Loading…
Nuclear Deterrence, State Legitimation, & Liberal Democracy
The threat of nuclear war has haunted two generations since the end of World War II. Great arsenals of highly sophisticated weapons have been amassed as deterrents by East and West alike, and these are seen increasingly by many as more problem than solution. This article argues that the policy of nu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Polity 1989-04, Vol.21 (3), p.563-586 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4caadc61bfca13debaf85c9dd8a4156898de4746b994339a202524942076515b3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 586 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 563 |
container_title | Polity |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Rosow, Stephen J. |
description | The threat of nuclear war has haunted two generations since the end of World War II. Great arsenals of highly sophisticated weapons have been amassed as deterrents by East and West alike, and these are seen increasingly by many as more problem than solution. This article argues that the policy of nuclear deterrence should be understood as a crisis that is more social, economic, and political than strategic and as one that is bound up with the legitimacy of the contemporary liberal-democratic, capitalist state. The author urges that deterrence be engaged as a system of social relations and not merely as a strategic doctrine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3234748 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_10_2307_3234748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3234748</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3234748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4caadc61bfca13debaf85c9dd8a4156898de4746b994339a202524942076515b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0F1LwzAUBuAgCs4p_oWCOhFWTZqkTfBK5icUvVCvQ5qezo6unUl6sX9vRgeCIOzq3Dy855wXoVOCrxOKsxuaUJYxsYdGJGMsJqlg-2iEMU1iymR2iI6cW2CMeSrZCN2-9qYBbaN78GAttAam0bvXHqIc5rWvl9rXXTuNJlFeF2B1E-SyM1ab9TE6qHTj4GQ7x-jz8eFj9hznb08vs7s8NpQKHzOjdWlSUlRGE1pCoSvBjSxLoRnhqZCihHBxWkjJKJU6wQlPmGQJzlJOeEHHaDLkrmz33YPzalk7A02jW-h6p1IsJQ-v7QQJyUSAZ3_gouttG55QJHQoCZd0oy4HZWznnIVKrWzow64VwWrTtdp2HeTFIHvzVRs971YWnPsN_XVXuzi1Kqtgzwe7cL6z_67-ARPalG0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307915938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nuclear Deterrence, State Legitimation, & Liberal Democracy</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Rosow, Stephen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosow, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><description>The threat of nuclear war has haunted two generations since the end of World War II. Great arsenals of highly sophisticated weapons have been amassed as deterrents by East and West alike, and these are seen increasingly by many as more problem than solution. This article argues that the policy of nuclear deterrence should be understood as a crisis that is more social, economic, and political than strategic and as one that is bound up with the legitimacy of the contemporary liberal-democratic, capitalist state. The author urges that deterrence be engaged as a system of social relations and not merely as a strategic doctrine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3497</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-1684</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3234748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amherst, Mass: Northeastern Political Science Association</publisher><subject>CAPITALISM ; Democracy ; Deterrence ; Economic liberalism ; International economics ; Liberalism ; Military strategy ; Nuclear deterrence ; NUCLEAR WEAPONS ; POLITICAL BEHAVIOR ; Political debate ; POLITICAL MOVEMENT ; Weapons</subject><ispartof>Polity, 1989-04, Vol.21 (3), p.563-586</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1989 Northeastern Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4caadc61bfca13debaf85c9dd8a4156898de4746b994339a202524942076515b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3234748$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3234748$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosow, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Nuclear Deterrence, State Legitimation, & Liberal Democracy</title><title>Polity</title><description>The threat of nuclear war has haunted two generations since the end of World War II. Great arsenals of highly sophisticated weapons have been amassed as deterrents by East and West alike, and these are seen increasingly by many as more problem than solution. This article argues that the policy of nuclear deterrence should be understood as a crisis that is more social, economic, and political than strategic and as one that is bound up with the legitimacy of the contemporary liberal-democratic, capitalist state. The author urges that deterrence be engaged as a system of social relations and not merely as a strategic doctrine.</description><subject>CAPITALISM</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Deterrence</subject><subject>Economic liberalism</subject><subject>International economics</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Military strategy</subject><subject>Nuclear deterrence</subject><subject>NUCLEAR WEAPONS</subject><subject>POLITICAL BEHAVIOR</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>POLITICAL MOVEMENT</subject><subject>Weapons</subject><issn>0032-3497</issn><issn>1744-1684</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0F1LwzAUBuAgCs4p_oWCOhFWTZqkTfBK5icUvVCvQ5qezo6unUl6sX9vRgeCIOzq3Dy855wXoVOCrxOKsxuaUJYxsYdGJGMsJqlg-2iEMU1iymR2iI6cW2CMeSrZCN2-9qYBbaN78GAttAam0bvXHqIc5rWvl9rXXTuNJlFeF2B1E-SyM1ab9TE6qHTj4GQ7x-jz8eFj9hznb08vs7s8NpQKHzOjdWlSUlRGE1pCoSvBjSxLoRnhqZCihHBxWkjJKJU6wQlPmGQJzlJOeEHHaDLkrmz33YPzalk7A02jW-h6p1IsJQ-v7QQJyUSAZ3_gouttG55QJHQoCZd0oy4HZWznnIVKrWzow64VwWrTtdp2HeTFIHvzVRs971YWnPsN_XVXuzi1Kqtgzwe7cL6z_67-ARPalG0</recordid><startdate>19890401</startdate><enddate>19890401</enddate><creator>Rosow, Stephen J.</creator><general>Northeastern Political Science Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890401</creationdate><title>Nuclear Deterrence, State Legitimation, & Liberal Democracy</title><author>Rosow, Stephen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4caadc61bfca13debaf85c9dd8a4156898de4746b994339a202524942076515b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>CAPITALISM</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Deterrence</topic><topic>Economic liberalism</topic><topic>International economics</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Military strategy</topic><topic>Nuclear deterrence</topic><topic>NUCLEAR WEAPONS</topic><topic>POLITICAL BEHAVIOR</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>POLITICAL MOVEMENT</topic><topic>Weapons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosow, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Polity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosow, Stephen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nuclear Deterrence, State Legitimation, & Liberal Democracy</atitle><jtitle>Polity</jtitle><date>1989-04-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>586</epage><pages>563-586</pages><issn>0032-3497</issn><eissn>1744-1684</eissn><abstract>The threat of nuclear war has haunted two generations since the end of World War II. Great arsenals of highly sophisticated weapons have been amassed as deterrents by East and West alike, and these are seen increasingly by many as more problem than solution. This article argues that the policy of nuclear deterrence should be understood as a crisis that is more social, economic, and political than strategic and as one that is bound up with the legitimacy of the contemporary liberal-democratic, capitalist state. The author urges that deterrence be engaged as a system of social relations and not merely as a strategic doctrine.</abstract><cop>Amherst, Mass</cop><pub>Northeastern Political Science Association</pub><doi>10.2307/3234748</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-3497 |
ispartof | Polity, 1989-04, Vol.21 (3), p.563-586 |
issn | 0032-3497 1744-1684 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_10_2307_3234748 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | CAPITALISM Democracy Deterrence Economic liberalism International economics Liberalism Military strategy Nuclear deterrence NUCLEAR WEAPONS POLITICAL BEHAVIOR Political debate POLITICAL MOVEMENT Weapons |
title | Nuclear Deterrence, State Legitimation, & Liberal Democracy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A10%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nuclear%20Deterrence,%20State%20Legitimation,%20&%20Liberal%20Democracy&rft.jtitle=Polity&rft.au=Rosow,%20Stephen%20J.&rft.date=1989-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=586&rft.pages=563-586&rft.issn=0032-3497&rft.eissn=1744-1684&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3234748&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3234748%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4caadc61bfca13debaf85c9dd8a4156898de4746b994339a202524942076515b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307915938&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3234748&rfr_iscdi=true |