Les ressorts politiques d’une falsification historique: Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus et les Ides de Mars

A re-examination of the record leads to establish the guilt of Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus in the conspiracy of Ides of March, a question which has been so long debated. The Ciceronian testimony seems indisputable about it. Convicted as one of the murderers of Caesar under the lex Pedia, Ahenobarbus ow...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Historia : Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 2015-03, Vol.64 (1), p.106-130
Main Authors: Etcheto, Henri, Jougleux, François
Format: Article
Language:fre ; ita
Subjects:
HISTORIA 2015, 106
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 130
container_issue 1
container_start_page 106
container_title Historia : Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte
container_volume 64
creator Etcheto, Henri
Jougleux, François
description A re-examination of the record leads to establish the guilt of Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus in the conspiracy of Ides of March, a question which has been so long debated. The Ciceronian testimony seems indisputable about it. Convicted as one of the murderers of Caesar under the lex Pedia, Ahenobarbus owed his exculpation and restitutio only to an opportune alliance with Antonius who sought supporters after the Perusine War. Asinius Pollio himself negotiated this arrangement and reinstatement and eventually obtained the reluctant acceptance of Octavian during the Brundisium Agreement. Then, Pollio promoted this version in his historical account later used by Suetonius and Appian, thus reproducing the « truth » now official about Ahenobarbus’ innocence.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_franz</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_24433810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24433810</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24433810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f630-5a98036327148cce18736658253ad1d7e99cc561cb52c872793752b0b322c1c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj01OwzAQhS0EEqVwBCRfIGjGU_-EXVV-WimITfeV4ziqqzYpdrKAFdfgepyERK2EZjGj9958mrlgE0FKZoRgLtkEAE0mCPGa3aS0A5CggSasLnzi0afUxi7xY7sPXfjoB636_f7pG89ru0-hDs52oW34NqSujWPikS-aB_7UHoaFPvH51jdtaWM5zL7j-4GwqkaM5282plt2NYL83blP2frleb1YZsX762oxL7JaEWTS5gZIkdA4M855NJqUkkZIshVW2ue5c1KhK6VwRgudk5aihJKEcOg0Tdn9Cbsbz9wcYzjY-LkRsxmRQRh8OPl1tM1X6nxo_H_s_JwVgBJwKAVIfzhjYY8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Les ressorts politiques d’une falsification historique: Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus et les Ides de Mars</title><source>JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources</source><creator>Etcheto, Henri ; Jougleux, François</creator><creatorcontrib>Etcheto, Henri ; Jougleux, François</creatorcontrib><description>A re-examination of the record leads to establish the guilt of Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus in the conspiracy of Ides of March, a question which has been so long debated. The Ciceronian testimony seems indisputable about it. Convicted as one of the murderers of Caesar under the lex Pedia, Ahenobarbus owed his exculpation and restitutio only to an opportune alliance with Antonius who sought supporters after the Perusine War. Asinius Pollio himself negotiated this arrangement and reinstatement and eventually obtained the reluctant acceptance of Octavian during the Brundisium Agreement. Then, Pollio promoted this version in his historical account later used by Suetonius and Appian, thus reproducing the « truth » now official about Ahenobarbus’ innocence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-2311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2365-3108</identifier><language>fre ; ita</language><publisher>Franz Steiner Verlag</publisher><subject>HISTORIA 2015, 106</subject><ispartof>Historia : Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, 2015-03, Vol.64 (1), p.106-130</ispartof><rights>Franz Steiner Verlag 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24433810$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24433810$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,58236,58469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Etcheto, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jougleux, François</creatorcontrib><title>Les ressorts politiques d’une falsification historique: Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus et les Ides de Mars</title><title>Historia : Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte</title><addtitle>Historia</addtitle><description>A re-examination of the record leads to establish the guilt of Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus in the conspiracy of Ides of March, a question which has been so long debated. The Ciceronian testimony seems indisputable about it. Convicted as one of the murderers of Caesar under the lex Pedia, Ahenobarbus owed his exculpation and restitutio only to an opportune alliance with Antonius who sought supporters after the Perusine War. Asinius Pollio himself negotiated this arrangement and reinstatement and eventually obtained the reluctant acceptance of Octavian during the Brundisium Agreement. Then, Pollio promoted this version in his historical account later used by Suetonius and Appian, thus reproducing the « truth » now official about Ahenobarbus’ innocence.</description><subject>HISTORIA 2015, 106</subject><issn>0018-2311</issn><issn>2365-3108</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpFj01OwzAQhS0EEqVwBCRfIGjGU_-EXVV-WimITfeV4ziqqzYpdrKAFdfgepyERK2EZjGj9958mrlgE0FKZoRgLtkEAE0mCPGa3aS0A5CggSasLnzi0afUxi7xY7sPXfjoB636_f7pG89ru0-hDs52oW34NqSujWPikS-aB_7UHoaFPvH51jdtaWM5zL7j-4GwqkaM5282plt2NYL83blP2frleb1YZsX762oxL7JaEWTS5gZIkdA4M855NJqUkkZIshVW2ue5c1KhK6VwRgudk5aihJKEcOg0Tdn9Cbsbz9wcYzjY-LkRsxmRQRh8OPl1tM1X6nxo_H_s_JwVgBJwKAVIfzhjYY8</recordid><startdate>20150315</startdate><enddate>20150315</enddate><creator>Etcheto, Henri</creator><creator>Jougleux, François</creator><general>Franz Steiner Verlag</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20150315</creationdate><title>Les ressorts politiques d’une falsification historique: Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus et les Ides de Mars</title><author>Etcheto, Henri ; Jougleux, François</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f630-5a98036327148cce18736658253ad1d7e99cc561cb52c872793752b0b322c1c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre ; ita</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>HISTORIA 2015, 106</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Etcheto, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jougleux, François</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Historia : Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Etcheto, Henri</au><au>Jougleux, François</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Les ressorts politiques d’une falsification historique: Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus et les Ides de Mars</atitle><jtitle>Historia : Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte</jtitle><addtitle>Historia</addtitle><date>2015-03-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>106-130</pages><issn>0018-2311</issn><eissn>2365-3108</eissn><abstract>A re-examination of the record leads to establish the guilt of Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus in the conspiracy of Ides of March, a question which has been so long debated. The Ciceronian testimony seems indisputable about it. Convicted as one of the murderers of Caesar under the lex Pedia, Ahenobarbus owed his exculpation and restitutio only to an opportune alliance with Antonius who sought supporters after the Perusine War. Asinius Pollio himself negotiated this arrangement and reinstatement and eventually obtained the reluctant acceptance of Octavian during the Brundisium Agreement. Then, Pollio promoted this version in his historical account later used by Suetonius and Appian, thus reproducing the « truth » now official about Ahenobarbus’ innocence.</abstract><pub>Franz Steiner Verlag</pub><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-2311
ispartof Historia : Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, 2015-03, Vol.64 (1), p.106-130
issn 0018-2311
2365-3108
language fre ; ita
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_24433810
source JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources
subjects HISTORIA 2015, 106
title Les ressorts politiques d’une falsification historique: Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus et les Ides de Mars
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A19%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_franz&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Les%20ressorts%20politiques%20d%E2%80%99une%20falsification%20historique:%20Cn.%20Domitius%20Ahenobarbus%20et%20les%20Ides%20de%20Mars&rft.jtitle=Historia%20:%20Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20alte%20Geschichte&rft.au=Etcheto,%20Henri&rft.date=2015-03-15&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=106-130&rft.issn=0018-2311&rft.eissn=2365-3108&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_franz%3E24433810%3C/jstor_franz%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f630-5a98036327148cce18736658253ad1d7e99cc561cb52c872793752b0b322c1c73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24433810&rfr_iscdi=true