Loading…
Will Increased Disclosure Help? Evaluating the Recommendations of the ALI's "Principles of the Law of Software Contracts"
The aim of the American Law Institute's new Principles of the Law of Software Contracts is to improve online contracting practices. Instead of regulating terms directly to reduce the possibility of unfair or biased terms, the Principles emphasize increased contract disclosure to encourage reade...
Saved in:
Published in: | The University of Chicago law review 2011-12, Vol.78 (1), p.165-186 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 186 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 165 |
container_title | The University of Chicago law review |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia |
description | The aim of the American Law Institute's new Principles of the Law of Software Contracts is to improve online contracting practices. Instead of regulating terms directly to reduce the possibility of unfair or biased terms, the Principles emphasize increased contract disclosure to encourage readership and comparison shopping. In this Article, I test whether increasing disclosure in the proposed manner is likely to increase readership in the setting of end user license agreements (EULAs) of software sold online. I follow the clickstreams of 47,399 households to 81 Internet software retailers and find that EULAs are approximately 0.36 percent more likely to be viewed when they are presented as clickwraps that explicitly require assent, as suggested by the Principles, than when they are presented as browsewraps. The results indicate that mandating disclosure will not by itself change readership or contracting practices to a meaningful degree. I briefly review other approaches to reform that may be more effective but come with their own limitations. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_41552854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20201228041870</informt_id><jstor_id>41552854</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41552854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j270t-3ba57cd2163de70371f73df49bce591c711edfe7ba46b41de907c604c9116eaa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhosoOKc_QSjzwqtCTpM2zZWMOd1goPiB3oUsPd0yuqYmmWP_3m5Tr87heV-eA-ck6oGgIiky8Xka9QhhkAgm2Hl04f2KEAK5yHrR7sPUdTxttEPlsYzvjde19RuH8QTr9i4ef6t6o4JpFnFYYvyC2q7X2JQdso2PbXXAw9n01seDZ2cabdoa_4OZ2u7XV1uFreqkI9sEp3Twg8vorFK1x6vf2Y_eH8Zvo0kye3qcjoazZJVyEhI6VxnXZQo5LZETyqHitKyYmGvMBGgOgGWFfK5YPmdQoiBc54RpAZCjUrQf3Ry9rbNfG_RBruzGNd1JCWkBPGOMka41Obbc2gSpFsa3QXpUTi-laSp7wNYtZGmNBCIphfyvlpKUQJoW3YsLvlddH1UrH6yTrTNr5XaSQZalRcboD43UfKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1281754440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Will Increased Disclosure Help? Evaluating the Recommendations of the ALI's "Principles of the Law of Software Contracts"</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Nexis Advance UK (Federated Access)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</creator><creatorcontrib>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the American Law Institute's new Principles of the Law of Software Contracts is to improve online contracting practices. Instead of regulating terms directly to reduce the possibility of unfair or biased terms, the Principles emphasize increased contract disclosure to encourage readership and comparison shopping. In this Article, I test whether increasing disclosure in the proposed manner is likely to increase readership in the setting of end user license agreements (EULAs) of software sold online. I follow the clickstreams of 47,399 households to 81 Internet software retailers and find that EULAs are approximately 0.36 percent more likely to be viewed when they are presented as clickwraps that explicitly require assent, as suggested by the Principles, than when they are presented as browsewraps. The results indicate that mandating disclosure will not by itself change readership or contracting practices to a meaningful degree. I briefly review other approaches to reform that may be more effective but come with their own limitations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-9494</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-859X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: UCLRA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: University of Chicago Law School</publisher><subject>Computer law ; Computer software ; Consumer goods industries ; Contract law ; Contracts ; Disclosure ; Electronic commerce ; Intellectual property ; Licensed products ; Readership ; Shopping ; Software ; Software law ; Software licenses ; Symposium: The Licensing of Intellectual Property ; Technological innovations ; Uniform commercial code ; Websites</subject><ispartof>The University of Chicago law review, 2011-12, Vol.78 (1), p.165-186</ispartof><rights>2011 The University of Chicago</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Law School Winter 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41552854$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1281754440?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,36037,44339,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</creatorcontrib><title>Will Increased Disclosure Help? Evaluating the Recommendations of the ALI's "Principles of the Law of Software Contracts"</title><title>The University of Chicago law review</title><description>The aim of the American Law Institute's new Principles of the Law of Software Contracts is to improve online contracting practices. Instead of regulating terms directly to reduce the possibility of unfair or biased terms, the Principles emphasize increased contract disclosure to encourage readership and comparison shopping. In this Article, I test whether increasing disclosure in the proposed manner is likely to increase readership in the setting of end user license agreements (EULAs) of software sold online. I follow the clickstreams of 47,399 households to 81 Internet software retailers and find that EULAs are approximately 0.36 percent more likely to be viewed when they are presented as clickwraps that explicitly require assent, as suggested by the Principles, than when they are presented as browsewraps. The results indicate that mandating disclosure will not by itself change readership or contracting practices to a meaningful degree. I briefly review other approaches to reform that may be more effective but come with their own limitations.</description><subject>Computer law</subject><subject>Computer software</subject><subject>Consumer goods industries</subject><subject>Contract law</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Licensed products</subject><subject>Readership</subject><subject>Shopping</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software law</subject><subject>Software licenses</subject><subject>Symposium: The Licensing of Intellectual Property</subject><subject>Technological innovations</subject><subject>Uniform commercial code</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0041-9494</issn><issn>1939-859X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhosoOKc_QSjzwqtCTpM2zZWMOd1goPiB3oUsPd0yuqYmmWP_3m5Tr87heV-eA-ck6oGgIiky8Xka9QhhkAgm2Hl04f2KEAK5yHrR7sPUdTxttEPlsYzvjde19RuH8QTr9i4ef6t6o4JpFnFYYvyC2q7X2JQdso2PbXXAw9n01seDZ2cabdoa_4OZ2u7XV1uFreqkI9sEp3Twg8vorFK1x6vf2Y_eH8Zvo0kye3qcjoazZJVyEhI6VxnXZQo5LZETyqHitKyYmGvMBGgOgGWFfK5YPmdQoiBc54RpAZCjUrQf3Ry9rbNfG_RBruzGNd1JCWkBPGOMka41Obbc2gSpFsa3QXpUTi-laSp7wNYtZGmNBCIphfyvlpKUQJoW3YsLvlddH1UrH6yTrTNr5XaSQZalRcboD43UfKQ</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</creator><general>University of Chicago Law School</general><general>University of Chicago, acting on behalf of the University of Chicago Law Review</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Will Increased Disclosure Help? Evaluating the Recommendations of the ALI's "Principles of the Law of Software Contracts"</title><author>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j270t-3ba57cd2163de70371f73df49bce591c711edfe7ba46b41de907c604c9116eaa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Computer law</topic><topic>Computer software</topic><topic>Consumer goods industries</topic><topic>Contract law</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Licensed products</topic><topic>Readership</topic><topic>Shopping</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software law</topic><topic>Software licenses</topic><topic>Symposium: The Licensing of Intellectual Property</topic><topic>Technological innovations</topic><topic>Uniform commercial code</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The University of Chicago law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Will Increased Disclosure Help? Evaluating the Recommendations of the ALI's "Principles of the Law of Software Contracts"</atitle><jtitle>The University of Chicago law review</jtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>165-186</pages><issn>0041-9494</issn><eissn>1939-859X</eissn><coden>UCLRA2</coden><abstract>The aim of the American Law Institute's new Principles of the Law of Software Contracts is to improve online contracting practices. Instead of regulating terms directly to reduce the possibility of unfair or biased terms, the Principles emphasize increased contract disclosure to encourage readership and comparison shopping. In this Article, I test whether increasing disclosure in the proposed manner is likely to increase readership in the setting of end user license agreements (EULAs) of software sold online. I follow the clickstreams of 47,399 households to 81 Internet software retailers and find that EULAs are approximately 0.36 percent more likely to be viewed when they are presented as clickwraps that explicitly require assent, as suggested by the Principles, than when they are presented as browsewraps. The results indicate that mandating disclosure will not by itself change readership or contracting practices to a meaningful degree. I briefly review other approaches to reform that may be more effective but come with their own limitations.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>University of Chicago Law School</pub><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-9494 |
ispartof | The University of Chicago law review, 2011-12, Vol.78 (1), p.165-186 |
issn | 0041-9494 1939-859X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_41552854 |
source | Business Source Ultimate; Nexis Advance UK (Federated Access); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global |
subjects | Computer law Computer software Consumer goods industries Contract law Contracts Disclosure Electronic commerce Intellectual property Licensed products Readership Shopping Software Software law Software licenses Symposium: The Licensing of Intellectual Property Technological innovations Uniform commercial code Websites |
title | Will Increased Disclosure Help? Evaluating the Recommendations of the ALI's "Principles of the Law of Software Contracts" |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T15%3A55%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Will%20Increased%20Disclosure%20Help?%20Evaluating%20the%20Recommendations%20of%20the%20ALI's%20%22Principles%20of%20the%20Law%20of%20Software%20Contracts%22&rft.jtitle=The%20University%20of%20Chicago%20law%20review&rft.au=Marotta-Wurgler,%20Florencia&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=165-186&rft.issn=0041-9494&rft.eissn=1939-859X&rft.coden=UCLRA2&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41552854%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j270t-3ba57cd2163de70371f73df49bce591c711edfe7ba46b41de907c604c9116eaa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1281754440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20201228041870&rft_jstor_id=41552854&rfr_iscdi=true |