Loading…

Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions

A detailed diffusion study was carried out on Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions in order to assess the role of different factors in the behaviour of the diffusing components. The faster diffusing species in the two systems, interdiffusion, intrinsic and impurity diffusion coefficients, are determine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2014-01, Vol.470 (2161), p.20130464-20130464
Main Authors: Santra, Sangeeta, Dong, Hongqun, Laurila, Tomi, Paul, Aloke
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73
container_end_page 20130464
container_issue 2161
container_start_page 20130464
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences
container_volume 470
creator Santra, Sangeeta
Dong, Hongqun
Laurila, Tomi
Paul, Aloke
description A detailed diffusion study was carried out on Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions in order to assess the role of different factors in the behaviour of the diffusing components. The faster diffusing species in the two systems, interdiffusion, intrinsic and impurity diffusion coefficients, are determined to facilitate the discussion. It was found that Cu was more mobile in the Cu-Si system, whereas Ga was the faster diffusing species in the Cu-Ga system. In both systems, the interdiffusion coefficients increased with increasing amount of solute (e.g. Si or Ga) in the matrix (Cu). Impurity diffusion coefficients for Si and Ga in Cu, found out by extrapolating interdiffusion coefficient data to zero composition of the solute, were both higher than the Cu tracer diffusion coefficient. These observed trends in diffusion behaviour could be rationalized by considering: (i) formation energies and concentration of vacancies, (ii) elastic moduli (indicating bond strengths) of the elements and (iii) the interaction parameters and the related thermodynamic factors. In summary, we have shown here that all the factors introduced in this paper should be considered simultaneously to understand interdiffusion in solid solutions. Otherwise, some of the aspects may look unusual or even impossible to explain.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rspa.2013.0464
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_V84_P7WCVFL3_Q</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660053965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1v1DAQjRBIlMKVc47tIcv4OzlWK1qQVqK00B5HjmMjt2m82E7F8utxCEJCCC6eD7_3ZuZV1WsCGwJd-yamvd5QIGwDXPIn1RHhijS04_JpyZnkjQBKnlcvUroDgE606qi6vQqjrYOrB--cjXbKtdMmh5hqXRom--lL7ads4wKYkw9TKevtfHKhT2s9DUt67U_rFEY_LO-cCya9rJ45PSb76lc8rj6fv_20fdfsPly8357tGsM7nhtuNBAn-r4jznSi55RYS8BZBtaJlvVDa_thYDAMVCnDetkrB4PoKEhFjWLH1cmqu4_h62xTxgefjB1HPdkwJyRSAgjWSVGgmxVqYkgpWof76B90PCABXBzExUFcHMTFwUK4XwkxHMoNwXibD3gX5jiVEq-uL88euQJPiSQILSOgOKcCv_v9KlU-0ac0W_wJ-VP-72nsf9P-uWOzsnzK9tvvi3S8R6mYEnjTcrxUt9ub8x3Dj-wHvuGoAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660053965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read &amp; Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Santra, Sangeeta ; Dong, Hongqun ; Laurila, Tomi ; Paul, Aloke</creator><creatorcontrib>Santra, Sangeeta ; Dong, Hongqun ; Laurila, Tomi ; Paul, Aloke</creatorcontrib><description>A detailed diffusion study was carried out on Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions in order to assess the role of different factors in the behaviour of the diffusing components. The faster diffusing species in the two systems, interdiffusion, intrinsic and impurity diffusion coefficients, are determined to facilitate the discussion. It was found that Cu was more mobile in the Cu-Si system, whereas Ga was the faster diffusing species in the Cu-Ga system. In both systems, the interdiffusion coefficients increased with increasing amount of solute (e.g. Si or Ga) in the matrix (Cu). Impurity diffusion coefficients for Si and Ga in Cu, found out by extrapolating interdiffusion coefficient data to zero composition of the solute, were both higher than the Cu tracer diffusion coefficient. These observed trends in diffusion behaviour could be rationalized by considering: (i) formation energies and concentration of vacancies, (ii) elastic moduli (indicating bond strengths) of the elements and (iii) the interaction parameters and the related thermodynamic factors. In summary, we have shown here that all the factors introduced in this paper should be considered simultaneously to understand interdiffusion in solid solutions. Otherwise, some of the aspects may look unusual or even impossible to explain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-5021</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2013.0464</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Royal Society Publishing</publisher><subject>Copper ; Diffusion ; Diffusion coefficient ; Diffusion rate ; Driving Force ; Impurities ; Indentation ; Interdiffusion ; Mathematical analysis ; Solid Solution ; Solid solutions ; Vacancy Wind Effect</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2014-01, Vol.470 (2161), p.20130464-20130464</ispartof><rights>2013 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santra, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Hongqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurila, Tomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Aloke</creatorcontrib><title>Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</addtitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</addtitle><description>A detailed diffusion study was carried out on Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions in order to assess the role of different factors in the behaviour of the diffusing components. The faster diffusing species in the two systems, interdiffusion, intrinsic and impurity diffusion coefficients, are determined to facilitate the discussion. It was found that Cu was more mobile in the Cu-Si system, whereas Ga was the faster diffusing species in the Cu-Ga system. In both systems, the interdiffusion coefficients increased with increasing amount of solute (e.g. Si or Ga) in the matrix (Cu). Impurity diffusion coefficients for Si and Ga in Cu, found out by extrapolating interdiffusion coefficient data to zero composition of the solute, were both higher than the Cu tracer diffusion coefficient. These observed trends in diffusion behaviour could be rationalized by considering: (i) formation energies and concentration of vacancies, (ii) elastic moduli (indicating bond strengths) of the elements and (iii) the interaction parameters and the related thermodynamic factors. In summary, we have shown here that all the factors introduced in this paper should be considered simultaneously to understand interdiffusion in solid solutions. Otherwise, some of the aspects may look unusual or even impossible to explain.</description><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Diffusion coefficient</subject><subject>Diffusion rate</subject><subject>Driving Force</subject><subject>Impurities</subject><subject>Indentation</subject><subject>Interdiffusion</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Solid Solution</subject><subject>Solid solutions</subject><subject>Vacancy Wind Effect</subject><issn>1364-5021</issn><issn>1471-2946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1v1DAQjRBIlMKVc47tIcv4OzlWK1qQVqK00B5HjmMjt2m82E7F8utxCEJCCC6eD7_3ZuZV1WsCGwJd-yamvd5QIGwDXPIn1RHhijS04_JpyZnkjQBKnlcvUroDgE606qi6vQqjrYOrB--cjXbKtdMmh5hqXRom--lL7ads4wKYkw9TKevtfHKhT2s9DUt67U_rFEY_LO-cCya9rJ45PSb76lc8rj6fv_20fdfsPly8357tGsM7nhtuNBAn-r4jznSi55RYS8BZBtaJlvVDa_thYDAMVCnDetkrB4PoKEhFjWLH1cmqu4_h62xTxgefjB1HPdkwJyRSAgjWSVGgmxVqYkgpWof76B90PCABXBzExUFcHMTFwUK4XwkxHMoNwXibD3gX5jiVEq-uL88euQJPiSQILSOgOKcCv_v9KlU-0ac0W_wJ-VP-72nsf9P-uWOzsnzK9tvvi3S8R6mYEnjTcrxUt9ub8x3Dj-wHvuGoAQ</recordid><startdate>20140108</startdate><enddate>20140108</enddate><creator>Santra, Sangeeta</creator><creator>Dong, Hongqun</creator><creator>Laurila, Tomi</creator><creator>Paul, Aloke</creator><general>The Royal Society Publishing</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140108</creationdate><title>Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions</title><author>Santra, Sangeeta ; Dong, Hongqun ; Laurila, Tomi ; Paul, Aloke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Diffusion coefficient</topic><topic>Diffusion rate</topic><topic>Driving Force</topic><topic>Impurities</topic><topic>Indentation</topic><topic>Interdiffusion</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Solid Solution</topic><topic>Solid solutions</topic><topic>Vacancy Wind Effect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santra, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Hongqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurila, Tomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Aloke</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santra, Sangeeta</au><au>Dong, Hongqun</au><au>Laurila, Tomi</au><au>Paul, Aloke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</stitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</addtitle><date>2014-01-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>470</volume><issue>2161</issue><spage>20130464</spage><epage>20130464</epage><pages>20130464-20130464</pages><issn>1364-5021</issn><eissn>1471-2946</eissn><abstract>A detailed diffusion study was carried out on Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions in order to assess the role of different factors in the behaviour of the diffusing components. The faster diffusing species in the two systems, interdiffusion, intrinsic and impurity diffusion coefficients, are determined to facilitate the discussion. It was found that Cu was more mobile in the Cu-Si system, whereas Ga was the faster diffusing species in the Cu-Ga system. In both systems, the interdiffusion coefficients increased with increasing amount of solute (e.g. Si or Ga) in the matrix (Cu). Impurity diffusion coefficients for Si and Ga in Cu, found out by extrapolating interdiffusion coefficient data to zero composition of the solute, were both higher than the Cu tracer diffusion coefficient. These observed trends in diffusion behaviour could be rationalized by considering: (i) formation energies and concentration of vacancies, (ii) elastic moduli (indicating bond strengths) of the elements and (iii) the interaction parameters and the related thermodynamic factors. In summary, we have shown here that all the factors introduced in this paper should be considered simultaneously to understand interdiffusion in solid solutions. Otherwise, some of the aspects may look unusual or even impossible to explain.</abstract><pub>The Royal Society Publishing</pub><doi>10.1098/rspa.2013.0464</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-5021
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2014-01, Vol.470 (2161), p.20130464-20130464
issn 1364-5021
1471-2946
language eng
recordid cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_V84_P7WCVFL3_Q
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)
subjects Copper
Diffusion
Diffusion coefficient
Diffusion rate
Driving Force
Impurities
Indentation
Interdiffusion
Mathematical analysis
Solid Solution
Solid solutions
Vacancy Wind Effect
title Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A20%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20different%20factors%20affecting%20interdiffusion%20in%20Cu(Ga)%20and%20Cu(Si)%20solid%20solutions&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20A,%20Mathematical,%20physical,%20and%20engineering%20sciences&rft.au=Santra,%20Sangeeta&rft.date=2014-01-08&rft.volume=470&rft.issue=2161&rft.spage=20130464&rft.epage=20130464&rft.pages=20130464-20130464&rft.issn=1364-5021&rft.eissn=1471-2946&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspa.2013.0464&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E1660053965%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660053965&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true