Temperature and SAR measurement errors in the evaluation of metallic linear structures heating during MRI using fluoroptic® probes

• Published in: Physics in medicine & biology 2007-03, Vol.52 (6), p.1633-1646
• Main Authors: Mattei, E, Triventi, M, Calcagnini, G, Censi, F, Kainz, W, Bassen, H I, Bartolini, P
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Equipment Design; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Metals; Models, Theoretical; Pacemaker, Artificial; Phantoms, Imaging; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Software; Temperature
• ISSN: 0031-9155; 1361-6560
• DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/6/006

The purpose of this work is to evaluate the error associated with temperature and SAR measurements using fluoroptic temperature probes on pacemaker (PM) leads during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We performed temperature measurements on pacemaker leads, excited with a 25, 64, and 128 MHz current. The PM lead tip heating was measured with a fluoroptic thermometer (Luxtron, Model 3100, USA). Different contact configurations between the pigmented portion of the temperature probe and the PM lead tip were investigated to find the contact position minimizing the temperature and SAR underestimation. A computer model was used to estimate the error made by fluoroptic probes in temperature and SAR measurement. The transversal contact of the pigmented portion of the temperature probe and the PM lead tip minimizes the underestimation for temperature and SAR. This contact position also has the lowest temperature and SAR error. For other contact positions, the maximum temperature error can be as high as -45%, whereas the maximum SAR error can be as high as -54%. MRI heating evaluations with temperature probes should use a contact position minimizing the maximum error, need to be accompanied by a thorough uncertainty budget and the temperature and SAR errors should be specified.