Loading…
Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling
The determination of Open Circuit Voltage (OCV) is required in order to successfully model electrode behavior, and a standard method for doing this is to charge and discharge a cell at very slow current rates while measuring both voltage and State of Charge (SOC). For example, scans at a rate of C/1...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2021-05, Vol.168 (5), p.50526 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 50526 |
container_title | Journal of the Electrochemical Society |
container_volume | 168 |
creator | Baker, Daniel R. Verbrugge, Mark W. |
description | The determination of Open Circuit Voltage (OCV) is required in order to successfully model electrode behavior, and a standard method for doing this is to charge and discharge a cell at very slow current rates while measuring both voltage and State of Charge (SOC). For example, scans at a rate of C/100 (needing 100 h to charge from empty to full) are often used, but faster scans lose accuracy because irreversible losses, including those due to transport phenomena and reaction kinetics, impact the voltage in rough proportion to scan rate. We develop perturbation methods to correct measurements at higher scan rates to make their accuracy comparable to results at slower scan rates. Perturbation corrections are given for cases in which current is scanned (e.g., at different constant C-rates) as well as when voltage is scanned (e.g., linear-sweep voltammetry). Sinusoidal scanning of either voltage or current is proposed to eliminate the discontinuities at scan reversal, increasing the accuracy of these methods. The analytic formulas given here can be combined with a regression analysis of data at multiple scan rates to determine not only the OCV but also other resistances in the electrode, and this is a goal of future work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1149/1945-7111/abf5f5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>iop_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1149_1945_7111_abf5f5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jesabf5f5</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEFOwzAQtBBIlMKdox9AqB07ccINqlKQiqgUOEeO44CrYFdrR6h8gi_jUODGaWd3Z2dWg9A5JZeU8nJGS54lglI6k02XddkBmvyNDtGEEMoSnmf0GJ14v4ktLbiYoM-qd-94PgBoG7ADvHYhIiN7XClprbEv2HX4RoagYRe34AaPF71WAVyr_RVeaqtB9uZDt3itIQzQyGCcxZXrh28gbYvDq8YPGkzwo1xl7OCdaaPLr_V8p_podoqOOtl7ffZTp-j5dvE0v0tWj8v7-fUqUSxNQ6JSIduCkEJwUfKOiZaUlORcFTkjucoLlqUlU40mMi90oyOp4VyWhDWF6ETJpojsdRU470F39RbMm4RdTUk9BlqP6dVjevU-0HhysT8xbltv3AA2Pvg__Qvy1Hm3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling</title><source>Institute of Physics</source><creator>Baker, Daniel R. ; Verbrugge, Mark W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Daniel R. ; Verbrugge, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><description>The determination of Open Circuit Voltage (OCV) is required in order to successfully model electrode behavior, and a standard method for doing this is to charge and discharge a cell at very slow current rates while measuring both voltage and State of Charge (SOC). For example, scans at a rate of C/100 (needing 100 h to charge from empty to full) are often used, but faster scans lose accuracy because irreversible losses, including those due to transport phenomena and reaction kinetics, impact the voltage in rough proportion to scan rate. We develop perturbation methods to correct measurements at higher scan rates to make their accuracy comparable to results at slower scan rates. Perturbation corrections are given for cases in which current is scanned (e.g., at different constant C-rates) as well as when voltage is scanned (e.g., linear-sweep voltammetry). Sinusoidal scanning of either voltage or current is proposed to eliminate the discontinuities at scan reversal, increasing the accuracy of these methods. The analytic formulas given here can be combined with a regression analysis of data at multiple scan rates to determine not only the OCV but also other resistances in the electrode, and this is a goal of future work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-4651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/abf5f5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JESOAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><ispartof>Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2021-05, Vol.168 (5), p.50526</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published on behalf of The Electrochemical Society by IOP Publishing Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6100-3238 ; 0000-0002-7642-4067</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbrugge, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><title>Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling</title><title>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</title><addtitle>JES</addtitle><addtitle>J. Electrochem. Soc</addtitle><description>The determination of Open Circuit Voltage (OCV) is required in order to successfully model electrode behavior, and a standard method for doing this is to charge and discharge a cell at very slow current rates while measuring both voltage and State of Charge (SOC). For example, scans at a rate of C/100 (needing 100 h to charge from empty to full) are often used, but faster scans lose accuracy because irreversible losses, including those due to transport phenomena and reaction kinetics, impact the voltage in rough proportion to scan rate. We develop perturbation methods to correct measurements at higher scan rates to make their accuracy comparable to results at slower scan rates. Perturbation corrections are given for cases in which current is scanned (e.g., at different constant C-rates) as well as when voltage is scanned (e.g., linear-sweep voltammetry). Sinusoidal scanning of either voltage or current is proposed to eliminate the discontinuities at scan reversal, increasing the accuracy of these methods. The analytic formulas given here can be combined with a regression analysis of data at multiple scan rates to determine not only the OCV but also other resistances in the electrode, and this is a goal of future work.</description><issn>0013-4651</issn><issn>1945-7111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEFOwzAQtBBIlMKdox9AqB07ccINqlKQiqgUOEeO44CrYFdrR6h8gi_jUODGaWd3Z2dWg9A5JZeU8nJGS54lglI6k02XddkBmvyNDtGEEMoSnmf0GJ14v4ktLbiYoM-qd-94PgBoG7ADvHYhIiN7XClprbEv2HX4RoagYRe34AaPF71WAVyr_RVeaqtB9uZDt3itIQzQyGCcxZXrh28gbYvDq8YPGkzwo1xl7OCdaaPLr_V8p_podoqOOtl7ffZTp-j5dvE0v0tWj8v7-fUqUSxNQ6JSIduCkEJwUfKOiZaUlORcFTkjucoLlqUlU40mMi90oyOp4VyWhDWF6ETJpojsdRU470F39RbMm4RdTUk9BlqP6dVjevU-0HhysT8xbltv3AA2Pvg__Qvy1Hm3</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Baker, Daniel R.</creator><creator>Verbrugge, Mark W.</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-3238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7642-4067</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling</title><author>Baker, Daniel R. ; Verbrugge, Mark W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbrugge, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP_英国物理学会OA刊</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Daniel R.</au><au>Verbrugge, Mark W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</jtitle><stitle>JES</stitle><addtitle>J. Electrochem. Soc</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>168</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>50526</spage><pages>50526-</pages><issn>0013-4651</issn><eissn>1945-7111</eissn><coden>JESOAN</coden><abstract>The determination of Open Circuit Voltage (OCV) is required in order to successfully model electrode behavior, and a standard method for doing this is to charge and discharge a cell at very slow current rates while measuring both voltage and State of Charge (SOC). For example, scans at a rate of C/100 (needing 100 h to charge from empty to full) are often used, but faster scans lose accuracy because irreversible losses, including those due to transport phenomena and reaction kinetics, impact the voltage in rough proportion to scan rate. We develop perturbation methods to correct measurements at higher scan rates to make their accuracy comparable to results at slower scan rates. Perturbation corrections are given for cases in which current is scanned (e.g., at different constant C-rates) as well as when voltage is scanned (e.g., linear-sweep voltammetry). Sinusoidal scanning of either voltage or current is proposed to eliminate the discontinuities at scan reversal, increasing the accuracy of these methods. The analytic formulas given here can be combined with a regression analysis of data at multiple scan rates to determine not only the OCV but also other resistances in the electrode, and this is a goal of future work.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1149/1945-7111/abf5f5</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-3238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7642-4067</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-4651 |
ispartof | Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2021-05, Vol.168 (5), p.50526 |
issn | 0013-4651 1945-7111 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_iop_journals_10_1149_1945_7111_abf5f5 |
source | Institute of Physics |
title | Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T15%3A25%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Slow%20Current%20or%20Potential%20Scanning%20of%20Battery%20Porous%20Electrodes:%20Generalized%20Perturbation%20Solution%20and%20the%20Merits%20of%20Sinusoidal%20Current%20Cycling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Electrochemical%20Society&rft.au=Baker,%20Daniel%20R.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=168&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=50526&rft.pages=50526-&rft.issn=0013-4651&rft.eissn=1945-7111&rft.coden=JESOAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1149/1945-7111/abf5f5&rft_dat=%3Ciop_cross%3Ejesabf5f5%3C/iop_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |