Loading…
Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions
A detailed diffusion study was carried out on Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions in order to assess the role of different factors in the behaviour of the diffusing components. The faster diffusing species in the two systems, interdiffusion, intrinsic and impurity diffusion coefficients, are determine...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2014-01, Vol.470 (2161), p.20130464-20130464 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73 |
container_end_page | 20130464 |
container_issue | 2161 |
container_start_page | 20130464 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences |
container_volume | 470 |
creator | Santra, Sangeeta Dong, Hongqun Laurila, Tomi Paul, Aloke |
description | A detailed diffusion study was carried out on Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions in order to assess the role of different factors in the behaviour of the diffusing components. The faster diffusing species in the two systems, interdiffusion, intrinsic and impurity diffusion coefficients, are determined to facilitate the discussion. It was found that Cu was more mobile in the Cu-Si system, whereas Ga was the faster diffusing species in the Cu-Ga system. In both systems, the interdiffusion coefficients increased with increasing amount of solute (e.g. Si or Ga) in the matrix (Cu). Impurity diffusion coefficients for Si and Ga in Cu, found out by extrapolating interdiffusion coefficient data to zero composition of the solute, were both higher than the Cu tracer diffusion coefficient. These observed trends in diffusion behaviour could be rationalized by considering: (i) formation energies and concentration of vacancies, (ii) elastic moduli (indicating bond strengths) of the elements and (iii) the interaction parameters and the related thermodynamic factors. In summary, we have shown here that all the factors introduced in this paper should be considered simultaneously to understand interdiffusion in solid solutions. Otherwise, some of the aspects may look unusual or even impossible to explain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rspa.2013.0464 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_V84_P7WCVFL3_Q</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660053965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1v1DAQjRBIlMKVc47tIcv4OzlWK1qQVqK00B5HjmMjt2m82E7F8utxCEJCCC6eD7_3ZuZV1WsCGwJd-yamvd5QIGwDXPIn1RHhijS04_JpyZnkjQBKnlcvUroDgE606qi6vQqjrYOrB--cjXbKtdMmh5hqXRom--lL7ads4wKYkw9TKevtfHKhT2s9DUt67U_rFEY_LO-cCya9rJ45PSb76lc8rj6fv_20fdfsPly8357tGsM7nhtuNBAn-r4jznSi55RYS8BZBtaJlvVDa_thYDAMVCnDetkrB4PoKEhFjWLH1cmqu4_h62xTxgefjB1HPdkwJyRSAgjWSVGgmxVqYkgpWof76B90PCABXBzExUFcHMTFwUK4XwkxHMoNwXibD3gX5jiVEq-uL88euQJPiSQILSOgOKcCv_v9KlU-0ac0W_wJ-VP-72nsf9P-uWOzsnzK9tvvi3S8R6mYEnjTcrxUt9ub8x3Dj-wHvuGoAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660053965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Santra, Sangeeta ; Dong, Hongqun ; Laurila, Tomi ; Paul, Aloke</creator><creatorcontrib>Santra, Sangeeta ; Dong, Hongqun ; Laurila, Tomi ; Paul, Aloke</creatorcontrib><description>A detailed diffusion study was carried out on Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions in order to assess the role of different factors in the behaviour of the diffusing components. The faster diffusing species in the two systems, interdiffusion, intrinsic and impurity diffusion coefficients, are determined to facilitate the discussion. It was found that Cu was more mobile in the Cu-Si system, whereas Ga was the faster diffusing species in the Cu-Ga system. In both systems, the interdiffusion coefficients increased with increasing amount of solute (e.g. Si or Ga) in the matrix (Cu). Impurity diffusion coefficients for Si and Ga in Cu, found out by extrapolating interdiffusion coefficient data to zero composition of the solute, were both higher than the Cu tracer diffusion coefficient. These observed trends in diffusion behaviour could be rationalized by considering: (i) formation energies and concentration of vacancies, (ii) elastic moduli (indicating bond strengths) of the elements and (iii) the interaction parameters and the related thermodynamic factors. In summary, we have shown here that all the factors introduced in this paper should be considered simultaneously to understand interdiffusion in solid solutions. Otherwise, some of the aspects may look unusual or even impossible to explain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-5021</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2013.0464</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Royal Society Publishing</publisher><subject>Copper ; Diffusion ; Diffusion coefficient ; Diffusion rate ; Driving Force ; Impurities ; Indentation ; Interdiffusion ; Mathematical analysis ; Solid Solution ; Solid solutions ; Vacancy Wind Effect</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2014-01, Vol.470 (2161), p.20130464-20130464</ispartof><rights>2013 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santra, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Hongqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurila, Tomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Aloke</creatorcontrib><title>Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</addtitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</addtitle><description>A detailed diffusion study was carried out on Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions in order to assess the role of different factors in the behaviour of the diffusing components. The faster diffusing species in the two systems, interdiffusion, intrinsic and impurity diffusion coefficients, are determined to facilitate the discussion. It was found that Cu was more mobile in the Cu-Si system, whereas Ga was the faster diffusing species in the Cu-Ga system. In both systems, the interdiffusion coefficients increased with increasing amount of solute (e.g. Si or Ga) in the matrix (Cu). Impurity diffusion coefficients for Si and Ga in Cu, found out by extrapolating interdiffusion coefficient data to zero composition of the solute, were both higher than the Cu tracer diffusion coefficient. These observed trends in diffusion behaviour could be rationalized by considering: (i) formation energies and concentration of vacancies, (ii) elastic moduli (indicating bond strengths) of the elements and (iii) the interaction parameters and the related thermodynamic factors. In summary, we have shown here that all the factors introduced in this paper should be considered simultaneously to understand interdiffusion in solid solutions. Otherwise, some of the aspects may look unusual or even impossible to explain.</description><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Diffusion coefficient</subject><subject>Diffusion rate</subject><subject>Driving Force</subject><subject>Impurities</subject><subject>Indentation</subject><subject>Interdiffusion</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Solid Solution</subject><subject>Solid solutions</subject><subject>Vacancy Wind Effect</subject><issn>1364-5021</issn><issn>1471-2946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1v1DAQjRBIlMKVc47tIcv4OzlWK1qQVqK00B5HjmMjt2m82E7F8utxCEJCCC6eD7_3ZuZV1WsCGwJd-yamvd5QIGwDXPIn1RHhijS04_JpyZnkjQBKnlcvUroDgE606qi6vQqjrYOrB--cjXbKtdMmh5hqXRom--lL7ads4wKYkw9TKevtfHKhT2s9DUt67U_rFEY_LO-cCya9rJ45PSb76lc8rj6fv_20fdfsPly8357tGsM7nhtuNBAn-r4jznSi55RYS8BZBtaJlvVDa_thYDAMVCnDetkrB4PoKEhFjWLH1cmqu4_h62xTxgefjB1HPdkwJyRSAgjWSVGgmxVqYkgpWof76B90PCABXBzExUFcHMTFwUK4XwkxHMoNwXibD3gX5jiVEq-uL88euQJPiSQILSOgOKcCv_v9KlU-0ac0W_wJ-VP-72nsf9P-uWOzsnzK9tvvi3S8R6mYEnjTcrxUt9ub8x3Dj-wHvuGoAQ</recordid><startdate>20140108</startdate><enddate>20140108</enddate><creator>Santra, Sangeeta</creator><creator>Dong, Hongqun</creator><creator>Laurila, Tomi</creator><creator>Paul, Aloke</creator><general>The Royal Society Publishing</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140108</creationdate><title>Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions</title><author>Santra, Sangeeta ; Dong, Hongqun ; Laurila, Tomi ; Paul, Aloke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Diffusion coefficient</topic><topic>Diffusion rate</topic><topic>Driving Force</topic><topic>Impurities</topic><topic>Indentation</topic><topic>Interdiffusion</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Solid Solution</topic><topic>Solid solutions</topic><topic>Vacancy Wind Effect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santra, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Hongqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurila, Tomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Aloke</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santra, Sangeeta</au><au>Dong, Hongqun</au><au>Laurila, Tomi</au><au>Paul, Aloke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</stitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. A</addtitle><date>2014-01-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>470</volume><issue>2161</issue><spage>20130464</spage><epage>20130464</epage><pages>20130464-20130464</pages><issn>1364-5021</issn><eissn>1471-2946</eissn><abstract>A detailed diffusion study was carried out on Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions in order to assess the role of different factors in the behaviour of the diffusing components. The faster diffusing species in the two systems, interdiffusion, intrinsic and impurity diffusion coefficients, are determined to facilitate the discussion. It was found that Cu was more mobile in the Cu-Si system, whereas Ga was the faster diffusing species in the Cu-Ga system. In both systems, the interdiffusion coefficients increased with increasing amount of solute (e.g. Si or Ga) in the matrix (Cu). Impurity diffusion coefficients for Si and Ga in Cu, found out by extrapolating interdiffusion coefficient data to zero composition of the solute, were both higher than the Cu tracer diffusion coefficient. These observed trends in diffusion behaviour could be rationalized by considering: (i) formation energies and concentration of vacancies, (ii) elastic moduli (indicating bond strengths) of the elements and (iii) the interaction parameters and the related thermodynamic factors. In summary, we have shown here that all the factors introduced in this paper should be considered simultaneously to understand interdiffusion in solid solutions. Otherwise, some of the aspects may look unusual or even impossible to explain.</abstract><pub>The Royal Society Publishing</pub><doi>10.1098/rspa.2013.0464</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-5021 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2014-01, Vol.470 (2161), p.20130464-20130464 |
issn | 1364-5021 1471-2946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_V84_P7WCVFL3_Q |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Copper Diffusion Diffusion coefficient Diffusion rate Driving Force Impurities Indentation Interdiffusion Mathematical analysis Solid Solution Solid solutions Vacancy Wind Effect |
title | Role of different factors affecting interdiffusion in Cu(Ga) and Cu(Si) solid solutions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A20%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20different%20factors%20affecting%20interdiffusion%20in%20Cu(Ga)%20and%20Cu(Si)%20solid%20solutions&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20A,%20Mathematical,%20physical,%20and%20engineering%20sciences&rft.au=Santra,%20Sangeeta&rft.date=2014-01-08&rft.volume=470&rft.issue=2161&rft.spage=20130464&rft.epage=20130464&rft.pages=20130464-20130464&rft.issn=1364-5021&rft.eissn=1471-2946&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspa.2013.0464&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E1660053965%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-4ca01f5bb91fc95b421ee10fe30ef583bd8ebdd30dd277c3b6b7f0d5920672c73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660053965&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |