The Shallow Decay Segment of GRB X-Ray Afterglow Revisited

Based on the early-year observations from Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, Liang et al. performed a systematic analysis for the shallow decay component of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) X-ray afterglow, in order to explore its physical origin. Here we revisit the analysis with an updated sample (with Swift/...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Astrophysical journal 2019-09, Vol.883 (1), p.97
Main Authors: Zhao, Litao, Zhang, Binbin, Gao, He, Lan, Lin, Lü, Houjun, Zhang, Bing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Astrophysics
Confidence intervals
Correlation
Decay
Gamma ray bursts
Gamma rays
gamma-ray burst: general
Luminosity
Parameters
Power law
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Based on the early-year observations from Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, Liang et al. performed a systematic analysis for the shallow decay component of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) X-ray afterglow, in order to explore its physical origin. Here we revisit the analysis with an updated sample (with Swift/XRT GRBs between 2004 February and 2017 July). We find that with a larger sample, (1) the distributions of the characteristic properties of the shallow decay phase (e.g., tb, SX, ΓX,1, and X,1) still accord with normal or lognormal distribution; (2) ΓX,1 and Γγ still show no correlation, but the tentative correlations of durations, energy fluences, and isotropic energies between the gamma-ray and X-ray phases still exist; (3) for most GRBs, there is no significant spectral evolution between the shallow decay segment and its follow-up segment, and the latter is usually consistent with the external-shock models; (4) assuming that the central engine has a power-law luminosity release history as , we find that the value q is mainly distributed between −0.5 and 0.5, with an average value of 0.16 0.12; (5) the tentative correlation between and disappears, so that the global three-parameter correlation ( ) becomes less significant; (6) the anticorrelation between LX and and the three-parameter correlation ( ) indeed exist with a high confidence level. Overall, our results are generally consistent with Liang et al., confirming their suggestion that the shallow decay segment in most bursts is consistent with an external forward shock origin, probably due to a continuous energy injection from a long-lived central engine.
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ab38c4