Loading…

The land use legacy effect: looking back to see a path forward to improve management

Water quality has suffered as humans have increased nutrient inputs across the landscape. In many cases, management actions to reduce nutrient inputs have not been met with concomitant ecosystem responses. These missed expectations are partly due to the continued slow delivery of nutrient-enriched g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental research letters 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.35005
Main Authors: Martin, Sherry L, Hamlin, Quercus F, Kendall, Anthony D, Wan, Luwen, Hyndman, David W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-55a9bb16c3c891f83f00e718d3d07d247dd0c36dc3248e45d5b6863346c8affa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-55a9bb16c3c891f83f00e718d3d07d247dd0c36dc3248e45d5b6863346c8affa3
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 35005
container_title Environmental research letters
container_volume 16
creator Martin, Sherry L
Hamlin, Quercus F
Kendall, Anthony D
Wan, Luwen
Hyndman, David W
description Water quality has suffered as humans have increased nutrient inputs across the landscape. In many cases, management actions to reduce nutrient inputs have not been met with concomitant ecosystem responses. These missed expectations are partly due to the continued slow delivery of nutrient-enriched groundwater pre-dating input reductions resulting from management actions. Land use legacies as expressed through this time lag are important to quantify in order to adjust management expectations. We present a novel coupling of nitrogen source maps with groundwater transport times to create a high-resolution (120 m) fully distributed estimate of the timing and magnitude of groundwater nitrogen deliveries to surface water across Michigan's Lower Peninsula. This new view of the landscape has been designed around common management timelines for: elected officials looking to make a difference for re-election (30 years). One striking result is that after 100 years, in our study area, approximately 50% of the nitrogen that enters the groundwater system remains in transit. This means that actions taken now may not show the expected lower nitrogen loads to receiving ecosystems for decades to centuries. We show that differences in groundwater travel times create a heterogeneous patchwork over which managers can prioritize actions to best match their targeted response times. Across the highest nitrogen inputs in our study region, less than 10% had short enough groundwater legacies to match the management timeline of most government and agency work. Agricultural practices (manure and chemical fertilizer) are the main nitrogen contributors across the top three management classes; however, human contributions through septic tank effluent and lawn fertilizers contribute 5%-8% of nitrogen.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1748-9326/abe14c
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_abe14c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d12b4cc2eee14ea0a6b8bcf90b9fa8a9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2512916512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-55a9bb16c3c891f83f00e718d3d07d247dd0c36dc3248e45d5b6863346c8affa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UT1PwzAQjRBIfO6MlhhYKNhx7DhsCPElIbGU2Trb5zYljYOTgvj3uAQVBsRyd3p6985-L8uOGT1nVKkLVhZqUvFcXoBBVtitbG8Dbf-ad7P9vl9QKgpRqr1sOp0jaaB1ZNWnAWdgPwh6j3a4JE0IL3U7IwbsCxkC6REJkA6GOfEhvkN0a7RedjG8IVlCCzNcYjscZjsemh6PvvtB9nx7M72-nzw-3T1cXz1OrKBsmAgBlTFMWm5VxbzinlIsmXLc0dLlRekctVw6y_NCYSGcMFJJzgtpFXgP_CB7GHVdgIXuYr2E-KED1PoLCHGmIQ61bVA7lpvC2hwxmYNAQRplrK-oqTwoqJLWyaiVPvO6wn7Qi7CKbXq-zgXLKyZTTSw6smwMfR_Rb64yqtc56LXRem20HnNIK2fjSh26H81_6Kd_0DE2mknNNeUiZac75_kn1cCWqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2512916512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The land use legacy effect: looking back to see a path forward to improve management</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><creator>Martin, Sherry L ; Hamlin, Quercus F ; Kendall, Anthony D ; Wan, Luwen ; Hyndman, David W</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Sherry L ; Hamlin, Quercus F ; Kendall, Anthony D ; Wan, Luwen ; Hyndman, David W</creatorcontrib><description>Water quality has suffered as humans have increased nutrient inputs across the landscape. In many cases, management actions to reduce nutrient inputs have not been met with concomitant ecosystem responses. These missed expectations are partly due to the continued slow delivery of nutrient-enriched groundwater pre-dating input reductions resulting from management actions. Land use legacies as expressed through this time lag are important to quantify in order to adjust management expectations. We present a novel coupling of nitrogen source maps with groundwater transport times to create a high-resolution (120 m) fully distributed estimate of the timing and magnitude of groundwater nitrogen deliveries to surface water across Michigan's Lower Peninsula. This new view of the landscape has been designed around common management timelines for: elected officials looking to make a difference for re-election (&lt;5 years), career managers hoping to see the fruits of their labor (5-30 years), and advocacy groups whose work can span generations (&gt;30 years). One striking result is that after 100 years, in our study area, approximately 50% of the nitrogen that enters the groundwater system remains in transit. This means that actions taken now may not show the expected lower nitrogen loads to receiving ecosystems for decades to centuries. We show that differences in groundwater travel times create a heterogeneous patchwork over which managers can prioritize actions to best match their targeted response times. Across the highest nitrogen inputs in our study region, less than 10% had short enough groundwater legacies to match the management timeline of most government and agency work. Agricultural practices (manure and chemical fertilizer) are the main nitrogen contributors across the top three management classes; however, human contributions through septic tank effluent and lawn fertilizers contribute 5%-8% of nitrogen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe14c</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agrochemicals ; Careers ; Elections ; Fertilizers ; Groundwater ; groundwater transport ; Land use ; Land use management ; land use practice ; Landscape design ; Nitrogen ; nitrogen management ; nutrient legacy ; Nutrients ; Septic tanks ; Surface water ; Time lag ; time lags ; Transportation planning ; Travel time ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.35005</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-55a9bb16c3c891f83f00e718d3d07d247dd0c36dc3248e45d5b6863346c8affa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-55a9bb16c3c891f83f00e718d3d07d247dd0c36dc3248e45d5b6863346c8affa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6414-4500 ; 0000-0001-7093-5010 ; 0000-0001-7471-0476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2512916512?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,25734,27905,27906,36993,44571</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Sherry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamlin, Quercus F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Anthony D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Luwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyndman, David W</creatorcontrib><title>The land use legacy effect: looking back to see a path forward to improve management</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Water quality has suffered as humans have increased nutrient inputs across the landscape. In many cases, management actions to reduce nutrient inputs have not been met with concomitant ecosystem responses. These missed expectations are partly due to the continued slow delivery of nutrient-enriched groundwater pre-dating input reductions resulting from management actions. Land use legacies as expressed through this time lag are important to quantify in order to adjust management expectations. We present a novel coupling of nitrogen source maps with groundwater transport times to create a high-resolution (120 m) fully distributed estimate of the timing and magnitude of groundwater nitrogen deliveries to surface water across Michigan's Lower Peninsula. This new view of the landscape has been designed around common management timelines for: elected officials looking to make a difference for re-election (&lt;5 years), career managers hoping to see the fruits of their labor (5-30 years), and advocacy groups whose work can span generations (&gt;30 years). One striking result is that after 100 years, in our study area, approximately 50% of the nitrogen that enters the groundwater system remains in transit. This means that actions taken now may not show the expected lower nitrogen loads to receiving ecosystems for decades to centuries. We show that differences in groundwater travel times create a heterogeneous patchwork over which managers can prioritize actions to best match their targeted response times. Across the highest nitrogen inputs in our study region, less than 10% had short enough groundwater legacies to match the management timeline of most government and agency work. Agricultural practices (manure and chemical fertilizer) are the main nitrogen contributors across the top three management classes; however, human contributions through septic tank effluent and lawn fertilizers contribute 5%-8% of nitrogen.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>groundwater transport</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>land use practice</subject><subject>Landscape design</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen management</subject><subject>nutrient legacy</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Septic tanks</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Time lag</subject><subject>time lags</subject><subject>Transportation planning</subject><subject>Travel time</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UT1PwzAQjRBIfO6MlhhYKNhx7DhsCPElIbGU2Trb5zYljYOTgvj3uAQVBsRyd3p6985-L8uOGT1nVKkLVhZqUvFcXoBBVtitbG8Dbf-ad7P9vl9QKgpRqr1sOp0jaaB1ZNWnAWdgPwh6j3a4JE0IL3U7IwbsCxkC6REJkA6GOfEhvkN0a7RedjG8IVlCCzNcYjscZjsemh6PvvtB9nx7M72-nzw-3T1cXz1OrKBsmAgBlTFMWm5VxbzinlIsmXLc0dLlRekctVw6y_NCYSGcMFJJzgtpFXgP_CB7GHVdgIXuYr2E-KED1PoLCHGmIQ61bVA7lpvC2hwxmYNAQRplrK-oqTwoqJLWyaiVPvO6wn7Qi7CKbXq-zgXLKyZTTSw6smwMfR_Rb64yqtc56LXRem20HnNIK2fjSh26H81_6Kd_0DE2mknNNeUiZac75_kn1cCWqQ</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Martin, Sherry L</creator><creator>Hamlin, Quercus F</creator><creator>Kendall, Anthony D</creator><creator>Wan, Luwen</creator><creator>Hyndman, David W</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-4500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7093-5010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7471-0476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>The land use legacy effect: looking back to see a path forward to improve management</title><author>Martin, Sherry L ; Hamlin, Quercus F ; Kendall, Anthony D ; Wan, Luwen ; Hyndman, David W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-55a9bb16c3c891f83f00e718d3d07d247dd0c36dc3248e45d5b6863346c8affa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>groundwater transport</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>land use practice</topic><topic>Landscape design</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen management</topic><topic>nutrient legacy</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Septic tanks</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Time lag</topic><topic>time lags</topic><topic>Transportation planning</topic><topic>Travel time</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Sherry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamlin, Quercus F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Anthony D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Luwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyndman, David W</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Sherry L</au><au>Hamlin, Quercus F</au><au>Kendall, Anthony D</au><au>Wan, Luwen</au><au>Hyndman, David W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The land use legacy effect: looking back to see a path forward to improve management</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>35005</spage><pages>35005-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>Water quality has suffered as humans have increased nutrient inputs across the landscape. In many cases, management actions to reduce nutrient inputs have not been met with concomitant ecosystem responses. These missed expectations are partly due to the continued slow delivery of nutrient-enriched groundwater pre-dating input reductions resulting from management actions. Land use legacies as expressed through this time lag are important to quantify in order to adjust management expectations. We present a novel coupling of nitrogen source maps with groundwater transport times to create a high-resolution (120 m) fully distributed estimate of the timing and magnitude of groundwater nitrogen deliveries to surface water across Michigan's Lower Peninsula. This new view of the landscape has been designed around common management timelines for: elected officials looking to make a difference for re-election (&lt;5 years), career managers hoping to see the fruits of their labor (5-30 years), and advocacy groups whose work can span generations (&gt;30 years). One striking result is that after 100 years, in our study area, approximately 50% of the nitrogen that enters the groundwater system remains in transit. This means that actions taken now may not show the expected lower nitrogen loads to receiving ecosystems for decades to centuries. We show that differences in groundwater travel times create a heterogeneous patchwork over which managers can prioritize actions to best match their targeted response times. Across the highest nitrogen inputs in our study region, less than 10% had short enough groundwater legacies to match the management timeline of most government and agency work. Agricultural practices (manure and chemical fertilizer) are the main nitrogen contributors across the top three management classes; however, human contributions through septic tank effluent and lawn fertilizers contribute 5%-8% of nitrogen.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/abe14c</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-4500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7093-5010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7471-0476</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-9326
ispartof Environmental research letters, 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.35005
issn 1748-9326
1748-9326
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_abe14c
source Publicly Available Content Database; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)
subjects Agricultural practices
Agrochemicals
Careers
Elections
Fertilizers
Groundwater
groundwater transport
Land use
Land use management
land use practice
Landscape design
Nitrogen
nitrogen management
nutrient legacy
Nutrients
Septic tanks
Surface water
Time lag
time lags
Transportation planning
Travel time
Water quality
title The land use legacy effect: looking back to see a path forward to improve management
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20land%20use%20legacy%20effect:%20looking%20back%20to%20see%20a%20path%20forward%20to%20improve%20management&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Martin,%20Sherry%20L&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=35005&rft.pages=35005-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/abe14c&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2512916512%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-55a9bb16c3c891f83f00e718d3d07d247dd0c36dc3248e45d5b6863346c8affa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2512916512&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true