Main Authors: Taylor, Mark B., Prokopenko, Inna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e34a765d2a2e155fc946b84dccc4a75c2687983e6a22f8652dc54f11bf4861c63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e34a765d2a2e155fc946b84dccc4a75c2687983e6a22f8652dc54f11bf4861c63
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
container_title Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy
container_volume 8
creator Taylor, Mark B.
Prokopenko, Inna
description Background and objective. To improve photoaging skin with laser treatment, multiple sessions have been considered necessary to achieve results comparable with one radiofrequency (RF) treatment. We compared single-treatment improvements obtained by the long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser and RF device. Study design Materials and methods. In a split-face study, patients with sagging skin were treated once with laser (left side) and once with RF (right side) energy. Results. Improvement judged by six blinded observers was greater for wrinkles and laxity (30% median) on the laser-treated side and essentially the same with both modalities (15% median) for texture, pores, and pigmentation. Improvement was maintained for at least 2-6 months on both facial sides without adverse effects. Conclusion. With a single treatment, both the long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser and ThermaCool RF device provide a modest degree of improvement in both wrinkles and laxity of facial skin and similar improvement in texture, pores, and pigmentation.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14764170600607285
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_14764170600607285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67819246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e34a765d2a2e155fc946b84dccc4a75c2687983e6a22f8652dc54f11bf4861c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNFrFDEQxkOp2Pb0D-iL7FPftmaySTaHvpRDr0LRB_VBfAhz2aRNyW7WJFu9_7573FERoTAww8zv-xg-Qs6BXgJV9C3wVnJoqaRztUyJI3K629UcFD1-mlt2Qs5yvqcUWgH8JTkBKRRIRU_Jz69j8KV2aGxlYj9i8jkOVXRVws5Hl-yvyQ5mWz3YlKdchTjc1uMUsq0-d_WPq3VVksXS26HsRLOPx1AF_OPL9hV54XAmXx_6gnz_-OHb6rq--bL-tLq6qU0Dy1LbhmMrRceQWRDCmSWXG8U7Y8x8EIZJ1S5VYyUy5pQUrDOCO4CN40qCkc2CXOx9xxTnb3PRvc_GhoCDjVPWslWwZHwHwh40KeacrNNj8j2mrQaqd4nq_xKdNW8O5tOmt91fxSHCGXi_B_zgYurxd0yh0wW3ISaXcDA-6-Y5_3f_yO8shnJnMFl9H6c0zME9890jfs6Wbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67819246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Split-face comparison of radiofrequency versus long-pulse Nd-YAG treatment of facial laxity</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Taylor, Mark B. ; Prokopenko, Inna</creator><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Mark B. ; Prokopenko, Inna</creatorcontrib><description>Background and objective. To improve photoaging skin with laser treatment, multiple sessions have been considered necessary to achieve results comparable with one radiofrequency (RF) treatment. We compared single-treatment improvements obtained by the long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser and RF device. Study design Materials and methods. In a split-face study, patients with sagging skin were treated once with laser (left side) and once with RF (right side) energy. Results. Improvement judged by six blinded observers was greater for wrinkles and laxity (30% median) on the laser-treated side and essentially the same with both modalities (15% median) for texture, pores, and pigmentation. Improvement was maintained for at least 2-6 months on both facial sides without adverse effects. Conclusion. With a single treatment, both the long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser and ThermaCool RF device provide a modest degree of improvement in both wrinkles and laxity of facial skin and similar improvement in texture, pores, and pigmentation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-4172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4180</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14764170600607285</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16581680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Humans ; Laser ; Laser Therapy ; pores ; Radio Waves - therapeutic use ; RF device ; rhytids ; Skin Aging ; Skin Pigmentation ; skin texture ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy, 2006-04, Vol.8 (1), p.17-22</ispartof><rights>2006 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e34a765d2a2e155fc946b84dccc4a75c2687983e6a22f8652dc54f11bf4861c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e34a765d2a2e155fc946b84dccc4a75c2687983e6a22f8652dc54f11bf4861c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16581680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prokopenko, Inna</creatorcontrib><title>Split-face comparison of radiofrequency versus long-pulse Nd-YAG treatment of facial laxity</title><title>Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy</title><addtitle>J Cosmet Laser Ther</addtitle><description>Background and objective. To improve photoaging skin with laser treatment, multiple sessions have been considered necessary to achieve results comparable with one radiofrequency (RF) treatment. We compared single-treatment improvements obtained by the long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser and RF device. Study design Materials and methods. In a split-face study, patients with sagging skin were treated once with laser (left side) and once with RF (right side) energy. Results. Improvement judged by six blinded observers was greater for wrinkles and laxity (30% median) on the laser-treated side and essentially the same with both modalities (15% median) for texture, pores, and pigmentation. Improvement was maintained for at least 2-6 months on both facial sides without adverse effects. Conclusion. With a single treatment, both the long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser and ThermaCool RF device provide a modest degree of improvement in both wrinkles and laxity of facial skin and similar improvement in texture, pores, and pigmentation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laser</subject><subject>Laser Therapy</subject><subject>pores</subject><subject>Radio Waves - therapeutic use</subject><subject>RF device</subject><subject>rhytids</subject><subject>Skin Aging</subject><subject>Skin Pigmentation</subject><subject>skin texture</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1476-4172</issn><issn>1476-4180</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNFrFDEQxkOp2Pb0D-iL7FPftmaySTaHvpRDr0LRB_VBfAhz2aRNyW7WJFu9_7573FERoTAww8zv-xg-Qs6BXgJV9C3wVnJoqaRztUyJI3K629UcFD1-mlt2Qs5yvqcUWgH8JTkBKRRIRU_Jz69j8KV2aGxlYj9i8jkOVXRVws5Hl-yvyQ5mWz3YlKdchTjc1uMUsq0-d_WPq3VVksXS26HsRLOPx1AF_OPL9hV54XAmXx_6gnz_-OHb6rq--bL-tLq6qU0Dy1LbhmMrRceQWRDCmSWXG8U7Y8x8EIZJ1S5VYyUy5pQUrDOCO4CN40qCkc2CXOx9xxTnb3PRvc_GhoCDjVPWslWwZHwHwh40KeacrNNj8j2mrQaqd4nq_xKdNW8O5tOmt91fxSHCGXi_B_zgYurxd0yh0wW3ISaXcDA-6-Y5_3f_yO8shnJnMFl9H6c0zME9890jfs6Wbw</recordid><startdate>200604</startdate><enddate>200604</enddate><creator>Taylor, Mark B.</creator><creator>Prokopenko, Inna</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200604</creationdate><title>Split-face comparison of radiofrequency versus long-pulse Nd-YAG treatment of facial laxity</title><author>Taylor, Mark B. ; Prokopenko, Inna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e34a765d2a2e155fc946b84dccc4a75c2687983e6a22f8652dc54f11bf4861c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laser</topic><topic>Laser Therapy</topic><topic>pores</topic><topic>Radio Waves - therapeutic use</topic><topic>RF device</topic><topic>rhytids</topic><topic>Skin Aging</topic><topic>Skin Pigmentation</topic><topic>skin texture</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prokopenko, Inna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Mark B.</au><au>Prokopenko, Inna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Split-face comparison of radiofrequency versus long-pulse Nd-YAG treatment of facial laxity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Cosmet Laser Ther</addtitle><date>2006-04</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>17-22</pages><issn>1476-4172</issn><eissn>1476-4180</eissn><abstract>Background and objective. To improve photoaging skin with laser treatment, multiple sessions have been considered necessary to achieve results comparable with one radiofrequency (RF) treatment. We compared single-treatment improvements obtained by the long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser and RF device. Study design Materials and methods. In a split-face study, patients with sagging skin were treated once with laser (left side) and once with RF (right side) energy. Results. Improvement judged by six blinded observers was greater for wrinkles and laxity (30% median) on the laser-treated side and essentially the same with both modalities (15% median) for texture, pores, and pigmentation. Improvement was maintained for at least 2-6 months on both facial sides without adverse effects. Conclusion. With a single treatment, both the long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser and ThermaCool RF device provide a modest degree of improvement in both wrinkles and laxity of facial skin and similar improvement in texture, pores, and pigmentation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>16581680</pmid><doi>10.1080/14764170600607285</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1476-4172
ispartof Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy, 2006-04, Vol.8 (1), p.17-22
issn 1476-4172
1476-4180
language eng
recordid cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_14764170600607285
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Adult
Humans
Laser
Laser Therapy
pores
Radio Waves - therapeutic use
RF device
rhytids
Skin Aging
Skin Pigmentation
skin texture
Treatment Outcome
title Split-face comparison of radiofrequency versus long-pulse Nd-YAG treatment of facial laxity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A50%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Split-face%20comparison%20of%20radiofrequency%20versus%20long-pulse%20Nd-YAG%20treatment%20of%20facial%20laxity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cosmetic%20and%20laser%20therapy&rft.au=Taylor,%20Mark%20B.&rft.date=2006-04&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=17-22&rft.issn=1476-4172&rft.eissn=1476-4180&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14764170600607285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E67819246%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e34a765d2a2e155fc946b84dccc4a75c2687983e6a22f8652dc54f11bf4861c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67819246&rft_id=info:pmid/16581680&rfr_iscdi=true