Downdraft influences on the differences of PM2.5 concentration: insights from a mega haze evolution in the winter of northern China

• Published in: Environmental research letters 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.014042
• Main Authors: Chen, Zhenyi, Ji, Chengli, Mao, Jiajia, Wang, Zhicheng, Jiao, Zhiming, Gao, Lina, Xiang, Yan, Zhang, Tianshu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: aerosol; Aerosols; Air quality; Boundary layers; Downdraft; Evolution; Haze; haze transportation; Lidar; Particulate matter; Time lag; Urban environments; Wind; winds
• ISSN: 1748-9326
• DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad1229

A significant haze event occurred in northern China from 16 to 21 November 2022. This study analyzed the haze spatial evolution, and meteorological influences by integrating ground and satellite measurements. Most data were obtained using aerosol lidar and wind lidar observations in suburban (Nanjiao Observation Station, NJOS) and urban Beijing (Haidian Observation Station, HDOS). The observations at NJOS and HDOS indicate the presence of a distinct layer of haze restricted to a height of up to 1500 m above the surface. However, the aerosol intensity at HDOS was comparatively lower (aerosol extinction coefficient: 1.39 ± 0.27 km−1) than at NJOS (1.77 ± 0.38 km−1), with approximately one day of time lag in response to the southerly winds. Though NJOS and HDOS presented a similar wind stratification structure, the downdraft under 1000 m influenced the surface air quality were significantly different. The intense downdraft at the lower height at HDOS prevented the vertical upward diffusion of accumulated ground pollutants, whose effect was similar to that of the inversion layer. That led to a more stable increasing trend of PM2.5 at HDOS, with the shallowest planet boundary layer height of 242 m on 20 November. By contrast, NJOS in the transportation path was more regularly influenced by the southerly flow and presented cyclical PM2.5 concentration. This study shows downdraft in urban environments acting as an accelerator for urban episodic PM2.5 pollution, suggesting the complicated contribution from meteorological factors.