Loading…

Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling

The determination of Open Circuit Voltage (OCV) is required in order to successfully model electrode behavior, and a standard method for doing this is to charge and discharge a cell at very slow current rates while measuring both voltage and State of Charge (SOC). For example, scans at a rate of C/1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2021-05, Vol.168 (5), p.50526
Main Authors: Baker, Daniel R., Verbrugge, Mark W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 50526
container_title Journal of the Electrochemical Society
container_volume 168
creator Baker, Daniel R.
Verbrugge, Mark W.
description The determination of Open Circuit Voltage (OCV) is required in order to successfully model electrode behavior, and a standard method for doing this is to charge and discharge a cell at very slow current rates while measuring both voltage and State of Charge (SOC). For example, scans at a rate of C/100 (needing 100 h to charge from empty to full) are often used, but faster scans lose accuracy because irreversible losses, including those due to transport phenomena and reaction kinetics, impact the voltage in rough proportion to scan rate. We develop perturbation methods to correct measurements at higher scan rates to make their accuracy comparable to results at slower scan rates. Perturbation corrections are given for cases in which current is scanned (e.g., at different constant C-rates) as well as when voltage is scanned (e.g., linear-sweep voltammetry). Sinusoidal scanning of either voltage or current is proposed to eliminate the discontinuities at scan reversal, increasing the accuracy of these methods. The analytic formulas given here can be combined with a regression analysis of data at multiple scan rates to determine not only the OCV but also other resistances in the electrode, and this is a goal of future work.
doi_str_mv 10.1149/1945-7111/abf5f5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>iop_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1149_1945_7111_abf5f5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jesabf5f5</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEFOwzAQtBBIlMKdox9AqB07ccINqlKQiqgUOEeO44CrYFdrR6h8gi_jUODGaWd3Z2dWg9A5JZeU8nJGS54lglI6k02XddkBmvyNDtGEEMoSnmf0GJ14v4ktLbiYoM-qd-94PgBoG7ADvHYhIiN7XClprbEv2HX4RoagYRe34AaPF71WAVyr_RVeaqtB9uZDt3itIQzQyGCcxZXrh28gbYvDq8YPGkzwo1xl7OCdaaPLr_V8p_podoqOOtl7ffZTp-j5dvE0v0tWj8v7-fUqUSxNQ6JSIduCkEJwUfKOiZaUlORcFTkjucoLlqUlU40mMi90oyOp4VyWhDWF6ETJpojsdRU470F39RbMm4RdTUk9BlqP6dVjevU-0HhysT8xbltv3AA2Pvg__Qvy1Hm3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling</title><source>Institute of Physics</source><creator>Baker, Daniel R. ; Verbrugge, Mark W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Daniel R. ; Verbrugge, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><description>The determination of Open Circuit Voltage (OCV) is required in order to successfully model electrode behavior, and a standard method for doing this is to charge and discharge a cell at very slow current rates while measuring both voltage and State of Charge (SOC). For example, scans at a rate of C/100 (needing 100 h to charge from empty to full) are often used, but faster scans lose accuracy because irreversible losses, including those due to transport phenomena and reaction kinetics, impact the voltage in rough proportion to scan rate. We develop perturbation methods to correct measurements at higher scan rates to make their accuracy comparable to results at slower scan rates. Perturbation corrections are given for cases in which current is scanned (e.g., at different constant C-rates) as well as when voltage is scanned (e.g., linear-sweep voltammetry). Sinusoidal scanning of either voltage or current is proposed to eliminate the discontinuities at scan reversal, increasing the accuracy of these methods. The analytic formulas given here can be combined with a regression analysis of data at multiple scan rates to determine not only the OCV but also other resistances in the electrode, and this is a goal of future work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-4651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/abf5f5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JESOAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><ispartof>Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2021-05, Vol.168 (5), p.50526</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published on behalf of The Electrochemical Society by IOP Publishing Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6100-3238 ; 0000-0002-7642-4067</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbrugge, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><title>Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling</title><title>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</title><addtitle>JES</addtitle><addtitle>J. Electrochem. Soc</addtitle><description>The determination of Open Circuit Voltage (OCV) is required in order to successfully model electrode behavior, and a standard method for doing this is to charge and discharge a cell at very slow current rates while measuring both voltage and State of Charge (SOC). For example, scans at a rate of C/100 (needing 100 h to charge from empty to full) are often used, but faster scans lose accuracy because irreversible losses, including those due to transport phenomena and reaction kinetics, impact the voltage in rough proportion to scan rate. We develop perturbation methods to correct measurements at higher scan rates to make their accuracy comparable to results at slower scan rates. Perturbation corrections are given for cases in which current is scanned (e.g., at different constant C-rates) as well as when voltage is scanned (e.g., linear-sweep voltammetry). Sinusoidal scanning of either voltage or current is proposed to eliminate the discontinuities at scan reversal, increasing the accuracy of these methods. The analytic formulas given here can be combined with a regression analysis of data at multiple scan rates to determine not only the OCV but also other resistances in the electrode, and this is a goal of future work.</description><issn>0013-4651</issn><issn>1945-7111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEFOwzAQtBBIlMKdox9AqB07ccINqlKQiqgUOEeO44CrYFdrR6h8gi_jUODGaWd3Z2dWg9A5JZeU8nJGS54lglI6k02XddkBmvyNDtGEEMoSnmf0GJ14v4ktLbiYoM-qd-94PgBoG7ADvHYhIiN7XClprbEv2HX4RoagYRe34AaPF71WAVyr_RVeaqtB9uZDt3itIQzQyGCcxZXrh28gbYvDq8YPGkzwo1xl7OCdaaPLr_V8p_podoqOOtl7ffZTp-j5dvE0v0tWj8v7-fUqUSxNQ6JSIduCkEJwUfKOiZaUlORcFTkjucoLlqUlU40mMi90oyOp4VyWhDWF6ETJpojsdRU470F39RbMm4RdTUk9BlqP6dVjevU-0HhysT8xbltv3AA2Pvg__Qvy1Hm3</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Baker, Daniel R.</creator><creator>Verbrugge, Mark W.</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-3238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7642-4067</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling</title><author>Baker, Daniel R. ; Verbrugge, Mark W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbrugge, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP_英国物理学会OA刊</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Daniel R.</au><au>Verbrugge, Mark W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</jtitle><stitle>JES</stitle><addtitle>J. Electrochem. Soc</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>168</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>50526</spage><pages>50526-</pages><issn>0013-4651</issn><eissn>1945-7111</eissn><coden>JESOAN</coden><abstract>The determination of Open Circuit Voltage (OCV) is required in order to successfully model electrode behavior, and a standard method for doing this is to charge and discharge a cell at very slow current rates while measuring both voltage and State of Charge (SOC). For example, scans at a rate of C/100 (needing 100 h to charge from empty to full) are often used, but faster scans lose accuracy because irreversible losses, including those due to transport phenomena and reaction kinetics, impact the voltage in rough proportion to scan rate. We develop perturbation methods to correct measurements at higher scan rates to make their accuracy comparable to results at slower scan rates. Perturbation corrections are given for cases in which current is scanned (e.g., at different constant C-rates) as well as when voltage is scanned (e.g., linear-sweep voltammetry). Sinusoidal scanning of either voltage or current is proposed to eliminate the discontinuities at scan reversal, increasing the accuracy of these methods. The analytic formulas given here can be combined with a regression analysis of data at multiple scan rates to determine not only the OCV but also other resistances in the electrode, and this is a goal of future work.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1149/1945-7111/abf5f5</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-3238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7642-4067</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-4651
ispartof Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2021-05, Vol.168 (5), p.50526
issn 0013-4651
1945-7111
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1149_1945_7111_abf5f5
source Institute of Physics
title Slow Current or Potential Scanning of Battery Porous Electrodes: Generalized Perturbation Solution and the Merits of Sinusoidal Current Cycling
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T15%3A25%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Slow%20Current%20or%20Potential%20Scanning%20of%20Battery%20Porous%20Electrodes:%20Generalized%20Perturbation%20Solution%20and%20the%20Merits%20of%20Sinusoidal%20Current%20Cycling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Electrochemical%20Society&rft.au=Baker,%20Daniel%20R.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=168&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=50526&rft.pages=50526-&rft.issn=0013-4651&rft.eissn=1945-7111&rft.coden=JESOAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1149/1945-7111/abf5f5&rft_dat=%3Ciop_cross%3Ejesabf5f5%3C/iop_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c27ad800874794f37d091064c86306c6835293cbe0a68ebe794b44a903b87f793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true