Loading…

Within-crown flowering synchrony in strangler figs, and its relationship to allofusion

We studied flowering phenology at the level of individual branches within strangler fig trees to determine (1) whether branches bloomed asynchronously within trees and (2) whether asynchrony, if observed, could be ascribed to genetically different branches of mosaic trees (i.e., trees formed by spon...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Biotropica 1997-09, Vol.29 (3), p.291-297
Main Authors:	Thomson, J.D. (State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.), Dent-Acosta, S, Escobar-Paramo, P
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Branches ECOLOGIA ECOLOGIE ECOLOGY Evolutionary genetics FENOLOGIA FICUS Flower buds Flowering genetic mosaic grafi Mosaic Mosaicism mutualism PANAMA Panamí PHENOLOGIE PHENOLOGY Plant genetics Pollinating insects pollination Single status strangler fig
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by
cites
container_end_page	297
container_issue	3
container_start_page	291
container_title	Biotropica
container_volume	29
creator	Thomson, J.D. (State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.) Dent-Acosta, S Escobar-Paramo, P
description	We studied flowering phenology at the level of individual branches within strangler fig trees to determine (1) whether branches bloomed asynchronously within trees and (2) whether asynchrony, if observed, could be ascribed to genetically different branches of mosaic trees (i.e., trees formed by spontaneous grafting of genetically different individuals) undergoing individual flowering cycles that were out of phase with each other. Although asynchrony was fairly common, it most often reflected individual branches failing to bloom during one flowering episode, then coming back to bloom in synchrony at the next episode. We detected fewer mosaic trees than expected, and found only a very weak suggestion that mosaic trees may show less within-tree synchrony than simple trees.
doi_str_mv	10.1111/j.1744-7429.1997.tb00430.x
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_2389144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2389144</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2389144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f234t-5ee5efc9834880a810e1d4eb6baa98c14bc858cbcc5b16bc981dfd80584404ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1OAyEURonRxFp9A02Ia2eEgWGYpanamjS6sD9LwjDQUkdoANP27R1T07u5ud85uYsPgHuMctzP4ybHFaVZRYs6x3Vd5alBiBKU78_A4ITOwQAhxDLCELsEVzFu-rMuER2AxdKmtXWZCn7noOn8TgfrVjAenFoH7w7QOhhTkG7V6QCNXcUHKF0LbYow6E4m611c2y1MHsqu8-Yn9sk1uDCyi_rmfw_B_PVlNppk04_x2-hpmpmC0JSVWpfaqJoTyjmSHCONW6ob1khZc4Vpo3jJVaNU2WDW9CJuTctRySlFVEsyBLfHv5uYfBDbYL9lOIiC8BpT2uPsiG1Men_CMnwJVpGqFMv3sXieVQs2KUZi2ft3R99IL-Qq2Cjmn3-9or6sgpFfAghtCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Within-crown flowering synchrony in strangler figs, and its relationship to allofusion</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Thomson, J.D. (State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.) ; Dent-Acosta, S ; Escobar-Paramo, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomson, J.D. (State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.) ; Dent-Acosta, S ; Escobar-Paramo, P</creatorcontrib><description>We studied flowering phenology at the level of individual branches within strangler fig trees to determine (1) whether branches bloomed asynchronously within trees and (2) whether asynchrony, if observed, could be ascribed to genetically different branches of mosaic trees (i.e., trees formed by spontaneous grafting of genetically different individuals) undergoing individual flowering cycles that were out of phase with each other. Although asynchrony was fairly common, it most often reflected individual branches failing to bloom during one flowering episode, then coming back to bloom in synchrony at the next episode. We detected fewer mosaic trees than expected, and found only a very weak suggestion that mosaic trees may show less within-tree synchrony than simple trees.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7429</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.1997.tb00430.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Branches ; ECOLOGIA ; ECOLOGIE ; ECOLOGY ; Evolutionary genetics ; FENOLOGIA ; FICUS ; Flower buds ; Flowering ; genetic mosaic ; grafi ; Mosaic ; Mosaicism ; mutualism ; PANAMA ; Panamí ; PHENOLOGIE ; PHENOLOGY ; Plant genetics ; Pollinating insects ; pollination ; Single status ; strangler fig</subject><ispartof>Biotropica, 1997-09, Vol.29 (3), p.291-297</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2389144$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2389144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomson, J.D. (State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dent-Acosta, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escobar-Paramo, P</creatorcontrib><title>Within-crown flowering synchrony in strangler figs, and its relationship to allofusion</title><title>Biotropica</title><description>We studied flowering phenology at the level of individual branches within strangler fig trees to determine (1) whether branches bloomed asynchronously within trees and (2) whether asynchrony, if observed, could be ascribed to genetically different branches of mosaic trees (i.e., trees formed by spontaneous grafting of genetically different individuals) undergoing individual flowering cycles that were out of phase with each other. Although asynchrony was fairly common, it most often reflected individual branches failing to bloom during one flowering episode, then coming back to bloom in synchrony at the next episode. We detected fewer mosaic trees than expected, and found only a very weak suggestion that mosaic trees may show less within-tree synchrony than simple trees.</description><subject>Branches</subject><subject>ECOLOGIA</subject><subject>ECOLOGIE</subject><subject>ECOLOGY</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>FENOLOGIA</subject><subject>FICUS</subject><subject>Flower buds</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>genetic mosaic</subject><subject>grafi</subject><subject>Mosaic</subject><subject>Mosaicism</subject><subject>mutualism</subject><subject>PANAMA</subject><subject>Panamí</subject><subject>PHENOLOGIE</subject><subject>PHENOLOGY</subject><subject>Plant genetics</subject><subject>Pollinating insects</subject><subject>pollination</subject><subject>Single status</subject><subject>strangler fig</subject><issn>0006-3606</issn><issn>1744-7429</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1OAyEURonRxFp9A02Ia2eEgWGYpanamjS6sD9LwjDQUkdoANP27R1T07u5ud85uYsPgHuMctzP4ybHFaVZRYs6x3Vd5alBiBKU78_A4ITOwQAhxDLCELsEVzFu-rMuER2AxdKmtXWZCn7noOn8TgfrVjAenFoH7w7QOhhTkG7V6QCNXcUHKF0LbYow6E4m611c2y1MHsqu8-Yn9sk1uDCyi_rmfw_B_PVlNppk04_x2-hpmpmC0JSVWpfaqJoTyjmSHCONW6ob1khZc4Vpo3jJVaNU2WDW9CJuTctRySlFVEsyBLfHv5uYfBDbYL9lOIiC8BpT2uPsiG1Men_CMnwJVpGqFMv3sXieVQs2KUZi2ft3R99IL-Qq2Cjmn3-9or6sgpFfAghtCQ</recordid><startdate>19970901</startdate><enddate>19970901</enddate><creator>Thomson, J.D. (State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.)</creator><creator>Dent-Acosta, S</creator><creator>Escobar-Paramo, P</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Association for Tropical Biology</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970901</creationdate><title>Within-crown flowering synchrony in strangler figs, and its relationship to allofusion</title><author>Thomson, J.D. (State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.) ; Dent-Acosta, S ; Escobar-Paramo, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f234t-5ee5efc9834880a810e1d4eb6baa98c14bc858cbcc5b16bc981dfd80584404ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Branches</topic><topic>ECOLOGIA</topic><topic>ECOLOGIE</topic><topic>ECOLOGY</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>FENOLOGIA</topic><topic>FICUS</topic><topic>Flower buds</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>genetic mosaic</topic><topic>grafi</topic><topic>Mosaic</topic><topic>Mosaicism</topic><topic>mutualism</topic><topic>PANAMA</topic><topic>Panamí</topic><topic>PHENOLOGIE</topic><topic>PHENOLOGY</topic><topic>Plant genetics</topic><topic>Pollinating insects</topic><topic>pollination</topic><topic>Single status</topic><topic>strangler fig</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomson, J.D. (State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dent-Acosta, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escobar-Paramo, P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomson, J.D. (State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.)</au><au>Dent-Acosta, S</au><au>Escobar-Paramo, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Within-crown flowering synchrony in strangler figs, and its relationship to allofusion</atitle><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle><date>1997-09-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>291-297</pages><issn>0006-3606</issn><eissn>1744-7429</eissn><abstract>We studied flowering phenology at the level of individual branches within strangler fig trees to determine (1) whether branches bloomed asynchronously within trees and (2) whether asynchrony, if observed, could be ascribed to genetically different branches of mosaic trees (i.e., trees formed by spontaneous grafting of genetically different individuals) undergoing individual flowering cycles that were out of phase with each other. Although asynchrony was fairly common, it most often reflected individual branches failing to bloom during one flowering episode, then coming back to bloom in synchrony at the next episode. We detected fewer mosaic trees than expected, and found only a very weak suggestion that mosaic trees may show less within-tree synchrony than simple trees.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1744-7429.1997.tb00430.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0006-3606
ispartof	Biotropica, 1997-09, Vol.29 (3), p.291-297
issn	0006-3606 1744-7429
language	eng
recordid	cdi_jstor_primary_2389144
source	Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects	Branches ECOLOGIA ECOLOGIE ECOLOGY Evolutionary genetics FENOLOGIA FICUS Flower buds Flowering genetic mosaic grafi Mosaic Mosaicism mutualism PANAMA Panamí PHENOLOGIE PHENOLOGY Plant genetics Pollinating insects pollination Single status strangler fig
title	Within-crown flowering synchrony in strangler figs, and its relationship to allofusion
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A45%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Within-crown%20flowering%20synchrony%20in%20strangler%20figs,%20and%20its%20relationship%20to%20allofusion&rft.jtitle=Biotropica&rft.au=Thomson,%20J.D.%20(State%20University%20of%20New%20York,%20Stony%20Brook,%20NY.)&rft.date=1997-09-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=291-297&rft.issn=0006-3606&rft.eissn=1744-7429&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1744-7429.1997.tb00430.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_istex%3E2389144%3C/jstor_istex%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f234t-5ee5efc9834880a810e1d4eb6baa98c14bc858cbcc5b16bc981dfd80584404ea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2389144&rfr_iscdi=true