Loading…

Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape

Fragmentation and degradation of the natural prairie landscape by agricultural practices has resulted in the creation of numerous man-made edges and relatively small plots, which may lead to higher predation rates on nests of upland nesting ducks. We placed artificial duck nests (n = 1110) at variou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Écoscience (Sainte-Foy) 1996-01, Vol.3 (4), p.436-441
Main Authors: Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria, Messier, François
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3
container_end_page 441
container_issue 4
container_start_page 436
container_title Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)
container_volume 3
creator Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria
Messier, François
description Fragmentation and degradation of the natural prairie landscape by agricultural practices has resulted in the creation of numerous man-made edges and relatively small plots, which may lead to higher predation rates on nests of upland nesting ducks. We placed artificial duck nests (n = 1110) at various distances from edge to test the hypothesis that nest predation was influenced by proximity to habitat edge. In large plots (200 ha), nest survival increased with distance from edge up to 250 m, but then declined. In small plots (50 ha), no significant edge effect was detected. Overall, nest success was similar in large and small plots. Nest survival differed among habitat types. In large plots, survival was greatest in delayed hay fields, intermediate in native grassland, and lowest along rights-of-way. In small plots, survival was greater in native grassland compared with delayed hay. Overall, more mammals than birds depredated nests and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) destroyed most of the nests. In large plots, more nests along edges were depredated by striped skunks than by other mammalian predators. Similarly, along rights-of-way, striped skunks destroyed more nests than did other mammalian species.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/11956860.1996.11682361
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_42902304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42902304</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42902304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BKUrdx3zbrMcxicM6ELXIZOHZGybmnSQ-fem1HGrELiE8517DweAKwQXCNbwBiHBeM3zTwi-QIjXmHB0BGaYVLysOObHYDZC5UidgrOUthBiwSCcgduXaI0afOiK_FQcvPPaq6YwO_1RdDYNqfBZKFxU763tBmuKPiofvS0a1ZmkVW_PwYlTTbIXP3MO3u7vXleP5fr54Wm1XJeaCDaUlFaIU8NZrXK0Daod1AqjDaGspkZbI4zVFWZaK8OFUiQDDkGKNdGGbhyZg-tpbx_D5y5nk61P2jY5iA27JBETuKYM_wOsEa0wyiCfQB1DStE62UffqriXCMqxXXloV47tykO72Xg5GbdpCPHXRbGAmECa9eWk-86F2KqvEBsjB7VvQsxVdtonSf648Q3pvYsF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15814721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria ; Messier, François</creator><creatorcontrib>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria ; Messier, François</creatorcontrib><description>Fragmentation and degradation of the natural prairie landscape by agricultural practices has resulted in the creation of numerous man-made edges and relatively small plots, which may lead to higher predation rates on nests of upland nesting ducks. We placed artificial duck nests (n = 1110) at various distances from edge to test the hypothesis that nest predation was influenced by proximity to habitat edge. In large plots (200 ha), nest survival increased with distance from edge up to 250 m, but then declined. In small plots (50 ha), no significant edge effect was detected. Overall, nest success was similar in large and small plots. Nest survival differed among habitat types. In large plots, survival was greatest in delayed hay fields, intermediate in native grassland, and lowest along rights-of-way. In small plots, survival was greater in native grassland compared with delayed hay. Overall, more mammals than birds depredated nests and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) destroyed most of the nests. In large plots, more nests along edges were depredated by striped skunks than by other mammalian predators. Similarly, along rights-of-way, striped skunks destroyed more nests than did other mammalian species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1195-6860</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-7626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/11956860.1996.11682361</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Anatidae ; artificial nests ; Aves ; Bird nesting ; canards ; Ducks ; edge effect ; Edge effects ; effet de bordure ; fragmentation de l'habitat ; Freshwater ; Grasslands ; habitat fragmentation ; Mammalia ; Mammals ; nest predation ; nids artificiels ; Prairies ; Predators ; prédation des nids ; Skunks ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy), 1996-01, Vol.3 (4), p.436-441</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Taylor and Francis Group LLC 1996</rights><rights>ÉCOSCIENCE</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42902304$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42902304$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messier, François</creatorcontrib><title>Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape</title><title>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</title><description>Fragmentation and degradation of the natural prairie landscape by agricultural practices has resulted in the creation of numerous man-made edges and relatively small plots, which may lead to higher predation rates on nests of upland nesting ducks. We placed artificial duck nests (n = 1110) at various distances from edge to test the hypothesis that nest predation was influenced by proximity to habitat edge. In large plots (200 ha), nest survival increased with distance from edge up to 250 m, but then declined. In small plots (50 ha), no significant edge effect was detected. Overall, nest success was similar in large and small plots. Nest survival differed among habitat types. In large plots, survival was greatest in delayed hay fields, intermediate in native grassland, and lowest along rights-of-way. In small plots, survival was greater in native grassland compared with delayed hay. Overall, more mammals than birds depredated nests and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) destroyed most of the nests. In large plots, more nests along edges were depredated by striped skunks than by other mammalian predators. Similarly, along rights-of-way, striped skunks destroyed more nests than did other mammalian species.</description><subject>Anatidae</subject><subject>artificial nests</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>canards</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>edge effect</subject><subject>Edge effects</subject><subject>effet de bordure</subject><subject>fragmentation de l'habitat</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>nest predation</subject><subject>nids artificiels</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>prédation des nids</subject><subject>Skunks</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1195-6860</issn><issn>2376-7626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BKUrdx3zbrMcxicM6ELXIZOHZGybmnSQ-fem1HGrELiE8517DweAKwQXCNbwBiHBeM3zTwi-QIjXmHB0BGaYVLysOObHYDZC5UidgrOUthBiwSCcgduXaI0afOiK_FQcvPPaq6YwO_1RdDYNqfBZKFxU763tBmuKPiofvS0a1ZmkVW_PwYlTTbIXP3MO3u7vXleP5fr54Wm1XJeaCDaUlFaIU8NZrXK0Daod1AqjDaGspkZbI4zVFWZaK8OFUiQDDkGKNdGGbhyZg-tpbx_D5y5nk61P2jY5iA27JBETuKYM_wOsEa0wyiCfQB1DStE62UffqriXCMqxXXloV47tykO72Xg5GbdpCPHXRbGAmECa9eWk-86F2KqvEBsjB7VvQsxVdtonSf648Q3pvYsF</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria</creator><creator>Messier, François</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Université Laval</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape</title><author>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria ; Messier, François</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Anatidae</topic><topic>artificial nests</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>canards</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>edge effect</topic><topic>Edge effects</topic><topic>effet de bordure</topic><topic>fragmentation de l'habitat</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>nest predation</topic><topic>nids artificiels</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>prédation des nids</topic><topic>Skunks</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messier, François</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria</au><au>Messier, François</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape</atitle><jtitle>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>436</spage><epage>441</epage><pages>436-441</pages><issn>1195-6860</issn><eissn>2376-7626</eissn><abstract>Fragmentation and degradation of the natural prairie landscape by agricultural practices has resulted in the creation of numerous man-made edges and relatively small plots, which may lead to higher predation rates on nests of upland nesting ducks. We placed artificial duck nests (n = 1110) at various distances from edge to test the hypothesis that nest predation was influenced by proximity to habitat edge. In large plots (200 ha), nest survival increased with distance from edge up to 250 m, but then declined. In small plots (50 ha), no significant edge effect was detected. Overall, nest success was similar in large and small plots. Nest survival differed among habitat types. In large plots, survival was greatest in delayed hay fields, intermediate in native grassland, and lowest along rights-of-way. In small plots, survival was greater in native grassland compared with delayed hay. Overall, more mammals than birds depredated nests and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) destroyed most of the nests. In large plots, more nests along edges were depredated by striped skunks than by other mammalian predators. Similarly, along rights-of-way, striped skunks destroyed more nests than did other mammalian species.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/11956860.1996.11682361</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1195-6860
ispartof Écoscience (Sainte-Foy), 1996-01, Vol.3 (4), p.436-441
issn 1195-6860
2376-7626
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_42902304
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Anatidae
artificial nests
Aves
Bird nesting
canards
Ducks
edge effect
Edge effects
effet de bordure
fragmentation de l'habitat
Freshwater
Grasslands
habitat fragmentation
Mammalia
Mammals
nest predation
nids artificiels
Prairies
Predators
prédation des nids
Skunks
Wildlife habitats
Wildlife management
title Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A40%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predation%20on%20artificial%20duck%20nests%20in%20a%20fragmented%20prairie%20landscape&rft.jtitle=%C3%89coscience%20(Sainte-Foy)&rft.au=Pasitschniak-Arts,%20Maria&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=436&rft.epage=441&rft.pages=436-441&rft.issn=1195-6860&rft.eissn=2376-7626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/11956860.1996.11682361&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42902304%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15814721&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42902304&rfr_iscdi=true