Loading…
Formation and stabilization of rhizosheaths of Zea mays L.: effect of soil water content
Field observations have shown that rhizosheaths of grasses formed under dry conditions are larger, more coherent, and more strongly bound to the roots than those formed in wet soils. We have quantified these effects in a model system in which corn (Zea mays L.) primary roots were grown through a 30-...
Saved in:
Published in: | Plant physiology (Bethesda) 1994-09, Vol.106 (1), p.179-186 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 186 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 179 |
container_title | Plant physiology (Bethesda) |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Watt, M. (Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada) McCully, M.E Canny, M.J |
description | Field observations have shown that rhizosheaths of grasses formed under dry conditions are larger, more coherent, and more strongly bound to the roots than those formed in wet soils. We have quantified these effects in a model system in which corn (Zea mays L.) primary roots were grown through a 30-cm-deep prepared soil profile that consisted of a central, horizontal, "dry" (9% water content) or "wet" (20% water content) layer (4 cm thick) sandwiched between damp soil (15-17% water content). Rhizosheaths formed in dry layers were 5 times the volume of the subtending root. In wet layers, rhizosheaths were only 1.5 times the root volume. Fractions of the rhizosheath soil were removed from individual roots by three successive treatments; sonication, hot water, and abrasion. Sonication removed 50 and 90% of the soil from rhizosheaths formed in dry and wet soils, respectively. After the heat treatment, 35% of the soil still adhered to those root portions where rhizosheaths had developed in dry soil, compared with 2% where sheaths had formed in wet soil. Root hairs were 4.5 times more abundant and were more distorted on portions of roots from dry layers than from wet layers. Drier soil enhanced adhesiveness of rhizosheath mucilages and stimulated the formation of root hairs; both effects stabilize the rhizosheath. Extensive and stable rhizosheaths may function in nutrient acquisition in dry soils |
doi_str_mv | 10.1104/pp.106.1.179 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_4276039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4276039</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4276039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f193t-c9b07be36fd308fb0e3a6f236c79a0c386d6106dc2175f20d597e79ee3b7c7d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0FLAzEUhIMoWKs3T-Ihf2DXl2Q32XiTYlVY8KAF8bK8zSY2pd2UJCDtr7elnmbmGxgYQm4ZlIxB9bDdlgxkyUqm9BmZsFrwgtdVc04mAAcPTaMvyVVKKwBgglUT8jUPcYPZh5HiONCUsfdrvz-R4Ghc-n1IS4t5mY752yLd4C7Rtnyk1jlr8hGn4Nf0F7ON1IQx2zFfkwuH62Rv_nVKFvPnz9lr0b6_vM2e2sIxLXJhdA-qt0K6QUDjerACpeNCGqURjGjkIA-fBsOZqh2HodbKKm2t6JVRAxNTcn_aXaUcYreNfoNx11VcSRD6UN-daoehw5_oU7f40LWoas7FHyN6WO4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formation and stabilization of rhizosheaths of Zea mays L.: effect of soil water content</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Watt, M. (Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada) ; McCully, M.E ; Canny, M.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Watt, M. (Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada) ; McCully, M.E ; Canny, M.J</creatorcontrib><description>Field observations have shown that rhizosheaths of grasses formed under dry conditions are larger, more coherent, and more strongly bound to the roots than those formed in wet soils. We have quantified these effects in a model system in which corn (Zea mays L.) primary roots were grown through a 30-cm-deep prepared soil profile that consisted of a central, horizontal, "dry" (9% water content) or "wet" (20% water content) layer (4 cm thick) sandwiched between damp soil (15-17% water content). Rhizosheaths formed in dry layers were 5 times the volume of the subtending root. In wet layers, rhizosheaths were only 1.5 times the root volume. Fractions of the rhizosheath soil were removed from individual roots by three successive treatments; sonication, hot water, and abrasion. Sonication removed 50 and 90% of the soil from rhizosheaths formed in dry and wet soils, respectively. After the heat treatment, 35% of the soil still adhered to those root portions where rhizosheaths had developed in dry soil, compared with 2% where sheaths had formed in wet soil. Root hairs were 4.5 times more abundant and were more distorted on portions of roots from dry layers than from wet layers. Drier soil enhanced adhesiveness of rhizosheath mucilages and stimulated the formation of root hairs; both effects stabilize the rhizosheath. Extensive and stable rhizosheaths may function in nutrient acquisition in dry soils</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.1.179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Plant Physiologists</publisher><subject>ABSORCION DE SUSTANCIAS NUTRITIVAS ; ABSORPTION DE SUBSTANCES NUTRITIVES ; Agricultural soils ; ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA ; ANATOMIE VEGETALE ; Arid soils ; CONTENIDO DE AGUA EN EL SUELO ; Corn ; Desert soils ; Environmental and Stress Physiology ; EPIDERME ; EPIDERMIS ; ETAPAS DE DESARROLLO DE LA PLANTA ; Pedogenesis ; PELOS RADICALES ; Plant roots ; Plants ; POIL ABSORBANT ; RACINE ; RAICES ; Root hairs ; Soil water ; Soil water content ; STADE DE DEVELOPPEMENT VEGETAL ; TENEUR EN EAU DU SOL ; TRASTORNOS DEL CRECIMIENTO ; TROUBLE DE LA CROISSANCE ; ULTRAESTRUCTURA ; ULTRASTRUCTURE ; ZEA MAYS</subject><ispartof>Plant physiology (Bethesda), 1994-09, Vol.106 (1), p.179-186</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 American Society of Plant Physiologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4276039$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4276039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watt, M. (Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCully, M.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canny, M.J</creatorcontrib><title>Formation and stabilization of rhizosheaths of Zea mays L.: effect of soil water content</title><title>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</title><description>Field observations have shown that rhizosheaths of grasses formed under dry conditions are larger, more coherent, and more strongly bound to the roots than those formed in wet soils. We have quantified these effects in a model system in which corn (Zea mays L.) primary roots were grown through a 30-cm-deep prepared soil profile that consisted of a central, horizontal, "dry" (9% water content) or "wet" (20% water content) layer (4 cm thick) sandwiched between damp soil (15-17% water content). Rhizosheaths formed in dry layers were 5 times the volume of the subtending root. In wet layers, rhizosheaths were only 1.5 times the root volume. Fractions of the rhizosheath soil were removed from individual roots by three successive treatments; sonication, hot water, and abrasion. Sonication removed 50 and 90% of the soil from rhizosheaths formed in dry and wet soils, respectively. After the heat treatment, 35% of the soil still adhered to those root portions where rhizosheaths had developed in dry soil, compared with 2% where sheaths had formed in wet soil. Root hairs were 4.5 times more abundant and were more distorted on portions of roots from dry layers than from wet layers. Drier soil enhanced adhesiveness of rhizosheath mucilages and stimulated the formation of root hairs; both effects stabilize the rhizosheath. Extensive and stable rhizosheaths may function in nutrient acquisition in dry soils</description><subject>ABSORCION DE SUSTANCIAS NUTRITIVAS</subject><subject>ABSORPTION DE SUBSTANCES NUTRITIVES</subject><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA</subject><subject>ANATOMIE VEGETALE</subject><subject>Arid soils</subject><subject>CONTENIDO DE AGUA EN EL SUELO</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Desert soils</subject><subject>Environmental and Stress Physiology</subject><subject>EPIDERME</subject><subject>EPIDERMIS</subject><subject>ETAPAS DE DESARROLLO DE LA PLANTA</subject><subject>Pedogenesis</subject><subject>PELOS RADICALES</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>POIL ABSORBANT</subject><subject>RACINE</subject><subject>RAICES</subject><subject>Root hairs</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soil water content</subject><subject>STADE DE DEVELOPPEMENT VEGETAL</subject><subject>TENEUR EN EAU DU SOL</subject><subject>TRASTORNOS DEL CRECIMIENTO</subject><subject>TROUBLE DE LA CROISSANCE</subject><subject>ULTRAESTRUCTURA</subject><subject>ULTRASTRUCTURE</subject><subject>ZEA MAYS</subject><issn>0032-0889</issn><issn>1532-2548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj0FLAzEUhIMoWKs3T-Ihf2DXl2Q32XiTYlVY8KAF8bK8zSY2pd2UJCDtr7elnmbmGxgYQm4ZlIxB9bDdlgxkyUqm9BmZsFrwgtdVc04mAAcPTaMvyVVKKwBgglUT8jUPcYPZh5HiONCUsfdrvz-R4Ghc-n1IS4t5mY752yLd4C7Rtnyk1jlr8hGn4Nf0F7ON1IQx2zFfkwuH62Rv_nVKFvPnz9lr0b6_vM2e2sIxLXJhdA-qt0K6QUDjerACpeNCGqURjGjkIA-fBsOZqh2HodbKKm2t6JVRAxNTcn_aXaUcYreNfoNx11VcSRD6UN-daoehw5_oU7f40LWoas7FHyN6WO4</recordid><startdate>19940901</startdate><enddate>19940901</enddate><creator>Watt, M. (Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada)</creator><creator>McCully, M.E</creator><creator>Canny, M.J</creator><general>American Society of Plant Physiologists</general><scope>FBQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940901</creationdate><title>Formation and stabilization of rhizosheaths of Zea mays L.: effect of soil water content</title><author>Watt, M. (Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada) ; McCully, M.E ; Canny, M.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f193t-c9b07be36fd308fb0e3a6f236c79a0c386d6106dc2175f20d597e79ee3b7c7d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>ABSORCION DE SUSTANCIAS NUTRITIVAS</topic><topic>ABSORPTION DE SUBSTANCES NUTRITIVES</topic><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA</topic><topic>ANATOMIE VEGETALE</topic><topic>Arid soils</topic><topic>CONTENIDO DE AGUA EN EL SUELO</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Desert soils</topic><topic>Environmental and Stress Physiology</topic><topic>EPIDERME</topic><topic>EPIDERMIS</topic><topic>ETAPAS DE DESARROLLO DE LA PLANTA</topic><topic>Pedogenesis</topic><topic>PELOS RADICALES</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>POIL ABSORBANT</topic><topic>RACINE</topic><topic>RAICES</topic><topic>Root hairs</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soil water content</topic><topic>STADE DE DEVELOPPEMENT VEGETAL</topic><topic>TENEUR EN EAU DU SOL</topic><topic>TRASTORNOS DEL CRECIMIENTO</topic><topic>TROUBLE DE LA CROISSANCE</topic><topic>ULTRAESTRUCTURA</topic><topic>ULTRASTRUCTURE</topic><topic>ZEA MAYS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watt, M. (Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCully, M.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canny, M.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><jtitle>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watt, M. (Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada)</au><au>McCully, M.E</au><au>Canny, M.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Formation and stabilization of rhizosheaths of Zea mays L.: effect of soil water content</atitle><jtitle>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</jtitle><date>1994-09-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>179-186</pages><issn>0032-0889</issn><eissn>1532-2548</eissn><abstract>Field observations have shown that rhizosheaths of grasses formed under dry conditions are larger, more coherent, and more strongly bound to the roots than those formed in wet soils. We have quantified these effects in a model system in which corn (Zea mays L.) primary roots were grown through a 30-cm-deep prepared soil profile that consisted of a central, horizontal, "dry" (9% water content) or "wet" (20% water content) layer (4 cm thick) sandwiched between damp soil (15-17% water content). Rhizosheaths formed in dry layers were 5 times the volume of the subtending root. In wet layers, rhizosheaths were only 1.5 times the root volume. Fractions of the rhizosheath soil were removed from individual roots by three successive treatments; sonication, hot water, and abrasion. Sonication removed 50 and 90% of the soil from rhizosheaths formed in dry and wet soils, respectively. After the heat treatment, 35% of the soil still adhered to those root portions where rhizosheaths had developed in dry soil, compared with 2% where sheaths had formed in wet soil. Root hairs were 4.5 times more abundant and were more distorted on portions of roots from dry layers than from wet layers. Drier soil enhanced adhesiveness of rhizosheath mucilages and stimulated the formation of root hairs; both effects stabilize the rhizosheath. Extensive and stable rhizosheaths may function in nutrient acquisition in dry soils</abstract><pub>American Society of Plant Physiologists</pub><doi>10.1104/pp.106.1.179</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-0889 |
ispartof | Plant physiology (Bethesda), 1994-09, Vol.106 (1), p.179-186 |
issn | 0032-0889 1532-2548 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_4276039 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | ABSORCION DE SUSTANCIAS NUTRITIVAS ABSORPTION DE SUBSTANCES NUTRITIVES Agricultural soils ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA ANATOMIE VEGETALE Arid soils CONTENIDO DE AGUA EN EL SUELO Corn Desert soils Environmental and Stress Physiology EPIDERME EPIDERMIS ETAPAS DE DESARROLLO DE LA PLANTA Pedogenesis PELOS RADICALES Plant roots Plants POIL ABSORBANT RACINE RAICES Root hairs Soil water Soil water content STADE DE DEVELOPPEMENT VEGETAL TENEUR EN EAU DU SOL TRASTORNOS DEL CRECIMIENTO TROUBLE DE LA CROISSANCE ULTRAESTRUCTURA ULTRASTRUCTURE ZEA MAYS |
title | Formation and stabilization of rhizosheaths of Zea mays L.: effect of soil water content |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T08%3A06%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formation%20and%20stabilization%20of%20rhizosheaths%20of%20Zea%20mays%20L.:%20effect%20of%20soil%20water%20content&rft.jtitle=Plant%20physiology%20(Bethesda)&rft.au=Watt,%20M.%20(Carleton%20University,%20Ottawa,%20Canada)&rft.date=1994-09-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=179-186&rft.issn=0032-0889&rft.eissn=1532-2548&rft_id=info:doi/10.1104/pp.106.1.179&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_fao_a%3E4276039%3C/jstor_fao_a%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f193t-c9b07be36fd308fb0e3a6f236c79a0c386d6106dc2175f20d597e79ee3b7c7d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4276039&rfr_iscdi=true |