An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments

Many authors have suggested including non-financial measures, besides traditional cost measures, in manufacturing performance measurement systems, in order to control the correct implementation of the manufacturing strategy with respect to all competitive priorities (quality, timeliness, flexibility...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of operations & production management 1996-08, Vol.16 (8), p.104-119
Main Author: Rangone, Andrea
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analytical hierarchy process
Competition
Costs
Departments
Energy consumption
Factories
Flexibility
Hierarchies
Management accountants
Manufacturing
Organizational structure
Performance evaluation
Performance measurement
Software packages
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-57dd5f14e81706d2604d16dd5a508a66372ba1f67f0410d2e969c8a75a85532b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-57dd5f14e81706d2604d16dd5a508a66372ba1f67f0410d2e969c8a75a85532b3
container_end_page 119
container_issue 8
container_start_page 104
container_title International journal of operations & production management
container_volume 16
creator Rangone, Andrea
description Many authors have suggested including non-financial measures, besides traditional cost measures, in manufacturing performance measurement systems, in order to control the correct implementation of the manufacturing strategy with respect to all competitive priorities (quality, timeliness, flexibility, dependability, etc.). But the use of non-financial performance measures makes it difficult to assess and compare the overall effectiveness of each manufacturing department, in terms of support provided to the achievement of the manufacturing strategy, since to this aim it is necessary to integrate performance measures expressed in heterogeneous measurement units. Aims to show the potential of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for assessing and comparing the overall manufacturing performance of different departments. Does not report the detailed analytical description of the AHP but focuses on the practical problems and managerial implications related to its application to performance measurement, pointing out also its assumptions and limitations.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/01443579610125804
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_MH408VZR_W</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>116359194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-57dd5f14e81706d2604d16dd5a508a66372ba1f67f0410d2e969c8a75a85532b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1rFTEUBuAgCl6rP8BdcKEbR8_J58yyFLWFiiBqwU04zSTeaefLZEZ7_725XnFhRVwlnDxvQs5h7DHCC0SoXwIqJbVtDAIKXYO6wzZodV0Z3ci7bLM_rwqw99mDnK8AQEjUG9Yfj5xG6ndL56nn2y4kSn6743OafMiZx0RD-D6lax6nxP00zJS68QtftoFP34ruez6HVA4HGn2pRV42ayS_rD9hG0piGcK45IfsXqQ-h0e_1iP28fWrDyen1fm7N2cnx-eVV6pZKm3bVkdUoUYLphUGVIum1EhDTcZIKy4Jo7ERFEIrQmMaX5PVVGstxaU8Ys8O95ZPfF1DXtzQZR_6nsYwrdlZJaUUqG2RT_8pRaM0CmsKfPIHvJrWVBpXjBRSGwFYEB6QT1POKUQ3p26gtHMIbj8md2tMJVMdMl1ews3vAKVrZ6y02qkL4d6eKqg_fX7vLoqHgw_Dvvntfz3x_O-RW9TNbZQ_AOhzr-4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232356201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Rangone, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Rangone, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Many authors have suggested including non-financial measures, besides traditional cost measures, in manufacturing performance measurement systems, in order to control the correct implementation of the manufacturing strategy with respect to all competitive priorities (quality, timeliness, flexibility, dependability, etc.). But the use of non-financial performance measures makes it difficult to assess and compare the overall effectiveness of each manufacturing department, in terms of support provided to the achievement of the manufacturing strategy, since to this aim it is necessary to integrate performance measures expressed in heterogeneous measurement units. Aims to show the potential of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for assessing and comparing the overall manufacturing performance of different departments. Does not report the detailed analytical description of the AHP but focuses on the practical problems and managerial implications related to its application to performance measurement, pointing out also its assumptions and limitations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/01443579610125804</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOPMDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Analytical hierarchy process ; Competition ; Costs ; Departments ; Energy consumption ; Factories ; Flexibility ; Hierarchies ; Management accountants ; Manufacturing ; Organizational structure ; Performance evaluation ; Performance measurement ; Software packages</subject><ispartof>International journal of operations &amp; production management, 1996-08, Vol.16 (8), p.104-119</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>MCB UP Limited 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-57dd5f14e81706d2604d16dd5a508a66372ba1f67f0410d2e969c8a75a85532b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-57dd5f14e81706d2604d16dd5a508a66372ba1f67f0410d2e969c8a75a85532b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/232356201/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/232356201?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rangone, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments</title><title>International journal of operations &amp; production management</title><description>Many authors have suggested including non-financial measures, besides traditional cost measures, in manufacturing performance measurement systems, in order to control the correct implementation of the manufacturing strategy with respect to all competitive priorities (quality, timeliness, flexibility, dependability, etc.). But the use of non-financial performance measures makes it difficult to assess and compare the overall effectiveness of each manufacturing department, in terms of support provided to the achievement of the manufacturing strategy, since to this aim it is necessary to integrate performance measures expressed in heterogeneous measurement units. Aims to show the potential of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for assessing and comparing the overall manufacturing performance of different departments. Does not report the detailed analytical description of the AHP but focuses on the practical problems and managerial implications related to its application to performance measurement, pointing out also its assumptions and limitations.</description><subject>Analytical hierarchy process</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Factories</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Management accountants</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Performance measurement</subject><subject>Software packages</subject><issn>0144-3577</issn><issn>1758-6593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1rFTEUBuAgCl6rP8BdcKEbR8_J58yyFLWFiiBqwU04zSTeaefLZEZ7_725XnFhRVwlnDxvQs5h7DHCC0SoXwIqJbVtDAIKXYO6wzZodV0Z3ci7bLM_rwqw99mDnK8AQEjUG9Yfj5xG6ndL56nn2y4kSn6743OafMiZx0RD-D6lax6nxP00zJS68QtftoFP34ruez6HVA4HGn2pRV42ayS_rD9hG0piGcK45IfsXqQ-h0e_1iP28fWrDyen1fm7N2cnx-eVV6pZKm3bVkdUoUYLphUGVIum1EhDTcZIKy4Jo7ERFEIrQmMaX5PVVGstxaU8Ys8O95ZPfF1DXtzQZR_6nsYwrdlZJaUUqG2RT_8pRaM0CmsKfPIHvJrWVBpXjBRSGwFYEB6QT1POKUQ3p26gtHMIbj8md2tMJVMdMl1ews3vAKVrZ6y02qkL4d6eKqg_fX7vLoqHgw_Dvvntfz3x_O-RW9TNbZQ_AOhzr-4</recordid><startdate>19960801</startdate><enddate>19960801</enddate><creator>Rangone, Andrea</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960801</creationdate><title>An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments</title><author>Rangone, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-57dd5f14e81706d2604d16dd5a508a66372ba1f67f0410d2e969c8a75a85532b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Analytical hierarchy process</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Factories</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Management accountants</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Performance measurement</topic><topic>Software packages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rangone, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of operations &amp; production management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rangone, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments</atitle><jtitle>International journal of operations &amp; production management</jtitle><date>1996-08-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>104-119</pages><issn>0144-3577</issn><eissn>1758-6593</eissn><coden>IOPMDU</coden><abstract>Many authors have suggested including non-financial measures, besides traditional cost measures, in manufacturing performance measurement systems, in order to control the correct implementation of the manufacturing strategy with respect to all competitive priorities (quality, timeliness, flexibility, dependability, etc.). But the use of non-financial performance measures makes it difficult to assess and compare the overall effectiveness of each manufacturing department, in terms of support provided to the achievement of the manufacturing strategy, since to this aim it is necessary to integrate performance measures expressed in heterogeneous measurement units. Aims to show the potential of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for assessing and comparing the overall manufacturing performance of different departments. Does not report the detailed analytical description of the AHP but focuses on the practical problems and managerial implications related to its application to performance measurement, pointing out also its assumptions and limitations.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/01443579610125804</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-3577
ispartof International journal of operations & production management, 1996-08, Vol.16 (8), p.104-119
issn 0144-3577
1758-6593
language eng
recordid cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_4W2_MH408VZR_W
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Analytical hierarchy process
Competition
Costs
Departments
Energy consumption
Factories
Flexibility
Hierarchies
Management accountants
Manufacturing
Organizational structure
Performance evaluation
Performance measurement
Software packages
title An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A50%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20analytical%20hierarchy%20process%20framework%20for%20comparing%20the%20overall%20performance%20of%20manufacturing%20departments&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20operations%20&%20production%20management&rft.au=Rangone,%20Andrea&rft.date=1996-08-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=104-119&rft.issn=0144-3577&rft.eissn=1758-6593&rft.coden=IOPMDU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/01443579610125804&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E116359194%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-57dd5f14e81706d2604d16dd5a508a66372ba1f67f0410d2e969c8a75a85532b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232356201&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true