Loading…

Invasions and extinctions through the looking glass of evolutionary ecology

Invasive and endangered species reflect opposite ends of a spectrum of ecological success, yet they experience many similar eco-evolutionary challenges including demographic bottlenecks, hybridization and novel environments. Despite these similarities, important differences exist. Demographic bottle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2017-01, Vol.372 (1712), p.1-12
Main Authors: Colautti, Robert I., Alexander, Jake M., Dlugosch, Katrina M., Keller, Stephen R., Sultan, Sonia E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1712
container_start_page 1
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 372
creator Colautti, Robert I.
Alexander, Jake M.
Dlugosch, Katrina M.
Keller, Stephen R.
Sultan, Sonia E.
description Invasive and endangered species reflect opposite ends of a spectrum of ecological success, yet they experience many similar eco-evolutionary challenges including demographic bottlenecks, hybridization and novel environments. Despite these similarities, important differences exist. Demographic bottlenecks are more transient in invasive species, which (i) maintains ecologically relevant genetic variation, (ii) reduces mutation load, and (iii) increases the efficiency of natural selection relative to genetic drift. Endangered species are less likely to benefit from admixture, which offsets mutation load but also reduces fitness when populations are locally adapted. Invading species generally experience more benign environments with fewer natural enemies, which increases fitness directly and also indirectly by masking inbreeding depression. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity can maintain fitness in novel environments but is more likely to evolve in invasive species encountering variable habitats and to be compromised by demographic factors in endangered species. Placed in an eco-evolutionary context, these differences affect the breadth of the ecological niche, which arises as an emergent property of antagonistic selection and genetic constraints. Comparative studies of invasions and extinctions that apply an eco-evolutionary perspective could provide new insights into the environmental and genetic basis of ecological success in novel environments and improve efforts to preserve global biodiversity. This article is part of the themed issue 'Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences'.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_26143415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26143415</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26143415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_261434153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFiksKwjAUALNQsH6OILwLFFKbVrsWRXHrvoSapqkxT_LSYm9vFfeuhmFmwiJe5Jt4J9J8xuZELee8yLYiYpez6yUZdATS3UC9gnFV-HpoPHa6GanAIt6N06CtJAKsQfVou88n_QCqQot6WLJpLS2p1Y8Ltj4ervtT3FJAXz69eYx3uckTkYokS__1NzrSOUU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invasions and extinctions through the looking glass of evolutionary ecology</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Access via JSTOR</source><creator>Colautti, Robert I. ; Alexander, Jake M. ; Dlugosch, Katrina M. ; Keller, Stephen R. ; Sultan, Sonia E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Colautti, Robert I. ; Alexander, Jake M. ; Dlugosch, Katrina M. ; Keller, Stephen R. ; Sultan, Sonia E.</creatorcontrib><description>Invasive and endangered species reflect opposite ends of a spectrum of ecological success, yet they experience many similar eco-evolutionary challenges including demographic bottlenecks, hybridization and novel environments. Despite these similarities, important differences exist. Demographic bottlenecks are more transient in invasive species, which (i) maintains ecologically relevant genetic variation, (ii) reduces mutation load, and (iii) increases the efficiency of natural selection relative to genetic drift. Endangered species are less likely to benefit from admixture, which offsets mutation load but also reduces fitness when populations are locally adapted. Invading species generally experience more benign environments with fewer natural enemies, which increases fitness directly and also indirectly by masking inbreeding depression. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity can maintain fitness in novel environments but is more likely to evolve in invasive species encountering variable habitats and to be compromised by demographic factors in endangered species. Placed in an eco-evolutionary context, these differences affect the breadth of the ecological niche, which arises as an emergent property of antagonistic selection and genetic constraints. Comparative studies of invasions and extinctions that apply an eco-evolutionary perspective could provide new insights into the environmental and genetic basis of ecological success in novel environments and improve efforts to preserve global biodiversity. This article is part of the themed issue 'Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>THE ROYAL SOCIETY</publisher><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2017-01, Vol.372 (1712), p.1-12</ispartof><rights>The Royal Society 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26143415$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26143415$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colautti, Robert I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Jake M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlugosch, Katrina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Sonia E.</creatorcontrib><title>Invasions and extinctions through the looking glass of evolutionary ecology</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><description>Invasive and endangered species reflect opposite ends of a spectrum of ecological success, yet they experience many similar eco-evolutionary challenges including demographic bottlenecks, hybridization and novel environments. Despite these similarities, important differences exist. Demographic bottlenecks are more transient in invasive species, which (i) maintains ecologically relevant genetic variation, (ii) reduces mutation load, and (iii) increases the efficiency of natural selection relative to genetic drift. Endangered species are less likely to benefit from admixture, which offsets mutation load but also reduces fitness when populations are locally adapted. Invading species generally experience more benign environments with fewer natural enemies, which increases fitness directly and also indirectly by masking inbreeding depression. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity can maintain fitness in novel environments but is more likely to evolve in invasive species encountering variable habitats and to be compromised by demographic factors in endangered species. Placed in an eco-evolutionary context, these differences affect the breadth of the ecological niche, which arises as an emergent property of antagonistic selection and genetic constraints. Comparative studies of invasions and extinctions that apply an eco-evolutionary perspective could provide new insights into the environmental and genetic basis of ecological success in novel environments and improve efforts to preserve global biodiversity. This article is part of the themed issue 'Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences'.</description><issn>0962-8436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFiksKwjAUALNQsH6OILwLFFKbVrsWRXHrvoSapqkxT_LSYm9vFfeuhmFmwiJe5Jt4J9J8xuZELee8yLYiYpez6yUZdATS3UC9gnFV-HpoPHa6GanAIt6N06CtJAKsQfVou88n_QCqQot6WLJpLS2p1Y8Ltj4ervtT3FJAXz69eYx3uckTkYokS__1NzrSOUU</recordid><startdate>20170119</startdate><enddate>20170119</enddate><creator>Colautti, Robert I.</creator><creator>Alexander, Jake M.</creator><creator>Dlugosch, Katrina M.</creator><creator>Keller, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Sultan, Sonia E.</creator><general>THE ROYAL SOCIETY</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20170119</creationdate><title>Invasions and extinctions through the looking glass of evolutionary ecology</title><author>Colautti, Robert I. ; Alexander, Jake M. ; Dlugosch, Katrina M. ; Keller, Stephen R. ; Sultan, Sonia E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_261434153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colautti, Robert I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Jake M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlugosch, Katrina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Sonia E.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colautti, Robert I.</au><au>Alexander, Jake M.</au><au>Dlugosch, Katrina M.</au><au>Keller, Stephen R.</au><au>Sultan, Sonia E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invasions and extinctions through the looking glass of evolutionary ecology</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><date>2017-01-19</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>372</volume><issue>1712</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><abstract>Invasive and endangered species reflect opposite ends of a spectrum of ecological success, yet they experience many similar eco-evolutionary challenges including demographic bottlenecks, hybridization and novel environments. Despite these similarities, important differences exist. Demographic bottlenecks are more transient in invasive species, which (i) maintains ecologically relevant genetic variation, (ii) reduces mutation load, and (iii) increases the efficiency of natural selection relative to genetic drift. Endangered species are less likely to benefit from admixture, which offsets mutation load but also reduces fitness when populations are locally adapted. Invading species generally experience more benign environments with fewer natural enemies, which increases fitness directly and also indirectly by masking inbreeding depression. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity can maintain fitness in novel environments but is more likely to evolve in invasive species encountering variable habitats and to be compromised by demographic factors in endangered species. Placed in an eco-evolutionary context, these differences affect the breadth of the ecological niche, which arises as an emergent property of antagonistic selection and genetic constraints. Comparative studies of invasions and extinctions that apply an eco-evolutionary perspective could provide new insights into the environmental and genetic basis of ecological success in novel environments and improve efforts to preserve global biodiversity. This article is part of the themed issue 'Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences'.</abstract><pub>THE ROYAL SOCIETY</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2017-01, Vol.372 (1712), p.1-12
issn 0962-8436
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_26143415
source PubMed (Medline); Access via JSTOR
title Invasions and extinctions through the looking glass of evolutionary ecology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A22%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invasions%20and%20extinctions%20through%20the%20looking%20glass%20of%20evolutionary%20ecology&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Colautti,%20Robert%20I.&rft.date=2017-01-19&rft.volume=372&rft.issue=1712&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E26143415%3C/jstor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_261434153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26143415&rfr_iscdi=true