Loading…

Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry

In this paper, we explore the economics of free under perpetual licensing. In particular, we focus on two emerging software business models that involve a free component: feature-limited freemium ( FLF ) and uniform seeding ( S ). Under FLF , the firm offers the basic software version for free, whil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Information systems research 2014-03, Vol.25 (1), p.173-199
Main Authors: Niculescu, Marius F., Wu, D. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-286d8306a5a048cc0f0f2fa495a35d750be2a82845565b5184683c18fdd77bad3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-286d8306a5a048cc0f0f2fa495a35d750be2a82845565b5184683c18fdd77bad3
container_end_page 199
container_issue 1
container_start_page 173
container_title Information systems research
container_volume 25
creator Niculescu, Marius F.
Wu, D. J.
description In this paper, we explore the economics of free under perpetual licensing. In particular, we focus on two emerging software business models that involve a free component: feature-limited freemium ( FLF ) and uniform seeding ( S ). Under FLF , the firm offers the basic software version for free, while charging for premium features. Under S , the firm gives away for free the full product to a percentage of the addressable market uniformly across consumer types. We benchmark their performance against a conventional business model under which software is sold as a bundle (labeled as "charge for everything" or CE ) without free offers. In the context of consumer bounded rationality and information asymmetry, we develop a unified two-period consumer valuation learning framework that accounts for both word-of-mouth (WOM) effects and experience-based learning, and use it to compare and contrast the three business models. Under both constant and dynamic pricing, for moderate strength of WOM signals, we derive the equilibria for each model and identify optimality regions. In particular, S is optimal when consumers significantly underestimate the value of functionality and cross-module synergies are weak. When either cross-module synergies are stronger or initial priors are higher, the firm decides between CE and FLF . Furthermore, we identify nontrivial switching dynamics from one optimality region to another depending on the initial consumer beliefs about the value of the embedded functionality. For example, there are regions where, ceteris paribus, FLF is optimal when the prior on premium functionality is either relatively low or high, but not in between. We also demonstrate the robustness of our findings with respect to various parameterizations of cross-module synergies, strength of WOM effects, and number of periods. We find that stronger WOM effects or more periods lead to an expansion of the seeding optimality region in parallel with a decrease in the seeding ratio. Moreover, under CE and dynamic pricing, second period price may be decreasing in the initial consumer valuation beliefs when WOM effects are strong and the prior is relatively low. However, this is not the case under weak WOM effects. We also discuss regions where price skimming and penetration pricing are optimal. Our results provide key managerial insights that are useful to firms in their business model search and implementation.
doi_str_mv 10.1287/isre.2013.0508
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_24700111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A366175567</galeid><jstor_id>24700111</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A366175567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-286d8306a5a048cc0f0f2fa495a35d750be2a82845565b5184683c18fdd77bad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1rFDEUxQdRsFZffRMCvjprPiaT1LdSWl1YUKh9DtnMzTTLTLLmZpD-92aoWIUFCdyE8DvnJvc0zVtGN4xr9TFghg2nTGyopPpZc8Yk71spRf-8nmmnWlXLy-YV4oFSKsSFOGtur12KaQ4OSfLkJgOQuzhAJt8gH6EsdiK74CBiiOMnsp2PU3C2hBSR-JRJuQdym3z5aTOQbRwWLPnhdfPC2wnhze_9vLm7uf5-9aXdff28vbrctU5SWlqu-0EL2ltpaaedo5567m13Ia2Qg5J0D9xqrjspe7mXTHe9Fo5pPwxK7e0gzpv3j77HnH4sgMUc0pJjbWmYZEwzzZV6okY7gQnRp5KtmwM6cyn6nqlqv1LtCWqECNlOKYIP9foffnOCr2uAOsyTgg9_CfZLHShgLRjG-4KjXRBP-rucsAbrzTGH2eYHw6hZ4zZr3GaN26xxV8G7R8EBS8p_aN4pShljTx9c35pn_J_fL0zMs4Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1511818277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry</title><source>Informs</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Niculescu, Marius F. ; Wu, D. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Niculescu, Marius F. ; Wu, D. J.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we explore the economics of free under perpetual licensing. In particular, we focus on two emerging software business models that involve a free component: feature-limited freemium ( FLF ) and uniform seeding ( S ). Under FLF , the firm offers the basic software version for free, while charging for premium features. Under S , the firm gives away for free the full product to a percentage of the addressable market uniformly across consumer types. We benchmark their performance against a conventional business model under which software is sold as a bundle (labeled as "charge for everything" or CE ) without free offers. In the context of consumer bounded rationality and information asymmetry, we develop a unified two-period consumer valuation learning framework that accounts for both word-of-mouth (WOM) effects and experience-based learning, and use it to compare and contrast the three business models. Under both constant and dynamic pricing, for moderate strength of WOM signals, we derive the equilibria for each model and identify optimality regions. In particular, S is optimal when consumers significantly underestimate the value of functionality and cross-module synergies are weak. When either cross-module synergies are stronger or initial priors are higher, the firm decides between CE and FLF . Furthermore, we identify nontrivial switching dynamics from one optimality region to another depending on the initial consumer beliefs about the value of the embedded functionality. For example, there are regions where, ceteris paribus, FLF is optimal when the prior on premium functionality is either relatively low or high, but not in between. We also demonstrate the robustness of our findings with respect to various parameterizations of cross-module synergies, strength of WOM effects, and number of periods. We find that stronger WOM effects or more periods lead to an expansion of the seeding optimality region in parallel with a decrease in the seeding ratio. Moreover, under CE and dynamic pricing, second period price may be decreasing in the initial consumer valuation beliefs when WOM effects are strong and the prior is relatively low. However, this is not the case under weak WOM effects. We also discuss regions where price skimming and penetration pricing are optimal. Our results provide key managerial insights that are useful to firms in their business model search and implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-7047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/isre.2013.0508</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Business models ; Computer software ; Computer software industry ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Customers ; Economic models ; Economic research ; Experiential learning ; freemium business models ; Information storage and retrieval systems ; Internet ; Licenses ; Licensing ; Licensing, certification and accreditation ; Management ; Prices ; Pricing policies ; product sampling ; Revenue sharing ; Seeding ; seeding strategies ; software ; Software industry ; Software services ; Studies ; Subscriptions ; Versioning</subject><ispartof>Information systems research, 2014-03, Vol.25 (1), p.173-199</ispartof><rights>2014 INFORMS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-286d8306a5a048cc0f0f2fa495a35d750be2a82845565b5184683c18fdd77bad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-286d8306a5a048cc0f0f2fa495a35d750be2a82845565b5184683c18fdd77bad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24700111$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/isre.2013.0508$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3679,27905,27906,58219,58452,62595</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niculescu, Marius F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, D. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry</title><title>Information systems research</title><description>In this paper, we explore the economics of free under perpetual licensing. In particular, we focus on two emerging software business models that involve a free component: feature-limited freemium ( FLF ) and uniform seeding ( S ). Under FLF , the firm offers the basic software version for free, while charging for premium features. Under S , the firm gives away for free the full product to a percentage of the addressable market uniformly across consumer types. We benchmark their performance against a conventional business model under which software is sold as a bundle (labeled as "charge for everything" or CE ) without free offers. In the context of consumer bounded rationality and information asymmetry, we develop a unified two-period consumer valuation learning framework that accounts for both word-of-mouth (WOM) effects and experience-based learning, and use it to compare and contrast the three business models. Under both constant and dynamic pricing, for moderate strength of WOM signals, we derive the equilibria for each model and identify optimality regions. In particular, S is optimal when consumers significantly underestimate the value of functionality and cross-module synergies are weak. When either cross-module synergies are stronger or initial priors are higher, the firm decides between CE and FLF . Furthermore, we identify nontrivial switching dynamics from one optimality region to another depending on the initial consumer beliefs about the value of the embedded functionality. For example, there are regions where, ceteris paribus, FLF is optimal when the prior on premium functionality is either relatively low or high, but not in between. We also demonstrate the robustness of our findings with respect to various parameterizations of cross-module synergies, strength of WOM effects, and number of periods. We find that stronger WOM effects or more periods lead to an expansion of the seeding optimality region in parallel with a decrease in the seeding ratio. Moreover, under CE and dynamic pricing, second period price may be decreasing in the initial consumer valuation beliefs when WOM effects are strong and the prior is relatively low. However, this is not the case under weak WOM effects. We also discuss regions where price skimming and penetration pricing are optimal. Our results provide key managerial insights that are useful to firms in their business model search and implementation.</description><subject>Business models</subject><subject>Computer software</subject><subject>Computer software industry</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic research</subject><subject>Experiential learning</subject><subject>freemium business models</subject><subject>Information storage and retrieval systems</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Licensing</subject><subject>Licensing, certification and accreditation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>product sampling</subject><subject>Revenue sharing</subject><subject>Seeding</subject><subject>seeding strategies</subject><subject>software</subject><subject>Software industry</subject><subject>Software services</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subscriptions</subject><subject>Versioning</subject><issn>1047-7047</issn><issn>1526-5536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkd1rFDEUxQdRsFZffRMCvjprPiaT1LdSWl1YUKh9DtnMzTTLTLLmZpD-92aoWIUFCdyE8DvnJvc0zVtGN4xr9TFghg2nTGyopPpZc8Yk71spRf-8nmmnWlXLy-YV4oFSKsSFOGtur12KaQ4OSfLkJgOQuzhAJt8gH6EsdiK74CBiiOMnsp2PU3C2hBSR-JRJuQdym3z5aTOQbRwWLPnhdfPC2wnhze_9vLm7uf5-9aXdff28vbrctU5SWlqu-0EL2ltpaaedo5567m13Ia2Qg5J0D9xqrjspe7mXTHe9Fo5pPwxK7e0gzpv3j77HnH4sgMUc0pJjbWmYZEwzzZV6okY7gQnRp5KtmwM6cyn6nqlqv1LtCWqECNlOKYIP9foffnOCr2uAOsyTgg9_CfZLHShgLRjG-4KjXRBP-rucsAbrzTGH2eYHw6hZ4zZr3GaN26xxV8G7R8EBS8p_aN4pShljTx9c35pn_J_fL0zMs4Y</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Niculescu, Marius F.</creator><creator>Wu, D. J.</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry</title><author>Niculescu, Marius F. ; Wu, D. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-286d8306a5a048cc0f0f2fa495a35d750be2a82845565b5184683c18fdd77bad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Business models</topic><topic>Computer software</topic><topic>Computer software industry</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic research</topic><topic>Experiential learning</topic><topic>freemium business models</topic><topic>Information storage and retrieval systems</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Licensing</topic><topic>Licensing, certification and accreditation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>product sampling</topic><topic>Revenue sharing</topic><topic>Seeding</topic><topic>seeding strategies</topic><topic>software</topic><topic>Software industry</topic><topic>Software services</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subscriptions</topic><topic>Versioning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niculescu, Marius F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, D. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Information systems research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niculescu, Marius F.</au><au>Wu, D. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry</atitle><jtitle>Information systems research</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>173-199</pages><issn>1047-7047</issn><eissn>1526-5536</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we explore the economics of free under perpetual licensing. In particular, we focus on two emerging software business models that involve a free component: feature-limited freemium ( FLF ) and uniform seeding ( S ). Under FLF , the firm offers the basic software version for free, while charging for premium features. Under S , the firm gives away for free the full product to a percentage of the addressable market uniformly across consumer types. We benchmark their performance against a conventional business model under which software is sold as a bundle (labeled as "charge for everything" or CE ) without free offers. In the context of consumer bounded rationality and information asymmetry, we develop a unified two-period consumer valuation learning framework that accounts for both word-of-mouth (WOM) effects and experience-based learning, and use it to compare and contrast the three business models. Under both constant and dynamic pricing, for moderate strength of WOM signals, we derive the equilibria for each model and identify optimality regions. In particular, S is optimal when consumers significantly underestimate the value of functionality and cross-module synergies are weak. When either cross-module synergies are stronger or initial priors are higher, the firm decides between CE and FLF . Furthermore, we identify nontrivial switching dynamics from one optimality region to another depending on the initial consumer beliefs about the value of the embedded functionality. For example, there are regions where, ceteris paribus, FLF is optimal when the prior on premium functionality is either relatively low or high, but not in between. We also demonstrate the robustness of our findings with respect to various parameterizations of cross-module synergies, strength of WOM effects, and number of periods. We find that stronger WOM effects or more periods lead to an expansion of the seeding optimality region in parallel with a decrease in the seeding ratio. Moreover, under CE and dynamic pricing, second period price may be decreasing in the initial consumer valuation beliefs when WOM effects are strong and the prior is relatively low. However, this is not the case under weak WOM effects. We also discuss regions where price skimming and penetration pricing are optimal. Our results provide key managerial insights that are useful to firms in their business model search and implementation.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/isre.2013.0508</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-7047
ispartof Information systems research, 2014-03, Vol.25 (1), p.173-199
issn 1047-7047
1526-5536
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_24700111
source Informs; JSTOR Archival Journals; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)
subjects Business models
Computer software
Computer software industry
Consumers
Consumption
Customers
Economic models
Economic research
Experiential learning
freemium business models
Information storage and retrieval systems
Internet
Licenses
Licensing
Licensing, certification and accreditation
Management
Prices
Pricing policies
product sampling
Revenue sharing
Seeding
seeding strategies
software
Software industry
Software services
Studies
Subscriptions
Versioning
title Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A11%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economics%20of%20Free%20Under%20Perpetual%20Licensing:%20Implications%20for%20the%20Software%20Industry&rft.jtitle=Information%20systems%20research&rft.au=Niculescu,%20Marius%20F.&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=173-199&rft.issn=1047-7047&rft.eissn=1526-5536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/isre.2013.0508&rft_dat=%3Cgale_jstor%3EA366175567%3C/gale_jstor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-286d8306a5a048cc0f0f2fa495a35d750be2a82845565b5184683c18fdd77bad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1511818277&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A366175567&rft_jstor_id=24700111&rfr_iscdi=true