A Novel Approach for Assessing the Quality and Effectiveness of IACUC Oversight in Investigator Compliance

• Published in: Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2000-01, Vol.39 (1), p.28-31
• Main Authors: Ingham, Kim M., Goldberg, Joel A., Klein, Hilton J., Johnson, Robert G., Kastello, Michael D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1559-6109

In research facilities that are registered with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), funded by the Public Health Service, or accredited by the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International, the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) is charged with oversight and evaluation of animal care and use under the terms of the Animal Welfare Act and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Although the committee's oversight of investigator compliance may be evaluated annually during USDA inspections and triennially during AAALAC International site visits, routinely assessing the quality and effectiveness of the IACUC's performance is difficult. To measure the successfulness of IACUC oversight, our committee retained a management consultant to objectively design and conduct a confidential survey that could be used to determine how the IACUC could improve the process of facilitating researcher compliance with federal regulations and accreditation standards. The consultant based the content of the survey on confidential interviews with all IACUC members, the IACUC administrator, and a cross sectional representation of the key animal-user population at the facility. The survey was then distributed to the entire animal-user population. Vice-presidents, directors, principal investigators, and technicians were included in the distribution. With a response rate of 34%, the survey results indicated that the facilitation process warranted refinements. The consultant provided the IACUC with its recommendations, which were based on the discernible trending information indicated in the survey responses. The IACUC developed a specific plan of action to address the consultant's recommendations and intends to re-survey the animal-user population once the action plan has been fully implemented. In summary, the survey is an excellent way to assess the quality and effectiveness of IACUC oversight in investigator compliance by determining the level of researcher satisfaction. The evaluation, review, and follow-up process using a confidential interview and questionnaire technique can enhance the performance and effectiveness of IACUC oversight.