Northern bottlenose whales in a pristine environment respond strongly to close and distant navy sonar signals

• Published in: Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2019-03, Vol.286 (1899), p.1-10
• Main Authors: Wensveen, Paul J., Isojunno, Saana, Hansen, Rune R., von Benda-Beckmann, Alexander M., Kleivane, Lars, van IJsselmuide, Sander, Lam, Frans-Peter A., Kvadsheim, Petter H., DeRuiter, Stacy L., Curé, Charlotte, Narazaki, Tomoko, Tyack, Peter L., Miller, Patrick J. O.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Behaviour
• ISSN: 0962-8452; 1471-2954

Impact assessments for sonar operations typically use received sound levels to predict behavioural disturbance in marine mammals. However, there are indications that cetaceans may learn to associate exposures from distant sound sources with lower perceived risk. To investigate the roles of source distance and received level in an area without frequent sonar activity, we conducted multi-scale controlled exposure experiments (n = 3) with 12 northern bottlenose whales near Jan Mayen, Norway. Animals were tagged with high-resolution archival tags (n = 1 per experiment) or mediumresolution satellite tags (n = 9 in total) and subsequently exposed to sonar. We also deployed bottom-moored recorders to acoustically monitor for whales in the exposed area. Tagged whales initiated avoidance of the sound source over awide range of distances (0.8–28 km),with responses characteristic of beakedwhales. Both onset and intensity of responsewere better predicted by received sound pressure level (SPL) than by source distance. Avoidance threshold SPLs estimated for each whale ranged from 117–126 dB re 1 mPa, comparable to those of other tagged beakedwhales. In this pristine underwater acoustic environment, we found no indication that the source distances tested in our experiments modulated the behavioural effects of sonar, as has been suggested for locations where whales are frequently exposed to sonar.