Loading…
Bayesian Model Comparison and Model Averaging for Small-Area Estimation
This paper considers small-area estimation with lung cancer mortality data, and discusses the choice of upper-level model for the variation over areas. Inference about the random effects for the areas may depend strongly on the choice of this model, but this choice is not a straightforward matter. W...
Saved in:
Published in: | The annals of applied statistics 2009-03, Vol.3 (1), p.199-221 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This paper considers small-area estimation with lung cancer mortality data, and discusses the choice of upper-level model for the variation over areas. Inference about the random effects for the areas may depend strongly on the choice of this model, but this choice is not a straightforward matter. We give a general methodology for both evaluating the data evidence for different models and averaging over plausible models to give robust area effect distributions. We reanalyze the data of Tsutakawa [Biometrics 41 (1985) 69-79] on lung cancer mortality rates in Missouri cities, and show the differences in conclusions about the city rates from this methodology. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1932-6157 |
DOI: | 10.1214/09-AOAS205 |