Community Engagement in US Biobanking: Multiplicity of Meaning and Method

Background/Aims: Efforts to improve individual and population health increasingly rely on large-scale collections of human biological specimens and associated data. Such collections or ‘biobanks' are hailed as valuable resources for facilitating translational biomedical research. However, bioba...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Community genetics 2014-01, Vol.17 (2), p.84-94
Main Authors: Haldeman, K.M., Cadigan, R.J., Davis, A., Goldenberg, A., Henderson, G.E., Lassiter, D., Reavely, E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological Specimen Banks - ethics
Biological Specimen Banks - trends
Communication
Community involvement
Community-Institutional Relations - legislation & jurisprudence
Goals
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Job Satisfaction
Living Donors
Original Paper
Original Papers
Telephone
Translational Medical Research
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background/Aims: Efforts to improve individual and population health increasingly rely on large-scale collections of human biological specimens and associated data. Such collections or ‘biobanks' are hailed as valuable resources for facilitating translational biomedical research. However, biobanks also raise important ethical considerations, such as whether, how and why biobanks might engage with those who contributed specimens. This paper examines perceptions and practices of community engagement (CE) among individuals who operate 6 diverse biobanks in the US. Methods: Twenty-four people from a diverse group of 6 biobanks were interviewed in-person or via telephone from March to July 2011. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed for common themes. Results: Emergent themes include how biobank personnel understand ‘community' and CE as it pertains to biobank operations, information regarding the diversity of practices of CE, and the reasons why biobanks conduct CE. Conclusion: Despite recommendations from federal agencies to conduct CE, the interpretation of CE varies widely among biobank employees, ultimately affecting how CE is practiced and what goals are achieved.
ISSN:1662-4246
1662-8063
DOI:10.1159/000357958