POKUSY I GRZECHY WIARY PRAGMATYCZNEJ IMMANUEL KANT O WEWNĘTRZNYM KŁAMSTWIE

The paper an analytical-interpretative commentary on several excerpts from I. Kant. The first one with an example of a doctor who thinks he knows his patient's illness deals with the concept of pragmatic faith. The author seeks to explicate this concept by giving three interpretations of Kantia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Roczniki filozoficzne 2004-01, Vol.52 (2), p.111-121
Main Author: GALEWICZ, WŁODZIMIERZ
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Subjects:
ARTYKUŁY OFIAROWANE KSIĘDZU PROFESOROWI JÓZEFOWI HERBUTOWI
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The paper an analytical-interpretative commentary on several excerpts from I. Kant. The first one with an example of a doctor who thinks he knows his patient's illness deals with the concept of pragmatic faith. The author seeks to explicate this concept by giving three interpretations of Kantian example. In a further part of the paper the internal lie is defined as a sin which may fall part of any „believers not careful enough” of the titular faith. The first example is this sin is an internal profession of faith in God („just in case”) without actual participation in it. The second example is a false worship to the Creator, the one that is motivated by fear or punishment. When interpreting these examples, the author refers to the Kantian distinction between homo noumenon (moral being) and homo phaenomenon (physical being). This distinction is related to the interdiction of using homo phaenomenon only as a means (an instrument to speak).
ISSN:0035-7685
2450-002X