Loading…

(Sub)nanosecond transient plasma for atmospheric plasma processing experiments: application to ozone generation and NO removal

In this paper we use a (sub)nanosecond high-voltage pulse source (2-9 ns pulses with 0.4 ns rise time) to generate streamer plasma in a wire-cylinder reactor and apply it to two atmospheric plasma processing applications: ozone generation and NO removal. We will investigate what pulse parameters res...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of physics. D, Applied physics Applied physics, 2017-10, Vol.50 (40), p.405201
Main Authors: Huiskamp, T, Hoeben, W F L M, Beckers, F J C M, van Heesch, E J M, Pemen, A J M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-efa08a69ba04eba9df6f71712b3ef46f626948e7824dcf9838961e8c7f962faa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-efa08a69ba04eba9df6f71712b3ef46f626948e7824dcf9838961e8c7f962faa3
container_end_page
container_issue 40
container_start_page 405201
container_title Journal of physics. D, Applied physics
container_volume 50
creator Huiskamp, T
Hoeben, W F L M
Beckers, F J C M
van Heesch, E J M
Pemen, A J M
description In this paper we use a (sub)nanosecond high-voltage pulse source (2-9 ns pulses with 0.4 ns rise time) to generate streamer plasma in a wire-cylinder reactor and apply it to two atmospheric plasma processing applications: ozone generation and NO removal. We will investigate what pulse parameters result in the highest plasma processing yields. The results show that for ozone generation, secondary-streamer effects appear to have a slight influence on the ozone yield: if the pulse duration increases and/or the voltage increases in such a way that streamers can start to cross the gap in the reactor, the ozone yields decrease. Furthermore, for NO removal, we see a similar effect of pulse duration and applied voltage as for the ozone generation, but the effect of the pulse duration is slightly different: long pulses result in the highest NO-removal yield. However, the NO-removal process is fundamentally different: besides removing NO, the plasma also produces NO and this production is more pronounced in the primary-streamer phase, which is why the pulse polarity has almost no influence on the NO-removal yield (only on the by-product formation). Moreover, the rise time of the pulses has a much more significant effect on ozone generation and NO removal than the pulse duration: a long rise time results in a lower enhanced electric field at the streamer heads, which consequently reduces the production of radicals required for ozone generation and NO removal, and decreases the streamer volume. Consequently, the resulting ozone yields and NO-removal yields are lower. Finally, the main conclusion is that the plasma generated with our nanosecond pulses is very efficient for ozone generation and NO removal, achieving yields as high as 175 g · kWh−1 for ozone generation and 2.5 mol · kWh−1 (or 14.9 eV per NO molecule) for NO removal.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6463/aa8617
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>iop_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1361_6463_aa8617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>daa8617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-efa08a69ba04eba9df6f71712b3ef46f626948e7824dcf9838961e8c7f962faa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePeYkCtbNRzdNvcniFyzuQT2HaZusXdokJF1RD_7ttlQ9iTAw8GbezOOH0DElF5RIOaNc0ESkgs8ApKDZDpr8SrtoQghjCc9Yto8OYtwQQuZC0gn6PH3cFmcWrIu6dLbCXQAba2077BuILWDjAoauddG_6FCXP7IPrtQx1naN9ZvvJ23viZcYvG_qErraWdw57D6c1XitrQ6jBv2PhxUOunWv0ByiPQNN1EfffYqeb66fFnfJcnV7v7haJiXPSZdoA0SCyAsgqS4gr4wwGc0oK7g2qTCCiTyVOpMsrUqTSy5zQbUsM5MLZgD4FJHxbhlcjEEb5fvEEN4VJWrgpwZYaoClRn695Xy01M6rjdsG2wf8b_3kj_VKzYlKh5ozQpWvDP8Cr46BLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>(Sub)nanosecond transient plasma for atmospheric plasma processing experiments: application to ozone generation and NO removal</title><source>Institute of Physics</source><creator>Huiskamp, T ; Hoeben, W F L M ; Beckers, F J C M ; van Heesch, E J M ; Pemen, A J M</creator><creatorcontrib>Huiskamp, T ; Hoeben, W F L M ; Beckers, F J C M ; van Heesch, E J M ; Pemen, A J M</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we use a (sub)nanosecond high-voltage pulse source (2-9 ns pulses with 0.4 ns rise time) to generate streamer plasma in a wire-cylinder reactor and apply it to two atmospheric plasma processing applications: ozone generation and NO removal. We will investigate what pulse parameters result in the highest plasma processing yields. The results show that for ozone generation, secondary-streamer effects appear to have a slight influence on the ozone yield: if the pulse duration increases and/or the voltage increases in such a way that streamers can start to cross the gap in the reactor, the ozone yields decrease. Furthermore, for NO removal, we see a similar effect of pulse duration and applied voltage as for the ozone generation, but the effect of the pulse duration is slightly different: long pulses result in the highest NO-removal yield. However, the NO-removal process is fundamentally different: besides removing NO, the plasma also produces NO and this production is more pronounced in the primary-streamer phase, which is why the pulse polarity has almost no influence on the NO-removal yield (only on the by-product formation). Moreover, the rise time of the pulses has a much more significant effect on ozone generation and NO removal than the pulse duration: a long rise time results in a lower enhanced electric field at the streamer heads, which consequently reduces the production of radicals required for ozone generation and NO removal, and decreases the streamer volume. Consequently, the resulting ozone yields and NO-removal yields are lower. Finally, the main conclusion is that the plasma generated with our nanosecond pulses is very efficient for ozone generation and NO removal, achieving yields as high as 175 g · kWh−1 for ozone generation and 2.5 mol · kWh−1 (or 14.9 eV per NO molecule) for NO removal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6463</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa8617</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPAPBE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>atmospheric non-thermal plasma ; plasma processing ; pulsed power ; transient plasma</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. D, Applied physics, 2017-10, Vol.50 (40), p.405201</ispartof><rights>2017 IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-efa08a69ba04eba9df6f71712b3ef46f626948e7824dcf9838961e8c7f962faa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-efa08a69ba04eba9df6f71712b3ef46f626948e7824dcf9838961e8c7f962faa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huiskamp, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeben, W F L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckers, F J C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Heesch, E J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pemen, A J M</creatorcontrib><title>(Sub)nanosecond transient plasma for atmospheric plasma processing experiments: application to ozone generation and NO removal</title><title>Journal of physics. D, Applied physics</title><addtitle>JPhysD</addtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys</addtitle><description>In this paper we use a (sub)nanosecond high-voltage pulse source (2-9 ns pulses with 0.4 ns rise time) to generate streamer plasma in a wire-cylinder reactor and apply it to two atmospheric plasma processing applications: ozone generation and NO removal. We will investigate what pulse parameters result in the highest plasma processing yields. The results show that for ozone generation, secondary-streamer effects appear to have a slight influence on the ozone yield: if the pulse duration increases and/or the voltage increases in such a way that streamers can start to cross the gap in the reactor, the ozone yields decrease. Furthermore, for NO removal, we see a similar effect of pulse duration and applied voltage as for the ozone generation, but the effect of the pulse duration is slightly different: long pulses result in the highest NO-removal yield. However, the NO-removal process is fundamentally different: besides removing NO, the plasma also produces NO and this production is more pronounced in the primary-streamer phase, which is why the pulse polarity has almost no influence on the NO-removal yield (only on the by-product formation). Moreover, the rise time of the pulses has a much more significant effect on ozone generation and NO removal than the pulse duration: a long rise time results in a lower enhanced electric field at the streamer heads, which consequently reduces the production of radicals required for ozone generation and NO removal, and decreases the streamer volume. Consequently, the resulting ozone yields and NO-removal yields are lower. Finally, the main conclusion is that the plasma generated with our nanosecond pulses is very efficient for ozone generation and NO removal, achieving yields as high as 175 g · kWh−1 for ozone generation and 2.5 mol · kWh−1 (or 14.9 eV per NO molecule) for NO removal.</description><subject>atmospheric non-thermal plasma</subject><subject>plasma processing</subject><subject>pulsed power</subject><subject>transient plasma</subject><issn>0022-3727</issn><issn>1361-6463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePeYkCtbNRzdNvcniFyzuQT2HaZusXdokJF1RD_7ttlQ9iTAw8GbezOOH0DElF5RIOaNc0ESkgs8ApKDZDpr8SrtoQghjCc9Yto8OYtwQQuZC0gn6PH3cFmcWrIu6dLbCXQAba2077BuILWDjAoauddG_6FCXP7IPrtQx1naN9ZvvJ23viZcYvG_qErraWdw57D6c1XitrQ6jBv2PhxUOunWv0ByiPQNN1EfffYqeb66fFnfJcnV7v7haJiXPSZdoA0SCyAsgqS4gr4wwGc0oK7g2qTCCiTyVOpMsrUqTSy5zQbUsM5MLZgD4FJHxbhlcjEEb5fvEEN4VJWrgpwZYaoClRn695Xy01M6rjdsG2wf8b_3kj_VKzYlKh5ozQpWvDP8Cr46BLg</recordid><startdate>20171011</startdate><enddate>20171011</enddate><creator>Huiskamp, T</creator><creator>Hoeben, W F L M</creator><creator>Beckers, F J C M</creator><creator>van Heesch, E J M</creator><creator>Pemen, A J M</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171011</creationdate><title>(Sub)nanosecond transient plasma for atmospheric plasma processing experiments: application to ozone generation and NO removal</title><author>Huiskamp, T ; Hoeben, W F L M ; Beckers, F J C M ; van Heesch, E J M ; Pemen, A J M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-efa08a69ba04eba9df6f71712b3ef46f626948e7824dcf9838961e8c7f962faa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>atmospheric non-thermal plasma</topic><topic>plasma processing</topic><topic>pulsed power</topic><topic>transient plasma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huiskamp, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeben, W F L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckers, F J C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Heesch, E J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pemen, A J M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. D, Applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huiskamp, T</au><au>Hoeben, W F L M</au><au>Beckers, F J C M</au><au>van Heesch, E J M</au><au>Pemen, A J M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>(Sub)nanosecond transient plasma for atmospheric plasma processing experiments: application to ozone generation and NO removal</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. D, Applied physics</jtitle><stitle>JPhysD</stitle><addtitle>J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys</addtitle><date>2017-10-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>40</issue><spage>405201</spage><pages>405201-</pages><issn>0022-3727</issn><eissn>1361-6463</eissn><coden>JPAPBE</coden><abstract>In this paper we use a (sub)nanosecond high-voltage pulse source (2-9 ns pulses with 0.4 ns rise time) to generate streamer plasma in a wire-cylinder reactor and apply it to two atmospheric plasma processing applications: ozone generation and NO removal. We will investigate what pulse parameters result in the highest plasma processing yields. The results show that for ozone generation, secondary-streamer effects appear to have a slight influence on the ozone yield: if the pulse duration increases and/or the voltage increases in such a way that streamers can start to cross the gap in the reactor, the ozone yields decrease. Furthermore, for NO removal, we see a similar effect of pulse duration and applied voltage as for the ozone generation, but the effect of the pulse duration is slightly different: long pulses result in the highest NO-removal yield. However, the NO-removal process is fundamentally different: besides removing NO, the plasma also produces NO and this production is more pronounced in the primary-streamer phase, which is why the pulse polarity has almost no influence on the NO-removal yield (only on the by-product formation). Moreover, the rise time of the pulses has a much more significant effect on ozone generation and NO removal than the pulse duration: a long rise time results in a lower enhanced electric field at the streamer heads, which consequently reduces the production of radicals required for ozone generation and NO removal, and decreases the streamer volume. Consequently, the resulting ozone yields and NO-removal yields are lower. Finally, the main conclusion is that the plasma generated with our nanosecond pulses is very efficient for ozone generation and NO removal, achieving yields as high as 175 g · kWh−1 for ozone generation and 2.5 mol · kWh−1 (or 14.9 eV per NO molecule) for NO removal.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1361-6463/aa8617</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3727
ispartof Journal of physics. D, Applied physics, 2017-10, Vol.50 (40), p.405201
issn 0022-3727
1361-6463
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1361_6463_aa8617
source Institute of Physics
subjects atmospheric non-thermal plasma
plasma processing
pulsed power
transient plasma
title (Sub)nanosecond transient plasma for atmospheric plasma processing experiments: application to ozone generation and NO removal
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A23%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=(Sub)nanosecond%20transient%20plasma%20for%20atmospheric%20plasma%20processing%20experiments:%20application%20to%20ozone%20generation%20and%20NO%20removal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20D,%20Applied%20physics&rft.au=Huiskamp,%20T&rft.date=2017-10-11&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=40&rft.spage=405201&rft.pages=405201-&rft.issn=0022-3727&rft.eissn=1361-6463&rft.coden=JPAPBE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6463/aa8617&rft_dat=%3Ciop_cross%3Edaa8617%3C/iop_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-efa08a69ba04eba9df6f71712b3ef46f626948e7824dcf9838961e8c7f962faa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true