Higher order thinking skills students in mathematical statistics course base on revised bloom taxonomy in factual and conceptual knowledge dimension

The purpose of this study was to identify Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in mathematics education study program students in the Mathematical statistics course. HOTS in this study is based on the Revised Bloom Taxonomy which includes analyzing, evaluating and creating, especially in the dimensio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2021-06, Vol.1918 (4), p.42076
Main Authors: Rahayu, A, Syah, A, Najib, A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Colleges & universities
Criteria
Critical thinking
Data collection
Education
Knowledge
Mathematical analysis
Mathematics education
Physics
Skills
Students
Taxonomy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this study was to identify Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in mathematics education study program students in the Mathematical statistics course. HOTS in this study is based on the Revised Bloom Taxonomy which includes analyzing, evaluating and creating, especially in the dimensions of factual knowledge and conceptual knowledge. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The research subjects were 35 students of the fourth semester mathematics education study program of Al Asyariah Mandar University. The data collection techniques such as essay test and each of which consisted of 3 items of dimension of procedural knowledge and conceptual knowledge, which was C4 (analyzing), C5 (evaluating), C6 (creative) level. HOTS data were obtained from test answers given to students and then analyzed descriptively. HOTS criteria include low, medium, and high. The results of the research on the factual knowledge dimension with a C4 level (analyzing) of 6.7 (medium), a C5 level (evaluating) of 4.6 (low), and a C6 level (creating) of 4.3 (low). Whereas in the conceptual knowledge dimension with a C4 level (analyzing) of 6.9 (medium), a C5 level (evaluating) of 4.7 (low), and a C6 level (creating) of 4.1 (low). In general, students’ HOTS are in low criteria.
ISSN:1742-6588
1742-6596
DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042076