Loading…

Timely, Relevant, Practical: A Study of Writing Center Summer Institute Alumni Perceptions of Value and Benefits

Since its inception in 2003, the IWCA Summer Institute (SI) has been understood within the writing center field to be an important professional development opportunity for new and experienced writing center professionals (WCPs). Publications on the SI to date have focused on anecdotal perceptions of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Writing center journal 2023-12, Vol.41 (3), p.20-37
Main Authors: Bleakney, Julia, Hall, Mark, Hixson-Bowles, Kelsey, Lee, Sohui, Singh-Corcoran, Nathalie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 37
container_issue 3
container_start_page 20
container_title The Writing center journal
container_volume 41
creator Bleakney, Julia
Hall, Mark
Hixson-Bowles, Kelsey
Lee, Sohui
Singh-Corcoran, Nathalie
description Since its inception in 2003, the IWCA Summer Institute (SI) has been understood within the writing center field to be an important professional development opportunity for new and experienced writing center professionals (WCPs). Publications on the SI to date have focused on anecdotal perceptions of the benefits to leaders and participants or on a single outcome, such as research output. Thus, the writing center field knows little about how and in what ways participants perceive the SI's benefits across cohorts and across a variety of professional areas. By gathering quantitative and qualitative data from every SI cohort from 2003 to 2019, the goal of this study was to identify and define the benefits of the SI, focusing in particular on how participants themselves understand them. The survey received 161 responses, a response rate of approximately 27%; all 17 years of the SI were represented. The study found that, despite the field's shifting priorities since 2003, the concerns and needs of WCPs have remained relatively constant over time, and that the SI serves the most pressing administrative needs of participants.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_27275939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A783041801</galeid><jstor_id>27275939</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A783041801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g899-67538a6c3895892b50e6eddadc29e41f7040479a0c8938badbfd066d8d6c52cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjk1Lw0AYhPegYK39BSIUvDbyZj_fPZbiFxSUknvY7EfZskkkG4T-exfqRZA5DAzPDHNFFoCoK1lzdkNucz4BcM5ALch9E3ufzpv1wSf_bYZ5s_6cjJ2jNemOXAeTsl_9-pI0L8_N7q3af7y-77b76oi6jCrB0EjLUAvUtBPgpXfOOEu153VQwIErbcCiZtgZ1wUHUjp00gpqO7Ykj5fZo0m-jUMY5_Kgj9m2W4UMeI1QF-rpH6rI-T7acfAhlvxP4eFSOOV5nNqvKfZmOrdUUSU00-wH1ltO-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Timely, Relevant, Practical: A Study of Writing Center Summer Institute Alumni Perceptions of Value and Benefits</title><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><creator>Bleakney, Julia ; Hall, Mark ; Hixson-Bowles, Kelsey ; Lee, Sohui ; Singh-Corcoran, Nathalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Bleakney, Julia ; Hall, Mark ; Hixson-Bowles, Kelsey ; Lee, Sohui ; Singh-Corcoran, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><description>Since its inception in 2003, the IWCA Summer Institute (SI) has been understood within the writing center field to be an important professional development opportunity for new and experienced writing center professionals (WCPs). Publications on the SI to date have focused on anecdotal perceptions of the benefits to leaders and participants or on a single outcome, such as research output. Thus, the writing center field knows little about how and in what ways participants perceive the SI's benefits across cohorts and across a variety of professional areas. By gathering quantitative and qualitative data from every SI cohort from 2003 to 2019, the goal of this study was to identify and define the benefits of the SI, focusing in particular on how participants themselves understand them. The survey received 161 responses, a response rate of approximately 27%; all 17 years of the SI were represented. The study found that, despite the field's shifting priorities since 2003, the concerns and needs of WCPs have remained relatively constant over time, and that the SI serves the most pressing administrative needs of participants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-6143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Purdue University Press</publisher><subject>Professional development</subject><ispartof>The Writing center journal, 2023-12, Vol.41 (3), p.20-37</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 University of Oklahoma</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27275939$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27275939$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25354,54524,54530</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27275939$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bleakney, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hixson-Bowles, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh-Corcoran, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><title>Timely, Relevant, Practical: A Study of Writing Center Summer Institute Alumni Perceptions of Value and Benefits</title><title>The Writing center journal</title><description>Since its inception in 2003, the IWCA Summer Institute (SI) has been understood within the writing center field to be an important professional development opportunity for new and experienced writing center professionals (WCPs). Publications on the SI to date have focused on anecdotal perceptions of the benefits to leaders and participants or on a single outcome, such as research output. Thus, the writing center field knows little about how and in what ways participants perceive the SI's benefits across cohorts and across a variety of professional areas. By gathering quantitative and qualitative data from every SI cohort from 2003 to 2019, the goal of this study was to identify and define the benefits of the SI, focusing in particular on how participants themselves understand them. The survey received 161 responses, a response rate of approximately 27%; all 17 years of the SI were represented. The study found that, despite the field's shifting priorities since 2003, the concerns and needs of WCPs have remained relatively constant over time, and that the SI serves the most pressing administrative needs of participants.</description><subject>Professional development</subject><issn>0889-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptjk1Lw0AYhPegYK39BSIUvDbyZj_fPZbiFxSUknvY7EfZskkkG4T-exfqRZA5DAzPDHNFFoCoK1lzdkNucz4BcM5ALch9E3ufzpv1wSf_bYZ5s_6cjJ2jNemOXAeTsl_9-pI0L8_N7q3af7y-77b76oi6jCrB0EjLUAvUtBPgpXfOOEu153VQwIErbcCiZtgZ1wUHUjp00gpqO7Ykj5fZo0m-jUMY5_Kgj9m2W4UMeI1QF-rpH6rI-T7acfAhlvxP4eFSOOV5nNqvKfZmOrdUUSU00-wH1ltO-A</recordid><startdate>20231222</startdate><enddate>20231222</enddate><creator>Bleakney, Julia</creator><creator>Hall, Mark</creator><creator>Hixson-Bowles, Kelsey</creator><creator>Lee, Sohui</creator><creator>Singh-Corcoran, Nathalie</creator><general>Purdue University Press</general><general>University of Oklahoma</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20231222</creationdate><title>Timely, Relevant, Practical</title><author>Bleakney, Julia ; Hall, Mark ; Hixson-Bowles, Kelsey ; Lee, Sohui ; Singh-Corcoran, Nathalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g899-67538a6c3895892b50e6eddadc29e41f7040479a0c8938badbfd066d8d6c52cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Professional development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bleakney, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hixson-Bowles, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh-Corcoran, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Writing center journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bleakney, Julia</au><au>Hall, Mark</au><au>Hixson-Bowles, Kelsey</au><au>Lee, Sohui</au><au>Singh-Corcoran, Nathalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Timely, Relevant, Practical: A Study of Writing Center Summer Institute Alumni Perceptions of Value and Benefits</atitle><jtitle>The Writing center journal</jtitle><date>2023-12-22</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>20-37</pages><issn>0889-6143</issn><abstract>Since its inception in 2003, the IWCA Summer Institute (SI) has been understood within the writing center field to be an important professional development opportunity for new and experienced writing center professionals (WCPs). Publications on the SI to date have focused on anecdotal perceptions of the benefits to leaders and participants or on a single outcome, such as research output. Thus, the writing center field knows little about how and in what ways participants perceive the SI's benefits across cohorts and across a variety of professional areas. By gathering quantitative and qualitative data from every SI cohort from 2003 to 2019, the goal of this study was to identify and define the benefits of the SI, focusing in particular on how participants themselves understand them. The survey received 161 responses, a response rate of approximately 27%; all 17 years of the SI were represented. The study found that, despite the field's shifting priorities since 2003, the concerns and needs of WCPs have remained relatively constant over time, and that the SI serves the most pressing administrative needs of participants.</abstract><pub>Purdue University Press</pub><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0889-6143
ispartof The Writing center journal, 2023-12, Vol.41 (3), p.20-37
issn 0889-6143
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_27275939
source JSTOR Open Access Journals
subjects Professional development
title Timely, Relevant, Practical: A Study of Writing Center Summer Institute Alumni Perceptions of Value and Benefits
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A38%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Timely,%20Relevant,%20Practical:%20A%20Study%20of%20Writing%20Center%20Summer%20Institute%20Alumni%20Perceptions%20of%20Value%20and%20Benefits&rft.jtitle=The%20Writing%20center%20journal&rft.au=Bleakney,%20Julia&rft.date=2023-12-22&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=20-37&rft.issn=0889-6143&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_JFNAL%3EA783041801%3C/gale_JFNAL%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g899-67538a6c3895892b50e6eddadc29e41f7040479a0c8938badbfd066d8d6c52cb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A783041801&rft_jstor_id=27275939&rfr_iscdi=true