Experimental comparison of induction control methods for wind farm power maximization on a scaled two-turbine setup

• Published in: Journal of physics. Conference series 2024-06, Vol.2767 (9), p.92064
• Main Authors: Van Der Hoek, Daan, Ferreira, Carlos Simão, Van Wingerden, Jan-Willem
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Actuation; Control methods; Maximization; Optimization; Particle image velocimetry; Pitch (inclination); Turbines; Upstream; Wind farms; Wind power; Wind tunnel testing; Wind tunnels; Wind turbines
• ISSN: 1742-6588; 1742-6596
• DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2767/9/092064

Induction control methods offer a potential solution to minimizing wake effects that occur in large wind farms. This paper presents an experimental study on multiple induction control methods for wind farm power maximization. Wind tunnel experiments were conducted on two aligned scaled wind turbines. The upstream turbine was operated with static induction control, periodic dynamic induction control with collective pitch actuation, and dynamic individual pitch control (the helix approach). All wind farm control implementations were compared to a baseline case, which optimized the individual power extraction of both turbines. Tomographic particle image velocimetry was used to measure the wake of the upstream turbine. Based on turbine measurements, grid searches were employed to discover the optimal frequency and amplitude of the pitch actuation in the dynamic induction control cases. While static induction control showed increased wake velocities in the near wake, it did not provide an overall increase in power production of the two-turbine array. Dynamic induction control methods, especially the helix approach in the counterclockwise direction, were seen to significantly increase the total power output compared to the baseline control case. However, this improvement came with a larger amount of pitch actuation and increased fatigue loading of structural components in the fore-aft direction.