Loading…

The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China

In the era of state socialism under Mao, land in China was treated as a means of production and was allocated administratively by the state free of charge. To accommodate the interests of foreign investors without violating the socialist principle of public ownership, the Chinese state has, since th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2005-06, Vol.95 (2), p.411-436
Main Authors: Lin, George C. S., Ho, Samuel P. S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3
container_end_page 436
container_issue 2
container_start_page 411
container_title Annals of the Association of American Geographers
container_volume 95
creator Lin, George C. S.
Ho, Samuel P. S.
description In the era of state socialism under Mao, land in China was treated as a means of production and was allocated administratively by the state free of charge. To accommodate the interests of foreign investors without violating the socialist principle of public ownership, the Chinese state has, since the 1980s, separated land use rights from land ownership and opened up a new market track for the conveyance of land use rights to commercial users. The result has been a distinct dual-track land system in the new political economy, characterized by significant asymmetry for arbitrage. Discrepancy between the state's intention and actual outcome has been a consequence of the internal diversity of power relations concerning land development. Our data analysis reveals that the loss of farmland to nonagricultural developments has slowed down in recent years, that the state's intention to increase land use efficiency has been severely compromised by the socialist legacy, and that illegal activities are pervasive. The Chinese socialist state is better seen as a dynamic, complex, heterogeneous, and self-conflictual institutional ensemble in and through which the forces and interests of different levels of the state are contested, negotiated, and mediated.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00467.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_3694126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3694126</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3694126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhH3CwkODUhLGdOM6Bwyp8SquC1HK2HO9ETZTYi52l3X-P05QicQFfPB_PO5p5CaEMcpbe2yFnhawyJUDmHKDMAVKe3z4im4fGY7KBVM5KCeopeRbjkFImZLEhu6trpJezmfGc7ozb08tTnHE6p0t8V3iPP3H0hwndTL8FbzFGjLR3tPEukQcfTDjR5rp35jl50pkx4ov7_4x8__jhqvmc7b5--tJsd5ktFK-yWpWtKNsCsRagOoC2tVx0pa1Fxdramr2AKpH7ujWSWVnyilvWSmQAXHZGnJE369xD8D-OGGc99dHiOBqH_hi1UKySsiwS-OovcPDH4NJumoOCiivGEqRWyAYfY8BOH0I_paM0A714rAe9WKkXK_Xisb7zWN8m6ev7-SZaM3bBONvHP_qKlVxJkbh3K3fTj3j67_l6e3GxTVHSv1z1Q5x9eNALWReMy9Ru1nbvOh8mc-PDuNezOY0-_N5J_POYX7rxrBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208072811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Lin, George C. S. ; Ho, Samuel P. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, George C. S. ; Ho, Samuel P. S.</creatorcontrib><description>In the era of state socialism under Mao, land in China was treated as a means of production and was allocated administratively by the state free of charge. To accommodate the interests of foreign investors without violating the socialist principle of public ownership, the Chinese state has, since the 1980s, separated land use rights from land ownership and opened up a new market track for the conveyance of land use rights to commercial users. The result has been a distinct dual-track land system in the new political economy, characterized by significant asymmetry for arbitrage. Discrepancy between the state's intention and actual outcome has been a consequence of the internal diversity of power relations concerning land development. Our data analysis reveals that the loss of farmland to nonagricultural developments has slowed down in recent years, that the state's intention to increase land use efficiency has been severely compromised by the socialist legacy, and that illegal activities are pervasive. The Chinese socialist state is better seen as a dynamic, complex, heterogeneous, and self-conflictual institutional ensemble in and through which the forces and interests of different levels of the state are contested, negotiated, and mediated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-5608</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2469-4452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8306</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2469-4460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00467.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAAGAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural land use ; Asia ; Bgi / Prodig ; China ; Development ; Fees ; Geography ; Human geography ; Land development ; Land economics ; Land management ; Land ownership ; Land tenure ; Land use ; Land use change ; Management ; Nation state ; Ownership ; People, Place, and Region ; Political economy ; Rural land use ; Socialism ; State</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2005-06, Vol.95 (2), p.411-436</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 Association of American Geographers</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Jun 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3694126$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3694126$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17152863$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, George C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Samuel P. S.</creatorcontrib><title>The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China</title><title>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</title><description>In the era of state socialism under Mao, land in China was treated as a means of production and was allocated administratively by the state free of charge. To accommodate the interests of foreign investors without violating the socialist principle of public ownership, the Chinese state has, since the 1980s, separated land use rights from land ownership and opened up a new market track for the conveyance of land use rights to commercial users. The result has been a distinct dual-track land system in the new political economy, characterized by significant asymmetry for arbitrage. Discrepancy between the state's intention and actual outcome has been a consequence of the internal diversity of power relations concerning land development. Our data analysis reveals that the loss of farmland to nonagricultural developments has slowed down in recent years, that the state's intention to increase land use efficiency has been severely compromised by the socialist legacy, and that illegal activities are pervasive. The Chinese socialist state is better seen as a dynamic, complex, heterogeneous, and self-conflictual institutional ensemble in and through which the forces and interests of different levels of the state are contested, negotiated, and mediated.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural land use</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Human geography</subject><subject>Land development</subject><subject>Land economics</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land ownership</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use change</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Nation state</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>People, Place, and Region</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Rural land use</subject><subject>Socialism</subject><subject>State</subject><issn>0004-5608</issn><issn>2469-4452</issn><issn>1467-8306</issn><issn>2469-4460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhH3CwkODUhLGdOM6Bwyp8SquC1HK2HO9ETZTYi52l3X-P05QicQFfPB_PO5p5CaEMcpbe2yFnhawyJUDmHKDMAVKe3z4im4fGY7KBVM5KCeopeRbjkFImZLEhu6trpJezmfGc7ozb08tTnHE6p0t8V3iPP3H0hwndTL8FbzFGjLR3tPEukQcfTDjR5rp35jl50pkx4ov7_4x8__jhqvmc7b5--tJsd5ktFK-yWpWtKNsCsRagOoC2tVx0pa1Fxdramr2AKpH7ujWSWVnyilvWSmQAXHZGnJE369xD8D-OGGc99dHiOBqH_hi1UKySsiwS-OovcPDH4NJumoOCiivGEqRWyAYfY8BOH0I_paM0A714rAe9WKkXK_Xisb7zWN8m6ev7-SZaM3bBONvHP_qKlVxJkbh3K3fTj3j67_l6e3GxTVHSv1z1Q5x9eNALWReMy9Ru1nbvOh8mc-PDuNezOY0-_N5J_POYX7rxrBg</recordid><startdate>200506</startdate><enddate>200506</enddate><creator>Lin, George C. S.</creator><creator>Ho, Samuel P. S.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Association of American Geographers</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200506</creationdate><title>The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China</title><author>Lin, George C. S. ; Ho, Samuel P. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural land use</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Human geography</topic><topic>Land development</topic><topic>Land economics</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land ownership</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use change</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Nation state</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>People, Place, and Region</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Rural land use</topic><topic>Socialism</topic><topic>State</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, George C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Samuel P. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, George C. S.</au><au>Ho, Samuel P. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</jtitle><date>2005-06</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>411</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>411-436</pages><issn>0004-5608</issn><issn>2469-4452</issn><eissn>1467-8306</eissn><eissn>2469-4460</eissn><coden>AAAGAK</coden><abstract>In the era of state socialism under Mao, land in China was treated as a means of production and was allocated administratively by the state free of charge. To accommodate the interests of foreign investors without violating the socialist principle of public ownership, the Chinese state has, since the 1980s, separated land use rights from land ownership and opened up a new market track for the conveyance of land use rights to commercial users. The result has been a distinct dual-track land system in the new political economy, characterized by significant asymmetry for arbitrage. Discrepancy between the state's intention and actual outcome has been a consequence of the internal diversity of power relations concerning land development. Our data analysis reveals that the loss of farmland to nonagricultural developments has slowed down in recent years, that the state's intention to increase land use efficiency has been severely compromised by the socialist legacy, and that illegal activities are pervasive. The Chinese socialist state is better seen as a dynamic, complex, heterogeneous, and self-conflictual institutional ensemble in and through which the forces and interests of different levels of the state are contested, negotiated, and mediated.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00467.x</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-5608
ispartof Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2005-06, Vol.95 (2), p.411-436
issn 0004-5608
2469-4452
1467-8306
2469-4460
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_3694126
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Agricultural land
Agricultural land use
Asia
Bgi / Prodig
China
Development
Fees
Geography
Human geography
Land development
Land economics
Land management
Land ownership
Land tenure
Land use
Land use change
Management
Nation state
Ownership
People, Place, and Region
Political economy
Rural land use
Socialism
State
title The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A54%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20State,%20Land%20System,%20and%20Land%20Development%20Processes%20in%20Contemporary%20China&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Association%20of%20American%20Geographers&rft.au=Lin,%20George%20C.%20S.&rft.date=2005-06&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=411-436&rft.issn=0004-5608&rft.eissn=1467-8306&rft.coden=AAAGAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00467.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3694126%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208072811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3694126&rfr_iscdi=true