Loading…
Integrated marketing communication and postmodernity: an odd couple?
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, under conditions of postmodernity, the market is too complex to be responded to with an IMC-framework. While the desire of IMC scholars and practitioners to reinstate order and predictability in an increasingly disordered and fragmented wor...
Saved in:
Published in: | Corporate communications 2005-01, Vol.10 (2), p.156-167 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-dabae27e808cb19f3586465ccae1d93c29818c528b5b34d06fb2f74696e25e6e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-dabae27e808cb19f3586465ccae1d93c29818c528b5b34d06fb2f74696e25e6e3 |
container_end_page | 167 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 156 |
container_title | Corporate communications |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Thøger Christensen, Lars Torp, Simon Fuat Firat, A. |
description | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, under conditions of postmodernity, the market is too complex to be responded to with an IMC-framework. While the desire of IMC scholars and practitioners to reinstate order and predictability in an increasingly disordered and fragmented world is understandable, such a mission may be misguided. The paper seeks to discuss the possibility that such attempts instead precipitate the production of complexity of an even more unpredictable nature.Design methodology approach - The paper proceeds through a critical juxtaposition of postmodernity and IMC, arguing that the latter - with its ambition to impose order and control - fails to understand important dimensions of contemporary markets.Findings - Rather than imposing a monological and hegemonic identity on markets and organizations - an identity that will unavoidably be challenged by consumers and employees - contemporary marketers and managers need to realize that organizational change and adaptability presuppose openness to variety, difference and polyphony.Research limitations implications - Although organizations, just like individuals, need a coherent narrative, polyphony promotes shared understandings and involvement and permits a kind of collective ownership that cannot be attained through the simple application of one-way managerial models that claim consistency and coherence without founding it in the life-world of the receiver.Originality value - Postmodern communication cannot adhere tightly to principles of IMC. Instead, openness towards fluidity and a certain degree of indeterminacy must be nurtured if organizations wish to cope with the postmodern world. Along with tolerance toward variety, organizations need to develop a tolerance for meanings negotiated together with consumer communities, such as brand communities, in the market. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/13563280510596961 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_974Q074H_X</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31005510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-dabae27e808cb19f3586465ccae1d93c29818c528b5b34d06fb2f74696e25e6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1rFTEQAPBFFHy2_QN6Wzx4cjWTzacXkfrRQkEKSnsL2WS2bN3drEkW2v--kScKrzzeKSH5zSQzU1WnQN4BEPUeWi5aqggHwrXQAp5VG5BcNYIw8bzsy31TgH5ZvUrpjhAiNehN9flizngbbUZfTzb-wjzMt7UL07TOg7N5CHNtZ18vIeUpeIzzkB8-lKM6eF_cuoz48bh60dsx4cnf9aj6-fXLj7Pz5vL7t4uzT5eNYwpy421nkUpURLkOdN9yJZjgzlkEr1tHtQLlOFUd71rmieg72ktWqkHKUWB7VL3Z5l1i-L1iymYaksNxtDOGNRkuBYWS8iBsOaecazgMgRBeelrg6x14F9Y4l2oNBQZKS6oLgi1yMaQUsTdLHEpXHwwQ82dM5smYSkyzjRlSxvt_AWUURshWcsOuqdGSXRHJzs1N8W-3HieMdvT_n9hNbRbfF0728L0_egQDzq4i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214189729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrated marketing communication and postmodernity: an odd couple?</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Library & Information Science Collection</source><creator>Thøger Christensen, Lars ; Torp, Simon ; Fuat Firat, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thøger Christensen, Lars ; Torp, Simon ; Fuat Firat, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, under conditions of postmodernity, the market is too complex to be responded to with an IMC-framework. While the desire of IMC scholars and practitioners to reinstate order and predictability in an increasingly disordered and fragmented world is understandable, such a mission may be misguided. The paper seeks to discuss the possibility that such attempts instead precipitate the production of complexity of an even more unpredictable nature.Design methodology approach - The paper proceeds through a critical juxtaposition of postmodernity and IMC, arguing that the latter - with its ambition to impose order and control - fails to understand important dimensions of contemporary markets.Findings - Rather than imposing a monological and hegemonic identity on markets and organizations - an identity that will unavoidably be challenged by consumers and employees - contemporary marketers and managers need to realize that organizational change and adaptability presuppose openness to variety, difference and polyphony.Research limitations implications - Although organizations, just like individuals, need a coherent narrative, polyphony promotes shared understandings and involvement and permits a kind of collective ownership that cannot be attained through the simple application of one-way managerial models that claim consistency and coherence without founding it in the life-world of the receiver.Originality value - Postmodern communication cannot adhere tightly to principles of IMC. Instead, openness towards fluidity and a certain degree of indeterminacy must be nurtured if organizations wish to cope with the postmodern world. Along with tolerance toward variety, organizations need to develop a tolerance for meanings negotiated together with consumer communities, such as brand communities, in the market.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-3289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/13563280510596961</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Business communications ; Communication ; Companies ; Consumers ; Information communication ; Integrated approach ; Integrated marketing ; Integrated marketing communications ; Marketing ; Modernity ; Operations management ; Organizational change ; Polyphony ; Postmodernism ; Production management ; Studies ; Writers</subject><ispartof>Corporate communications, 2005-01, Vol.10 (2), p.156-167</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright MCB UP Limited (MCB) 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-dabae27e808cb19f3586465ccae1d93c29818c528b5b34d06fb2f74696e25e6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-dabae27e808cb19f3586465ccae1d93c29818c528b5b34d06fb2f74696e25e6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214189729/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214189729?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11686,21379,21392,27922,27923,33609,33610,33904,33905,34134,36058,36059,43731,43890,44361,73991,74179,74665</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thøger Christensen, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torp, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuat Firat, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Integrated marketing communication and postmodernity: an odd couple?</title><title>Corporate communications</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, under conditions of postmodernity, the market is too complex to be responded to with an IMC-framework. While the desire of IMC scholars and practitioners to reinstate order and predictability in an increasingly disordered and fragmented world is understandable, such a mission may be misguided. The paper seeks to discuss the possibility that such attempts instead precipitate the production of complexity of an even more unpredictable nature.Design methodology approach - The paper proceeds through a critical juxtaposition of postmodernity and IMC, arguing that the latter - with its ambition to impose order and control - fails to understand important dimensions of contemporary markets.Findings - Rather than imposing a monological and hegemonic identity on markets and organizations - an identity that will unavoidably be challenged by consumers and employees - contemporary marketers and managers need to realize that organizational change and adaptability presuppose openness to variety, difference and polyphony.Research limitations implications - Although organizations, just like individuals, need a coherent narrative, polyphony promotes shared understandings and involvement and permits a kind of collective ownership that cannot be attained through the simple application of one-way managerial models that claim consistency and coherence without founding it in the life-world of the receiver.Originality value - Postmodern communication cannot adhere tightly to principles of IMC. Instead, openness towards fluidity and a certain degree of indeterminacy must be nurtured if organizations wish to cope with the postmodern world. Along with tolerance toward variety, organizations need to develop a tolerance for meanings negotiated together with consumer communities, such as brand communities, in the market.</description><subject>Business communications</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Information communication</subject><subject>Integrated approach</subject><subject>Integrated marketing</subject><subject>Integrated marketing communications</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Operations management</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Polyphony</subject><subject>Postmodernism</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>1356-3289</issn><issn>1758-6046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1rFTEQAPBFFHy2_QN6Wzx4cjWTzacXkfrRQkEKSnsL2WS2bN3drEkW2v--kScKrzzeKSH5zSQzU1WnQN4BEPUeWi5aqggHwrXQAp5VG5BcNYIw8bzsy31TgH5ZvUrpjhAiNehN9flizngbbUZfTzb-wjzMt7UL07TOg7N5CHNtZ18vIeUpeIzzkB8-lKM6eF_cuoz48bh60dsx4cnf9aj6-fXLj7Pz5vL7t4uzT5eNYwpy421nkUpURLkOdN9yJZjgzlkEr1tHtQLlOFUd71rmieg72ktWqkHKUWB7VL3Z5l1i-L1iymYaksNxtDOGNRkuBYWS8iBsOaecazgMgRBeelrg6x14F9Y4l2oNBQZKS6oLgi1yMaQUsTdLHEpXHwwQ82dM5smYSkyzjRlSxvt_AWUURshWcsOuqdGSXRHJzs1N8W-3HieMdvT_n9hNbRbfF0728L0_egQDzq4i</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Thøger Christensen, Lars</creator><creator>Torp, Simon</creator><creator>Fuat Firat, A.</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Integrated marketing communication and postmodernity: an odd couple?</title><author>Thøger Christensen, Lars ; Torp, Simon ; Fuat Firat, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-dabae27e808cb19f3586465ccae1d93c29818c528b5b34d06fb2f74696e25e6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Business communications</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Information communication</topic><topic>Integrated approach</topic><topic>Integrated marketing</topic><topic>Integrated marketing communications</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Operations management</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Polyphony</topic><topic>Postmodernism</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thøger Christensen, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torp, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuat Firat, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Library Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Corporate communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thøger Christensen, Lars</au><au>Torp, Simon</au><au>Fuat Firat, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrated marketing communication and postmodernity: an odd couple?</atitle><jtitle>Corporate communications</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>156-167</pages><issn>1356-3289</issn><eissn>1758-6046</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, under conditions of postmodernity, the market is too complex to be responded to with an IMC-framework. While the desire of IMC scholars and practitioners to reinstate order and predictability in an increasingly disordered and fragmented world is understandable, such a mission may be misguided. The paper seeks to discuss the possibility that such attempts instead precipitate the production of complexity of an even more unpredictable nature.Design methodology approach - The paper proceeds through a critical juxtaposition of postmodernity and IMC, arguing that the latter - with its ambition to impose order and control - fails to understand important dimensions of contemporary markets.Findings - Rather than imposing a monological and hegemonic identity on markets and organizations - an identity that will unavoidably be challenged by consumers and employees - contemporary marketers and managers need to realize that organizational change and adaptability presuppose openness to variety, difference and polyphony.Research limitations implications - Although organizations, just like individuals, need a coherent narrative, polyphony promotes shared understandings and involvement and permits a kind of collective ownership that cannot be attained through the simple application of one-way managerial models that claim consistency and coherence without founding it in the life-world of the receiver.Originality value - Postmodern communication cannot adhere tightly to principles of IMC. Instead, openness towards fluidity and a certain degree of indeterminacy must be nurtured if organizations wish to cope with the postmodern world. Along with tolerance toward variety, organizations need to develop a tolerance for meanings negotiated together with consumer communities, such as brand communities, in the market.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/13563280510596961</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-3289 |
ispartof | Corporate communications, 2005-01, Vol.10 (2), p.156-167 |
issn | 1356-3289 1758-6046 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_974Q074H_X |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Library & Information Science Collection |
subjects | Business communications Communication Companies Consumers Information communication Integrated approach Integrated marketing Integrated marketing communications Marketing Modernity Operations management Organizational change Polyphony Postmodernism Production management Studies Writers |
title | Integrated marketing communication and postmodernity: an odd couple? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T03%3A49%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrated%20marketing%20communication%20and%20postmodernity:%20an%20odd%20couple?&rft.jtitle=Corporate%20communications&rft.au=Th%C3%B8ger%20Christensen,%20Lars&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=156-167&rft.issn=1356-3289&rft.eissn=1758-6046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/13563280510596961&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E31005510%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-dabae27e808cb19f3586465ccae1d93c29818c528b5b34d06fb2f74696e25e6e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214189729&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |