The effect of giving commercial feed, beloso trash fish (Saurida tumbil), kurisi trash fish (Nemipterus nematophorus), and mixed trash fish on growth of cantang grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus-lanceolatus) in floating net cage

An experiment was conducted to observe the effect of commercial feeding, and trash fish feed supplement on cantang grouper fish growth in floating net cages at Situbondo, Indonesia. The method used in this experiment was designed with 4 treatments and 3 replications. Samples (26.49 ± 0.81 cm) were a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2020-02, Vol.441 (1), p.12069
Main Authors: Nugraha, M A, Rozi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cages
Epinephelus fuscoguttatus
Feed supplements
Fish
Fish stocking
Nemipterus nematophorus
Saurida tumbil
Survival
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An experiment was conducted to observe the effect of commercial feeding, and trash fish feed supplement on cantang grouper fish growth in floating net cages at Situbondo, Indonesia. The method used in this experiment was designed with 4 treatments and 3 replications. Samples (26.49 ± 0.81 cm) were a stocking density of400 fish/cage and maintenance for 30 days. The treatments used were P0;commercial pellets, P1;100% beloso trash fish (Saurida tumbil), P2; 100% kurisi trash fish (Nemipterus nematophorus) and P3; mixed wasted fish; 50% beloso trash fish + 50% kurisi trash fish, with four replicates. The best treatment result is that P0 quantitatively has significant effect on feed growth, survival, and efficiency compared to other treatments; SGR (0.5618%), SR (85%), FCR (3.69), and EPP (27.08%) compared to other treatments. The best treatment result is that P0 quantitatively has significant effect feed on growth, survival, and efficiency feed utilization of cantang grouper (E. fuscoguttatus-lanceolatus) compared to other treatments.
ISSN:1755-1307
1755-1315
DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/441/1/012069