Loading…
The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China
In the era of state socialism under Mao, land in China was treated as a means of production and was allocated administratively by the state free of charge. To accommodate the interests of foreign investors without violating the socialist principle of public ownership, the Chinese state has, since th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2005-06, Vol.95 (2), p.411-436 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3 |
container_end_page | 436 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 411 |
container_title | Annals of the Association of American Geographers |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Lin, George C. S. Ho, Samuel P. S. |
description | In the era of state socialism under Mao, land in China was treated as a means of production and was allocated administratively by the state free of charge. To accommodate the interests of foreign investors without violating the socialist principle of public ownership, the Chinese state has, since the 1980s, separated land use rights from land ownership and opened up a new market track for the conveyance of land use rights to commercial users. The result has been a distinct dual-track land system in the new political economy, characterized by significant asymmetry for arbitrage. Discrepancy between the state's intention and actual outcome has been a consequence of the internal diversity of power relations concerning land development. Our data analysis reveals that the loss of farmland to nonagricultural developments has slowed down in recent years, that the state's intention to increase land use efficiency has been severely compromised by the socialist legacy, and that illegal activities are pervasive. The Chinese socialist state is better seen as a dynamic, complex, heterogeneous, and self-conflictual institutional ensemble in and through which the forces and interests of different levels of the state are contested, negotiated, and mediated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00467.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_3694126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3694126</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3694126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhH3CwkODUhLGdOM6Bwyp8SquC1HK2HO9ETZTYi52l3X-P05QicQFfPB_PO5p5CaEMcpbe2yFnhawyJUDmHKDMAVKe3z4im4fGY7KBVM5KCeopeRbjkFImZLEhu6trpJezmfGc7ozb08tTnHE6p0t8V3iPP3H0hwndTL8FbzFGjLR3tPEukQcfTDjR5rp35jl50pkx4ov7_4x8__jhqvmc7b5--tJsd5ktFK-yWpWtKNsCsRagOoC2tVx0pa1Fxdramr2AKpH7ujWSWVnyilvWSmQAXHZGnJE369xD8D-OGGc99dHiOBqH_hi1UKySsiwS-OovcPDH4NJumoOCiivGEqRWyAYfY8BOH0I_paM0A714rAe9WKkXK_Xisb7zWN8m6ev7-SZaM3bBONvHP_qKlVxJkbh3K3fTj3j67_l6e3GxTVHSv1z1Q5x9eNALWReMy9Ru1nbvOh8mc-PDuNezOY0-_N5J_POYX7rxrBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208072811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Lin, George C. S. ; Ho, Samuel P. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, George C. S. ; Ho, Samuel P. S.</creatorcontrib><description>In the era of state socialism under Mao, land in China was treated as a means of production and was allocated administratively by the state free of charge. To accommodate the interests of foreign investors without violating the socialist principle of public ownership, the Chinese state has, since the 1980s, separated land use rights from land ownership and opened up a new market track for the conveyance of land use rights to commercial users. The result has been a distinct dual-track land system in the new political economy, characterized by significant asymmetry for arbitrage. Discrepancy between the state's intention and actual outcome has been a consequence of the internal diversity of power relations concerning land development. Our data analysis reveals that the loss of farmland to nonagricultural developments has slowed down in recent years, that the state's intention to increase land use efficiency has been severely compromised by the socialist legacy, and that illegal activities are pervasive. The Chinese socialist state is better seen as a dynamic, complex, heterogeneous, and self-conflictual institutional ensemble in and through which the forces and interests of different levels of the state are contested, negotiated, and mediated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-5608</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2469-4452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8306</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2469-4460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00467.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAAGAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural land use ; Asia ; Bgi / Prodig ; China ; Development ; Fees ; Geography ; Human geography ; Land development ; Land economics ; Land management ; Land ownership ; Land tenure ; Land use ; Land use change ; Management ; Nation state ; Ownership ; People, Place, and Region ; Political economy ; Rural land use ; Socialism ; State</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2005-06, Vol.95 (2), p.411-436</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 Association of American Geographers</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Jun 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3694126$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3694126$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17152863$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, George C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Samuel P. S.</creatorcontrib><title>The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China</title><title>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</title><description>In the era of state socialism under Mao, land in China was treated as a means of production and was allocated administratively by the state free of charge. To accommodate the interests of foreign investors without violating the socialist principle of public ownership, the Chinese state has, since the 1980s, separated land use rights from land ownership and opened up a new market track for the conveyance of land use rights to commercial users. The result has been a distinct dual-track land system in the new political economy, characterized by significant asymmetry for arbitrage. Discrepancy between the state's intention and actual outcome has been a consequence of the internal diversity of power relations concerning land development. Our data analysis reveals that the loss of farmland to nonagricultural developments has slowed down in recent years, that the state's intention to increase land use efficiency has been severely compromised by the socialist legacy, and that illegal activities are pervasive. The Chinese socialist state is better seen as a dynamic, complex, heterogeneous, and self-conflictual institutional ensemble in and through which the forces and interests of different levels of the state are contested, negotiated, and mediated.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural land use</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Human geography</subject><subject>Land development</subject><subject>Land economics</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land ownership</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use change</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Nation state</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>People, Place, and Region</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Rural land use</subject><subject>Socialism</subject><subject>State</subject><issn>0004-5608</issn><issn>2469-4452</issn><issn>1467-8306</issn><issn>2469-4460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhH3CwkODUhLGdOM6Bwyp8SquC1HK2HO9ETZTYi52l3X-P05QicQFfPB_PO5p5CaEMcpbe2yFnhawyJUDmHKDMAVKe3z4im4fGY7KBVM5KCeopeRbjkFImZLEhu6trpJezmfGc7ozb08tTnHE6p0t8V3iPP3H0hwndTL8FbzFGjLR3tPEukQcfTDjR5rp35jl50pkx4ov7_4x8__jhqvmc7b5--tJsd5ktFK-yWpWtKNsCsRagOoC2tVx0pa1Fxdramr2AKpH7ujWSWVnyilvWSmQAXHZGnJE369xD8D-OGGc99dHiOBqH_hi1UKySsiwS-OovcPDH4NJumoOCiivGEqRWyAYfY8BOH0I_paM0A714rAe9WKkXK_Xisb7zWN8m6ev7-SZaM3bBONvHP_qKlVxJkbh3K3fTj3j67_l6e3GxTVHSv1z1Q5x9eNALWReMy9Ru1nbvOh8mc-PDuNezOY0-_N5J_POYX7rxrBg</recordid><startdate>200506</startdate><enddate>200506</enddate><creator>Lin, George C. S.</creator><creator>Ho, Samuel P. S.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Association of American Geographers</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200506</creationdate><title>The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China</title><author>Lin, George C. S. ; Ho, Samuel P. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural land use</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Human geography</topic><topic>Land development</topic><topic>Land economics</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land ownership</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use change</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Nation state</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>People, Place, and Region</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Rural land use</topic><topic>Socialism</topic><topic>State</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, George C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Samuel P. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, George C. S.</au><au>Ho, Samuel P. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</jtitle><date>2005-06</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>411</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>411-436</pages><issn>0004-5608</issn><issn>2469-4452</issn><eissn>1467-8306</eissn><eissn>2469-4460</eissn><coden>AAAGAK</coden><abstract>In the era of state socialism under Mao, land in China was treated as a means of production and was allocated administratively by the state free of charge. To accommodate the interests of foreign investors without violating the socialist principle of public ownership, the Chinese state has, since the 1980s, separated land use rights from land ownership and opened up a new market track for the conveyance of land use rights to commercial users. The result has been a distinct dual-track land system in the new political economy, characterized by significant asymmetry for arbitrage. Discrepancy between the state's intention and actual outcome has been a consequence of the internal diversity of power relations concerning land development. Our data analysis reveals that the loss of farmland to nonagricultural developments has slowed down in recent years, that the state's intention to increase land use efficiency has been severely compromised by the socialist legacy, and that illegal activities are pervasive. The Chinese socialist state is better seen as a dynamic, complex, heterogeneous, and self-conflictual institutional ensemble in and through which the forces and interests of different levels of the state are contested, negotiated, and mediated.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00467.x</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-5608 |
ispartof | Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2005-06, Vol.95 (2), p.411-436 |
issn | 0004-5608 2469-4452 1467-8306 2469-4460 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_3694126 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Agricultural land Agricultural land use Asia Bgi / Prodig China Development Fees Geography Human geography Land development Land economics Land management Land ownership Land tenure Land use Land use change Management Nation state Ownership People, Place, and Region Political economy Rural land use Socialism State |
title | The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A54%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20State,%20Land%20System,%20and%20Land%20Development%20Processes%20in%20Contemporary%20China&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Association%20of%20American%20Geographers&rft.au=Lin,%20George%20C.%20S.&rft.date=2005-06&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=411-436&rft.issn=0004-5608&rft.eissn=1467-8306&rft.coden=AAAGAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00467.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3694126%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4827-985b35b4ee9308f00bbc23f5c9371b9cad307482d9ba61c65272c1b6e10026fa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208072811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3694126&rfr_iscdi=true |