Loading…

Debating China's Naval Nationalism [with Reply]

In "China's Naval Nationalism: Sources, Prospects, and the U.S. Response," Robert Ross seeks to explain why "China will soon embark on a more ambitious maritime policy, beginning with the construction of a power-projection navy centered on an aircraft carrier." Ross argues t...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	International security 2010-10, Vol.35 (2), p.161-175
Main Authors:	Glosny, Michael A., Saunders, Phillip C., Ross, Robert S.
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Aircraft carriers ARMED FORCES China Chinese nationalism Correspondence Debates and debating Geopolitics GOVERNMENT POLICY MARITIME LAW Maritime security Military defense Military strategy National security Nationalism Navies Navy Prestige Review articles Seas Security Strategic planning
Citations:	Items that this one cites Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-75a0e9b5503faeb2fb098a16c1df54f2d1eeffa247ccae7044de43de6189f8d83
cites	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-75a0e9b5503faeb2fb098a16c1df54f2d1eeffa247ccae7044de43de6189f8d83
container_end_page	175
container_issue	2
container_start_page	161
container_title	International security
container_volume	35
creator	Glosny, Michael A. Saunders, Phillip C. Ross, Robert S.
description	In "China's Naval Nationalism: Sources, Prospects, and the U.S. Response," Robert Ross seeks to explain why "China will soon embark on a more ambitious maritime policy, beginning with the construction of a power-projection navy centered on an aircraft carrier." Ross argues that geopolitical constraints should lead China, a continental power, to pursue access denial as its optimal maritime strategy. He relies on "naval nationalism" to explain China's development of naval power-projection capabilities, which he describes as a suboptimal choice given China's geopolitical position.
doi_str_mv	10.1162/ISEC_c_00021
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_40981246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20200616031806</informt_id><jstor_id>40981246</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40981246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-75a0e9b5503faeb2fb098a16c1df54f2d1eeffa247ccae7044de43de6189f8d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVks1vEzEQxVcIJELhxhUpt3Jgqcf2OvYNFAqtFIFE4YTQyPHaiaP9qu0UtX99vV2IKgFCXOzD_N7zzBsXxXMgrwEEPTm_OF2iQUIIhQfFDCoGJZeEPyxmJNdLKqV6XDyJcZcRISmbFSfv7Fon323my63v9HGcf9RXusln8n2nGx_b-bcfPm3nn-3QXH9_Wjxyuon22c_7qPj6_vTL8qxcffpwvny7Kk0lWCoXlSZWrauKMKftmro1UVKDMFC7ijtag7XOacoXxmi7IJzXlrPaCpDKyVqyo-J48h1Cf7m3MWHro7FNozvb7yMupFBCARP_JisJoAiMnq8m0oQ-xmAdDsG3OlwjEBwDxPsBZnw14aH1CfXGxyHhNqUhYq2TRt-5_q7Uhw3WvR9dGAPxC6WE5pRBEAaSjH2e_W4XrQ5m-_9W_DDyzprU7qPFXb8PeWERmeKKV3gxrn_cPoxiwlWWvZxk40sH_C-zv_kD6qM1V6zyFBmhkrGxL8hqJApv_HBXv2fxYrLYxdSHQ9Q8fwSgXLBbRkvQoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>758119018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Debating China's Naval Nationalism [with Reply]</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>Glosny, Michael A. ; Saunders, Phillip C. ; Ross, Robert S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Glosny, Michael A. ; Saunders, Phillip C. ; Ross, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><description>In "China's Naval Nationalism: Sources, Prospects, and the U.S. Response," Robert Ross seeks to explain why "China will soon embark on a more ambitious maritime policy, beginning with the construction of a power-projection navy centered on an aircraft carrier." Ross argues that geopolitical constraints should lead China, a continental power, to pursue access denial as its optimal maritime strategy. He relies on "naval nationalism" to explain China's development of naval power-projection capabilities, which he describes as a suboptimal choice given China's geopolitical position.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-2889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_c_00021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Aircraft carriers ; ARMED FORCES ; China ; Chinese nationalism ; Correspondence ; Debates and debating ; Geopolitics ; GOVERNMENT POLICY ; MARITIME LAW ; Maritime security ; Military defense ; Military strategy ; National security ; Nationalism ; Navies ; Navy ; Prestige ; Review articles ; Seas ; Security ; Strategic planning</subject><ispartof>International security, 2010-10, Vol.35 (2), p.161-175</ispartof><rights>2010 President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 The President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-75a0e9b5503faeb2fb098a16c1df54f2d1eeffa247ccae7044de43de6189f8d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-75a0e9b5503faeb2fb098a16c1df54f2d1eeffa247ccae7044de43de6189f8d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40981246$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40981246$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27921,27923,27924,33223,54008,54009,58237,58470</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glosny, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Phillip C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><title>Debating China's Naval Nationalism [with Reply]</title><title>International security</title><description>In "China's Naval Nationalism: Sources, Prospects, and the U.S. Response," Robert Ross seeks to explain why "China will soon embark on a more ambitious maritime policy, beginning with the construction of a power-projection navy centered on an aircraft carrier." Ross argues that geopolitical constraints should lead China, a continental power, to pursue access denial as its optimal maritime strategy. He relies on "naval nationalism" to explain China's development of naval power-projection capabilities, which he describes as a suboptimal choice given China's geopolitical position.</description><subject>Aircraft carriers</subject><subject>ARMED FORCES</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese nationalism</subject><subject>Correspondence</subject><subject>Debates and debating</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>GOVERNMENT POLICY</subject><subject>MARITIME LAW</subject><subject>Maritime security</subject><subject>Military defense</subject><subject>Military strategy</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Navies</subject><subject>Navy</subject><subject>Prestige</subject><subject>Review articles</subject><subject>Seas</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><issn>0162-2889</issn><issn>1531-4804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVks1vEzEQxVcIJELhxhUpt3Jgqcf2OvYNFAqtFIFE4YTQyPHaiaP9qu0UtX99vV2IKgFCXOzD_N7zzBsXxXMgrwEEPTm_OF2iQUIIhQfFDCoGJZeEPyxmJNdLKqV6XDyJcZcRISmbFSfv7Fon323my63v9HGcf9RXusln8n2nGx_b-bcfPm3nn-3QXH9_Wjxyuon22c_7qPj6_vTL8qxcffpwvny7Kk0lWCoXlSZWrauKMKftmro1UVKDMFC7ijtag7XOacoXxmi7IJzXlrPaCpDKyVqyo-J48h1Cf7m3MWHro7FNozvb7yMupFBCARP_JisJoAiMnq8m0oQ-xmAdDsG3OlwjEBwDxPsBZnw14aH1CfXGxyHhNqUhYq2TRt-5_q7Uhw3WvR9dGAPxC6WE5pRBEAaSjH2e_W4XrQ5m-_9W_DDyzprU7qPFXb8PeWERmeKKV3gxrn_cPoxiwlWWvZxk40sH_C-zv_kD6qM1V6zyFBmhkrGxL8hqJApv_HBXv2fxYrLYxdSHQ9Q8fwSgXLBbRkvQoA</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Glosny, Michael A.</creator><creator>Saunders, Phillip C.</creator><creator>Ross, Robert S.</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>The MIT Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Debating China's Naval Nationalism [with Reply]</title><author>Glosny, Michael A. ; Saunders, Phillip C. ; Ross, Robert S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-75a0e9b5503faeb2fb098a16c1df54f2d1eeffa247ccae7044de43de6189f8d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aircraft carriers</topic><topic>ARMED FORCES</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese nationalism</topic><topic>Correspondence</topic><topic>Debates and debating</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>GOVERNMENT POLICY</topic><topic>MARITIME LAW</topic><topic>Maritime security</topic><topic>Military defense</topic><topic>Military strategy</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Navies</topic><topic>Navy</topic><topic>Prestige</topic><topic>Review articles</topic><topic>Seas</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glosny, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Phillip C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International security</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glosny, Michael A.</au><au>Saunders, Phillip C.</au><au>Ross, Robert S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Debating China's Naval Nationalism [with Reply]</atitle><jtitle>International security</jtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>161-175</pages><issn>0162-2889</issn><eissn>1531-4804</eissn><abstract>In "China's Naval Nationalism: Sources, Prospects, and the U.S. Response," Robert Ross seeks to explain why "China will soon embark on a more ambitious maritime policy, beginning with the construction of a power-projection navy centered on an aircraft carrier." Ross argues that geopolitical constraints should lead China, a continental power, to pursue access denial as its optimal maritime strategy. He relies on "naval nationalism" to explain China's development of naval power-projection capabilities, which he describes as a suboptimal choice given China's geopolitical position.</abstract><cop>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/ISEC_c_00021</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0162-2889
ispartof	International security, 2010-10, Vol.35 (2), p.161-175
issn	0162-2889 1531-4804
language	eng
recordid	cdi_jstor_primary_40981246
source	International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archival Journals; MIT Press Journals
subjects	Aircraft carriers ARMED FORCES China Chinese nationalism Correspondence Debates and debating Geopolitics GOVERNMENT POLICY MARITIME LAW Maritime security Military defense Military strategy National security Nationalism Navies Navy Prestige Review articles Seas Security Strategic planning
title	Debating China's Naval Nationalism [with Reply]
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A57%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Debating%20China's%20Naval%20Nationalism%20%5Bwith%20Reply%5D&rft.jtitle=International%20security&rft.au=Glosny,%20Michael%20A.&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=161-175&rft.issn=0162-2889&rft.eissn=1531-4804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/ISEC_c_00021&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_rmit_%3E40981246%3C/jstor_rmit_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-75a0e9b5503faeb2fb098a16c1df54f2d1eeffa247ccae7044de43de6189f8d83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=758119018&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20200616031806&rft_jstor_id=40981246&rfr_iscdi=true