Perception and prevalence of work-related health hazards among health care workers in public health facilities in southern India

• Published in: International journal of occupational and environmental health 2015-01, Vol.21 (1), p.74-81
• Main Authors: Senthil, Arasi, Anandh, Balasubramanian, Jayachandran, Palsamy, Thangavel, Gurusamy, Josephin, Diana, Yamini, Ravindran, Kalpana, Balakrishnan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accidents, Occupational - statistics & numerical data; Adult; Contact; Cross-Sectional Studies; Ergonomic; Exposure; Female; Hazardous Substances; Hazards; Health care industry; Health hazards; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Health Personnel - psychology; Health Personnel - statistics & numerical data; Health workers; Humans; India; India - epidemiology; Male; Medical personnel; Middle Aged; Needles; Needlestick Injuries - epidemiology; Needlestick Injuries - etiology; Occupational; Occupational Exposure; Occupational hazards; Occupational health; Original; Perception; Prevalence; Self Report; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1077-3525; 2049-3967
• DOI: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000096

Background: Health care workers (HCWs) are exposed to occupational related health hazards. Measuring worker perception and the prevalence of these hazards can help facilitate better risk management for HCWs, as these workers are envisaged to be the first point of contact, especially in resource poor settings. Objective: To describe the perception of occupational health hazards and self-reported exposure prevalence among HCWs in Southern India. Methods: We used cross sectional design with stratified random sampling of HCWs from different levels of health facilities and categories in a randomly selected district in Southern India. Data on perception and exposure prevalence were collected using a structured interview schedule developed by occupational health experts and administered by trained investigators. Results: A total of 482 HCWs participated. Thirty nine percent did not recognize work-related health hazards, but reported exposure to at least one hazard upon further probing. Among the 81·5% who reported exposure to biological hazard, 93·9% had direct skin contact with infectious materials. Among HCWs reporting needle stick injury, 70·5% had at least one in the previous three months. Ergonomic hazards included lifting heavy objects (42%) and standing for long hours (37%). Psychological hazards included negative feelings (20·3%) and verbal or physical abuse during work (20·5%). Conclusion: More than a third of HCWs failed to recognize work-related health hazards. Despite training in handling infectious materials, HCWs reported direct skin contact with infectious materials and needle stick injuries. Results indicate the need for training oriented toward behavioral change and provision of occupational health services.