Loading…

Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review

This paper provides a scoping review of behavioural interventions that target household energy demand. We evaluate 584 empirical papers that test the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to change behaviour associated with household energy demand. The most studied behavioural tools are provid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental research letters 2022-06, Vol.17 (6), p.63005
Main Authors: Composto, Jordana W, Weber, Elke U
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 63005
container_title Environmental research letters
container_volume 17
creator Composto, Jordana W
Weber, Elke U
description This paper provides a scoping review of behavioural interventions that target household energy demand. We evaluate 584 empirical papers that test the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to change behaviour associated with household energy demand. The most studied behavioural tools are providing timely feedback and reminders and making information intuitive and easy to access , followed by (in order) communicating a norm, reframing consequences, making behaviour observable, obtaining a commitment, setting proper defaults , and transitions and habit disruption . The most studied demand-side behaviour is electricity use. There is high heterogeneity in effect sizes. We classified the target behaviours of each study as avoid, shift , or improve behaviours and find that avoid behaviours (in particular, reducing electricity usage) are the predominant focus of researchers. The effectiveness of interventions differs across avoid, shift , and improve responses and by the behavioural tool. Specifically, shifting behaviours are less effectively motivated than avoiding behaviours by using an information intervention but more effectively by using a norm intervention. We review the literature to provide further information about which behavioural tools are most effective for specific contexts. The effectiveness of most behavioural tools are augmented when they are used in the right combination with other tools. We recommend that researchers focus future work on high impact behaviours and the evaluation of synergistic combinations of behavioural interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_ac71b8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9e2b1eae1611426cb8d94ca776bba0f8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2673629806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v3CAUtKpGar7uPSL10Es2AYwB91ZF-ZIi5ZJcgx74scvKMS54t8q_LxtHSQ5RT6DHzLxhpqq-M3rKqNZnTAm9aGsuz8ApZvWXav9t9PXD_Vt1kPOa0kY0Su9Xjxfeo5vCFgfMmURPLK5gG-ImQU_CMGEqT1OIQyZTJAm7jUOyipuMq9h3pNDS8pl0-ARD94sAyS6OYVgW5Dbg36Nqz0Of8fj1PKweLi_uz68Xt3dXN-e_bxdOCD0tRMO5bqVruG1to8BKzmsAjlo477imddNo5Ztacq2kR4FWdLquyycoKO3qw-pm1u0irM2YwhOkZxMhmJdBTEsDaQquR9MitwwBmWRMcOms7lrhQClpLVCvi9aPWWtM8c8G82TWJY2h2DdcqmKh1VQWFJ1RLsWcE_q3rYyaXSNmF7nZRW7mRgrlZKaEOL5r_gf-8xM4pr5AjTTFQ2nRjJ2v_wGva5oC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2673629806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><creator>Composto, Jordana W ; Weber, Elke U</creator><creatorcontrib>Composto, Jordana W ; Weber, Elke U</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides a scoping review of behavioural interventions that target household energy demand. We evaluate 584 empirical papers that test the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to change behaviour associated with household energy demand. The most studied behavioural tools are providing timely feedback and reminders and making information intuitive and easy to access , followed by (in order) communicating a norm, reframing consequences, making behaviour observable, obtaining a commitment, setting proper defaults , and transitions and habit disruption . The most studied demand-side behaviour is electricity use. There is high heterogeneity in effect sizes. We classified the target behaviours of each study as avoid, shift , or improve behaviours and find that avoid behaviours (in particular, reducing electricity usage) are the predominant focus of researchers. The effectiveness of interventions differs across avoid, shift , and improve responses and by the behavioural tool. Specifically, shifting behaviours are less effectively motivated than avoiding behaviours by using an information intervention but more effectively by using a norm intervention. We review the literature to provide further information about which behavioural tools are most effective for specific contexts. The effectiveness of most behavioural tools are augmented when they are used in the right combination with other tools. We recommend that researchers focus future work on high impact behaviours and the evaluation of synergistic combinations of behavioural interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Behavior ; behavioural interventions ; climate change mitigation ; Communication ; Demand ; demand-side solutions ; Electricity ; Energy demand ; Evaluation ; Heterogeneity ; household energy ; Intervention ; Literature reviews ; Residential energy ; Reviews</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2022-06, Vol.17 (6), p.63005</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3900-7328</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2673629806?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Composto, Jordana W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Elke U</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>This paper provides a scoping review of behavioural interventions that target household energy demand. We evaluate 584 empirical papers that test the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to change behaviour associated with household energy demand. The most studied behavioural tools are providing timely feedback and reminders and making information intuitive and easy to access , followed by (in order) communicating a norm, reframing consequences, making behaviour observable, obtaining a commitment, setting proper defaults , and transitions and habit disruption . The most studied demand-side behaviour is electricity use. There is high heterogeneity in effect sizes. We classified the target behaviours of each study as avoid, shift , or improve behaviours and find that avoid behaviours (in particular, reducing electricity usage) are the predominant focus of researchers. The effectiveness of interventions differs across avoid, shift , and improve responses and by the behavioural tool. Specifically, shifting behaviours are less effectively motivated than avoiding behaviours by using an information intervention but more effectively by using a norm intervention. We review the literature to provide further information about which behavioural tools are most effective for specific contexts. The effectiveness of most behavioural tools are augmented when they are used in the right combination with other tools. We recommend that researchers focus future work on high impact behaviours and the evaluation of synergistic combinations of behavioural interventions.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>behavioural interventions</subject><subject>climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>demand-side solutions</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy demand</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>household energy</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Residential energy</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v3CAUtKpGar7uPSL10Es2AYwB91ZF-ZIi5ZJcgx74scvKMS54t8q_LxtHSQ5RT6DHzLxhpqq-M3rKqNZnTAm9aGsuz8ApZvWXav9t9PXD_Vt1kPOa0kY0Su9Xjxfeo5vCFgfMmURPLK5gG-ImQU_CMGEqT1OIQyZTJAm7jUOyipuMq9h3pNDS8pl0-ARD94sAyS6OYVgW5Dbg36Nqz0Of8fj1PKweLi_uz68Xt3dXN-e_bxdOCD0tRMO5bqVruG1to8BKzmsAjlo477imddNo5Ztacq2kR4FWdLquyycoKO3qw-pm1u0irM2YwhOkZxMhmJdBTEsDaQquR9MitwwBmWRMcOms7lrhQClpLVCvi9aPWWtM8c8G82TWJY2h2DdcqmKh1VQWFJ1RLsWcE_q3rYyaXSNmF7nZRW7mRgrlZKaEOL5r_gf-8xM4pr5AjTTFQ2nRjJ2v_wGva5oC</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Composto, Jordana W</creator><creator>Weber, Elke U</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3900-7328</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review</title><author>Composto, Jordana W ; Weber, Elke U</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>behavioural interventions</topic><topic>climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>demand-side solutions</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy demand</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>household energy</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Residential energy</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Composto, Jordana W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Elke U</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Composto, Jordana W</au><au>Weber, Elke U</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>63005</spage><pages>63005-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>This paper provides a scoping review of behavioural interventions that target household energy demand. We evaluate 584 empirical papers that test the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to change behaviour associated with household energy demand. The most studied behavioural tools are providing timely feedback and reminders and making information intuitive and easy to access , followed by (in order) communicating a norm, reframing consequences, making behaviour observable, obtaining a commitment, setting proper defaults , and transitions and habit disruption . The most studied demand-side behaviour is electricity use. There is high heterogeneity in effect sizes. We classified the target behaviours of each study as avoid, shift , or improve behaviours and find that avoid behaviours (in particular, reducing electricity usage) are the predominant focus of researchers. The effectiveness of interventions differs across avoid, shift , and improve responses and by the behavioural tool. Specifically, shifting behaviours are less effectively motivated than avoiding behaviours by using an information intervention but more effectively by using a norm intervention. We review the literature to provide further information about which behavioural tools are most effective for specific contexts. The effectiveness of most behavioural tools are augmented when they are used in the right combination with other tools. We recommend that researchers focus future work on high impact behaviours and the evaluation of synergistic combinations of behavioural interventions.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b8</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3900-7328</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-9326
ispartof Environmental research letters, 2022-06, Vol.17 (6), p.63005
issn 1748-9326
1748-9326
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_ac71b8
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)
subjects Behavior
behavioural interventions
climate change mitigation
Communication
Demand
demand-side solutions
Electricity
Energy demand
Evaluation
Heterogeneity
household energy
Intervention
Literature reviews
Residential energy
Reviews
title Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A29%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20behavioural%20interventions%20to%20reduce%20household%20energy%20demand:%20a%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Composto,%20Jordana%20W&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=63005&rft.pages=63005-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2673629806%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4522896c52b9b57ab6223aa2e84cfc28035587f5362876fe4eb4d8335450a78c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2673629806&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true