Loading…
Sexual dimorphism and trophic constraints: Prey selection in the European polecat (Mustela putorius)
Although widespread among mammals, sexual dimorphism raises several evolutionary and ecological issues. Despite strong sexual dimorphism (reaching the ratio 1.81), a study of diet and prey selection in polecats (Mustela putorius) revealed only minor differences in their feeding habits. There was a g...
Saved in:
Published in: | Écoscience (Sainte-Foy) 2003-01, Vol.10 (1), p.17-23 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-11fe6bab43eb12741a3da725e4f9c021d5be1412176007a99730940b51b4ddf03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-11fe6bab43eb12741a3da725e4f9c021d5be1412176007a99730940b51b4ddf03 |
container_end_page | 23 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | Écoscience (Sainte-Foy) |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Lode, T |
description | Although widespread among mammals, sexual dimorphism raises several evolutionary and ecological issues. Despite strong sexual dimorphism (reaching the ratio 1.81), a study of diet and prey selection in polecats (Mustela putorius) revealed only minor differences in their feeding habits. There was a greater frequency of large-sized prey (mainly lagomorphs) in the summer diet of females than in that of males. The frequency of anurans (Rana dalmatina and Bufo bufo) in the diet did not differ significantly between the two sexes. Male prey predominated in the diet of both sexes. Although prey availability, as indicated by the trapping of small rodents and anurans, showed a predominance of males in populations, Ivlev's index for selectivity demonstrated selective predation on male prey exceeding availability both by male and female polecats. This selective predation by polecats may affect both population structure and population exchanges. My results suggest that sexual dimorphism of polecats was not linked to a different prey choice but results from independent intrasexual selective pressures, thus refuting the predictions of the trophic niche differentiation hypothesis. The wide size dimorphism reflects selection both for mating access in males and for food in females, illustrating the complementary influence of sexual selection and environmental constraints on sex divergence in growth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/11956860.2003.11682745 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_42901503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42901503</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42901503</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-11fe6bab43eb12741a3da725e4f9c021d5be1412176007a99730940b51b4ddf03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMouH78CUpOooeuM0mbbL2JrB-gKKjnkLYpRtqkJim6_71dVr16Gob3ezO8R8gxwhxhAeeIZSEWAuYMgM8RxYLJvNgiM8alyKRgYpvM1lC2pnbJXozvAKwsAGakeTZfo-5oY3sfhjcbe6pdQ1Pw01LT2ruYgrYuxQv6FMyKRtOZOlnvqHU0vRm6HCfWaEcHPyk60dOHMSbTaTqMyQc7xrMDstPqLprDn7lPXq-XL1e32f3jzd3V5X1Wc5GnDLE1otJVzk2FUwbUvNGSFSZvyxoYNkVlMEeGUgBIXZaSQ5lDVWCVN00LfJ-cbO4OwX-MJibV21ibrtPO-DEqXMiCl0xOoNiAdfAxBtOqIdheh5VCUOtS1W-pal2q-i11Mh5tjO9xyvbnylkJWACf9MuNbl3rQ68_fegalfSq86EN2tU2Kv7Pj28w9IjU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18753927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sexual dimorphism and trophic constraints: Prey selection in the European polecat (Mustela putorius)</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Lode, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Lode, T</creatorcontrib><description>Although widespread among mammals, sexual dimorphism raises several evolutionary and ecological issues. Despite strong sexual dimorphism (reaching the ratio 1.81), a study of diet and prey selection in polecats (Mustela putorius) revealed only minor differences in their feeding habits. There was a greater frequency of large-sized prey (mainly lagomorphs) in the summer diet of females than in that of males. The frequency of anurans (Rana dalmatina and Bufo bufo) in the diet did not differ significantly between the two sexes. Male prey predominated in the diet of both sexes. Although prey availability, as indicated by the trapping of small rodents and anurans, showed a predominance of males in populations, Ivlev's index for selectivity demonstrated selective predation on male prey exceeding availability both by male and female polecats. This selective predation by polecats may affect both population structure and population exchanges. My results suggest that sexual dimorphism of polecats was not linked to a different prey choice but results from independent intrasexual selective pressures, thus refuting the predictions of the trophic niche differentiation hypothesis. The wide size dimorphism reflects selection both for mating access in males and for food in females, illustrating the complementary influence of sexual selection and environmental constraints on sex divergence in growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1195-6860</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-7626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2003.11682745</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>1973 ; 1978; Saint-Girons ; Amphibians ; Arnold ; Burton ; Diet ; Dimorphisme sexuel ; Ecological genetics ; Female animals ; Male animals ; Mammals ; Mating behavior ; Mustela putorius ; Niche trophique ; Predation ; Prédation ; Seasons ; Sexual dimorphism ; Trophic niche ; Voles</subject><ispartof>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy), 2003-01, Vol.10 (1), p.17-23</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Taylor and Francis Group LLC 2003</rights><rights>ÉCOSCIENCE</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-11fe6bab43eb12741a3da725e4f9c021d5be1412176007a99730940b51b4ddf03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-11fe6bab43eb12741a3da725e4f9c021d5be1412176007a99730940b51b4ddf03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42901503$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42901503$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,58236,58469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lode, T</creatorcontrib><title>Sexual dimorphism and trophic constraints: Prey selection in the European polecat (Mustela putorius)</title><title>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</title><description>Although widespread among mammals, sexual dimorphism raises several evolutionary and ecological issues. Despite strong sexual dimorphism (reaching the ratio 1.81), a study of diet and prey selection in polecats (Mustela putorius) revealed only minor differences in their feeding habits. There was a greater frequency of large-sized prey (mainly lagomorphs) in the summer diet of females than in that of males. The frequency of anurans (Rana dalmatina and Bufo bufo) in the diet did not differ significantly between the two sexes. Male prey predominated in the diet of both sexes. Although prey availability, as indicated by the trapping of small rodents and anurans, showed a predominance of males in populations, Ivlev's index for selectivity demonstrated selective predation on male prey exceeding availability both by male and female polecats. This selective predation by polecats may affect both population structure and population exchanges. My results suggest that sexual dimorphism of polecats was not linked to a different prey choice but results from independent intrasexual selective pressures, thus refuting the predictions of the trophic niche differentiation hypothesis. The wide size dimorphism reflects selection both for mating access in males and for food in females, illustrating the complementary influence of sexual selection and environmental constraints on sex divergence in growth.</description><subject>1973</subject><subject>1978; Saint-Girons</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Arnold</subject><subject>Burton</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dimorphisme sexuel</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Mustela putorius</subject><subject>Niche trophique</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Prédation</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sexual dimorphism</subject><subject>Trophic niche</subject><subject>Voles</subject><issn>1195-6860</issn><issn>2376-7626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMouH78CUpOooeuM0mbbL2JrB-gKKjnkLYpRtqkJim6_71dVr16Gob3ezO8R8gxwhxhAeeIZSEWAuYMgM8RxYLJvNgiM8alyKRgYpvM1lC2pnbJXozvAKwsAGakeTZfo-5oY3sfhjcbe6pdQ1Pw01LT2ruYgrYuxQv6FMyKRtOZOlnvqHU0vRm6HCfWaEcHPyk60dOHMSbTaTqMyQc7xrMDstPqLprDn7lPXq-XL1e32f3jzd3V5X1Wc5GnDLE1otJVzk2FUwbUvNGSFSZvyxoYNkVlMEeGUgBIXZaSQ5lDVWCVN00LfJ-cbO4OwX-MJibV21ibrtPO-DEqXMiCl0xOoNiAdfAxBtOqIdheh5VCUOtS1W-pal2q-i11Mh5tjO9xyvbnylkJWACf9MuNbl3rQ68_fegalfSq86EN2tU2Kv7Pj28w9IjU</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>Lode, T</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Université Laval</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>Sexual dimorphism and trophic constraints: Prey selection in the European polecat (Mustela putorius)</title><author>Lode, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-11fe6bab43eb12741a3da725e4f9c021d5be1412176007a99730940b51b4ddf03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>1973</topic><topic>1978; Saint-Girons</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Arnold</topic><topic>Burton</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dimorphisme sexuel</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Mustela putorius</topic><topic>Niche trophique</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Prédation</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sexual dimorphism</topic><topic>Trophic niche</topic><topic>Voles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lode, T</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lode, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sexual dimorphism and trophic constraints: Prey selection in the European polecat (Mustela putorius)</atitle><jtitle>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</jtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>17-23</pages><issn>1195-6860</issn><eissn>2376-7626</eissn><abstract>Although widespread among mammals, sexual dimorphism raises several evolutionary and ecological issues. Despite strong sexual dimorphism (reaching the ratio 1.81), a study of diet and prey selection in polecats (Mustela putorius) revealed only minor differences in their feeding habits. There was a greater frequency of large-sized prey (mainly lagomorphs) in the summer diet of females than in that of males. The frequency of anurans (Rana dalmatina and Bufo bufo) in the diet did not differ significantly between the two sexes. Male prey predominated in the diet of both sexes. Although prey availability, as indicated by the trapping of small rodents and anurans, showed a predominance of males in populations, Ivlev's index for selectivity demonstrated selective predation on male prey exceeding availability both by male and female polecats. This selective predation by polecats may affect both population structure and population exchanges. My results suggest that sexual dimorphism of polecats was not linked to a different prey choice but results from independent intrasexual selective pressures, thus refuting the predictions of the trophic niche differentiation hypothesis. The wide size dimorphism reflects selection both for mating access in males and for food in females, illustrating the complementary influence of sexual selection and environmental constraints on sex divergence in growth.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/11956860.2003.11682745</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1195-6860 |
ispartof | Écoscience (Sainte-Foy), 2003-01, Vol.10 (1), p.17-23 |
issn | 1195-6860 2376-7626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_42901503 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection; JSTOR |
subjects | 1973 1978 Saint-Girons Amphibians Arnold Burton Diet Dimorphisme sexuel Ecological genetics Female animals Male animals Mammals Mating behavior Mustela putorius Niche trophique Predation Prédation Seasons Sexual dimorphism Trophic niche Voles |
title | Sexual dimorphism and trophic constraints: Prey selection in the European polecat (Mustela putorius) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A58%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sexual%20dimorphism%20and%20trophic%20constraints:%20Prey%20selection%20in%20the%20European%20polecat%20(Mustela%20putorius)&rft.jtitle=%C3%89coscience%20(Sainte-Foy)&rft.au=Lode,%20T&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=17-23&rft.issn=1195-6860&rft.eissn=2376-7626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/11956860.2003.11682745&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42901503%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-11fe6bab43eb12741a3da725e4f9c021d5be1412176007a99730940b51b4ddf03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18753927&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42901503&rfr_iscdi=true |