Loading…
Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review
This paper provides a scoping review of behavioural interventions that target household energy demand. We evaluate 584 empirical papers that test the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to change behaviour associated with household energy demand. The most studied behavioural tools are provid...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental research letters 2022-06, Vol.17 (6), p.63005 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 63005 |
container_title | Environmental research letters |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Composto, Jordana W Weber, Elke U |
description | This paper provides a scoping review of behavioural interventions that target household energy demand. We evaluate 584 empirical papers that test the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to change behaviour associated with household energy demand. The most studied behavioural tools are
providing timely feedback and reminders
and
making information intuitive and easy to access
, followed by (in order)
communicating a norm, reframing consequences, making behaviour observable, obtaining a commitment, setting proper defaults
, and
transitions and habit disruption
. The most studied demand-side behaviour is electricity use. There is high heterogeneity in effect sizes. We classified the target behaviours of each study as
avoid, shift
, or
improve
behaviours and find that
avoid
behaviours (in particular, reducing electricity usage) are the predominant focus of researchers. The effectiveness of interventions differs across
avoid, shift
, and
improve
responses and by the behavioural tool. Specifically,
shifting
behaviours are less effectively motivated than
avoiding
behaviours by using an
information
intervention but more effectively by using a
norm
intervention. We review the literature to provide further information about which behavioural tools are most effective for specific contexts. The effectiveness of most behavioural tools are augmented when they are used in the right combination with other tools. We recommend that researchers focus future work on high impact behaviours and the evaluation of synergistic combinations of behavioural interventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_ac71b8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9e2b1eae1611426cb8d94ca776bba0f8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2673629806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v3CAUtKpGar7uPSL10Es2AYwB91ZF-ZIi5ZJcgx74scvKMS54t8q_LxtHSQ5RT6DHzLxhpqq-M3rKqNZnTAm9aGsuz8ApZvWXav9t9PXD_Vt1kPOa0kY0Su9Xjxfeo5vCFgfMmURPLK5gG-ImQU_CMGEqT1OIQyZTJAm7jUOyipuMq9h3pNDS8pl0-ARD94sAyS6OYVgW5Dbg36Nqz0Of8fj1PKweLi_uz68Xt3dXN-e_bxdOCD0tRMO5bqVruG1to8BKzmsAjlo477imddNo5Ztacq2kR4FWdLquyycoKO3qw-pm1u0irM2YwhOkZxMhmJdBTEsDaQquR9MitwwBmWRMcOms7lrhQClpLVCvi9aPWWtM8c8G82TWJY2h2DdcqmKh1VQWFJ1RLsWcE_q3rYyaXSNmF7nZRW7mRgrlZKaEOL5r_gf-8xM4pr5AjTTFQ2nRjJ2v_wGva5oC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2673629806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><creator>Composto, Jordana W ; Weber, Elke U</creator><creatorcontrib>Composto, Jordana W ; Weber, Elke U</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides a scoping review of behavioural interventions that target household energy demand. We evaluate 584 empirical papers that test the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to change behaviour associated with household energy demand. The most studied behavioural tools are
providing timely feedback and reminders
and
making information intuitive and easy to access
, followed by (in order)
communicating a norm, reframing consequences, making behaviour observable, obtaining a commitment, setting proper defaults
, and
transitions and habit disruption
. The most studied demand-side behaviour is electricity use. There is high heterogeneity in effect sizes. We classified the target behaviours of each study as
avoid, shift
, or
improve
behaviours and find that
avoid
behaviours (in particular, reducing electricity usage) are the predominant focus of researchers. The effectiveness of interventions differs across
avoid, shift
, and
improve
responses and by the behavioural tool. Specifically,
shifting
behaviours are less effectively motivated than
avoiding
behaviours by using an
information
intervention but more effectively by using a
norm
intervention. We review the literature to provide further information about which behavioural tools are most effective for specific contexts. The effectiveness of most behavioural tools are augmented when they are used in the right combination with other tools. We recommend that researchers focus future work on high impact behaviours and the evaluation of synergistic combinations of behavioural interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Behavior ; behavioural interventions ; climate change mitigation ; Communication ; Demand ; demand-side solutions ; Electricity ; Energy demand ; Evaluation ; Heterogeneity ; household energy ; Intervention ; Literature reviews ; Residential energy ; Reviews</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2022-06, Vol.17 (6), p.63005</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3900-7328</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2673629806?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Composto, Jordana W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Elke U</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>This paper provides a scoping review of behavioural interventions that target household energy demand. We evaluate 584 empirical papers that test the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to change behaviour associated with household energy demand. The most studied behavioural tools are
providing timely feedback and reminders
and
making information intuitive and easy to access
, followed by (in order)
communicating a norm, reframing consequences, making behaviour observable, obtaining a commitment, setting proper defaults
, and
transitions and habit disruption
. The most studied demand-side behaviour is electricity use. There is high heterogeneity in effect sizes. We classified the target behaviours of each study as
avoid, shift
, or
improve
behaviours and find that
avoid
behaviours (in particular, reducing electricity usage) are the predominant focus of researchers. The effectiveness of interventions differs across
avoid, shift
, and
improve
responses and by the behavioural tool. Specifically,
shifting
behaviours are less effectively motivated than
avoiding
behaviours by using an
information
intervention but more effectively by using a
norm
intervention. We review the literature to provide further information about which behavioural tools are most effective for specific contexts. The effectiveness of most behavioural tools are augmented when they are used in the right combination with other tools. We recommend that researchers focus future work on high impact behaviours and the evaluation of synergistic combinations of behavioural interventions.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>behavioural interventions</subject><subject>climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>demand-side solutions</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy demand</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>household energy</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Residential energy</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v3CAUtKpGar7uPSL10Es2AYwB91ZF-ZIi5ZJcgx74scvKMS54t8q_LxtHSQ5RT6DHzLxhpqq-M3rKqNZnTAm9aGsuz8ApZvWXav9t9PXD_Vt1kPOa0kY0Su9Xjxfeo5vCFgfMmURPLK5gG-ImQU_CMGEqT1OIQyZTJAm7jUOyipuMq9h3pNDS8pl0-ARD94sAyS6OYVgW5Dbg36Nqz0Of8fj1PKweLi_uz68Xt3dXN-e_bxdOCD0tRMO5bqVruG1to8BKzmsAjlo477imddNo5Ztacq2kR4FWdLquyycoKO3qw-pm1u0irM2YwhOkZxMhmJdBTEsDaQquR9MitwwBmWRMcOms7lrhQClpLVCvi9aPWWtM8c8G82TWJY2h2DdcqmKh1VQWFJ1RLsWcE_q3rYyaXSNmF7nZRW7mRgrlZKaEOL5r_gf-8xM4pr5AjTTFQ2nRjJ2v_wGva5oC</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Composto, Jordana W</creator><creator>Weber, Elke U</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3900-7328</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review</title><author>Composto, Jordana W ; Weber, Elke U</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>behavioural interventions</topic><topic>climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>demand-side solutions</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy demand</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>household energy</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Residential energy</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Composto, Jordana W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Elke U</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Composto, Jordana W</au><au>Weber, Elke U</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>63005</spage><pages>63005-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>This paper provides a scoping review of behavioural interventions that target household energy demand. We evaluate 584 empirical papers that test the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to change behaviour associated with household energy demand. The most studied behavioural tools are
providing timely feedback and reminders
and
making information intuitive and easy to access
, followed by (in order)
communicating a norm, reframing consequences, making behaviour observable, obtaining a commitment, setting proper defaults
, and
transitions and habit disruption
. The most studied demand-side behaviour is electricity use. There is high heterogeneity in effect sizes. We classified the target behaviours of each study as
avoid, shift
, or
improve
behaviours and find that
avoid
behaviours (in particular, reducing electricity usage) are the predominant focus of researchers. The effectiveness of interventions differs across
avoid, shift
, and
improve
responses and by the behavioural tool. Specifically,
shifting
behaviours are less effectively motivated than
avoiding
behaviours by using an
information
intervention but more effectively by using a
norm
intervention. We review the literature to provide further information about which behavioural tools are most effective for specific contexts. The effectiveness of most behavioural tools are augmented when they are used in the right combination with other tools. We recommend that researchers focus future work on high impact behaviours and the evaluation of synergistic combinations of behavioural interventions.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b8</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3900-7328</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-9326 |
ispartof | Environmental research letters, 2022-06, Vol.17 (6), p.63005 |
issn | 1748-9326 1748-9326 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_ac71b8 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access) |
subjects | Behavior behavioural interventions climate change mitigation Communication Demand demand-side solutions Electricity Energy demand Evaluation Heterogeneity household energy Intervention Literature reviews Residential energy Reviews |
title | Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A29%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20behavioural%20interventions%20to%20reduce%20household%20energy%20demand:%20a%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Composto,%20Jordana%20W&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=63005&rft.pages=63005-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2673629806%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2673629806&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |