Loading…
Blackwell Games
Blackwell games are infinite games of imperfect information. The two players simultaneously make their moves and are then informed of each other's moves. Payoff is determined by a Borel measurable function f on the set of possible resulting sequences of moves. A standard result in Game Theory i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Lecture notes-monograph series 1996-01, Vol.30, p.369-390 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 390 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 369 |
container_title | Lecture notes-monograph series |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Marco R. Vervoort |
description | Blackwell games are infinite games of imperfect information. The two players simultaneously make their moves and are then informed of each other's moves. Payoff is determined by a Borel measurable function f on the set of possible resulting sequences of moves. A standard result in Game Theory is that finite games of this type are determined. Blackwell proved that infinite games are determined, but only for the cases where the payoff function is the indicator function of an open or Gδset [2, 3]. For games of perfect information, determinacy has been proven for games of arbitrary Borel complexity [6, 7, 8]. In this paper I prove the determinacy of Blackwell games over a$G_{\delta \sigma}$set, in a manner similar to Davis' proof of determinacy of games of$G_{\delta \sigma}$complexity of perfect information [5]. There is also extensive literature about the consequences of assuming AD, the axiom that all such games of perfect information are determined [9, 11]. In the final section of this paper I formulate an analogous axiom for games of imperfect information, and explore some of the consequences of this axiom. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_4355956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4355956</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4355956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_43559563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDex1DUyNDfgYOAqLs4yMDAzsjAz52Tgd8pJTM4uT83JUXBPzE0t5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrpZxSX5RfEFRZm5iUWV8SbGpqaWpmbGBKQBR2ghSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blackwell Games</title><source>Project Euclid Open Access</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Marco R. Vervoort</creator><creatorcontrib>Marco R. Vervoort</creatorcontrib><description>Blackwell games are infinite games of imperfect information. The two players simultaneously make their moves and are then informed of each other's moves. Payoff is determined by a Borel measurable function f on the set of possible resulting sequences of moves. A standard result in Game Theory is that finite games of this type are determined. Blackwell proved that infinite games are determined, but only for the cases where the payoff function is the indicator function of an open or Gδset [2, 3]. For games of perfect information, determinacy has been proven for games of arbitrary Borel complexity [6, 7, 8]. In this paper I prove the determinacy of Blackwell games over a$G_{\delta \sigma}$set, in a manner similar to Davis' proof of determinacy of games of$G_{\delta \sigma}$complexity of perfect information [5]. There is also extensive literature about the consequences of assuming AD, the axiom that all such games of perfect information are determined [9, 11]. In the final section of this paper I formulate an analogous axiom for games of imperfect information, and explore some of the consequences of this axiom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-2170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Institute of Mathematical Statistics</publisher><subject>Chess ; Determinacy ; Game theory ; Games ; Imperfect information ; Mathematical functions ; Mixed strategy ; Optimal strategies ; Perfect information ; Probability distributions</subject><ispartof>Lecture notes-monograph series, 1996-01, Vol.30, p.369-390</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Institute of Mathematical Statistics</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4355956$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4355956$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marco R. Vervoort</creatorcontrib><title>Blackwell Games</title><title>Lecture notes-monograph series</title><description>Blackwell games are infinite games of imperfect information. The two players simultaneously make their moves and are then informed of each other's moves. Payoff is determined by a Borel measurable function f on the set of possible resulting sequences of moves. A standard result in Game Theory is that finite games of this type are determined. Blackwell proved that infinite games are determined, but only for the cases where the payoff function is the indicator function of an open or Gδset [2, 3]. For games of perfect information, determinacy has been proven for games of arbitrary Borel complexity [6, 7, 8]. In this paper I prove the determinacy of Blackwell games over a$G_{\delta \sigma}$set, in a manner similar to Davis' proof of determinacy of games of$G_{\delta \sigma}$complexity of perfect information [5]. There is also extensive literature about the consequences of assuming AD, the axiom that all such games of perfect information are determined [9, 11]. In the final section of this paper I formulate an analogous axiom for games of imperfect information, and explore some of the consequences of this axiom.</description><subject>Chess</subject><subject>Determinacy</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Imperfect information</subject><subject>Mathematical functions</subject><subject>Mixed strategy</subject><subject>Optimal strategies</subject><subject>Perfect information</subject><subject>Probability distributions</subject><issn>0749-2170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDex1DUyNDfgYOAqLs4yMDAzsjAz52Tgd8pJTM4uT83JUXBPzE0t5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrpZxSX5RfEFRZm5iUWV8SbGpqaWpmbGBKQBR2ghSw</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Marco R. Vervoort</creator><general>Institute of Mathematical Statistics</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Blackwell Games</title><author>Marco R. Vervoort</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_43559563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Chess</topic><topic>Determinacy</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Imperfect information</topic><topic>Mathematical functions</topic><topic>Mixed strategy</topic><topic>Optimal strategies</topic><topic>Perfect information</topic><topic>Probability distributions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marco R. Vervoort</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Lecture notes-monograph series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marco R. Vervoort</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blackwell Games</atitle><jtitle>Lecture notes-monograph series</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>30</volume><spage>369</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>369-390</pages><issn>0749-2170</issn><abstract>Blackwell games are infinite games of imperfect information. The two players simultaneously make their moves and are then informed of each other's moves. Payoff is determined by a Borel measurable function f on the set of possible resulting sequences of moves. A standard result in Game Theory is that finite games of this type are determined. Blackwell proved that infinite games are determined, but only for the cases where the payoff function is the indicator function of an open or Gδset [2, 3]. For games of perfect information, determinacy has been proven for games of arbitrary Borel complexity [6, 7, 8]. In this paper I prove the determinacy of Blackwell games over a$G_{\delta \sigma}$set, in a manner similar to Davis' proof of determinacy of games of$G_{\delta \sigma}$complexity of perfect information [5]. There is also extensive literature about the consequences of assuming AD, the axiom that all such games of perfect information are determined [9, 11]. In the final section of this paper I formulate an analogous axiom for games of imperfect information, and explore some of the consequences of this axiom.</abstract><pub>Institute of Mathematical Statistics</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-2170 |
ispartof | Lecture notes-monograph series, 1996-01, Vol.30, p.369-390 |
issn | 0749-2170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_4355956 |
source | Project Euclid Open Access; JSTOR Archival Journals |
subjects | Chess Determinacy Game theory Games Imperfect information Mathematical functions Mixed strategy Optimal strategies Perfect information Probability distributions |
title | Blackwell Games |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A28%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blackwell%20Games&rft.jtitle=Lecture%20notes-monograph%20series&rft.au=Marco%20R.%20Vervoort&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=369-390&rft.issn=0749-2170&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E4355956%3C/jstor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_43559563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4355956&rfr_iscdi=true |