Loading…
The pitfalls of planar spin-glass benchmarks: raising the bar for quantum annealers (again)
In an effort to overcome the limitations of random spin-glass benchmarks for quantum annealers, focus has shifted to carefully crafted gadget-based problems whose logical structure typically has a planar topology. Recent experiments on these gadget problems using a commercially available quantum ann...
Saved in:
Published in: | Quantum science and technology 2017-09, Vol.2 (3), p.38501 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-194b4797a2b861c13a84ac3c366707338f97af5ea1a850eeb49e806a468f3ce43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-194b4797a2b861c13a84ac3c366707338f97af5ea1a850eeb49e806a468f3ce43 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 38501 |
container_title | Quantum science and technology |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Mandrà, Salvatore Katzgraber, Helmut G Thomas, Creighton |
description | In an effort to overcome the limitations of random spin-glass benchmarks for quantum annealers, focus has shifted to carefully crafted gadget-based problems whose logical structure typically has a planar topology. Recent experiments on these gadget problems using a commercially available quantum annealer have demonstrated an impressive performance over a selection of commonly used classical optimisation heuristics. Here, we show that efficient classical optimisation techniques, such as minimum-weight-perfect matching, can solve these gadget problems exactly and in polynomial time. We present approaches on how to mitigate this shortcoming of commonly used benchmark problems based on planar logical topologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/2058-9565/aa7877 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>iop_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2058_9565_aa7877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>qstaa7877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-194b4797a2b861c13a84ac3c366707338f97af5ea1a850eeb49e806a468f3ce43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1PwzAQxS0EElXpzugJgUSoHSe2w4YqvqRKLGVisC7GTl1SJ7XTgf8eR0WIATHd6e69p6cfQueU3FAi5TwnpcyqkpdzACGFOEKTn9Pxr_0UzWLcEEJYTmlF-AS9rdYG926w0LYRdxb3LXgIOPbOZ00LMeLaeL3eQviItziAi843eEiuOslsF_BuD37YbzF4b6A1IeJLaMD5qzN0kmKjmX3PKXp9uF8tnrLly-Pz4m6ZaVayIaNVUReiEpDXklNNGcgCNNOMc0EEY9Kmny0NUJAlMaYuKiMJh4JLy7Qp2BSRQ64OXYzBWNUHlwp_KkrUyEeNANQIQB34JMv1weK6Xm26ffCp4H_yiz_kuzioXDFFWOpFVf9u2RfOAXM0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The pitfalls of planar spin-glass benchmarks: raising the bar for quantum annealers (again)</title><source>Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:IOP Publishing Read and Publish 2024-2025 (Reading List)</source><creator>Mandrà, Salvatore ; Katzgraber, Helmut G ; Thomas, Creighton</creator><creatorcontrib>Mandrà, Salvatore ; Katzgraber, Helmut G ; Thomas, Creighton</creatorcontrib><description>In an effort to overcome the limitations of random spin-glass benchmarks for quantum annealers, focus has shifted to carefully crafted gadget-based problems whose logical structure typically has a planar topology. Recent experiments on these gadget problems using a commercially available quantum annealer have demonstrated an impressive performance over a selection of commonly used classical optimisation heuristics. Here, we show that efficient classical optimisation techniques, such as minimum-weight-perfect matching, can solve these gadget problems exactly and in polynomial time. We present approaches on how to mitigate this shortcoming of commonly used benchmark problems based on planar logical topologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2058-9565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2058-9565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/aa7877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>benchmarking ; exact algorithms ; P versus NP ; quantum annealing ; spin glasses</subject><ispartof>Quantum science and technology, 2017-09, Vol.2 (3), p.38501</ispartof><rights>2017 IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-194b4797a2b861c13a84ac3c366707338f97af5ea1a850eeb49e806a468f3ce43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-194b4797a2b861c13a84ac3c366707338f97af5ea1a850eeb49e806a468f3ce43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3341-9943 ; 0000-0002-3908-2694</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mandrà, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katzgraber, Helmut G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Creighton</creatorcontrib><title>The pitfalls of planar spin-glass benchmarks: raising the bar for quantum annealers (again)</title><title>Quantum science and technology</title><addtitle>QST</addtitle><addtitle>Quantum Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>In an effort to overcome the limitations of random spin-glass benchmarks for quantum annealers, focus has shifted to carefully crafted gadget-based problems whose logical structure typically has a planar topology. Recent experiments on these gadget problems using a commercially available quantum annealer have demonstrated an impressive performance over a selection of commonly used classical optimisation heuristics. Here, we show that efficient classical optimisation techniques, such as minimum-weight-perfect matching, can solve these gadget problems exactly and in polynomial time. We present approaches on how to mitigate this shortcoming of commonly used benchmark problems based on planar logical topologies.</description><subject>benchmarking</subject><subject>exact algorithms</subject><subject>P versus NP</subject><subject>quantum annealing</subject><subject>spin glasses</subject><issn>2058-9565</issn><issn>2058-9565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kL1PwzAQxS0EElXpzugJgUSoHSe2w4YqvqRKLGVisC7GTl1SJ7XTgf8eR0WIATHd6e69p6cfQueU3FAi5TwnpcyqkpdzACGFOEKTn9Pxr_0UzWLcEEJYTmlF-AS9rdYG926w0LYRdxb3LXgIOPbOZ00LMeLaeL3eQviItziAi843eEiuOslsF_BuD37YbzF4b6A1IeJLaMD5qzN0kmKjmX3PKXp9uF8tnrLly-Pz4m6ZaVayIaNVUReiEpDXklNNGcgCNNOMc0EEY9Kmny0NUJAlMaYuKiMJh4JLy7Qp2BSRQ64OXYzBWNUHlwp_KkrUyEeNANQIQB34JMv1weK6Xm26ffCp4H_yiz_kuzioXDFFWOpFVf9u2RfOAXM0</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Mandrà, Salvatore</creator><creator>Katzgraber, Helmut G</creator><creator>Thomas, Creighton</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3341-9943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-2694</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>The pitfalls of planar spin-glass benchmarks: raising the bar for quantum annealers (again)</title><author>Mandrà, Salvatore ; Katzgraber, Helmut G ; Thomas, Creighton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-194b4797a2b861c13a84ac3c366707338f97af5ea1a850eeb49e806a468f3ce43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>benchmarking</topic><topic>exact algorithms</topic><topic>P versus NP</topic><topic>quantum annealing</topic><topic>spin glasses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mandrà, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katzgraber, Helmut G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Creighton</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Quantum science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mandrà, Salvatore</au><au>Katzgraber, Helmut G</au><au>Thomas, Creighton</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The pitfalls of planar spin-glass benchmarks: raising the bar for quantum annealers (again)</atitle><jtitle>Quantum science and technology</jtitle><stitle>QST</stitle><addtitle>Quantum Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>38501</spage><pages>38501-</pages><issn>2058-9565</issn><eissn>2058-9565</eissn><abstract>In an effort to overcome the limitations of random spin-glass benchmarks for quantum annealers, focus has shifted to carefully crafted gadget-based problems whose logical structure typically has a planar topology. Recent experiments on these gadget problems using a commercially available quantum annealer have demonstrated an impressive performance over a selection of commonly used classical optimisation heuristics. Here, we show that efficient classical optimisation techniques, such as minimum-weight-perfect matching, can solve these gadget problems exactly and in polynomial time. We present approaches on how to mitigate this shortcoming of commonly used benchmark problems based on planar logical topologies.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/2058-9565/aa7877</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3341-9943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-2694</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2058-9565 |
ispartof | Quantum science and technology, 2017-09, Vol.2 (3), p.38501 |
issn | 2058-9565 2058-9565 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2058_9565_aa7877 |
source | Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:IOP Publishing Read and Publish 2024-2025 (Reading List) |
subjects | benchmarking exact algorithms P versus NP quantum annealing spin glasses |
title | The pitfalls of planar spin-glass benchmarks: raising the bar for quantum annealers (again) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A33%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20pitfalls%20of%20planar%20spin-glass%20benchmarks:%20raising%20the%20bar%20for%20quantum%20annealers%20(again)&rft.jtitle=Quantum%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Mandr%C3%A0,%20Salvatore&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=38501&rft.pages=38501-&rft.issn=2058-9565&rft.eissn=2058-9565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2058-9565/aa7877&rft_dat=%3Ciop_cross%3Eqstaa7877%3C/iop_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-194b4797a2b861c13a84ac3c366707338f97af5ea1a850eeb49e806a468f3ce43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |