The World Social Forum and global democratisation: Learning from Porto Alegre

Being anti-something can be politically useful, but only up to a point. The search for alternative globalisation projects has been central to the World Social Forum process. The first two forums, held in the Brazilian city of Porto Alegre in 2001 and 2002, provided a wide variety of approaches towar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Third world quarterly 2002-08, Vol.23 (4), p.621-632
Main Author: Teivainen, Teivo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alternative Approaches
Alternatives
Antiglobalization
Civil society
Democracy
Developing Countries
Development Strategies
Globalization
Government budgets
Government initiatives
Political debate
Political protests
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Social Policy
State government
Third World
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Being anti-something can be politically useful, but only up to a point. The search for alternative globalisation projects has been central to the World Social Forum process. The first two forums, held in the Brazilian city of Porto Alegre in 2001 and 2002, provided a wide variety of approaches towards global democratisation. This article analyses the contradictions and prospects of various approaches towards global democratisation that could be found in the meetings, including the organisational aspects of the World Social Forum itself. It simultaneously argues for the political importance of learning from the innovative experiences in the so-called developing countries, such as the participatory budget planning of the Porto Alegre municipality. Without such learning that transgresses the idea of developed/adult/teacher vs developing/child/pupil, global democratisation cannot advance very far.
ISSN:0143-6597
1360-2241
DOI:10.1080/0143659022000005300