Loading…
Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape
Fragmentation and degradation of the natural prairie landscape by agricultural practices has resulted in the creation of numerous man-made edges and relatively small plots, which may lead to higher predation rates on nests of upland nesting ducks. We placed artificial duck nests (n = 1110) at variou...
Saved in:
Published in: | Écoscience (Sainte-Foy) 1996-01, Vol.3 (4), p.436-441 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3 |
container_end_page | 441 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 436 |
container_title | Écoscience (Sainte-Foy) |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria Messier, François |
description | Fragmentation and degradation of the natural prairie landscape by agricultural practices has resulted in the creation of numerous man-made edges and relatively small plots, which may lead to higher predation rates on nests of upland nesting ducks. We placed artificial duck nests (n = 1110) at various distances from edge to test the hypothesis that nest predation was influenced by proximity to habitat edge. In large plots (200 ha), nest survival increased with distance from edge up to 250 m, but then declined. In small plots (50 ha), no significant edge effect was detected. Overall, nest success was similar in large and small plots. Nest survival differed among habitat types. In large plots, survival was greatest in delayed hay fields, intermediate in native grassland, and lowest along rights-of-way. In small plots, survival was greater in native grassland compared with delayed hay. Overall, more mammals than birds depredated nests and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) destroyed most of the nests. In large plots, more nests along edges were depredated by striped skunks than by other mammalian predators. Similarly, along rights-of-way, striped skunks destroyed more nests than did other mammalian species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/11956860.1996.11682361 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_42902304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42902304</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42902304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BKUrdx3zbrMcxicM6ELXIZOHZGybmnSQ-fem1HGrELiE8517DweAKwQXCNbwBiHBeM3zTwi-QIjXmHB0BGaYVLysOObHYDZC5UidgrOUthBiwSCcgduXaI0afOiK_FQcvPPaq6YwO_1RdDYNqfBZKFxU763tBmuKPiofvS0a1ZmkVW_PwYlTTbIXP3MO3u7vXleP5fr54Wm1XJeaCDaUlFaIU8NZrXK0Daod1AqjDaGspkZbI4zVFWZaK8OFUiQDDkGKNdGGbhyZg-tpbx_D5y5nk61P2jY5iA27JBETuKYM_wOsEa0wyiCfQB1DStE62UffqriXCMqxXXloV47tykO72Xg5GbdpCPHXRbGAmECa9eWk-86F2KqvEBsjB7VvQsxVdtonSf648Q3pvYsF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15814721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria ; Messier, François</creator><creatorcontrib>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria ; Messier, François</creatorcontrib><description>Fragmentation and degradation of the natural prairie landscape by agricultural practices has resulted in the creation of numerous man-made edges and relatively small plots, which may lead to higher predation rates on nests of upland nesting ducks. We placed artificial duck nests (n = 1110) at various distances from edge to test the hypothesis that nest predation was influenced by proximity to habitat edge. In large plots (200 ha), nest survival increased with distance from edge up to 250 m, but then declined. In small plots (50 ha), no significant edge effect was detected. Overall, nest success was similar in large and small plots. Nest survival differed among habitat types. In large plots, survival was greatest in delayed hay fields, intermediate in native grassland, and lowest along rights-of-way. In small plots, survival was greater in native grassland compared with delayed hay. Overall, more mammals than birds depredated nests and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) destroyed most of the nests. In large plots, more nests along edges were depredated by striped skunks than by other mammalian predators. Similarly, along rights-of-way, striped skunks destroyed more nests than did other mammalian species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1195-6860</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-7626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/11956860.1996.11682361</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Anatidae ; artificial nests ; Aves ; Bird nesting ; canards ; Ducks ; edge effect ; Edge effects ; effet de bordure ; fragmentation de l'habitat ; Freshwater ; Grasslands ; habitat fragmentation ; Mammalia ; Mammals ; nest predation ; nids artificiels ; Prairies ; Predators ; prédation des nids ; Skunks ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy), 1996-01, Vol.3 (4), p.436-441</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Taylor and Francis Group LLC 1996</rights><rights>ÉCOSCIENCE</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42902304$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42902304$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messier, François</creatorcontrib><title>Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape</title><title>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</title><description>Fragmentation and degradation of the natural prairie landscape by agricultural practices has resulted in the creation of numerous man-made edges and relatively small plots, which may lead to higher predation rates on nests of upland nesting ducks. We placed artificial duck nests (n = 1110) at various distances from edge to test the hypothesis that nest predation was influenced by proximity to habitat edge. In large plots (200 ha), nest survival increased with distance from edge up to 250 m, but then declined. In small plots (50 ha), no significant edge effect was detected. Overall, nest success was similar in large and small plots. Nest survival differed among habitat types. In large plots, survival was greatest in delayed hay fields, intermediate in native grassland, and lowest along rights-of-way. In small plots, survival was greater in native grassland compared with delayed hay. Overall, more mammals than birds depredated nests and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) destroyed most of the nests. In large plots, more nests along edges were depredated by striped skunks than by other mammalian predators. Similarly, along rights-of-way, striped skunks destroyed more nests than did other mammalian species.</description><subject>Anatidae</subject><subject>artificial nests</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>canards</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>edge effect</subject><subject>Edge effects</subject><subject>effet de bordure</subject><subject>fragmentation de l'habitat</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>nest predation</subject><subject>nids artificiels</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>prédation des nids</subject><subject>Skunks</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1195-6860</issn><issn>2376-7626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BKUrdx3zbrMcxicM6ELXIZOHZGybmnSQ-fem1HGrELiE8517DweAKwQXCNbwBiHBeM3zTwi-QIjXmHB0BGaYVLysOObHYDZC5UidgrOUthBiwSCcgduXaI0afOiK_FQcvPPaq6YwO_1RdDYNqfBZKFxU763tBmuKPiofvS0a1ZmkVW_PwYlTTbIXP3MO3u7vXleP5fr54Wm1XJeaCDaUlFaIU8NZrXK0Daod1AqjDaGspkZbI4zVFWZaK8OFUiQDDkGKNdGGbhyZg-tpbx_D5y5nk61P2jY5iA27JBETuKYM_wOsEa0wyiCfQB1DStE62UffqriXCMqxXXloV47tykO72Xg5GbdpCPHXRbGAmECa9eWk-86F2KqvEBsjB7VvQsxVdtonSf648Q3pvYsF</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria</creator><creator>Messier, François</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Université Laval</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape</title><author>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria ; Messier, François</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Anatidae</topic><topic>artificial nests</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>canards</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>edge effect</topic><topic>Edge effects</topic><topic>effet de bordure</topic><topic>fragmentation de l'habitat</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>nest predation</topic><topic>nids artificiels</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>prédation des nids</topic><topic>Skunks</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messier, François</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pasitschniak-Arts, Maria</au><au>Messier, François</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape</atitle><jtitle>Écoscience (Sainte-Foy)</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>436</spage><epage>441</epage><pages>436-441</pages><issn>1195-6860</issn><eissn>2376-7626</eissn><abstract>Fragmentation and degradation of the natural prairie landscape by agricultural practices has resulted in the creation of numerous man-made edges and relatively small plots, which may lead to higher predation rates on nests of upland nesting ducks. We placed artificial duck nests (n = 1110) at various distances from edge to test the hypothesis that nest predation was influenced by proximity to habitat edge. In large plots (200 ha), nest survival increased with distance from edge up to 250 m, but then declined. In small plots (50 ha), no significant edge effect was detected. Overall, nest success was similar in large and small plots. Nest survival differed among habitat types. In large plots, survival was greatest in delayed hay fields, intermediate in native grassland, and lowest along rights-of-way. In small plots, survival was greater in native grassland compared with delayed hay. Overall, more mammals than birds depredated nests and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) destroyed most of the nests. In large plots, more nests along edges were depredated by striped skunks than by other mammalian predators. Similarly, along rights-of-way, striped skunks destroyed more nests than did other mammalian species.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/11956860.1996.11682361</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1195-6860 |
ispartof | Écoscience (Sainte-Foy), 1996-01, Vol.3 (4), p.436-441 |
issn | 1195-6860 2376-7626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_42902304 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Anatidae artificial nests Aves Bird nesting canards Ducks edge effect Edge effects effet de bordure fragmentation de l'habitat Freshwater Grasslands habitat fragmentation Mammalia Mammals nest predation nids artificiels Prairies Predators prédation des nids Skunks Wildlife habitats Wildlife management |
title | Predation on artificial duck nests in a fragmented prairie landscape |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A40%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predation%20on%20artificial%20duck%20nests%20in%20a%20fragmented%20prairie%20landscape&rft.jtitle=%C3%89coscience%20(Sainte-Foy)&rft.au=Pasitschniak-Arts,%20Maria&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=436&rft.epage=441&rft.pages=436-441&rft.issn=1195-6860&rft.eissn=2376-7626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/11956860.1996.11682361&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42902304%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-447164d658a237b18f0ca21b34584dced9dec725ccad69aa38f0f1042c3cd4bf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15814721&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42902304&rfr_iscdi=true |